Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Models for the long-term variations of solar activity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.17188 v1 pith:GPSQEO6F submitted 2023-05-26 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.IMphysics.space-ph

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.IMphysics.space-ph
keywords cyclemodelsdynamosolarlong-termvariationsarticlecauses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

One obvious feature of the solar cycle is its variation from one cycle to another. In this article, we review the dynamo models for the long-term variations of the solar cycle. By long-term variations, we mean the cycle modulations beyond the 11-year periodicity and these include, the Gnevyshev-Ohl/Even-Odd rule, grand minima, grand maxima, Gleissberg cycle, and Suess cycles. After a brief review of the observed data, we present the dynamo models for the solar cycle. By carefully analyzing the dynamo models and the observed data, we identify the following broad causes for the modulation: (i) magnetic feedback on the flow, (ii) stochastic forcing, and (iii) time delays in various processes of the dynamo. To demonstrate each of these causes, we present the results from some illustrative models for the cycle modulations and discuss their strengths and weakness. We also discuss a few critical issues and their current trends. The article ends with a discussion of our current state of ignorance about comparing detailed features of the magnetic cycle and the large-scale velocity from the dynamo models with robust observations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ScholarSearch: Benchmarking Scholar Searching Ability of LLMs

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ScholarSearch provides a new, deliberately difficult benchmark for measuring LLM deep research in academic domains, where the best tested search model scores 18.83%.

  2. Connecting mean-field theory with dynamo simulations

    astro-ph.SR 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    Mean-field dynamo models reproduce the large-scale magnetic modes of 3D simulations at least qualitatively, but quantitative closure remains incomplete because transport coefficients are hard to measure and non-locali...

Pith tools