Spin-photon Qubits for Scalable Quantum Network

Kuldeep Singh; Md Sakibul Islam; Nitesh Singh; Wayesh Qarony; Yunhe Zhao

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 10 references

This review assembles the case that silicon defect centers—G, T, Ci, C, plus erbium dopants—can serve as the unifying platform for scalable quantum networks, because they emit single photons in the low-loss telecom band and can be monolithi

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 18:09 UTC pith:GUULRKWW

load-bearing objection A useful but overselling silicon-centric survey; the 'transform-limited Ci linewidth' claim is internally contradicted and the silicon-backbone conclusion leans on unreplicated preprints. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.06285 v1 pith:GUULRKWW submitted 2025-12-06 quant-ph physics.optics

Spin-photon Qubits for Scalable Quantum Network

Md Sakibul Islam , Kuldeep Singh , Yunhe Zhao , Nitesh Singh , Wayesh Qarony This is my paper

classification quant-ph physics.optics

keywords spin-photon qubitssilicon color centersT centerG centertelecom-band quantum emittersquantum networksCMOS-compatible quantum photonicscavity quantum electrodynamics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review assembles the case that silicon defect centers—G, T, Ci, C, plus erbium dopants—can serve as the unifying platform for scalable quantum networks, because they emit single photons in the low-loss telecom band and can be monolithically integrated with CMOS silicon photonics. The paper argues that recently demonstrated spin-photon interfaces in silicon, such as a three-qubit register at a T center, coherent spin control of a single G center, transform-limited Ci-center linewidths, and ODMR from C centers, bring this vision within reach. If the assessment holds, quantum repeaters, distributed quantum computing, and chip-scale quantum photonic integrated circuits could be built in the same material infrastructure as modern microelectronics.

Core claim

The central claim is that silicon, long viewed as an indirect-gap material unsuitable for quantum light sources, now hosts a family of telecom-band spin-photonic qubits that collectively satisfy the criteria for scalable networking: coherent spin control, deterministic single-photon emission, and integration with nanophotonic cavities. The review singles out the T center as the most advanced optically addressable spin-photon interface in silicon, with electron and nuclear spin coherence times up to about 0.41 ms, 112 ms, and 67 ms, and an on-chip three-qubit register with a two-qubit gate fidelity near 77%. It also highlights single-G-center ODMR and coherent spin control, narrow Ci-center l

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the silicon color center family (G, T, Ci, C) used as spin-photon interfaces: each defect binds an exciton whose telecom-band zero-phonon line is entangled with an addressable spin, and isotopically purified 28Si suppresses magnetic and spectral noise. The supporting mechanism is Purcell-enhanced cavity quantum electrodynamics, where high-Q/V nanophotonic cavities funnel emission into the zero-phonon line, shorten radiative lifetimes, and boost photon indistinguishability. Together they enable the paper's classification of platforms by spin-photon interface availability, CMOS compatibility, and emitter scalability.

Load-bearing premise

The favorable verdict on silicon rests on a handful of recent, not-yet-independently-replicated experiments—the T-center three-qubit register, single-G-center ODMR, and Ci write/erase—and the whole case collapses if those results do not reproduce.

What would settle it

Independent replication that fails to reproduce single-G-center ODMR at the reported contrast, or a measurement showing T-center two-qubit Bell-state fidelity dropping well below 77% under varied fabrication conditions, would undermine the central claim. A simpler check: measure the fraction of deterministically written Ci centers that emit transform-limited single photons on a standard silicon-on-insulator wafer; if yields fall far below the reported ~50%, the programmable-placement advantage evaporates.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

Telecom-band silicon emitters eliminate the need for quantum frequency conversion that visible and near-infrared platforms require.
T centers can serve as on-chip multi-qubit quantum memories with millisecond-to-second nuclear spin coherence, directly interfaced with telecom photons.
Programmable femtosecond-laser write/erase of Ci centers could allow deterministic emitter placement in prefabricated photonic circuits.
Monolithic all-silicon quantum photonic integrated circuits could co-integrate spin-photon sources, waveguides, modulators, and single-photon detectors on one chip.
Metropolitan-to-global quantum network demonstrations could shift from diamond or silicon-carbide visible-wavelength nodes to silicon devices without frequency conversion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If silicon becomes the interconnect hub, hybrid architectures are likely: diamond or silicon-carbide nodes retaining the longest coherence times, with silicon providing the telecom-frequency photonic glue among them.
The paper's case would be strengthened or broken by a systematic wafer-scale yield study of deterministically placed emitters, which it does not provide.
The G center's spin may be tied to center-of-mass hopping; pinning defects with strain could be a testable path to longer spin coherence.
T-center gate fidelity near 77% is far below fault-tolerant thresholds, but the paper implies error-corrected operation could be added via the surrounding nuclear spin register—an extrapolation the paper does not itself make.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

A useful but overselling silicon-centric survey; the 'transform-limited Ci linewidth' claim is internally contradicted and the silicon-backbone conclusion leans on unreplicated preprints.

read the letter

Short version: this is a broad, readable survey of solid-state spin-photon qubits with a strong silicon-centric angle. The survey itself is useful and mostly current, but the conclusion oversells silicon: at least one cited 'breakthrough' is contradicted by the paper's own numbers, and the strongest supporting results are very recent preprints that the authors don't flag as such.

What's actually good: the classification of silicon color centers by spin-photon interface availability, CMOS compatibility, and scalability is a sensible organizing scheme. The coverage of diamond NV/SiV/SnV, QDs, SiC, and 2D materials is even-handed, and the reference list reaches into 2024–2025. For someone wanting a compact map of where telecom-band spin-photon interfaces stand, this is a reasonable starting point.

The soft spot is the silicon milestone list. Section 4.3 reports single Ci-center ZPL linewidths as narrow as ~4.2 GHz, limited by spectrometer resolution. Two sentences later it says lifetimes of 3–8 ns correspond to transform-limited linewidths in the tens of MHz. Those are mutually exclusive. The measured line is not transform-limited, and Section 5's claim of 'transform-limited linewidths in Ci centers' is an overclaim. This isn't a minor typo; it's one of the three named milestones supporting the conclusion.

The other two milestones are also on thin ice: the T-center three-qubit register is a 2025 preprint with ~77% two-qubit gate fidelity, below typical fault-tolerance thresholds, and the single G-center ODMR is another 2025 preprint. The review doesn't disclose preprint status or the fidelity caveat. That doesn't make the survey useless, but it means the 'silicon as backbone' conclusion is running ahead of independently verified results.

Verdict: worth a serious referee, not a desk reject. The review fills a gap and the organizing framework is useful. But the authors need to fix the Ci contradiction, soften the transform-limited claim, and be transparent about which cited results are preprints. If that's done, the paper would be a serviceable entry point for the field.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of solid-state spin-photonic qubits for quantum networks, focusing on silicon-based emitters. It surveys diamond color centers, III-V quantum dots, silicon carbide defects, 2D materials, and silicon G, T, Ci, C centers and erbium dopants, with an assessment framework based on emission wavelength, spin coherence, spin-photon interface availability, CMOS compatibility, and nanophotonic integration. The central thesis is that silicon, with telecom-band emission and mature CMOS processing, is the natural hub for large-scale integration and will form the backbone of future global quantum networks. Specific recent milestones cited in support include a three-qubit T-center register, single G-center ODMR and coherent control, transform-limited Ci-center linewidths, and ensemble ODMR for C centers.

Significance. The review is a timely and useful synthesis of a rapidly developing field. It collects a large body of recent literature and its comparative lens—telecom-band operation, spin-photon interface, CMOS compatibility, and scalability—is appropriate. The emphasis on silicon color centers is valuable, and the paper correctly identifies intrinsic telecom-band emission without frequency conversion as a key advantage. If the cited milestones hold, the review provides a credible roadmap for silicon-based quantum networks. However, the strongest claims rest on a few very recent, not-yet-independently-replicated preprints (refs 93 and 277), and one stated milestone—transform-limited Ci linewidths—is internally inconsistent with the data reported in §4.3. These issues do not destroy the survey's value but require the central claim to be moderated and the evidence base to be described more cautiously.

major comments (2)

[§4.3 and §5] Section 4.3 reports individual Ci-center ZPL linewidths 'as narrow as 0.03 nm (~4.2 GHz), limited by spectrometer resolution' and then states that time-resolved PL lifetimes of 3–8 ns 'correspond to transform-limited linewidths in the tens of MHz.' The Fourier-transform-limited width for a 3–8 ns lifetime is roughly 20–50 MHz, two orders of magnitude below the measured 4.2 GHz. The measured value is therefore not transform-limited, and Section 5's list of recent breakthroughs—'transform-limited linewidths in Ci centers'—is an overclaim. Please revise to distinguish the spectrometer-limited measurement from the lifetime-derived natural-linewidth estimate, and remove 'transform-limited linewidths' from the demonstrated milestones unless direct sub-GHz linewidth data are available.
[§4.2, §4.1, §5 (refs 93, 277)] The two key non-diamond silicon milestones—the T-center three-qubit register and single G-center ODMR/coherent spin control—are attributed to refs 93 and 277, both 2025 preprints without independent replication. The manuscript does not flag their preprint status. In addition, the T-center nuclear–nuclear entangling gate is reported at ~77% fidelity (ref 93), below typical fault-tolerance thresholds; the text instead calls T centers 'current state of the art' and 'ready for integration into scalable, fiber-connected quantum computing.' Section 5 leans heavily on these results for the conclusion that silicon forms the 'backbone of future global quantum networks.' Please identify these as preprints and state the fidelity limitation, or temper the conclusion to reflect that these are initial demonstrations.

minor comments (6)

[§4.3] Typo: 'lifetimesnof' should be 'lifetimes of'.
[§3.2] Typo: 'single phone' should be 'single photon'.
[Figure 2 caption] The caption describes the C center as 'interstitial carbon + substitutional oxygen,' but §4.4 correctly states it is an interstitial carbon paired with an interstitial oxygen. Please correct the caption to match the text and the literature.
[Abstract / §3] The abstract and introduction state that systems are classified by spin-photon interface availability, CMOS compatibility, and emitter scalability, but no explicit classification table or scoring matrix is provided in the text. A summary table would make the comparisons concrete and easier for readers to evaluate.
[References] Several key references (e.g., refs 57, 93, 277, 292) are preprints or have incomplete bibliographic data; please add arXiv identifiers or DOI and clearly mark preprint status, especially for the milestone claims.
[§3.1 / Figure 6] The text describing the 1.3 km NV experiment seems to conflate the loophole-free Bell test (Hensen et al., ref 161) with the multinode network demonstration (Pompili et al., ref 117). Please verify that the description and Figure 6(a) caption correspond to the correct experiment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the paper is a literature review whose conclusions rest on externally cited experimental results, not on fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or imported uniqueness theorems.

full rationale

This is a review/survey paper, not a derivation chain. The central claim—that silicon-based spin-photonic qubits are positioned to become a scalable quantum-network platform—is supported by cited experimental milestones (e.g., T-center three-qubit register [93], single G-center ODMR [277], Ci-center write/erase [293]). None of these milestones is derived within the paper from an input that already contains the conclusion. The paper does not fit parameters to data and then rename the fit as a prediction; it reports literature values and capabilities. The closest internal tension is in §4.3, where individual Ci centers are reported with ZPL linewidths 'as narrow as 0.03 nm (~4.2 GHz), limited by spectrometer resolution,' while a 3–8 ns lifetime is said to correspond to 'transform-limited linewidths in the tens of MHz.' This is an inconsistency or overclaim about whether transform-limited behavior has actually been observed, but it is not circularity: the measured linewidth is not used to construct the transform-limited claim. The paper also explicitly flags missing support for some claims, e.g., for Ci centers 'single spin readout remains unexplored' and 'no T2 measurements exist,' and for C centers that they have 'not yet been demonstrated at the single-defect level.' The self-citations present (refs 73, 266, 268, 278, 293) are prior experimental publications with independent, externally accessible data; they do not smuggle in an ansatz or invoke a self-authored uniqueness theorem. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review, the paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. The 'axioms' are the background assumptions that the cited experiments are correct and that the chosen evaluation criteria are the right ones.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The cited experimental results (e.g., refs 93, 277, 293) are accurately described.
The review's conclusions depend entirely on the fidelity of its literature survey; no independent verification is provided.
ad hoc to paper Telecom-band emission, CMOS compatibility, and spin-photon interface availability are the determining criteria for scalable quantum network emitters.
These criteria are selected by the authors in the abstract and Section 3 to structure the review; they are reasonable but not derived from first principles.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 55807 in / 9023 out tokens · 83208 ms · 2026-08-03T18:09:45.209916+00:00 · methodology

0 comments

read the original abstract

Solid-state quantum light sources offer a scalable pathway for interfacing stationary spin qubits with flying photonic qubits, forming the backbone of future quantum networks. Telecom-band spin-photonic qubits, operating in the 1260-1675 nm wavelength range, are particularly well-suited for long-distance quantum communication due to minimal loss in standard optical fibers. Achieving scalability, however, hinges on fulfilling several stringent criteria: coherent spin-state control, deterministic and indistinguishable single-photon emission, and integration with nanophotonic structures that enhance radiative properties, such as lifetime, coherence, and photon indistinguishability. This study explores the state-of-the-art spin-photonic qubits across solid-state platforms, including diamond color centers, silicon carbide defect centers, quantum dots, and two-dimensional materials. Special attention is given to silicon-based emitters, particularly G, T, C- and Ci-centers, which promise monolithic integration with complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology and telecom-band operation. We classify these systems based on spin-photon interface availability, CMOS process compatibility, and emitter scalability. We also discuss recent advances in cavity quantum electrodynamics (cQED), including Purcell enhancement and quality factor engineering in integrated photonic (circuits) environments. The work highlights emerging demonstrations of quantum networking over metropolitan scales and outlines the trajectory toward chip-scale quantum photonic integrated circuits (QPICs). It combines deterministic emitter creation, coherent spin manipulation, and quantum information processing. These developments pave the way for global quantum networks, enabling secure communication, distributed quantum computing, and quantum-enhanced sensing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.06285 by Kuldeep Singh, Md Sakibul Islam, Nitesh Singh, Wayesh Qarony, Yunhe Zhao.

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: On-chip spin-photon interfaces across solid-state quantum emitters. Single-photon emission from solid-state quantum emitters, including diamond color centers, quantum dots, silicon carbide (SiC) defects, and two-dimensional (2D) materials, has been demonstrated in integrated photonic platforms. On-chip spin-photon interfaces enable efficient coupling between long-lived spin qubits (quantum memories) and ph… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Quantum network demonstrations in metropolitan areas. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Evolution of Color Centers in Si. (a) First isolation and optical characterization of a singlecolor center in silicon. The photoluminescence (PL) spectrum from a carbon-implanted SOI wafer shows a sharp zero-phonon line (ZPL) at ~1278 nm corresponding to the G center ensemble. Inset: atomic structure of the G center, composed of two adjacent substitutional carbon atoms (black) bound to a silicon self-inte… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Optically and electrically triggered spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Vision for a Monolithic Silicon Quantum Photonic Integrated Circuit. Schematic representation of an all-silicon quantum photonic integrated circuit (QPIC) that integrates optically addressable or electrically injected spin–photon qubits with CMOS-compatible silicon photonics. Key photonic components, including Mach–Zehnder interferometers, phase shifters, directional couplers, and multi-mode interferometer… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

10 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[155]

(217) Khazen, K.; von Bardeleben, H

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01609-2. (217) Khazen, K.; von Bardeleben, H. J. NV -Centers in SiC: A Solution for Quantum Computing Technology? Front. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2023, Volume 2 -. https://doi.org/10.3389/frqst.2023.1115039. (218) Wang, J.-F.; Yan, F.-F.; Li, Q.; Liu, Z. -H.; Liu, H.; Guo, G. -P.; Guo, L.-P.; Zhou, X.; Cui, J. -M.; Wang, J....

arXiv 2023
[184]

(188) Barbiero, A.; Shooter, G.; Skiba-Szymanska, J.; Huang, J.; Ravi, L.; Davies, J

https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000178. (188) Barbiero, A.; Shooter, G.; Skiba-Szymanska, J.; Huang, J.; Ravi, L.; Davies, J. I.; Ramsay, B.; Ellis, D. J. P.; Shields, A. J.; Müller, T.; Stevenson, R. M. Purcell Enhanced and Tunable Single -Photon Emission at Telecom Wavelengths from InAs Quantum Dots in Circular Photonic Crystal Resonators. 2025. (189) ...

doi:10.1364/optica.4.000178 2025
[188]

(48) Da Lio, B.; Faurby, C.; Zhou, X.; Chan, M

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10319. (48) Da Lio, B.; Faurby, C.; Zhou, X.; Chan, M. L.; Uppu, R.; Thyrrestrup, H.; Scholz, S.; Wieck, A. D.; Ludwig, A.; Lodahl, P.; Midolo, L. A Pure and Indistinguishable Single -Photon Source at Telecommunication Wavelength. Adv. Quantum Technol. 2022, 5 (5), 2200006. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.2022000...

doi:10.1038/nature10319 2022
[247]

(46) Barnes, K.; Battaglino, P.; Bloom, B

https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.336. (46) Barnes, K.; Battaglino, P.; Bloom, B. J.; Cassella, K.; Coxe, R.; Crisosto, N.; King, J. P.; Kondov, S. S.; Kotru, K.; Larsen, S. C.; Lauigan, J.; Lester, B. J.; McDonald, M.; Megidish, E.; 38 Narayanaswami, S.; Nishiguchi, C.; Notermans, R.; Peng, L. S.; Ryou, A.; Wu, T.-Y.; Yarwood, M. Assembly and Coherent C...

work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.336 2014
[535]

(131) Bhaskar, M

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253512. (131) Bhaskar, M. K.; Riedinger, R.; Machielse, B.; Levonian, D. S.; Nguyen, C. T.; Knall, E. N.; Park, H.; Englund, D.; Lončar, M.; Sukachev, D. D.; Lukin, M. D. Experimental Demonstration of Memory-Enhanced Quantum Communication. Nature 2020, 580 (7801), 60 –64. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41586-020-2103-5;TECHMETA....

doi:10.1126/science.1253512 2020
[2025]

(150) Manson, N

https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-025-00398-2. (150) Manson, N. B.; Beha, K.; Batalov, A.; Rogers, L. J.; Doherty, M. W.; Bratschitsch, R.; Leitenstorfer, A. Assignment of the NV${}^{0}$ 575 -Nm Zero -Phonon Line in Diamond to a ${}^{2}E$ - ${}^{2}{A}_{2}$ Transition. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87 (15), 155209. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.155209. (151) Chakr...

doi:10.1038/s44172-025-00398-2 2013
[2410]

(167) Berdnikov, Y.; Holewa, P.; Kadkhodazadeh, S.; Śmigiel, J

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05132. (167) Berdnikov, Y.; Holewa, P.; Kadkhodazadeh, S.; Śmigiel, J. M.; Sakanas, A.; Frackowiak, A.; Yvind, K.; Syperek, M.; Semenova, E. Near -Critical Stranski -Krastanov Growth of InAs/InP Quantum Dots. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14 (1), 23697. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70451-1. (168) Dusanowski, Ł.; Nawrath, C.;...

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05132 2024
[2779]

(47) Timoney, N.; Baumgart, I.; Johanning, M.; Varón, A

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29977-z. (47) Timoney, N.; Baumgart, I.; Johanning, M.; Varón, A. F.; Plenio, M. B.; Retzker, A.; Wunderlich, C. Quantum Gates and Memory Using Microwave -Dressed States. Nature 2011, 476 (7359), 185–

doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29977-z 2011
[4065]

(68) Al-Hmoud, M.; Bougouffa, S

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704219114. (68) Al-Hmoud, M.; Bougouffa, S. Simultaneous High Q/V -Ratio and Optimized Far -Field Emission Pattern in Diamond Slot -Bridge Nanobeam Cavity. Results Phys. 2021, 26, 104314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104314. (69) Wan, N. H.; Mouradian, S.; Englund, D. Two -Dimensional Photonic Crystal S...

arXiv 2021
[5564]

(164) He, Y.-M.; He, Y.; Wei, Y.-J.; Wu, D.; Atatüre, M.; Schneider, C.; Höfling, S.; Kamp, M.; Lu, C

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60403-2. (164) He, Y.-M.; He, Y.; Wei, Y.-J.; Wu, D.; Atatüre, M.; Schneider, C.; Höfling, S.; Kamp, M.; Lu, C. - Y.; Pan, J. -W. On -Demand Semiconductor Single -Photon Source with near -Unity Indistinguishability. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8 (3), 213 –217. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.262. (165) Mäntynen, H.; Anttu...

doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60403-2 2013

[1] [155]

(217) Khazen, K.; von Bardeleben, H

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01609-2. (217) Khazen, K.; von Bardeleben, H. J. NV -Centers in SiC: A Solution for Quantum Computing Technology? Front. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2023, Volume 2 -. https://doi.org/10.3389/frqst.2023.1115039. (218) Wang, J.-F.; Yan, F.-F.; Li, Q.; Liu, Z. -H.; Liu, H.; Guo, G. -P.; Guo, L.-P.; Zhou, X.; Cui, J. -M.; Wang, J....

arXiv 2023

[2] [184]

(188) Barbiero, A.; Shooter, G.; Skiba-Szymanska, J.; Huang, J.; Ravi, L.; Davies, J

https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000178. (188) Barbiero, A.; Shooter, G.; Skiba-Szymanska, J.; Huang, J.; Ravi, L.; Davies, J. I.; Ramsay, B.; Ellis, D. J. P.; Shields, A. J.; Müller, T.; Stevenson, R. M. Purcell Enhanced and Tunable Single -Photon Emission at Telecom Wavelengths from InAs Quantum Dots in Circular Photonic Crystal Resonators. 2025. (189) ...

doi:10.1364/optica.4.000178 2025

[3] [188]

(48) Da Lio, B.; Faurby, C.; Zhou, X.; Chan, M

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10319. (48) Da Lio, B.; Faurby, C.; Zhou, X.; Chan, M. L.; Uppu, R.; Thyrrestrup, H.; Scholz, S.; Wieck, A. D.; Ludwig, A.; Lodahl, P.; Midolo, L. A Pure and Indistinguishable Single -Photon Source at Telecommunication Wavelength. Adv. Quantum Technol. 2022, 5 (5), 2200006. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.2022000...

doi:10.1038/nature10319 2022

[4] [247]

(46) Barnes, K.; Battaglino, P.; Bloom, B

https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.336. (46) Barnes, K.; Battaglino, P.; Bloom, B. J.; Cassella, K.; Coxe, R.; Crisosto, N.; King, J. P.; Kondov, S. S.; Kotru, K.; Larsen, S. C.; Lauigan, J.; Lester, B. J.; McDonald, M.; Megidish, E.; 38 Narayanaswami, S.; Nishiguchi, C.; Notermans, R.; Peng, L. S.; Ryou, A.; Wu, T.-Y.; Yarwood, M. Assembly and Coherent C...

work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.336 2014

[5] [535]

(131) Bhaskar, M

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253512. (131) Bhaskar, M. K.; Riedinger, R.; Machielse, B.; Levonian, D. S.; Nguyen, C. T.; Knall, E. N.; Park, H.; Englund, D.; Lončar, M.; Sukachev, D. D.; Lukin, M. D. Experimental Demonstration of Memory-Enhanced Quantum Communication. Nature 2020, 580 (7801), 60 –64. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41586-020-2103-5;TECHMETA....

doi:10.1126/science.1253512 2020

[6] [2025]

(150) Manson, N

https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-025-00398-2. (150) Manson, N. B.; Beha, K.; Batalov, A.; Rogers, L. J.; Doherty, M. W.; Bratschitsch, R.; Leitenstorfer, A. Assignment of the NV${}^{0}$ 575 -Nm Zero -Phonon Line in Diamond to a ${}^{2}E$ - ${}^{2}{A}_{2}$ Transition. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87 (15), 155209. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.155209. (151) Chakr...

doi:10.1038/s44172-025-00398-2 2013

[7] [2410]

(167) Berdnikov, Y.; Holewa, P.; Kadkhodazadeh, S.; Śmigiel, J

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05132. (167) Berdnikov, Y.; Holewa, P.; Kadkhodazadeh, S.; Śmigiel, J. M.; Sakanas, A.; Frackowiak, A.; Yvind, K.; Syperek, M.; Semenova, E. Near -Critical Stranski -Krastanov Growth of InAs/InP Quantum Dots. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14 (1), 23697. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70451-1. (168) Dusanowski, Ł.; Nawrath, C.;...

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05132 2024

[8] [2779]

(47) Timoney, N.; Baumgart, I.; Johanning, M.; Varón, A

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29977-z. (47) Timoney, N.; Baumgart, I.; Johanning, M.; Varón, A. F.; Plenio, M. B.; Retzker, A.; Wunderlich, C. Quantum Gates and Memory Using Microwave -Dressed States. Nature 2011, 476 (7359), 185–

doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29977-z 2011

[9] [4065]

(68) Al-Hmoud, M.; Bougouffa, S

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704219114. (68) Al-Hmoud, M.; Bougouffa, S. Simultaneous High Q/V -Ratio and Optimized Far -Field Emission Pattern in Diamond Slot -Bridge Nanobeam Cavity. Results Phys. 2021, 26, 104314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104314. (69) Wan, N. H.; Mouradian, S.; Englund, D. Two -Dimensional Photonic Crystal S...

arXiv 2021

[10] [5564]

(164) He, Y.-M.; He, Y.; Wei, Y.-J.; Wu, D.; Atatüre, M.; Schneider, C.; Höfling, S.; Kamp, M.; Lu, C

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60403-2. (164) He, Y.-M.; He, Y.; Wei, Y.-J.; Wu, D.; Atatüre, M.; Schneider, C.; Höfling, S.; Kamp, M.; Lu, C. - Y.; Pan, J. -W. On -Demand Semiconductor Single -Photon Source with near -Unity Indistinguishability. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8 (3), 213 –217. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.262. (165) Mäntynen, H.; Anttu...

doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60403-2 2013