Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models for User Interest Journeys

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.15498 v1 pith:GSOH33VV submitted 2023-05-24 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR
keywords userinterestsjourneysllmsmodelsunderstandinginterestlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. Their potential for deeper user understanding and improved personalized user experience on recommendation platforms is, however, largely untapped. This paper aims to address this gap. Recommender systems today capture users' interests through encoding their historical activities on the platforms. The generated user representations are hard to examine or interpret. On the other hand, if we were to ask people about interests they pursue in their life, they might talk about their hobbies, like I just started learning the ukulele, or their relaxation routines, e.g., I like to watch Saturday Night Live, or I want to plant a vertical garden. We argue, and demonstrate through extensive experiments, that LLMs as foundation models can reason through user activities, and describe their interests in nuanced and interesting ways, similar to how a human would. We define interest journeys as the persistent and overarching user interests, in other words, the non-transient ones. These are the interests that we believe will benefit most from the nuanced and personalized descriptions. We introduce a framework in which we first perform personalized extraction of interest journeys, and then summarize the extracted journeys via LLMs, using techniques like few-shot prompting, prompt-tuning and fine-tuning. Together, our results in prompting LLMs to name extracted user journeys in a large-scale industrial platform demonstrate great potential of these models in providing deeper, more interpretable, and controllable user understanding. We believe LLM powered user understanding can be a stepping stone to entirely new user experiences on recommendation platforms that are journey-aware, assistive, and enabling frictionless conversation down the line.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring the Potential of LLMs as Personalized Assistants: Dataset, Evaluation, and Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    HiCUPID is a synthetic benchmark for personalized LLM assistants, with multi-hop questions and a distilled Llama-3.2 evaluator that closely matches human preferences on a small validation set.

  2. LLM-Based User Personas for Recommendations at Scale

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A framework for real-time LLM-based user interest personas in large-scale video recommendations, using distillation, async inference, and video clustering to balance interests with novel topics and improve viewer valu...

  3. PersonaFeedback: A Large-scale Human-annotated Benchmark For Personalization

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PersonaFeedback provides a human-labeled benchmark showing current LLMs, including strong reasoners, score only about 65-70 percent on hard personalization choices, and explicit persona information helps more than retrieval.

Pith tools