REVIEW 2 cited by
Constraint Back-translation Improves Complex Instruction Following of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) struggle to follow instructions with complex constraints in format, length, etc. Following the conventional instruction-tuning practice, previous works conduct post-training on complex instruction-response pairs generated by feeding complex instructions to advanced LLMs. However, even advanced LLMs cannot follow complex instructions well, thus limiting the quality of generated data. In this work, we find that existing datasets inherently contain implicit complex constraints and propose a novel data generation technique, constraint back-translation. Specifically, we take the high-quality instruction-response pairs in existing datasets and only adopt advanced LLMs to add complex constraints already met by the responses to the instructions, which naturally reduces costs and data noise. In the experiments, we adopt Llama3-70B-Instruct to back-translate constraints and create a high-quality complex instruction-response dataset, named CRAB. We present that post-training on CRAB improves multiple backbone LLMs' complex instruction-following ability, evaluated on extensive instruction-following benchmarks. We further find that constraint back-translation also serves as a useful auxiliary training objective in post-training. Our code, data, and models will be released to facilitate future research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
AGENTIF: Benchmarking Instruction Following of Large Language Models in Agentic Scenarios
AgentIF introduces a realistic, long-form instruction-following benchmark for agentic scenarios and shows that current LLMs follow fewer than 30% of such instructions perfectly.
-
VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction Following
A hybrid verifier that combines rule-based code checks and a reasoning-LLM judge enables reinforcement learning to improve LLM instruction following on several benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.