Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 142 references

Fully numerical calculations on atoms with fractional occupations. Range-separated exchange functionals

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fractional occupations let finite-element atoms reach sub-microhartree accuracy with only 139 radial basis functions.

desk verdict A useful new erfc range-separated implementation and complete HF/HFS reference tables for Z=1–118, but the microhartree convergence claim is asserted without a per-element convergence study and the abstract overstates 'ground states.' read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02528 v2 pith:GTWR52BN submitted 2019-08-07 physics.comp-ph physics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph

Susi Lehtola This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.comp-phphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords finiteelementmethodfractionaloccupationsHartree-Fockdensityfunctionaltheoryrange-separatedexchangeerfckernelYukawaatomictotalenergies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends a fully numerical finite element atomic structure program to atoms whose density is made spherically symmetric by splitting electron occupations fractionally across degenerate shells. It derives specialized Hartree–Fock, local density, and generalized gradient approximation equations for this setting, and adds range-separated exchange with both Yukawa and complementary-error-function kernels. The central numerical claim is that a single radial mesh of ten 15-node elements, only 139 radial basis functions, converges atomic total energies past the microhartree level, while reproducing published LDA and GGA values for neutral atoms and cations through Z=86. The paper also reports new spin-restricted non-relativistic Hartree–Fock and Hartree–Fock–Slater ground states for all elements through Z=118. If true, this gives chemistry a simple, parameter-free route to complete-basis-set atomic reference energies, including for functionals that contain exact exchange.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the radial finite element basis χ_{nlm}=$r^{{-1}}$B_n(r)Y_l^m(θ,φ) combined with fractional shell occupations f_{nl}, so that the density n(r)=Σ_{nl} f_{nl}(2l+1)R_{nl}^2/4π is spherically symmetric by construction. This makes the exact-exchange matrix depend on orbital angular momenta only through the coupled angular momentum L between incoming and outgoing shells, reducing the self-consistent field calculation to radial quadrature. The range-separated kernels enter through their Green's functions: the Coulomb form r_<^L/r_>^{L+1}, the Yukawa form (2L+1)λ i_L(λ r_<)k_L(λ r_>), and the erfc kernel through the scaled Φ_n(Ξ,ξ) spherical-harmonic expansion with a Taylor stabilization for short ranges. This machinery removes all angular quadrature, which is what lets microhartree-level atomic calculations run with only 139 radial functions instead of dense numerical grids.

What would settle it

Rerun a heavy closed-shell case such as Rn or Og with a second mesh of more elements, a larger practical infinity, and tighter quadrature; if the Hartree–Fock or Hartree–Fock–Slater energy shifts by more than about one microhartree, the single-mesh convergence claim fails for that part of the table.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that the spherically averaged atomic problem becomes nearly trivial when occupations are shared equally over each (n,l) shell: the density matrix is diagonal in l and m, the Coulomb term collapses to a single L=0 component, and exact exchange, including range-separated exchange, reduces to one-dimensional radial integrals with a finite set of coupled angular momenta. With this reduction, ten 15-node radial finite elements reaching r∞=40 a0 are claimed to give energies converged beyond 1 µEh for atoms and cations with 1≤Z≤86. The paper also validates the erfc range-separation implementation against large Gaussian-basis calculations for spherically symmetric atoms, and argues that earlier literature values deviate from the complete basis set limit by as much as 10 µEh for heavier atoms.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical premise that one fixed radial finite element mesh, ten 15-node elements ending at r∞=40 a0, is already converged to microhartree accuracy for every atom and cation in the tables, including heavy elements past Z=86.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Complete basis set benchmarks for LDA, GGA, hybrid, and range-separated hybrid functionals on atoms become routine, exposing basis-set truncation errors in earlier literature.
  • The reported Hartree–Fock and Hartree–Fock–Slater ground states for Z=1 to 118 provide a consistent non-relativistic, spin-restricted reference set for functional development and for generating pseudopotentials and numerical basis sets.
  • Fractional-occupation calculations resolve negative-gap and shell-degeneracy situations, so ground and low-lying excited atomic states can be compared at the basis set limit.
  • The erfc range-separation implementation makes it possible to benchmark modern screened hybrid functionals at the complete basis set limit, something Gaussian basis sets can only approximate.
  • The computed radial effective potentials give a superposition-of-atomic-potentials initial guess for molecular calculations with documented sub-microhartree accuracy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The convergence claim is stated for a single fixed mesh in Section III but is not shown element by element; testing heavier elements such as Og with additional radial elements would settle whether 139 functions truly deliver microhartree accuracy across the whole periodic table.
  • The same spherical-averaging construction could naturally extend to fractional occupations within a shell rather than only across all 2l+1 orbitals, which the paper itself notes as future work.
  • Because the Hartree–Fock and Hartree–Fock–Slater tables cover all elements to Z=118, they could serve as a uniform non-relativistic baseline against which relativistic and quantum-electrodynamic corrections in superheavy elements could be assessed.
  • A natural next test is to apply the erfc Green's function machinery to open-shell and excited-state atoms with fractional occupations, since the paper validates it mainly on spherically symmetric closed-shell species.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the HelFEM fully numerical finite element program to atomic calculations with spherically symmetric densities via fractionally occupied orbitals. Specialized implementations are described for LDA and GGA functionals, Hartree-Fock exchange, and range-separated exchange with Yukawa and erfc kernels, together with the generation of radial potentials for the superposition-of-atomic-potentials initial guess. Results include VWN and PBE total energies for neutral atoms and cations with 1 ≤ Z ≤ 86 compared to the fully numerical reference of Kraisler et al., LC-BLYP energies for first- and second-row atoms compared to Gaussian-basis calculations, and spin-restricted HF and HFS energies and configurations for all elements 1 ≤ Z ≤ 118. The central claims are that the approach reaches beyond microhartree accuracy with only 139 radial basis functions, that the literature values deviate by up to 10 μEh from the complete basis set limit, and that the erfc range-separation implementation is validated against large Gaussian-basis results.

Significance. If the numerical accuracy claims are substantiated, this is a valuable contribution: it provides a fully numerical, open, and fast route to complete-basis benchmarks of modern range-separated hybrid functionals on atoms, and the fractional-occupation machinery is practically important for generating atomic densities, potentials, and initial guesses. The work contains no fitting or circular validation: the erfc expansion is taken from an independent reference, the range-separation parameters belong to functional definitions, and comparisons are made to literature values from independent groups. The specialized angular reduction for LDA/GGA, exact exchange, and range-separated kernels is a useful methodological development, and the reported periodic-table energy tables will likely be used by the community as reference data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, first paragraph] The central accuracy claim that the ten 15-node element mesh with r∞ = 40 a0 and 139 radial basis functions gives energies "converged beyond microhartree accuracy" for every atom and cation up to Z = 118 is asserted but not demonstrated. No convergence study is presented, so the only evidence is agreement with literature values. This is load-bearing because Tables I and II report differences of up to about 10 μEh for heavy atoms and attribute those differences to error in the reference data; that attribution is valid only if the present basis is itself converged to well below 10 μEh. The concern is acute for heavy atoms, where the 1s orbital is very compact while the valence tails are diffuse, and a fixed ten-element mesh must resolve both. I request explicit convergence tests: for representative elements across the periodic table, including heavy atoms and cations, report the total energy as a function of element subdivision, polynomial order, and r∞, or provide an equivalent per-element error analysis.
  2. [Section III, Tables IV and V; Abstract] The abstract and Section IV state that spin-restricted ground states are reported for HF and HFS for all Z = 1 to 118, but the tables themselves contain italicized entries (Pr in HF; Cf, Es, Fm in HFS) for which a lower-lying configuration was identified but failed to converge. For these elements the reported states are not established ground states. The text is transparent about this, but the central periodic-table claim is stronger than the evidence. Please either revise the wording to "converged spin-restricted states" with the caveats made explicit in the abstract, or extend the calculations so that the lower-lying configurations are converged and the ground-state statement is accurate.
  3. [Section III, paragraph on Saito comparison] The claim that agreement with Saito's B-spline Hartree-Fock values for noble gases is "perfect" is stated without any numerical comparison. Since the noble-gas comparison is the only external benchmark that extends to Z > 86 and is used to underwrite the accuracy of the heavy-atom HF and HFS tables, please provide a table or listing of the actual differences for the noble gases He through Og, or at minimum the largest absolute deviation. Without numerical values, the reader cannot assess whether the agreement is at the claimed microhartree level or only at a coarser level.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II B, Eq. (24)] The displayed equation for the exchange matrix element appears to contain a typographical error: the Gaunt-type coefficient is written twice identically in the numerator, and the notation is not defined. Please correct the expression and define the angular momentum coupling symbol used.
  2. [Section I vs Section III] The Introduction states that the reference calculations of Kraisler et al. employed 16 000 point grids, while the Results section says 10 000 radial grid points were used in ref. 82. This inconsistency should be resolved.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors and artifacts: "accucacy" in Section IV, "occu pations" in the title line, and some font inconsistencies in the equations. A careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  4. [Table III] The table reports five decimals for the finite element values and fewer for the Gaussian basis values. Please state explicitly in the caption or text that all tabulated digits are significant and specify the total energy unit (Eh).
  5. [Section III, erfc validation paragraph] The statement that the aug-pc-∞ Gaussian basis truncation error is under 1 μEh for light atoms and tens of μEh for heavier atoms is important but is only referenced indirectly. Since this underpins the choice of ref. 15 as the validation target, a one-sentence summary of how that error was established would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the numerical benchmarks are checked against independent literature values and the erfc expansion is imported from an external source.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The central new features are (i) fractionally occupied orbitals handled through the standard spherically averaged density matrix, (ii) specialized LDA/GGA and HF implementations, and (iii) range-separated exchange using Yukawa and erfc kernels. No parameter is fitted to the quantities that are later called predictions. The erfc Green's function expansion is taken from an independent reference (Angyan, Gerber, and Marsman, ref. 100), with an explicit correction of a typo in that reference. Validation is performed against independent literature data: Kraisler, Makov, and Kelson (ref. 82) for VWN/PBE atomic and cationic energies, Anderson, Oviedo, and Wong (ref. 15) for LC-BLYP range-separated calculations, and Saito (ref. 132) for noble-gas Hartree-Fock energies. The one place where the author's own prior work is invoked, the claim that the aug-pc-infinity Gaussian basis truncation error is known from ref. 14, is not circular: that prior study compared Gaussian-basis results against Erkale and finite-element calculations, and the erfc comparison in Table III directly reproduces the independent literature values for light atoms. The self-citations to refs. 14 and 78 describe the underlying finite-element and SAP methods rather than the target results. The assertion that ten 15-node elements with r_inf = 40 a0 give convergence beyond microhartree accuracy is not backed by a per-element convergence study, and the paper itself flags configurations whose lower-energy wave functions failed to converge in Tables IV and V. These are evidence gaps and explicit limitations, not reductions of the predictions to their inputs. Accordingly, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted physical constants. The only hand-chosen numerical input is the radial finite element grid, which is a discretization parameter. The central derivatives rest on standard mathematical identities and on the external erfc Green's function expansion from ref. 100.

free parameters (1)
  • radial finite element grid = 10 15-node elements, r_inf = 40 a0, 139 radial basis functions
    Chosen by hand for all atoms; the microhartree accuracy claim depends on this discretization, and it is a numerical convergence parameter rather than a physical model parameter.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Laplace expansion of the Coulomb interaction (Eq. 2) factorizes two-electron integrals into radial and angular parts.
    Standard identity used throughout the atomic integral evaluation; no independent verification provided in the paper.
  • standard math Spherical harmonic expansion of the erfc-screened Coulomb Green's function (Eqs. 11-16) taken from ref. 100, with a corrected lower summation limit.
    The paper relies on this external expansion for the erfc kernel and explicitly corrects a typo in the source, but does not re-derive the expansion.
  • standard math Unsöld's theorem (Eq. 19): equal occupations of all m orbitals on a shell yield a spherically symmetric density.
    Used to construct the spherical density from fractional shell occupations.
  • domain assumption Ensemble v-representability and the zero-temperature limit of finite-temperature DFT justify fractional occupations.
    Theoretical basis for fractionally occupied orbitals, cited from refs. 17, 18 and 26-28 in the introduction.
  • domain assumption Finite element basis from ref. 14 is complete enough to converge atomic energies to microhartree accuracy.
    The present work uses the finite element approach established earlier and does not re-prove convergence properties.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fully numerical calculations on atoms with fractional occupations. Range-separated exchange functionals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GTWR52BN

@misc{pith2026190802528,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fully numerical calculations on atoms with fractional occupations. Range-separated exchange functionals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GTWR52BN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02528}
}
abstract

A recently developed finite element approach for fully numerical atomic structure calculations [S. Lehtola, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 119, e25945 (2019)] is extended to the description of atoms with spherically symmetric densities via fractionally occupied orbitals. Specialized versions of Hartree-Fock as well as local density and generalized gradient approximation density functionals are developed, allowing extremely rapid calculations at the basis set limit on the ground and low-lying excited states even for heavy atoms. The implementation of range-separation based on the Yukawa or complementary error function (erfc) kernels is also described, allowing complete basis set benchmarks of modern range-separated hybrid functionals with either integer or fractional occupation numbers. Finally, computation of atomic effective potentials at the local density or generalized gradient approximation levels for the superposition of atomic potentials (SAP) approach [S. Lehtola, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1593 (2019)] that has been shown to be a simple and efficient way to initialize electronic structure calculations is described. The present numerical approach is shown to afford beyond microhartree accuracy with a small number of numerical basis functions, and to reproduce literature results for the ground states of atoms and their cations for $1 \leq Z \leq 86 $. Our results indicate that the literature values deviate by up to 10 {\mu}Eh from the complete basis set limit. The numerical scheme for the erfc kernel is shown to work by comparison to results from large Gaussian basis set calculations from the literature. Spin-restricted ground states are reported for Hartree-Fock and Hartree-Fock-Slater calculations with fractional occupations for $1 \leq Z \leq 118$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    602 [26]. A systematic, non-relativistic study for spherical atoms 1 ≤ Z ≤ 86 has recently been presented by Kraisler, Makov and Kelson for the local density and PBE functionals based on three local density func- tionals, employing 16 000 point grids and wave func- tions converged to 2 µE h [82]. It was found in ref. 82 that the ground state of most atoms...

  2. [2]

    Due to its separability, Yukawa- screened functionals are easy to handle in fully nu- merical approaches

    Yukawa kernel The Yukawa-screened [105] potential, φ sr(r12) = exp(−λr 12) has a relatively well-known simple ex- pansion e−λ |r−r′| |r − r′| = 4πλ ∞∑ L=0 iL(λr <)kL(λr >) × L∑ M=−L Y M L (Ω 1) ( Y M L (Ω 2) ) ∗ (8) where iL and kL are regular and irregular modified Bessel functions that are regular at zero and infin- ity, respectively. Due to its separabil...

  3. [3]

    erfc kernel Most range-separated functionals, however, are based on the complementary error function (erfc) kernelφ sr(r) = erfc (µr ). Such functionals are easy to implement in Gaussian-basis programs, requiring but simple modifications to the two-electron inte- grals [118, 119], as well as plane wave programs since the kernel has a simple Fourier transfo...

  4. [4]

    Self-Consistent Equa- tions Including Exchange and Correlation Effects,

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, “Self-Consistent Equa- tions Including Exchange and Correlation Effects,” Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965)

    1965

  5. [5]

    Let the element begin at rb and end at re

    Coulomb potential Employing the Laplace expansion, equation (2), the Coulomb potential at a point r for a spherically symmetric charge distribution is V (r) = ∫ ∞ 0 1 r> n(r′)r2dr′ (31) Expressing the orbitals as in equation (17) yields potential matrix elements of the form Vij(r) = ∫ ∞ 0 1 r> Bi(r′)Bj(r′)dr′ (32) = 1 r ∫ r 0 Bi(r′)Bj (r′)dr′ + ∫ ∞ r 1 r′...

  6. [6]

    (37) and so δE = ∫ ( δE δnδn + δE δ∇nδ∇n ) d3r

    Exchange-correlation potential The functional derivative satisfies δE =E[n +δn] −E[n] = ∫ δE δnδnd3r. (37) and so δE = ∫ ( δE δnδn + δE δ∇nδ∇n ) d3r. (38) Integrating by parts one gets ∫ δE δ∇nδ∇nd3r = [ δE δ∇nδnd3r − ∫ ∇ δE δ∇nδnd3r ] (39) = − ∫ ∇ δE δ∇nδnd3r (40) 9 from which one can identify v(r) = δE δn − ∇ δE δ∇n. (41) Expressing the functional in ter...

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    A review on non-relativistic, fully numerical electronic structure calcu- lations on atoms and diatomic molecules,

    Susi Lehtola, “A review on non-relativistic, fully numerical electronic structure calcu- lations on atoms and diatomic molecules,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 119, e25968 (2019), arXiv:1902.01431

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Self-Consistent Field, Including Exchange and Superposition of Configu- rations, with Some Results for Oxygen,

    D. R. Hartree, W. Hartree, and Bertha Swirles, “Self-Consistent Field, Including Exchange and Superposition of Configu- rations, with Some Results for Oxygen,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 238, 229–247 (1939)

    1939

Show all 142 references
  1. [9]

    Inhomogeneous Elec- tron Gas,

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, “Inhomogeneous Elec- tron Gas,” Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871 (1964)

    1964

  2. [10]

    Co- hesive energy of 3d transition metals: Density functional theory atomic and bulk calculations,

    P. H. T. Philipsen and E. J. Baerends, “Co- hesive energy of 3d transition metals: Density functional theory atomic and bulk calculations,” Phys. Rev. B 54, 5326–5333 (1996)

    1996

  3. [11]

    Atomic reference ener- gies for density functional calculations,

    E. J. Baerends, V. Branchadell, and M. Sodupe, “Atomic reference ener- gies for density functional calculations,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 265, 481–489 (1997)

    1997

  4. [12]

    Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. The representation of 3d orbitals in transition-metal atoms,

    P. Jeffrey Hay, “Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. The representation of 3d orbitals in transition-metal atoms,” J. Chem. Phys. 66, 4377–4384 (1977)

    1977

  5. [13]

    Stability of Self-Consistent Sym- metries in Atomic Theory: The Cases of Ne, F – , and O – – ,

    Roger F. Prat, “Stability of Self-Consistent Sym- metries in Atomic Theory: The Cases of Ne, F – , and O – – ,” Phys. Rev. A 6, 1735–1740 (1972)

    1972

  6. [14]

    In analogy to the scheme for Coulomb integrals dis- cussed in ref

    In an intraelement integral, both ij and kl are within the same element, whereas in an interelement integralij are in one element and kl are in another. In analogy to the scheme for Coulomb integrals dis- cussed in ref. 14, the interelement integrals are eval- uated with Nquad...

  7. [15]

    Bonding in C 2 and Be 2: Broken symmetry and correlation in DFT solutions,

    A. Goursot, J. P. Malrieu, and D. R. Salahub, “Bonding in C 2 and Be 2: Broken symmetry and correlation in DFT solutions,” Theor. Chim. Acta 91, 225–236 (1995)

    1995

  8. [16]

    Energies of atoms with nonspherical charge densities cal- culated with nonlocal density-functional theory,

    Frank W. Kutzler and G. S. Painter, “Energies of atoms with nonspherical charge densities cal- culated with nonlocal density-functional theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1285–1288 (1987)

    1987

  9. [17]

    Nonempiri- cal Construction of Current-Density Functionals from Conventional Density-Functional Approxima- tions,

    Jianmin Tao and John P. Perdew, “Nonempiri- cal Construction of Current-Density Functionals from Conventional Density-Functional Approxima- tions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 196403 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    Johnson, Ross M

    Erin R. Johnson, Ross M. Dickson, and Axel D. Becke, “Density functionals and transition-metal 14 H 1s1 -0.357710 Nb [Kr] 5s24d3 -3753.033166 Tl [Xe] 4f 145d106s26p1 -18961.740923 He 1s2 -2.861680 Mo [Kr] 4d6 -3974.815043 Pb [Xe] 4f 145d106s26p2 -19523.831389 Li [He] 2s1 -7.37...

    2007

  11. [19]

    On the degeneracy of atomic states within exact-exchange (spin-) density functional theory,

    S. Pittalis, S. Kurth, and E. K. U. Gross, “On the degeneracy of atomic states within exact-exchange (spin-) density functional theory,” J. Chem. Phys. 125, 084105 (2006)

    2006

  12. [20]

    Fully numerical Hartree–Fock and density functional calculations. I. Atoms,

    Susi Lehtola, “Fully numerical Hartree–Fock and density functional calculations. I. Atoms,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 119, e25945 (2019), arXiv:1810.11651

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Accurate Electron Affini- ties and Orbital Energies of Anions from a Nonempirically Tuned Range-Separated Density Functional Theory Approach,

    Lindsey N. Anderson, M. Belén Oviedo, and Bryan M. Wong, “Accurate Electron Affini- ties and Orbital Energies of Anions from a Nonempirically Tuned Range-Separated Density Functional Theory Approach,” 15 H 1s1 -0.406534 Nb [Kr] 4d35s2 -3747.428127 Tl [Xe] 4f 145d106s26p1 -18948....

    2017

  14. [22]

    Beiträge zur Quantenmechanik der Atome,

    Albrecht Unsöld, “Beiträge zur Quantenmechanik der Atome,” Ann. Phys. 387, 355–393 (1927)

    1927

  15. [23]

    Exact Density Func- tionals for Ground-State Energies. I. General Re- sults,

    H. Englisch and R. Englisch, “Exact Density Func- tionals for Ground-State Energies. I. General Re- sults,” Phys. status solidi 123, 711–721 (1984)

    1984

  16. [24]

    Ex- act Density Functionals for Ground- State Energies II. Details and Remarks,

    H. Englisch and R Englisch, “Ex- act Density Functionals for Ground- State Energies II. Details and Remarks,” Phys. status solidi 124, 373–379 (1984)

    1984

  17. [25]

    Basis set ef- fects on spectroscopic constants for C 2 and Si 2 and the symmetry dilemma in the Xα model,

    B. I. Dunlap and W. N. Mei, “Basis set ef- fects on spectroscopic constants for C 2 and Si 2 and the symmetry dilemma in the Xα model,” 16 J. Chem. Phys. 78, 4997–5003 (1983)

    1983

  18. [26]

    S. G. Wang and W. H. E. Schwarz, “Sim- ulation of nondynamical correlation in density functional calculations by the optimized frac- tional orbital occupation approach: Application to the potential energy surfaces of O 3 and SO 2,” J. Chem. Phys. 105, 4641–4648 (1996)

    1996

  19. [27]

    One-determinantal pure state versus ensemble Kohn–Sham solutions in the case of strong electron correlation: CH 2 and C 2,

    P. R. T. Schipper, O. V. Gritsenko, and E. J. Baerends, “One-determinantal pure state versus ensemble Kohn–Sham solutions in the case of strong electron correlation: CH 2 and C 2,” Theor. Chem. Accounts Theory, Comput. Model. (Theoretica C him. Acta) 99, 329–343 (1998)

    1998

  20. [28]

    Fractional occupation numbers and spin den- sity functional calculations of degenerate systems,

    R. Takeda, S. Yamanaka, and K. Yamaguchi, “Fractional occupation numbers and spin den- sity functional calculations of degenerate systems,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 93, 317–323 (2003)

    2003

  21. [29]

    The en- ergy, orbitals and electric properties of the ozone molecule with ensemble density functional theory,

    Cecilie R Nygaard and Jeppe Olsen, “The en- ergy, orbitals and electric properties of the ozone molecule with ensemble density functional theory,” Mol. Phys. 111, 1259–1270 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Occupa- tion numbers in density-functional calculations,

    M. M. Valiev and G. W. Fernando, “Occupa- tion numbers in density-functional calculations,” Phys. Rev. B 52, 10697–10700 (1995)

    1995

  23. [31]

    K. J. H. Giesbertz and E. J. Baerends, “Aufbau de- rived from a unified treatment of occupation num- bers in Hartree–Fock, Kohn–Sham, and natural or- bital theories with the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker con- ditions for the inequality constraints ni ≤ 1 and ni ≥ 0,” J. Chem. Phys. 132, 1...

    2010

  24. [32]

    Fractional occupation in Kohn– Sham density-functional theory and the treat- ment of non-pure-state ν-representable densities,

    Eli Kraisler, Guy Makov, Nathan Argaman, and Itzhak Kelson, “Fractional occupation in Kohn– Sham density-functional theory and the treat- ment of non-pure-state ν-representable densities,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 032115 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Thermal Proper- ties of the Inhomogeneous Electron Gas,

    N. David Mermin, “Thermal Proper- ties of the Inhomogeneous Electron Gas,” Phys. Rev. 137, A1441–A1443 (1965)

    1965

  26. [34]

    Den- sity functional theory at finite temperatures,

    Mario V. Stoitsov and Ivan Zh Petkov, “Den- sity functional theory at finite temperatures,” Ann. Phys. (N. Y). 184, 121–147 (1988)

    1988

  27. [35]

    Density functional the- ory with fractional orbital occupations

    Jeng-Da Chai, “Density functional the- ory with fractional orbital occupations.” J. Chem. Phys. 136, 154104 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    Thermally-assisted- occupation density functional theory with generalized-gradient approximations,

    Jeng Da Chai, “Thermally-assisted- occupation density functional theory with generalized-gradient approximations,” J. Chem. Phys. 140 (2014), 10.1063/1.4867532

    2014 doi

  29. [37]

    Elec- tronic Properties of Zigzag Graphene Nanoribbons Studied by TAO-DFT,

    Chun-Shian Wu and Jeng-Da Chai, “Elec- tronic Properties of Zigzag Graphene Nanoribbons Studied by TAO-DFT,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 2003–2011 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Role of Kekulé and Non-Kekulé Structures in the Rad- ical Character of Alternant Polycyclic Aro- matic Hydrocarbons: A TAO-DFT Study,

    Chia-Nan Yeh and Jeng-Da Chai, “Role of Kekulé and Non-Kekulé Structures in the Rad- ical Character of Alternant Polycyclic Aro- matic Hydrocarbons: A TAO-DFT Study,” Sci. Rep. 6, 30562 (2016), arXiv:1604.04296

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Effect of Li Adsorption on the Electronic and Hydrogen Stor- age Properties of Acenes: A Dispersion-Corrected TAO-DFT Study,

    Sonai Seenithurai and Jeng-Da Chai, “Effect of Li Adsorption on the Electronic and Hydrogen Stor- age Properties of Acenes: A Dispersion-Corrected TAO-DFT Study,” Sci. Rep. 6, 33081 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Electronic Properties of Cyclacenes from TAO- DFT,

    Chun-Shian Wu, Pei-Yin Lee, and Jeng-Da Chai, “Electronic Properties of Cyclacenes from TAO- DFT,” Sci. Rep. 6, 37249 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Role of exact exchange in thermally-assisted-occupation density func- tional theory: A proposal of new hybrid schemes,

    Jeng-Da Chai, “Role of exact exchange in thermally-assisted-occupation density func- tional theory: A proposal of new hybrid schemes,” J. Chem. Phys. 146, 044102 (2017), arXiv:1610.02018

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Effect of Li Termination on the Electronic and Hydrogen Stor- age Properties of Linear Carbon Chains: A TAO- DFT Study,

    Sonai Seenithurai and Jeng-Da Chai, “Effect of Li Termination on the Electronic and Hydrogen Stor- age Properties of Linear Carbon Chains: A TAO- DFT Study,” Sci. Rep. 7, 4966 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Self-consistent determina- tion of the fictitious temperature in thermally- assisted-occupation density functional theory,

    Chih-Ying Lin, Kerwin Hui, Jui-Hui Chung, and Jeng-Da Chai, “Self-consistent determina- tion of the fictitious temperature in thermally- assisted-occupation density functional theory,” RSC Adv. 7, 50496–50507 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Electronic properties of the coronene series from thermally-assisted-occupation density func- tional theory,

    Chia-Nan Yeh, Can Wu, Haibin Su, and Jeng-Da Chai, “Electronic properties of the coronene series from thermally-assisted-occupation density func- tional theory,” RSC Adv. 8, 34350–34358 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Electronic and Hydrogen Storage Properties of Li-Terminated Linear Boron Chains Studied by TAO-DFT,

    Sonai Seenithurai and Jeng-Da Chai, “Electronic and Hydrogen Storage Properties of Li-Terminated Linear Boron Chains Studied by TAO-DFT,” Sci. Rep. 8, 13538 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Electronic Proper- ties of Triangle-Shaped Graphene Nanoflakes from TAO-DFT,

    Qing Deng and Jeng-da Chai, “Electronic Proper- ties of Triangle-Shaped Graphene Nanoflakes from TAO-DFT,” ACS Omega 4, 14202–14210 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Electronic Prop- erties of Möbius Cyclacenes Studied by Thermally- Assisted-Occupation Density Functional Theory,

    Jui-hui Chung and Jeng-da Chai, “Electronic Prop- erties of Möbius Cyclacenes Studied by Thermally- Assisted-Occupation Density Functional Theory,” Sci. Rep. 9, 2907 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Towards First Prin- ciples Calculation of Electron Im- pact Mass Spectra of Molecules,

    Stefan Grimme, “Towards First Prin- ciples Calculation of Electron Im- pact Mass Spectra of Molecules,” Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 52, 6306–6312 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    A Prac- ticable Real-Space Measure and Visualiza- tion of Static Electron-Correlation Effects,

    Stefan Grimme and Andreas Hansen, “A Prac- ticable Real-Space Measure and Visualiza- tion of Static Electron-Correlation Effects,” Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 54, 12308–12313 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    Improving self-consistent field con- vergence by varying occupation numbers,

    Angela D. Rabuck and Gustavo E. Scuse- ria, “Improving self-consistent field con- vergence by varying occupation numbers,” J. Chem. Phys. 110, 695–700 (1999)

    1999

  43. [51]

    The Basics of Electronic Structure Theory for Periodic Systems,

    Peter Kratzer and Jörg Neugebauer, “The Basics of Electronic Structure Theory for Periodic Systems,” Front. Chem. 7, 1–18 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Ab initio floating occupation molecular orbital- complete active space configuration interac- tion: An efficient approximation to CASSCF,

    Petr Slavíček and Todd J. Martínez, “Ab initio floating occupation molecular orbital- complete active space configuration interac- tion: An efficient approximation to CASSCF,” J. Chem. Phys. 132, 234102 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    First-principles calcula- tion of the equilibrium ground-state properties of transition metals: Applications to Nb and Mo,

    C. L. Fu and K. M. Ho, “First-principles calcula- tion of the equilibrium ground-state properties of transition metals: Applications to Nb and Mo,” Phys. Rev. B 28, 5480–5486 (1983)

    1983

  46. [54]

    High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals,

    M. Methfessel and A. T. Paxton, “High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals,” Phys. Rev. B 40, 3616–3621 (1989)

    1989

  47. [55]

    Ther- 17 mal Contraction and Disordering of the Al(110) Surface,

    Nicola Marzari, David Vanderbilt, Alessan- dro De Vita, and M. C. Payne, “Ther- 17 mal Contraction and Disordering of the Al(110) Surface,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3296–3299 (1999), arXiv:9903147 [cond-mat]

    1999

  48. [56]

    Static, dynamic, and electronic properties of liquid gal- lium studied by first-principles simulation,

    J. M. Holender, M. J. Gillan, M. C. Payne, and A. D. Simpson, “Static, dynamic, and electronic properties of liquid gal- lium studied by first-principles simulation,” Phys. Rev. B 52, 967–975 (1995)

    1995

  49. [57]

    Fractional occupancies and tem- perature in electronic-structure calculations,

    Michael Springborg, R. C. Albers, and Karla Schmidt, “Fractional occupancies and tem- perature in electronic-structure calculations,” Phys. Rev. B 57, 1427–1435 (1998)

    1998

  50. [58]

    Correction terms to the density-functional ground-state energy arising from occupation number broadening,

    O. Grotheer and M. Fähnle, “Correction terms to the density-functional ground-state energy arising from occupation number broadening,” Phys. Rev. B 58, 13459–13464 (1998)

    1998

  51. [59]

    Occupation-number broad- ening schemes: Choice of

    Michael J. Mehl, “Occupation-number broad- ening schemes: Choice of "temperature",” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 61, 1654–1657 (2000)

    2000

  52. [60]

    Fractional occupations and density-functional energies and forces,

    M. Weinert and J. W. Davenport, “Fractional occupations and density-functional energies and forces,” Phys. Rev. B 45, 13709–13712 (1992)

    1992

  53. [61]

    Fractional occupation numbers and density functional energy gradients within the linear combi- nation of Gaussian-type orbitals approach,

    R.W. Warren and B.I. Dunlap, “Fractional occupation numbers and density functional energy gradients within the linear combi- nation of Gaussian-type orbitals approach,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 262, 384–392 (1996)

    1996

  54. [62]

    Convergence acceleration of itera- tive sequences. The case of SCF iteration,

    P. Pulay, “Convergence acceleration of itera- tive sequences. The case of SCF iteration,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 73, 393–398 (1980)

    1980

  55. [63]

    Improved SCF convergence accelera- tion,

    P. Pulay, “Improved SCF convergence accelera- tion,” J. Comput. Chem. 3, 556–560 (1982)

    1982

  56. [64]

    Steepest-descent determination of occupation numbers and energy minimization in the local-density approximation,

    F. W. A verill and G. S. Painter, “Steepest-descent determination of occupation numbers and energy minimization in the local-density approximation,” Phys. Rev. B 46, 2498–2502 (1992)

    1992

  57. [65]

    Quadrati- cally convergent algorithm for fractional occu- pation numbers in density functional theory,

    Eric Cancès, Konstantin N. Kudin, Gustavo E. Scuseria, and Gabriel Turinici, “Quadrati- cally convergent algorithm for fractional occu- pation numbers in density functional theory,” J. Chem. Phys. 118, 5364–5368 (2003)

    2003

  58. [66]

    A second- order unconstrained optimization method for canonical-ensemble density-functional methods,

    Cecilie R. Nygaard and Jeppe Olsen, “A second- order unconstrained optimization method for canonical-ensemble density-functional methods,” J. Chem. Phys. 138, 094109 (2013)

    2013

  59. [67]

    Calculation of the va- cancy formation energy in aluminium,

    M J Gillan, “Calculation of the va- cancy formation energy in aluminium,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1, 689–711 (1989)

    1989

  60. [68]

    First- principles molecular dynamics for metals,

    G. W. Fernando, Guo-Xin Qian, M. Wein- ert, and J. W. Davenport, “First- principles molecular dynamics for metals,” Phys. Rev. B 40, 7985–7988 (1989)

    1989

  61. [69]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics with a finite-temperature density functional,

    M. P. Grumbach, D. Hohl, R. M. Martin, and R. Car, “Ab initio molecular dynamics with a finite-temperature density functional,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6, 1999–2014 (1994)

    1994

  62. [70]

    Vacancies and im- purities in aluminum and magnesium,

    N. Chetty, M. Weinert, T. S. Rahman, and J. W. Davenport, “Vacancies and im- purities in aluminum and magnesium,” Phys. Rev. B 52, 6313–6326 (1995)

    1995

  63. [71]

    Ensemble Density-Functional Theory for Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics of Metals and Finite-Temperature Insula- tors,

    Nicola Marzari, David Vanderbilt, and M. C. Payne, “Ensemble Density-Functional Theory for Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics of Metals and Finite-Temperature Insula- tors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1337–1340 (1997), arXiv:9703081 [cond-mat]

    1997

  64. [72]

    Local- density-functional calculations of the energy of atoms,

    Svetlana Kotochigova, Zachary H Levine, Eric L Shirley, M D Stiles, and Charles W Clark, “Local- density-functional calculations of the energy of atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 55, 191–199 (1997)

    1997

  65. [73]

    Ap- plications of the generalized-gradient ap- proximation to atoms, clusters, and solids,

    In-Ho Lee and Richard M. Martin, “Ap- plications of the generalized-gradient ap- proximation to atoms, clusters, and solids,” Phys. Rev. B 56, 7197–7205 (1997)

    1997

  66. [74]

    Generalized Gra- dient Approximation Made Simple,

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof, “Generalized Gra- dient Approximation Made Simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  67. [75]

    Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)],

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof, “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)],” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396–1396 (1997)

    1996

  68. [76]

    Ab initio pseudopotentials for electronic structure calculations of poly-atomic sys- tems using density-functional theory,

    Martin Fuchs and Matthias Scheffler, “Ab initio pseudopotentials for electronic structure calculations of poly-atomic sys- tems using density-functional theory,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 119, 67–98 (1999), arXiv:9807418 [cond-mat]

    1999

  69. [77]

    Generating relativistic pseudo-potentials with explicit incorporation of semi-core states us- ing APE, the Atomic Pseudo-potentials Engine,

    Micael J.T. Oliveira and Fernando Nogueira, “Generating relativistic pseudo-potentials with explicit incorporation of semi-core states us- ing APE, the Atomic Pseudo-potentials Engine,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 524–534 (2008)

    2008

  70. [78]

    Numerical atomic basis orbitals from H to Kr,

    T. Ozaki and H. Kino, “Numerical atomic basis orbitals from H to Kr,” Phys. Rev. B 69, 195113 (2004)

    2004

  71. [79]

    Ab initio molecular sim- ulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals,

    Volker Blum, Ralf Gehrke, Felix Hanke, Paula Havu, Ville Havu, Xinguo Ren, Karsten Reuter, and Matthias Scheffler, “Ab initio molecular sim- ulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2175–2196 (2009)

    2009

  72. [80]

    Compact basis sets for LCAO-LSD calcula- tions. Part I: Method and bases for Sc to Zn,

    J. Andzelm, E. Radzio, and D. R. Salahub, “Compact basis sets for LCAO-LSD calcula- tions. Part I: Method and bases for Sc to Zn,” J. Comput. Chem. 6, 520–532 (1985)

    1985

  73. [81]

    Optimization of Gaussian-type basis sets for local spin den- sity functional calculations. Part I. Boron through neon, optimization technique and validation,

    Nathalie Godbout, Dennis R. Salahub, Jan Andzelm, and Erich Wimmer, “Optimization of Gaussian-type basis sets for local spin den- sity functional calculations. Part I. Boron through neon, optimization technique and validation,” Can. J. Chem. 70, 560–571 (1992)

    1992

  74. [82]

    Optimization of Gaussian basis sets for density-functional calcu- lations,

    Dirk Porezag and Mark Pederson, “Optimization of Gaussian basis sets for density-functional calcu- lations,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 2840–2847 (1999)

    1999

  75. [83]

    Chemistry with ADF,

    G. te Velde, F. M. Bickelhaupt, E. J. Baerends, C. Fonseca Guerra, S. J. A. van Gisbergen, J. G. Snijders, and T. Ziegler, “Chemistry with ADF,” J. Comput. Chem. 22, 931–967 (2001)

    2001

  76. [84]

    Assessment of Initial Guesses for Self-Consistent Field Calculations. Superposition of Atomic Potentials: Simple yet Efficient,

    Susi Lehtola, “Assessment of Initial Guesses for Self-Consistent Field Calculations. Superposition of Atomic Potentials: Simple yet Efficient,” 18 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1593–1604 (2019), arXiv:1810.11659

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Nonintegral Occupa- tion Numbers in Transition Atoms in Crystals,

    J. C. Slater, J. B. Mann, T. M. Wil- son, and J. H. Wood, “Nonintegral Occupa- tion Numbers in Transition Atoms in Crystals,” Phys. Rev. 184, 672–694 (1969)

    1969

  78. [86]

    Atomic Central-Field Models for Open Shells with Application to Tran- sition Metals,

    Suheil F. Abdulnur, Jan Linderberg, Ungve Öhrn, and Poul W. Thulstrup, “Atomic Central-Field Models for Open Shells with Application to Tran- sition Metals,” Phys. Rev. A 6, 889–898 (1972)

    1972

  79. [87]

    Proof that ∂E/∂n i = ǫi in density-functional theory,

    J. Janak, “Proof that ∂E/∂n i = ǫi in density-functional theory,” Phys. Rev. B 18, 7165–7168 (1978)

    1978

  80. [88]

    Ensemble ν-representable ab initio density- functional calculation of energy and spin in atoms: A test of exchange-correlation approximations,

    Eli Kraisler, Guy Makov, and Itzhak Kel- son, “Ensemble ν-representable ab initio density- functional calculation of energy and spin in atoms: A test of exchange-correlation approximations,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 042516 (2010)

    2010

  81. [89]

    HelFEM – Finite element methods for elec tronic structure calculations on small systems,

    Susi Lehtola, “HelFEM – Finite element methods for elec tronic structure calculations on small systems,” (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    Fully numerical Hartree– Fock and density functional cal- culations. II. Diatomic molecules,

    Susi Lehtola, “Fully numerical Hartree– Fock and density functional cal- culations. II. Diatomic molecules,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 119, e25944 (2019), arXiv:1810.11653

    2019 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Projector augmented-wave method,

    P. E. Blöchl, “Projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994)

    1994

  84. [92]

    The Pseudopotential Ap- proximation in Electronic Structure Theory,

    Peter Schwerdtfeger, “The Pseudopotential Ap- proximation in Electronic Structure Theory,” ChemPhysChem 12, 3143–3155 (2011)

    2011

  85. [93]

    Norm- conserving Hartree–Fock pseudopo- tentials and their asymptotic behav- ior,

    J. R. Trail and R. J. Needs, “Norm- conserving Hartree–Fock pseudopo- tentials and their asymptotic behav- ior,” J. Chem. Phys. 122, 014112 (2005), arXiv:0909.5502

    2005 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Optimized norm-conserving Hartree-Fock pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations,

    W. A. Al-Saidi, E. J. Walter, and A. M. Rappe, “Optimized norm-conserving Hartree-Fock pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 075112 (2008), arXiv:0712.1822

    2008 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Hybrid den- sity functional calculations of the band gap of GaxIn1-xN,

    Xifan Wu, Eric J. Walter, Andrew M. Rappe, Roberto Car, and Annabella Selloni, “Hybrid den- sity functional calculations of the band gap of GaxIn1-xN,” Phys. Rev. B 80, 115201 (2009)

    2009

  88. [96]

    Hybrid functional pseudopotentials,

    Jing Yang, Liang Z. Tan, and Andrew M. Rappe, “Hybrid functional pseudopotentials,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 085130 (2018)

    2018

  89. [97]

    The Theory of Complex Spectra,

    J. C. Slater, “The Theory of Complex Spectra,” Phys. Rev. 34, 1293–1322 (1929)

    1929

  90. [98]

    Recent developments in LIBXC – A comprehensive li- brary of functionals for density functional theory,

    Susi Lehtola, Conrad Steigemann, Micael J.T. Oliveira, and Miguel A.L. Marques, “Recent developments in LIBXC – A comprehensive li- brary of functionals for density functional theory,” SoftwareX 7, 1–5 (2018)

    2018

  91. [99]

    In- creasing the applicability of density functional theory. IV. Consequences of ionization-potential improved exchange-correlation potentials,

    Prakash Verma and Rodney J. Bartlett, “In- creasing the applicability of density functional theory. IV. Consequences of ionization-potential improved exchange-correlation potentials,” J. Chem. Phys. 140, 18A534 (2014)

    2014

  92. [100]

    The QTP family of consistent functionals and poten- tials in Kohn-Sham density functional theory,

    Yifan Jin and Rodney J. Bartlett, “The QTP family of consistent functionals and poten- tials in Kohn-Sham density functional theory,” J. Chem. Phys. 145, 034107 (2016)

    2016

  93. [101]

    Non-empirical exchange-correlation parameterizations based on exact con- ditions from correlated orbital theory,

    Roberto Luiz A. Haiduke and Rodney J. Bartlett, “Non-empirical exchange-correlation parameterizations based on exact con- ditions from correlated orbital theory,” J. Chem. Phys. 148, 184106 (2018)

    2018

  94. [102]

    Screened-exchange density functionals with broad accuracy for chemistry and solid-state physics

    Roberto Peverati and Donald G. Truhlar, “Screened-exchange density functionals with broad accuracy for chemistry and solid-state physics.” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 16187–91 (2012)

    2012

  95. [103]

    Revised M11 Exchange-Correlation Functional for Electronic Excitation Energies and Ground-State Properties,

    Pragya Verma, Ying Wang, Soumen Ghosh, Xiao He, and Donald G. Truhlar, “Revised M11 Exchange-Correlation Functional for Electronic Excitation Energies and Ground-State Properties,” J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 2966–2990 (2019)

    2019

  96. [104]

    ωB97X-V: A 10-parameter, range-separated hybrid, generalized gradient approximation density functional with nonlocal correlation, designed by a survival-of-the-fittest strategy,

    Narbe Mardirossian and Martin Head-Gordon, “ωB97X-V: A 10-parameter, range-separated hybrid, generalized gradient approximation density functional with nonlocal correlation, designed by a survival-of-the-fittest strategy,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 9904–9924 (2014)

    2014

  97. [105]

    ωB97M-V: A combinatorially optimized, range-separated hybrid, meta-GGA density functional with VV10 nonlocal correlation,

    Narbe Mardirossian and Martin Head-Gordon, “ωB97M-V: A combinatorially optimized, range-separated hybrid, meta-GGA density functional with VV10 nonlocal correlation,” J. Chem. Phys. 144, 214110 (2016)

    2016

  98. [106]

    Spherical harmonic expansion of short-range screened Coulomb interactions,

    János G. Ángyán, Iann Gerber, and Mar- tijn Marsman, “Spherical harmonic expansion of short-range screened Coulomb interactions,” J. Phys. A. Math. Gen. 39, 8613–8630 (2006)

    2006

  99. [107]

    Linear-response range-separated density-functional theory for atomic pho- toexcitation and photoionization spectra,

    Felipe Zapata, Eleonora Luppi, and Julien Toulouse, “Linear-response range-separated density-functional theory for atomic pho- toexcitation and photoionization spectra,” J. Chem. Phys. 150, 234104 (2019)

    2019

  100. [108]

    Coulomb-attenuated exchange energy density functionals,

    Peter M. W. Gill, Ross D. Adamson, and John A. Pople, “Coulomb-attenuated exchange energy density functionals,” Mol. Phys. 88, 1005–1009 (1996)

    1996

  101. [109]

    Combining long-range configuration inter- action with short-range density functionals,

    Thierry Leininger, Hermann Stoll, Hans- Joachim Werner, and Andreas Savin, “Combining long-range configuration inter- action with short-range density functionals,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 275, 151–160 (1997)

    1997

  102. [110]

    A new hybrid exchange– correlation functional using the Coulomb- attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP),

    Takeshi Yanai, David P Tew, and Nicholas C Handy, “A new hybrid exchange– correlation functional using the Coulomb- attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP),” Chem. Phys. Lett. 393, 51–57 (2004)

    2004

  103. [111]

    On the Interac- tion of Elementary Particles. I

    Hideki Yukawa, “On the Interac- tion of Elementary Particles. I.” Proc. Physico-Mathematical Soc. Japan. 3rd Ser. 17, 48–57 (1935)

    1935

  104. [112]

    Multiresolution quantum chem- istry: Basic theory and initial applications,

    Robert J. Harrison, George I. Fann, Takeshi Yanai, Zhengting Gan, and Gregory Beylkin, “Multiresolution quantum chem- istry: Basic theory and initial applications,” J. Chem. Phys. 121, 11587–11598 (2004)

    2004

  105. [113]

    Luca Frediani, Eirik Fossgaard, Tor Flå, and Kenneth Ruud, “Fully adaptive algorithms for multivariate integral equations using the non-standard form and multiwavelets 19 with applications to the Poisson and bound- state Helmholtz kernels in three dimensions,” Mol. Phys. 111, ...

    2013

  106. [114]

    Unifying General and Segmented Contracted Basis Sets. Seg- mented Polarization Consistent Basis Sets,

    Frank Jensen, “Unifying General and Segmented Contracted Basis Sets. Seg- mented Polarization Consistent Basis Sets,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 1074–1085 (2014)

    2014

  107. [115]

    Optimization of numerical orbitals using the Helmholtz kernel,

    Eelis Solala, Sergio A. Losilla, Dage Sundholm, Wenhua Xu, and Pauli Parkkinen, “Optimization of numerical orbitals using the Helmholtz kernel,” J. Chem. Phys. 146, 084102 (2017)

    2017

  108. [116]

    A Generalized Grid-Based Fast Multi- pole Method for Integrating Helmholtz Kernels,

    Pauli Parkkinen, Sergio A Losilla, Eelis Solala, Elias A Toivanen, Wen-Hua Xu, and Dage Sund- holm, “A Generalized Grid-Based Fast Multi- pole Method for Integrating Helmholtz Kernels,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 654–665 (2017)

    2017

  109. [117]

    Range-separated exchange functionals with Slater-type functions,

    Michael Seth and Tom Ziegler, “Range-separated exchange functionals with Slater-type functions,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 901–907 (2012)

    2012

  110. [118]

    Modeling Transition Metal Reactions with Range-Separated Functionals,

    Michael Seth, Tom Ziegler, Marc Steinmetz, and Stefan Grimme, “Modeling Transition Metal Reactions with Range-Separated Functionals,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 2286–2299 (2013)

    2013

  111. [119]

    Repulsion integrals involving Slater-type functions and Yukawa poten- tial,

    Jaime Fernández Rico, Rafael López, Guillermo Ramírez, and Ignacio Ema, “Repulsion integrals involving Slater-type functions and Yukawa poten- tial,” Theor. Chem. Acc. 132, 1304 (2013)

    2013

  112. [120]

    Range-separation by the Yukawa potential in long-range corrected density functional theory with Gaussian-type basis functions,

    Yoshinobu Akinaga and Seiichiro Ten-no, “Range-separation by the Yukawa potential in long-range corrected density functional theory with Gaussian-type basis functions,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 462, 348–351 (2008)

    2008

  113. [121]

    Initiation of explic- itly correlated Slater-type geminal theory,

    Seiichiro Ten-no, “Initiation of explic- itly correlated Slater-type geminal theory,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 398, 56–61 (2004)

    2004

  114. [122]

    New implementation of second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation the- ory with an analytic Slater-type geminal,

    Seiichiro Ten-no, “New implementation of second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation the- ory with an analytic Slater-type geminal,” J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014108 (2007)

    2007

  115. [123]

    Intramolecular charge-transfer excita- tion energies from range-separated hybrid functionals using the Yukawa potential,

    Yoshinobu Akinaga and Seiichiro Ten- No, “Intramolecular charge-transfer excita- tion energies from range-separated hybrid functionals using the Yukawa potential,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 109, 1905–1914 (2009)

    2009

  116. [124]

    Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential,

    Jochen Heyd, Gustavo E. Scuseria, and Matthias Ernzerhof, “Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential,” J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)

    2003

  117. [125]

    A simple algebraic deriva- tion of the Obara-Saika scheme for gen- eral two-electron interaction potentials

    Reinhart Ahlrichs, “A simple algebraic deriva- tion of the Obara-Saika scheme for gen- eral two-electron interaction potentials.” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 3072–7 (2006)

    2006

  118. [126]

    Calculation of coulom- bic lattice potentials: II. Spherical har- monic expansion of the Green function,

    Simon L. Marshall, “Calculation of coulom- bic lattice potentials: II. Spherical har- monic expansion of the Green function,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 3175–3198 (2002)

    2002

  119. [127]

    Kohn–Sham density- functional theory within a finite basis set,

    John A. Pople, Peter M. W. Gill, and Benny G. Johnson, “Kohn–Sham density- functional theory within a finite basis set,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 199, 557–560 (1992)

    1992

  120. [128]

    Kinetic-energy-density depen- dent semilocal exchange-correlation functionals,

    Fabio Della Sala, Eduardo Fabiano, and Lu- cian A. Constantin, “Kinetic-energy-density depen- dent semilocal exchange-correlation functionals,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 116, 1641–1694 (2016)

    2016

  121. [129]

    On the eigenfunctions of many- particle systems in quantum mechanics,

    Tosio Kato, “On the eigenfunctions of many- particle systems in quantum mechanics,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 10, 151–177 (1957)

    1957

  122. [130]

    Charge Densities in Atoms,

    Erich Steiner, “Charge Densities in Atoms,” J. Chem. Phys. 39, 2365–2366 (1963)

    1963

  123. [131]

    Ground- and excited- state cusp conditions for the electron density,

    Á Nagy and K. D. Sen, “Ground- and excited- state cusp conditions for the electron density,” J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6300–6308 (2001)

    2001

  124. [132]

    A Variational Ap- proach to the Unipotential Many-Electron Prob- lem,

    R. Sharp and G. Horton, “A Variational Ap- proach to the Unipotential Many-Electron Prob- lem,” Phys. Rev. 90, 317–317 (1953)

    1953

  125. [133]

    Note1, Eli Kraisler, private communication, 2019

    2019

  126. [134]

    A long- range correction scheme for generalized- gradient-approximation exchange functionals,

    Hisayoshi Iikura, Takao Tsuneda, Takeshi Yanai, and Kimihiko Hirao, “A long- range correction scheme for generalized- gradient-approximation exchange functionals,” J. Chem. Phys. 115, 3540 (2001)

    2001

  127. [135]

    Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation- energy formula into a functional of the electron density,

    Chengteh Lee, Weitao Yang, and Robert G. Parr, “Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation- energy formula into a functional of the electron density,” Phys. Rev. B 37, 785–789 (1988)

    1988

  128. [136]

    ERKALE – A flexible program package for X-ray properties of atoms and molecules,

    Jussi Lehtola, Mikko Hakala, Arto Sakko, and Keijo Hämäläinen, “ERKALE – A flexible program package for X-ray properties of atoms and molecules,” J. Comput. Chem. 33, 1572–1585 (2012)

    2012

  129. [137]

    A new mixing of Hartree– Fock and local density-functional theories,

    Axel D. Becke, “A new mixing of Hartree– Fock and local density-functional theories,” J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1372–1377 (1993)

    1993

  130. [138]

    Hartree–Fock–Roothaan energies and expectation values for the neutral atoms He to Uuo: The B-spline expansion method,

    Shiro L. Saito, “Hartree–Fock–Roothaan energies and expectation values for the neutral atoms He to Uuo: The B-spline expansion method,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 95, 836–870 (2009)

    2009

  131. [139]

    Roothaan– Hartree–Fock atomic wavefunctions,

    Enrico Clementi and Carla Roetti, “Roothaan– Hartree–Fock atomic wavefunctions,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14, 177–478 (1974)

    1974

  132. [140]

    Principles for a direct SCF approach to LCAO-MO ab-initio calculations,

    J. Almlöf, K. Faegri, and K. Korsell, “Principles for a direct SCF approach to LCAO-MO ab-initio calculations,” J. Comput. Chem. 3, 385–399 (1982)

    1982

  133. [141]

    Starting SCF cal- culations by superposition of atomic densities

    J. H. Van Lenthe, R. Zwaans, H. J. J. Van Dam, and M. F. Guest, “Starting SCF cal- culations by superposition of atomic densities.” J. Comput. Chem. 27, 926–32 (2006)

    2006

  134. [142]

    Psi4 1.1: An Open-Source Elec- tronic Structure Program Emphasizing Automa- 20 tion, Advanced Libraries, and Interoperability,

    Robert M. Parrish, Lori A. Burns, Daniel G. A. Smith, Andrew C. Simmonett, A. Eugene De- Prince, Edward G. Hohenstein, Uğur Bozkaya, Alexander Yu. Sokolov, Roberto Di Remigio, Ryan Matthew Richard, Jérôme F Gonthier, Andrew M. James, Harley R. McAlexander, Ashutosh Kumar, Masa...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.