Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Warfare:Breaking the Watermark Protection of AI-Generated Content

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.07726 v4 pith:GOCIW2ON submitted 2023-09-27 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords contentwarfarewatermarkai-generatedgenerativeachievesacrossadvanced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI-Generated Content (AIGC) is rapidly expanding, with services using advanced generative models to create realistic images and fluent text. Regulating such content is crucial to prevent policy violations, such as unauthorized commercialization or unsafe content distribution. Watermarking is a promising solution for content attribution and verification, but we demonstrate its vulnerability to two key attacks: (1) Watermark removal, where adversaries erase embedded marks to evade regulation, and (2) Watermark forging, where they generate illicit content with forged watermarks, leading to misattribution. We propose Warfare, a unified attack framework leveraging a pre-trained diffusion model for content processing and a generative adversarial network for watermark manipulation. Evaluations across datasets and embedding setups show that Warfare achieves high success rates while preserving content quality. We further introduce Warfare-Plus, which enhances efficiency without compromising effectiveness. The code can be found in https://github.com/GuanlinLee/warfare.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CopyrightMeter: Revisiting Copyright Protection in Text-to-image Models

    cs.CR 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Most existing copyright protections for text-to-image models are not resilient to attacks, and the best protection depends on which priority, fidelity, efficacy, or resilience, matters most.

Pith tools