Pith. sign in

REVIEW

High-precision mass measurement of doubly magic ²⁰⁸Pb

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.11602 v1 pith:GSULEWCN submitted 2022-10-20 nucl-ex physics.atom-ph

High-precision mass measurement of doubly magic ²⁰⁸Pb

classification nucl-ex physics.atom-ph
keywords massprecisiontextatomicbeentimeshigh-precisionmeasurement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The absolute atomic mass of $^{208}$Pb has been determined with a fractional uncertainty of $7\times 10^{-11}$ by measuring the cyclotron-frequency ratio $R$ of $^{208}$Pb$^{41+}$ to $^{132}$Xe$^{26+}$ with the high-precision Penning-trap mass spectrometer Pentatrap and computing the binding energies $E_{\text{Pb}}$ and $E_{\text{Xe}}$ of the missing 41 and 26 atomic electrons, respectively, with the ab initio fully relativistic multi-configuration Dirac-Hartree-Fock (MCDHF) method. $R$ has been measured with a relative precision of $9\times 10^{-12}$. $E_{\text{Pb}}$ and $E_{\text{Xe}}$ have been computed with an uncertainty of 9.1 eV and 2.1 eV, respectively, yielding $207.976\,650\,571(14)$ u (u$=9.314\,941\,024\,2(28)\times 10^{8}$ eV/c$^2$) for the $^{208}$Pb neutral atomic mass. This result agrees within $1.2\sigma$ with that from the Atomic-Mass Evaluation (AME) 2020, while improving the precision by almost two orders of magnitude. The new mass value directly improves the mass precision of 14 nuclides in the region of Z=81-84 and is the most precise mass value with A>200. Thus, the measurement establishes a new region of reference mass values which can be used e.g. for precision mass determination of transuranium nuclides, including the superheavies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.