REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 98 references
JT gravity on the worldline
T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Coupling a quantum observer to JT gravity replaces unitary evolution by an exact average over Euclidean times, with fluctuations a finely spaced observer can resolve.
desk verdict The exact measure over Euclidean times is new and solid; the variance that drives the quantitative 'observer feels quantum gravity' claim is not verifiable because the Hessian is never displayed. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the exact measure μ(β_obs,u1,m) in Eq. (3.12), whose construction is the paper's main technical result. It is built by gauge-fixing the worldline einbein to the proper-time modulus β_obs, integrating the massive particle worldline to a heat kernel on AdS (with proper-length variable y), and expressing the two boundary segments via Wheeler-de Witt wavefunctions φ_u(ℓ) = (2/π²ℓ) ∫ ds s sinh(2πs) e^{-s²u/2} K_{2is}(4/ℓ) in the chordal-distance ℓ basis. Saddle-point evaluation of the resulting five-dimensional integral fixes ℓ*, θ₁*, θ₂* and identifies β_obs* = y* = d(ℓ*), the geodesic length; the quadratic Hessian A_ij then yields the variance formula (3.46), separati
What would settle it
Compute the full 5×5 Hessian matrix A_ij at the saddle point (including the β_obs–y and y–θ cross-terms) and evaluate the marginal variance exactly; if formula (3.46) is violated or the cross-terms contribute at the same order in m and β, the predicted fluctuation sizes and the detectability windows of §3.3–3.4 change. Alternatively, evaluate the exact measure (3.8) numerically at large m and check whether the variance matches (3.47)–(3.48).
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central discovery is the exact formula (3.12): U_QG = ∫ dβ_obs μ(β_obs,u1,m) e^{-β_obs H}, where the measure μ is obtained by integrating out the fluctuating JT boundary, the massive worldline, and the einbein modulus. The measure is assembled from the AdS heat kernel for the worldline and from Wheeler-de Witt wavefunctions of JT gravity in the chordal-distance basis, and is therefore an ordinary one-dimensional integral. At large mass or small β the integral is dominated by a saddle point at which β_obs equals the geodesic distance between the anchor points; the variance around this saddle separates into a Brownian term ~ β*/m and a quantum-gravity term that scales as β/φ_r (weak backre
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that in the five-dimensional saddle-point integral the fluctuations of the worldline proper-length y decouple from the fluctuations of β_obs, so that the marginal variance is correctly given by formula (3.46) for the quotient of Hessian blocks; the full Hessian is not displayed.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- An observer's quantum evolution in dynamical gravity is generically a probabilistic mixture of evolutions at different Euclidean times, not a single unitary flow; unitarity is recovered only when the measure localizes.
- A quantum system with sufficiently small level spacing ω (satisfying ω log(1/ε) ≪ 1) can detect the gravitational fluctuations of its own proper time, even when relative fluctuations δβ_obs/β*_obs are small.
- The quantum-gravity variance of the observer's temperature, δβ²_QG ~ β/φ_r on the disk, is larger than the effective Planck length squared of JT gravity, echoing horizon-width results.
- On the double trumpet, where no smooth classical saddle controls the path integral, the observer's inverse temperature fluctuates strongly: relative variance grows logarithmically in the weak-backreaction limit and is order one in the strong-backreaction limit.
- Late-time Lorentzian overlaps decay as t^{-3} with a universal power, replacing the exponential decay of semiclassical two-point functions.
Reading between the lines
- The exact measure μ(β_obs) could be used as a prior for the observer's clock in background-independent constructions: a careful treatment of the observer's quantum state would need to propagate through the time-average rather than a single τ, which may sharpen or modify clock-based dressings of bulk observables.
- The same worldline-plus-heat-kernel machinery should extend to the double-cone and higher-genus topologies; if the β_obs measure remains non-sharply peaked there, the ensemble interpretation of JT observables would acquire a direct operational meaning for a bulk observer.
- Because the disk measure is peaked at the geodetic length for any boundary-anchored open worldline, the result suggests a general 'geodesic dressing' principle: any local probe in a nearly-AdS₂ throat experiences proper time as a fluctuating variable whose mean is set by the classical geodesic, and whose variance is set by the combination of worldline mass and renormalized dilaton.
- A testable extension: couple the observer to a clock degree of freedom with a tunable frequency ω and measure transition rates between neighboring energy levels; the ratios predicted in Eqs. (3.58)–(3.59) should be observable in a quantum simulator of the dual theory, providing a concrete signature of the time-averaging.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies a one-dimensional quantum-mechanical observer living on a bulk worldline coupled to Euclidean Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity. On the disk topology the authors derive an exact expression, Eq. (3.8)/(3.12), in which the gravitational dressing turns the ordinary evolution operator into an integral over the worldline proper time β_obs with a measure built from Wheeler-de Witt wavefunctions. In the semiclassical limit the measure is peaked around the geodesic length between the two boundary anchor points, and the paper computes the variance of β_obs, separating a Brownian worldline contribution from a genuine quantum-gravity contribution, and argues that a finely spaced observer can resolve the latter. The paper also gives a Lorentzian continuation, discusses worldline correlation functions and holographic renormalization, and computes the double-trumpet contribution, finding that the effective inverse temperature is not sharply peaked.
Significance. If the central results hold, the paper provides a rare controlled example of a bulk observer coupled to quantum gravity, with an exact integral representation of the dressed propagator and a concrete quantitative criterion for when the observer can perceive gravitational fluctuations. The exact formula (3.12), the use of known WdW wavefunctions, the holographic renormalization discussion, and the analytic double-trumpet calculation are genuine strengths. The main weakness is that the fluctuation analysis—the part that supports the 'observer can feel quantum gravity' conclusion—rests on a variance formula whose derivation is not shown and whose displayed form is not the standard Gaussian marginalization. The central exact formula may well be correct, but the quantitative detectability claims are not verifiable as written.
major comments (2)
- [§3.4] This equation is the load-bearing ingredient for the variance results (3.47)–(3.48) and for the detectability analysis of §3.3.4. However, the Hessian A_ij is not displayed ('the full expressions are cumbersome, so we will not write them here'), and Eq. (3.46) is not the standard Schur-complement formula for marginal variance. For a real quadratic action with Hessian A, the variance of β_obs after integrating out the other variables is (A^{-1})_{ββ}^{-1} = A_{ββ} - A_{β,rest} A_{rest,rest}^{-1} A_{rest,β}. In particular, if β decouples from ℓ and θ, the variance should be exactly 1/A_{ββ}. Eq. (3.46) contains a standalone +2|A_{ℓθ1}|^2/|A_{θ1θ1}| term that would shrink the variance even in that decoupled case. The appeal to 'steepest descent direction' and absolute values suggests a complex-contour Gaussian, but no derivation is provided. Since the claimed sizes of the quantum-gravity fl
- [§3.4] The nonperturbative section asserts, based on 'plotting' the exact measure, that away from the semiclassical limit the quantum-gravity part of the variance is not parametrically suppressed and can grow larger. The text first says 'we will not report the plots here' and then includes figures 4 and 5, but no numerical method, data, or error estimate is given for Var_full and Var_QFT. The definition of Var_QFT is verbal only—'fixing the gravitational variables θ1, θ2, ℓ to their saddle point values'—and no integral formula or quadrature scheme is supplied. These plots are therefore not reproducible, and the nonperturbative conclusions drawn from them are not independently checkable. Please provide either the exact quadrature expressions, the numerical data, or an analytic scaling argument.
minor comments (4)
- [§3.3.4] The detectability estimates (3.58)–(3.59) are introduced with 'up to numerical factors'. Since the criterion is a comparison with the level spacing ω, exact prefactors should be given if the threshold is to be quantitative.
- [§3.4] The sentence 'we will not report the plots here' is inconsistent with the presence of figures 4 and 5. Clarify which statements are supported by the displayed figures and which are only described verbally.
- [§1] There is a typo in the introduction: 'unitary in Quantum Qravity' should read 'Quantum Gravity'.
- [§3.3.3] The demonstration that y-fluctuations decouple from β_obs is given for a two-dimensional toy integral. In the full five-dimensional integral, the same statement is used but the full Hessian is not shown; please make this step explicit.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the observer measure is derived from independent WdW/heat-kernel inputs; the sole self-citation [7] is an incidental similarity remark, and the Hessian gap is a verifiability issue, not a reduction.
full rationale
The central chain is self-contained. Eq. (3.12) is not assumed: the measure µ(β_obs) is distilled from the path integral (3.1)-(3.8), which uses gauge-fixed einbein, the AdS heat kernel [75,76], and WdW wavefunctions [77], all external. The saddle point and fluctuation analysis is analytic; no parameter is fitted to the 'predicted' variance. Self-citation [7] in the introduction is a comparison ('similar to the one that one would have when turning on one-dimensional quantum gravity on a worldline [7]') and is never used to derive the measure; [5] is motivational. The double-trumpet measure is obtained by explicit integration over the neck length b (eq. 4.7), not by importing a result from the authors' prior work. The only suspicious element, Eq. (3.46), is indeed unsupported: the Hessian A_ij is never displayed ('the full expressions are cumbersome, so we will not write them here'), and the formula is not the standard Schur-complement marginal variance. However, this is a missing proof / possible calculational error, not a case where the output is equivalent to the input by construction or by self-citation. It does not raise the circularity score. The score of 1 reflects the single incidental self-citation, with no load-bearing circular step.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (6)
- standard math The JT path integral reduces to the Schwarzian action for the boundary curve (Eq. 2.4).
- standard math Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions φ_u(ℓ) in (3.10) give the disk two-point function of JT gravity.
- standard math The worldline path integral equals the scalar heat kernel in AdS2 (Eq. 3.4).
- domain assumption The observer backreaction is negligible (E_n ≪ m, 1/β, 1/u1).
- ad hoc to paper The y-fluctuations decouple from β_obs in the quadratic fluctuation matrix, so the marginal variance is (3.46).
- domain assumption Analytic continuation u→ϵ+it maps the Euclidean measure to the Lorentzian integral (3.64) with the same measure structure.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of JT gravity on the worldline." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GW6HDKAA
@misc{pith2026260714213,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: JT gravity on the worldline},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GW6HDKAA}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14213}
}
read the original abstract
Motivated by the problem of understanding the experience of an observer in dynamical quantum gravity, we study the effects of coupling a one-dimensional quantum mechanical system living on a bulk worldline to Euclidean AdS JT gravity. On the disk topology, where the worldline stretches between two boundary points, we derive exact expressions for the Euclidean propagator of the observer and for its correlation functions, and discuss their holographic interpretation. The main effect on the quantum mechanics is the fluctuation of the total Euclidean time for which the observer evolves, or its inverse temperature for closed Euclidean paths. This turns the standard quantum mechanical evolution operator into an average of those, weighted by a measure over Euclidean times which in the semiclassical limit is peaked around the geodesic distance between the boundary points. We characterize the fluctuations around this value, finding that they are small compared to the mean, but large compared to the effective Planck scale of the model. These fluctuations can be resolved by an observer with a finely spaced density of states. We also discuss the Lorentzian interpretation of these Euclidean calculations. Finally, we compute a contribution to the partition function of the observer coupled to gravity coming from the double trumpet. In this case the fluctuations of the effective temperature are large, reflecting the absence of a smooth semiclassical saddle point.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
The Trouble with de Sitter space,
N. Goheer, M. Kleban, and L. Susskind, “The Trouble with de Sitter space,”JHEP07 (2003) 056,arXiv:hep-th/0212209
arXiv 2003
-
[2]
Some thoughts on the quantum theory of de sitter space,
T. Banks, “Some thoughts on the quantum theory of de sitter space,” inThe Davis Meeting on Cosmic Inflation. 5, 2003.arXiv:astro-ph/0305037
arXiv 2003
-
[3]
De Sitter holography with a finite number of states,
M. K. Parikh and E. P. Verlinde, “De Sitter holography with a finite number of states,” JHEP01(2005) 054,arXiv:hep-th/0410227
arXiv 2005
-
[4]
Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,
T. Banks, B. Fiol, and A. Morisse, “Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,”JHEP12 (2006) 004,arXiv:hep-th/0609062
arXiv 2006
-
[5]
Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline,
D. Anninos, S. A. Hartnoll, and D. M. Hofman, “Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline,”Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 075002, arXiv:1109.4942 [hep-th]
arXiv 2012
-
[6]
De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids,
D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and D. M. Hofman, “De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids,” JHEP07(2019) 038,arXiv:1811.08153 [hep-th]
arXiv 2019
-
[7]
One-dimensional Quantum Gravity and the Schwarzian theory,
D. Anninos, D. M. Hofman, and S. Vitouladitis, “One-dimensional Quantum Gravity and the Schwarzian theory,”JHEP03(2022) 121,arXiv:2112.03793 [hep-th]
arXiv 2022
-
[9]
Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,
H. Verlinde, “Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,”JHEP03(2025) 076, arXiv:2402.00635 [hep-th]. – 38 –
arXiv 2025
Show all 98 references
-
[10]
SYK correlators from 2D Liouville-de Sitter gravity,
H. Verlinde and M. Zhang, “SYK correlators from 2D Liouville-de Sitter gravity,”JHEP05 (2025) 053,arXiv:2402.02584 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[11]
Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,
V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, “Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,”JHEP05 (2025) 032,arXiv:2310.16994 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[12]
A microscopic model of de Sitter spacetime with an observer,
D. Tietto and H. Verlinde, “A microscopic model of de Sitter spacetime with an observer,” arXiv:2502.03869 [hep-th]
-
[13]
Generalized Free Fields in de Sitter from 1D CFT,
K. Goto, A. Milekhin, H. Verlinde, and J. Xu, “Generalized Free Fields in de Sitter from 1D CFT,”arXiv:2605.03037 [hep-th]
-
[14]
An observer’s quantization of 3d de Sitter,
A. Blommaert, D. Tietto, and H. Verlinde, “An observer’s quantization of 3d de Sitter,” arXiv:2606.26241 [hep-th]
-
[15]
Gravitational observatories,
D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and C. Maneerat, “Gravitational observatories,”JHEP12(2023) 024,arXiv:2310.08648 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[16]
Cosmological observatories,
D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and C. Maneerat, “Cosmological observatories,”Class. Quant. Grav.41no. 16, (2024) 165009,arXiv:2402.04305 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[17]
Gravitational observatories in AdS4,
D. Anninos, R. Arias, D. A. Galante, and C. Maneerat, “Gravitational observatories in AdS4,”JHEP07(2025) 234,arXiv:2412.16305 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[18]
The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe,
B. Banihashemi, G. Batra, A. Y. T. Law, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe,”arXiv:2604.10267 [hep-th]
-
[19]
Quantum stress-energy at timelike boundaries: Testing a new beyond-ΛCDM parameter with cosmological data,
O. H. E. Philcox, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “Quantum stress-energy at timelike boundaries: Testing a new beyond-ΛCDM parameter with cosmological data,”Phys. Rev. D 113no. 4, (2026) 043548,arXiv:2507.00115 [astro-ph.CO]
2026 arXiv
-
[20]
Timelike-bounded dS4 holography from a solvable sector of the T2 deformation,
E. Silverstein and G. Torroba, “Timelike-bounded dS4 holography from a solvable sector of the T2 deformation,”JHEP03(2025) 156,arXiv:2409.08709 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[21]
Bulk-local dS3 holography: the matter withTT+Λ 2,
G. Batra, G. B. De Luca, E. Silverstein, G. Torroba, and S. Yang, “Bulk-local dS3 holography: the matter withTT+Λ 2,”JHEP10(2024) 072,arXiv:2403.01040 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[22]
De Sitter microstates from TT+Λ 2 and the Hawking-Page transition,
E. Coleman, E. A. Mazenc, V. Shyam, E. Silverstein, R. M. Soni, G. Torroba, and S. Yang, “De Sitter microstates from TT+Λ 2 and the Hawking-Page transition,”JHEP07(2022) 140,arXiv:2110.14670 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[23]
The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,
J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200
1998 arXiv
-
[24]
Anti-de Sitter space and holography,
E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291,arXiv:hep-th/9802150
1998 arXiv
-
[25]
Wave Function of the Universe,
J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Wave Function of the Universe,”Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2960–2975
1983
-
[26]
Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,
J. Maldacena, G. J. Turiaci, and Z. Yang, “Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,”JHEP 01(2021) 139,arXiv:1904.01911 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[27]
Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,
Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko, and J. Maldacena, “Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,”JHEP02(2021) 009,arXiv:2007.16091 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[28]
De Sitter Bra-Ket wormholes,
A. Fumagalli, V. Gorbenko, and J. Kames-King, “De Sitter Bra-Ket wormholes,”JHEP05 (2025) 074,arXiv:2408.08351 [hep-th]. – 39 –
2025 arXiv
-
[29]
The no boundary density matrix,
V. Ivo, Y.-Z. Li, and J. Maldacena, “The no boundary density matrix,”arXiv:2409.14218 [hep-th]
-
[30]
Remarks on 2D quantum cosmology,
D. Anninos, C. Baracco, and B. Mühlmann, “Remarks on 2D quantum cosmology,”JCAP 10(2024) 031,arXiv:2406.15271 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[31]
Quantum Liouville cosmology,
D. Anninos, T. Hertog, and J. Karlsson, “Quantum Liouville cosmology,”JCAP06(2026) 065,arXiv:2512.15969 [hep-th]
2026 arXiv
-
[32]
Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal,
A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, R. Bousso, L. V. Iliesiu, A. Levine, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, “Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal,”arXiv:2602.02682 [hep-th]
-
[33]
Observers,α-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,
D. Harlow, “Observers,α-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,”arXiv:2602.03835 [hep-th]
-
[34]
”It from Bit
Y. Zhao, “”It from Bit”: The Hartle-Hawking state and quantum mechanics for de Sitter observers,”arXiv:2602.05939 [hep-th]
-
[35]
The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,
S. D. Mathur, “The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,”Class. Quant. Grav. 26(2009) 224001,arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-th]
2009 arXiv
-
[36]
Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?,
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?,”JHEP02(2013) 062,arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]
2013 arXiv
-
[37]
Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,
G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,”JHEP 09(2020) 002,arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[38]
The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,
A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,”JHEP12(2019) 063, arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]
2019 arXiv
-
[39]
Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,
A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,”JHEP05(2020) 013, arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[40]
Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,
G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,”JHEP03(2022) 205,arXiv:1911.11977 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[41]
Clocks and Rods in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity,
A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verschelde, “Clocks and Rods in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity,”JHEP09(2019) 060,arXiv:1902.11194 [hep-th]
2019 arXiv
-
[42]
Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience,
D. L. Jafferis and L. Lamprou, “Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience,”JHEP03(2022) 084,arXiv:2009.04476 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[43]
On black hole interior reconstruction, singularities and the emergence of time,
J. de Boer, D. L. Jafferis, and L. Lamprou, “On black hole interior reconstruction, singularities and the emergence of time,”arXiv:2211.16512 [hep-th]
-
[44]
Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,
S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,”Phys. Rev. D 108no. 8, (2023) 086020,arXiv:2112.12156 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[45]
Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,
S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 8, (2023) 086019, arXiv:2110.05497 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[46]
Fiducial observers and the thermal atmosphere in the black hole quantum throat,
T. G. Mertens, T. Tappeiner, and B. de S. L. Torres, “Fiducial observers and the thermal atmosphere in the black hole quantum throat,”JHEP04(2026) 145,arXiv:2507.20983 [hep-th]
2026 arXiv
-
[47]
Falling through the horizon of a quantum black hole,
V. Franken, T. G. Mertens, and B. de S. L. Torres, “Falling through the horizon of a quantum black hole,”arXiv:2607.03344 [hep-th]. – 40 –
-
[48]
A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,
E. Witten, “A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,”JHEP03(2024) 077, arXiv:2308.03663 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[49]
An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,
V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,”JHEP02(2023) 082,arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[50]
An observer’s measure of de Sitter entropy,
M. Mirbabayi, “An observer’s measure of de Sitter entropy,”JHEP10(2024) 077, arXiv:2311.07724 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[51]
Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon,
D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu, “Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon,” arXiv:2411.08090 [hep-th]
-
[52]
The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,
A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu, and A. Levine, “The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,”JHEP05(2025) 059,arXiv:2501.02632 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[53]
On observers in holographic maps,
C. Akers, G. Bueller, O. DeWolfe, K. Higginbotham, J. Reinking, and R. Rodriguez, “On observers in holographic maps,”JHEP05(2025) 201,arXiv:2503.09681 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[54]
An intrinsic cosmological observer,
A. J. Speranza, “An intrinsic cosmological observer,”Class. Quant. Grav.42no. 21, (2025) 215023,arXiv:2504.07630 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[55]
Comments on the de Sitter Double Cone,
Z. Yang, Y. Zhang, and W. Zheng, “Comments on the de Sitter Double Cone,” arXiv:2505.08647 [hep-th]
-
[56]
Relativity of the event: examples in JT gravity and linearized GR,
F. Nitti, F. Piazza, and A. Taskov, “Relativity of the event: examples in JT gravity and linearized GR,”JHEP10(2024) 092,arXiv:2402.01847 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[57]
Generalized conformal quantum mechanics as an ideal observer in two-dimensional gravity,
A. Banerjee, T. Kibe, M. Molina, and A. Mukhopadhyay, “Generalized conformal quantum mechanics as an ideal observer in two-dimensional gravity,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 6, (2025) 066011,arXiv:2409.15415 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[58]
Lower Dimensional Gravity,
R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity,”Nucl. Phys. B252(1985) 343–356
1985
-
[59]
Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,
C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B126(1983) 41–45
1983
-
[60]
Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography,
A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, “Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography,”JHEP11 (2015) 014,arXiv:1402.6334 [hep-th]
2015 arXiv
-
[61]
An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography,
J. Engelsöy, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verlinde, “An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography,”JHEP07(2016) 139,arXiv:1606.03438 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[62]
Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,
J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,”Phys. Rev. D94 no. 10, (2016) 106002,arXiv:1604.07818 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[63]
A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity,
P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity,” arXiv:1806.06840 [hep-th]
-
[64]
JT gravity as a matrix integral,
P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “JT gravity as a matrix integral,” arXiv:1903.11115 [hep-th]
1903 arXiv
-
[65]
Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity,
P. Saad, “Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity,” arXiv:1910.10311 [hep-th]
1910 arXiv
-
[66]
The entropy of Hawking radiation,
A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawking radiation,”Rev. Mod. Phys.93no. 3, (2021) 035002,arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[67]
On the quantum width of a black hole horizon,
D. Marolf, “On the quantum width of a black hole horizon,”Springer Proc. Phys.98(2005) 99–112,arXiv:hep-th/0312059. – 41 –
2005 arXiv
-
[68]
Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,
E. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,”JHEP04(2020) 209, arXiv:1911.02018 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[69]
Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,
E. P. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,”Phys. Lett. B822(2021) 136663,arXiv:1902.08207 [gr-qc]
2021 arXiv
-
[70]
Modular fluctuations from shockwave geometries,
E. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Modular fluctuations from shockwave geometries,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 10, (2022) 106011,arXiv:2208.01059 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[71]
Quantum Fluctuations of the Black Hole Horizon,
B. Freivogel, A. Speranza, and E. Verlinde, “Quantum Fluctuations of the Black Hole Horizon,”arXiv:2606.28243 [hep-th]
-
[72]
Large Quantum Gravity Fluctuations of BTZ Black Holes,
B. Freivogel and U. Moitra, “Large Quantum Gravity Fluctuations of BTZ Black Holes,” arXiv:2606.28160 [hep-th]
-
[73]
Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,
J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,”PTEP2016no. 12, (2016) 12C104, arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[74]
Classifying boundary conditions in JT gravity: from energy-branes toα-branes,
A. Goel, L. V. Iliesiu, J. Kruthoff, and Z. Yang, “Classifying boundary conditions in JT gravity: from energy-branes toα-branes,”JHEP04(2021) 069,arXiv:2010.12592 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[75]
Harmonic analysis and propagators on homogeneous spaces,
R. Camporesi, “Harmonic analysis and propagators on homogeneous spaces,”Phys. Rept. 196(1990) 1–134
1990
-
[76]
Heat kernels on cone ofAdS2 andk-wound circular Wilson loop inAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring,
R. Bergamin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Heat kernels on cone ofAdS2 andk-wound circular Wilson loop inAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring,”J. Phys. A49no. 14, (2016) 14LT01,arXiv:1510.06894 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[77]
The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,
Z. Yang, “The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,”JHEP05(2019) 205,arXiv:1809.08647 [hep-th]
2019 arXiv
-
[78]
Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,
T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci, and H. L. Verlinde, “Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,”JHEP08(2017) 136,arXiv:1705.08408 [hep-th]
2017 arXiv
-
[79]
JT gravity at finite cutoff,
L. V. Iliesiu, J. Kruthoff, G. J. Turiaci, and H. Verlinde, “JT gravity at finite cutoff,”SciPost Phys.9(2020) 023,arXiv:2004.07242 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[80]
Finite-cutoff JT gravity and self-avoiding loops,
D. Stanford and Z. Yang, “Finite-cutoff JT gravity and self-avoiding loops,” arXiv:2004.08005 [hep-th]
2004 arXiv
-
[81]
Nonperturbative effects and resurgence in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity at finite cutoff,
L. Griguolo, R. Panerai, J. Papalini, and D. Seminara, “Nonperturbative effects and resurgence in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity at finite cutoff,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 4, (2022) 046015,arXiv:2106.01375 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[82]
Finite cut-off JT and Liouville quantum gravities on the disk at one loop,
S. Chaudhuri and F. Ferrari, “Finite cut-off JT and Liouville quantum gravities on the disk at one loop,”JHEP01(2025) 160,arXiv:2404.03748 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[83]
A new perspective on dilaton gravity at finite cutoff,
L. Griguolo, J. Papalini, L. Russo, and D. Seminara, “A new perspective on dilaton gravity at finite cutoff,”arXiv:2512.21774 [hep-th]
-
[84]
Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with matter, generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and random matrices,
D. L. Jafferis, D. K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov, and J. Sonner, “Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with matter, generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and random matrices,” Phys. Rev. D108no. 6, (2023) 066015,arXiv:2209.02131 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[85]
Defects in conformal field theory,
M. Billò, V. Gonçalves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri, “Defects in conformal field theory,” JHEP04(2016) 091,arXiv:1601.02883 [hep-th]. – 42 –
2016 arXiv
-
[86]
Gravity and the crossed product,
E. Witten, “Gravity and the crossed product,”JHEP10(2022) 008,arXiv:2112.12828 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[87]
Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model as Liouville quantum mechanics,
D. Bagrets, A. Altland, and A. Kamenev, “Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model as Liouville quantum mechanics,”Nucl. Phys. B911(2016) 191–205,arXiv:1607.00694 [cond-mat.str-el]
2016 arXiv
-
[88]
Eternal traversable wormhole,
J. Maldacena and X.-L. Qi, “Eternal traversable wormhole,”arXiv:1804.00491 [hep-th]
-
[89]
Euclidean wormhole in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,
A. M. García-García and V. Godet, “Euclidean wormhole in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 4, (2021) 046014,arXiv:2010.11633 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[90]
Quantum JT Gravity in a box as a Pöschl-Teller Scattering Problem,
L. Griguolo, J. Papalini, L. Russo, D. Seminara, and A. Tarana, “Quantum JT Gravity in a box as a Pöschl-Teller Scattering Problem,”arXiv:2607.01385 [hep-th]
-
[91]
On the non-perturbative bulk Hilbert space of JT gravity,
L. V. Iliesiu, A. Levine, H. W. Lin, H. Maxfield, and M. Mezei, “On the non-perturbative bulk Hilbert space of JT gravity,”JHEP10(2024) 220,arXiv:2403.08696 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[92]
Lorentzian Path Integrals and Jackiw-Teitelboim wormholes with imaginary scalars,
J. Held, M. Kaplan, D. Marolf, and Z. Wang, “Lorentzian Path Integrals and Jackiw-Teitelboim wormholes with imaginary scalars,”arXiv:2601.09932 [hep-th]
-
[93]
Coupling Fields to 3D Quantum Gravity via Chern-Simons Theory,
A. Castro, I. Coman, J. R. Fliss, and C. Zukowski, “Coupling Fields to 3D Quantum Gravity via Chern-Simons Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131no. 17, (2023) 171602,arXiv:2304.02668 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[94]
Keeping matter in the loop in dS3 quantum gravity,
A. Castro, I. Coman, J. R. Fliss, and C. Zukowski, “Keeping matter in the loop in dS3 quantum gravity,”JHEP07(2023) 120,arXiv:2302.12281 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 004 (2024)]
2023 arXiv
-
[95]
A spool for every quotient: One-loop partition functions in AdS3 gravity,
R. Bourne, J. R. Fliss, and B. Knighton, “A spool for every quotient: One-loop partition functions in AdS3 gravity,”SciPost Phys.20(2026) 065,arXiv:2507.05364 [hep-th]
2026 arXiv
-
[96]
Real observers solving imaginary problems,
J. Maldacena, “Real observers solving imaginary problems,”arXiv:2412.14014 [hep-th]
-
[97]
On the phase of the de Sitter density of states,
Y. Chen, D. Stanford, H. Tang, and Z. Yang, “On the phase of the de Sitter density of states,”JHEP05(2026) 068,arXiv:2511.01400 [hep-th]
2026
-
[98]
Infrared Realization of dS2 in AdS2,
D. Anninos and D. M. Hofman, “Infrared Realization of dS2 in AdS2,”Class. Quant. Grav. 35no. 8, (2018) 085003,arXiv:1703.04622 [hep-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[99]
A. M. Polyakov,Gauge Fields and Strings, vol. 3 ofContemporary Concepts in Physics. Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzerland, 1987. – 43 –
1987
Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.