Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Constraint Back-translation Improves Complex Instruction Following of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.24175 v2 pith:GTUMGJIX submitted 2024-10-31 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords complexllmsconstraintsdatainstructionsadvancedback-translationconstraint
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) struggle to follow instructions with complex constraints in format, length, etc. Following the conventional instruction-tuning practice, previous works conduct post-training on complex instruction-response pairs generated by feeding complex instructions to advanced LLMs. However, even advanced LLMs cannot follow complex instructions well, thus limiting the quality of generated data. In this work, we find that existing datasets inherently contain implicit complex constraints and propose a novel data generation technique, constraint back-translation. Specifically, we take the high-quality instruction-response pairs in existing datasets and only adopt advanced LLMs to add complex constraints already met by the responses to the instructions, which naturally reduces costs and data noise. In the experiments, we adopt Llama3-70B-Instruct to back-translate constraints and create a high-quality complex instruction-response dataset, named CRAB. We present that post-training on CRAB improves multiple backbone LLMs' complex instruction-following ability, evaluated on extensive instruction-following benchmarks. We further find that constraint back-translation also serves as a useful auxiliary training objective in post-training. Our code, data, and models will be released to facilitate future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AGENTIF: Benchmarking Instruction Following of Large Language Models in Agentic Scenarios

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    AgentIF introduces a realistic, long-form instruction-following benchmark for agentic scenarios and shows that current LLMs follow fewer than 30% of such instructions perfectly.

  2. VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction Following

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hybrid verifier that combines rule-based code checks and a reasoning-LLM judge enables reinforcement learning to improve LLM instruction following on several benchmarks.

Pith tools