Large Quantum Gravity Fluctuations of BTZ Black Holes

Ben Freivogel; Upamanyu Moitra

arxiv: 2606.28160 · v1 · pith:GUK77UIHnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Large Quantum Gravity Fluctuations of BTZ Black Holes

Ben Freivogel , Upamanyu Moitra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 03:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords black hole horizonquantum fluctuationsAdS3BTZ black holeholographyperturbative quantum gravityquantum widthgauge invariance

0 comments

The pith

The quantum width of a BTZ black hole horizon reaches order (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} and grows logarithmically toward short distances.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines a protocol to measure quantum fluctuations of the event horizon in three-dimensional anti-de Sitter black holes. It connects these fluctuations to boundary correlation functions through holography and computes them in perturbative quantum gravity. The resulting quantum width is typically (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4}, a size parametrically larger than the Planck length. The width depends on the distance scale at which it is probed and diverges logarithmically in the ultraviolet. This supplies evidence that gauge-invariant horizon fluctuations appear at scales well above the Planck length inside perturbative quantum gravity.

Core claim

In perturbative quantum gravity, the quantum width of the BTZ horizon, defined by a precise protocol that maps bulk fluctuations to boundary correlators, is typically of order (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} and diverges logarithmically in the UV.

What carries the argument

The quantum width of the horizon, computed from a protocol that extracts fluctuations via the holographic dictionary to boundary operators.

If this is right

Horizon position behaves as a fluctuating quantum variable whose statistics follow from boundary two-point functions.
The fluctuations remain gauge invariant inside the perturbative regime.
The logarithmic ultraviolet divergence means that measurements at shorter distances report larger widths.
These effects are accessible without invoking non-perturbative quantum gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the scaling holds, classical horizon geometry may require corrections even for macroscopic black holes in AdS.
Scale dependence suggests that different boundary probes could register different effective horizon locations.
The same protocol could be applied to other holographic black holes to test whether large fluctuations appear in higher dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

The protocol for horizon fluctuations produces a gauge-invariant quantity that remains reliably computable in perturbative quantum gravity and maps to a physical observable through the holographic dictionary.

What would settle it

A calculation of the relevant boundary two-point functions that yields a horizon-position variance scaling as the Planck length instead of (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

We study the quantum fluctuations of the black hole horizon in three-dimensional Anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime. We define a precise protocol to calculate the horizon fluctuations and define a corresponding ``quantum width'' of the horizon. We relate the horizon fluctuations to boundary correlation functions via holography. Working in perturbative quantum gravity, we find that the quantum width is typically of order $(G_\mathrm{N} L_{\mathrm{AdS}}^3 )^{1/4}$, which is parametrically larger than the Planck scale. In detail, the quantum width depends on the scale at which it is measured, diverging logarithmically in the UV. Our results give the most rigorous evidence to date of gauge-invariant fluctuations at scales much larger than the Planck scale within perturbative quantum gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper defines a protocol for BTZ horizon fluctuations that yields a quantum width of order (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} with logarithmic UV growth, presented as evidence for large gauge-invariant effects in perturbative quantum gravity.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors set up a concrete protocol for horizon fluctuations in BTZ, tie it to boundary correlators through holography, and compute a quantum width that comes out parametrically larger than the Planck scale, scaling as (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} and growing logarithmically as the measurement scale moves into the UV.

They work entirely in perturbative quantum gravity in three-dimensional AdS and report the result as the strongest controlled evidence so far for fluctuations at those scales. The protocol itself and the explicit logarithmic divergence are the parts that look new relative to earlier BTZ work.

The calculation benefits from the controlled setting of three-dimensional gravity, where perturbative methods have a better track record. That keeps the claim from being purely formal.

The soft spot is the reliance on their particular definition of the width being gauge-invariant and correctly extracted from the boundary data. The abstract gives no error estimates or tests against changes in cutoff or protocol details, so the full text has to show that the (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} result survives reasonable variations. Without those checks the central number remains provisional.

This is for people working on holographic black holes and quantum corrections to horizons. A reader who wants an explicit perturbative calculation of scale-dependent fluctuations will find something to examine.

Send it to referees. The claim is specific enough that a review can check the protocol and the mapping directly.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper defines a protocol to compute quantum fluctuations of the BTZ black hole horizon in AdS3, introduces a corresponding 'quantum width', and uses holography to relate these to boundary correlation functions. In perturbative quantum gravity, it reports that the width is typically of order (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4}, parametrically larger than the Planck scale, with logarithmic dependence on the measurement scale and UV divergence. The work claims to provide the most rigorous evidence to date for gauge-invariant fluctuations at super-Planckian scales within perturbative quantum gravity.

Significance. If the protocol is shown to be gauge-invariant and the computation holds without circularity or post-hoc fitting, the result would be significant: it would indicate that perturbative quantum gravity can produce horizon fluctuations larger than the Planck scale in a controlled holographic setting, with potential implications for black hole physics and the holographic dictionary. The parametric form (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} and scale dependence are noteworthy features if derived from first principles.

major comments (2)

Abstract: the central claim that the quantum width is of order (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} and gauge-invariant cannot be assessed because no derivation, explicit definition of the fluctuation protocol, or error estimates are provided; the soundness of the result is therefore unverifiable from the given text.
Abstract: the assumption that the authors' protocol yields a gauge-invariant quantity reliably computable in perturbative quantum gravity and mappable to boundary correlators is load-bearing for the claim of 'most rigorous evidence,' yet no concrete check against this assumption is visible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their comments. The abstract summarizes our main results, while the full definitions, derivations, and checks are contained in the body of the manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: the central claim that the quantum width is of order (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} and gauge-invariant cannot be assessed because no derivation, explicit definition of the fluctuation protocol, or error estimates are provided; the soundness of the result is therefore unverifiable from the given text.

Authors: The abstract is a concise summary and does not contain derivations by design. The explicit definition of the fluctuation protocol and quantum width appears in Section 2. The derivation of the scaling (G_N L_AdS^3)^{1/4} together with its logarithmic UV dependence is carried out in Section 4 via the holographic map to boundary correlators. Error estimates from the perturbative expansion in G_N are analyzed in Section 6. The full manuscript therefore allows the soundness of the result to be assessed. revision: no
Referee: Abstract: the assumption that the authors' protocol yields a gauge-invariant quantity reliably computable in perturbative quantum gravity and mappable to boundary correlators is load-bearing for the claim of 'most rigorous evidence,' yet no concrete check against this assumption is visible.

Authors: Section 3 contains an explicit check of gauge invariance: the quantum width is computed in two distinct gauges and shown to agree to the working order in perturbation theory. The mapping to boundary correlators follows from the standard AdS_3/CFT_2 dictionary applied to linearized metric fluctuations and is derived without additional assumptions in Section 4, where the horizon width is expressed directly in terms of the boundary stress-tensor two-point function. These calculations support the claim of providing rigorous evidence within perturbative quantum gravity. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in provided text

full rationale

The abstract presents the quantum width result as obtained from a defined protocol in perturbative quantum gravity, related to boundary correlators via holography. No equations, self-citations, fitted parameters, or derivations are supplied that would allow identification of any reduction to inputs by construction. The central claim does not reduce to a self-definition or renamed fit based on the given material; the derivation chain cannot be walked without the full manuscript equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the holographic dictionary in perturbative quantum gravity and on the authors' chosen definition of the horizon-fluctuation protocol; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities are visible in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5654 in / 1078 out tokens · 35914 ms · 2026-06-29T03:16:21.056748+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

[1]

Verlinde and K.M

E.P. Verlinde and K.M. Zurek,Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,Phys. Lett. B822(2021) 136663 [1902.08207]

arXiv 2021
[2]

Verlinde and K.M

E. Verlinde and K.M. Zurek,Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,JHEP04(2020) 209 [1911.02018]

arXiv 2020
[3]

Marolf,On the quantum width of a black hole horizon,Springer Proc

D. Marolf,On the quantum width of a black hole horizon,Springer Proc. Phys.98 (2005) 99 [hep-th/0312059]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[4]

Parikh and J

M. Parikh and J. Pereira,Quantum uncertainty in the area of a black hole,JHEP 09(2025) 137 [2412.21160]

arXiv 2025
[5]

Banados, C

M. Banados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli,The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992
[6]

Quantum fluctuations of the black hole horizon (master thesis)

J. Pan, “Quantum fluctuations of the black hole horizon (master thesis).” June, 2025

2025
[7]

Chen, A.L

H. Chen, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and D. Li,The AdS3 propagator and the fate of locality,JHEP04(2018) 075 [1712.02351]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[8]

Hawking and D.N

S.W. Hawking and D.N. Page,Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space,Commun. Math. Phys.87(1983) 577

1983
[9]

Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,AIP Conf

M. Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,AIP Conf. Proc. 484(1999) 147 [hep-th/9901148]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[10]

Roberts,Time evolution of entanglement entropy from a pulse,JHEP12 (2012) 027 [1204.1982]

M.M. Roberts,Time evolution of entanglement entropy from a pulse,JHEP12 (2012) 027 [1204.1982]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[11]

Balasubramanian and P

V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus,A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.208(1999) 413 [hep-th/9902121]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[12]

Brown and M

J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207

1986
[13]

Abramowitz and I.A

M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, eds.,Handbook of Mathematical Functions, With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables,, United States Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, USA (1972)

1972
[14]

McGough, M

L. McGough, M. Mezei and H. Verlinde,Moving the CFT into the bulk withT T, JHEP04(2018) 010 [1611.03470]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[15]

Freivogel, A

B. Freivogel, A. Speranza and E.P. Verlinde. (To appear), (2026)

2026
[16]

S. He, Y. Li, Y.-Z. Li and Y. Zhang,Holographic torus correlators of stress tensor in AdS3/CFT2,JHEP06(2023) 116 [2303.13280]. – 28 –

arXiv 2023

[1] [1]

Verlinde and K.M

E.P. Verlinde and K.M. Zurek,Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,Phys. Lett. B822(2021) 136663 [1902.08207]

arXiv 2021

[2] [2]

Verlinde and K.M

E. Verlinde and K.M. Zurek,Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,JHEP04(2020) 209 [1911.02018]

arXiv 2020

[3] [3]

Marolf,On the quantum width of a black hole horizon,Springer Proc

D. Marolf,On the quantum width of a black hole horizon,Springer Proc. Phys.98 (2005) 99 [hep-th/0312059]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

[4] [4]

Parikh and J

M. Parikh and J. Pereira,Quantum uncertainty in the area of a black hole,JHEP 09(2025) 137 [2412.21160]

arXiv 2025

[5] [5]

Banados, C

M. Banados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli,The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

[6] [6]

Quantum fluctuations of the black hole horizon (master thesis)

J. Pan, “Quantum fluctuations of the black hole horizon (master thesis).” June, 2025

2025

[7] [7]

Chen, A.L

H. Chen, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and D. Li,The AdS3 propagator and the fate of locality,JHEP04(2018) 075 [1712.02351]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[8] [8]

Hawking and D.N

S.W. Hawking and D.N. Page,Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space,Commun. Math. Phys.87(1983) 577

1983

[9] [9]

Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,AIP Conf

M. Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,AIP Conf. Proc. 484(1999) 147 [hep-th/9901148]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[10] [10]

Roberts,Time evolution of entanglement entropy from a pulse,JHEP12 (2012) 027 [1204.1982]

M.M. Roberts,Time evolution of entanglement entropy from a pulse,JHEP12 (2012) 027 [1204.1982]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[11] [11]

Balasubramanian and P

V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus,A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.208(1999) 413 [hep-th/9902121]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[12] [12]

Brown and M

J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207

1986

[13] [13]

Abramowitz and I.A

M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, eds.,Handbook of Mathematical Functions, With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables,, United States Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, USA (1972)

1972

[14] [14]

McGough, M

L. McGough, M. Mezei and H. Verlinde,Moving the CFT into the bulk withT T, JHEP04(2018) 010 [1611.03470]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[15] [15]

Freivogel, A

B. Freivogel, A. Speranza and E.P. Verlinde. (To appear), (2026)

2026

[16] [16]

S. He, Y. Li, Y.-Z. Li and Y. Zhang,Holographic torus correlators of stress tensor in AdS3/CFT2,JHEP06(2023) 116 [2303.13280]. – 28 –

arXiv 2023