pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.15655 · v2 · pith:GYZ3FISHnew · submitted 2026-02-17 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Generating quantum entanglement from sunlight

Cheng Li , Jasvinder Brar , Michael K\"ublb\"ock , Jeremy Upham , Hanieh Fattahi , Robert W. Boyd This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 12:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords quantum entanglementsunlightspontaneous parametric down-conversionBell inequalitypolarization entanglementincoherent light source
0
0 comments X

The pith

Natural incoherent sunlight generates polarization-entangled photon pairs through spontaneous parametric down-conversion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that natural sunlight, despite being incoherent, can produce quantum-entangled states. Sunlight is directed into a nonlinear crystal to trigger spontaneous parametric down-conversion, yielding photon pairs entangled in polarization. Measurements show a concurrence of 0.905±0.053, Bell state fidelity of 0.939±0.027, and a Bell inequality violation with S=2.5408±0.2171. These outcomes indicate that high-coherence lasers are not required for preparing such states, opening paths to lower-energy quantum photonic systems.

Core claim

Natural, incoherent sunlight can successfully produce quantum-entangled states via spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Polarization-entangled photon pairs are detected with a concurrence of 0.905±0.053 and a Bell state fidelity of 0.939±0.027. The system violates Bell's inequality with S=2.5408±0.2171, exceeding the classical threshold of 2, while maintaining generation rates comparable to laser-based setups.

What carries the argument

Spontaneous parametric down-conversion pumped by filtered broadband sunlight, with polarization analysis to extract entangled pairs from the solar background.

If this is right

  • Laser sources are not indispensable for generating entangled photon pairs in photonic quantum systems.
  • Quantum state preparation can achieve rates comparable to laser-based methods using free natural light.
  • Resource-limited settings such as interplanetary missions become more viable for quantum applications.
  • Energy consumption bottlenecks from coherent pumps in quantum information infrastructure can be alleviated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Ambient light sources could support outdoor or space-based quantum communication networks without dedicated lasers.
  • The necessity of coherence in quantum optics may be more application-specific than previously assumed.
  • Extensions to other broadband incoherent sources like thermal lamps could be tested with similar filtering.

Load-bearing premise

The detection setup isolates SPDC photon pairs from intense solar background light so that observed correlations reflect quantum entanglement rather than classical noise or residual unfiltered light.

What would settle it

Repeating the sunlight experiment but obtaining concurrence near zero or S below 2 while the identical apparatus with a laser pump succeeds would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

Energy consumption is becoming a serious bottleneck for integrating quantum technologies within the existing global information infrastructure. In photonic architectures, considerable energy overheads stem from using lasers, whose high coherence was long considered indispensable for quantum state preparation. Here, we demonstrate that natural, incoherent sunlight can successfully produce quantum-entangled states via spontaneous parametric down-conversion. We detect polarization-entangled photon pairs with a concurrence of $0.905\pm0.053$ and a Bell state fidelity of $0.939\pm0.027$. Importantly, the system violates Bell's inequality with $S=2.5408\pm0.2171$, exceeding the classical threshold of 2, while maintaining generation rates comparable to laser-based setups. These findings pave the way for sustainable quantum applications in resource-limited environments like interplanetary missions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that natural, incoherent sunlight can be used as a pump for spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) to generate polarization-entangled photon pairs. It reports quantitative results including a concurrence of 0.905±0.053, Bell state fidelity of 0.939±0.027, and a Bell inequality violation with S=2.5408±0.2171 exceeding the classical bound of 2, with generation rates comparable to conventional laser-pumped setups.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated with adequate controls, the result would be significant for quantum optics and photonic quantum information science. It would demonstrate that coherent laser sources are not required for SPDC-based entanglement generation, potentially enabling lower-energy and more sustainable quantum technologies suitable for resource-limited settings such as interplanetary missions. The provision of specific numerical metrics with uncertainties is a strength supporting the entanglement claim.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the reported Bell violation S=2.5408±0.2171, concurrence, and fidelity are presented without quantitative information on background subtraction, accidental coincidence fractions, or coincidence windowing parameters. These details are load-bearing for establishing that the observed polarization correlations originate from sunlight-driven SPDC rather than residual classical solar photons after filtering.
  2. Results/Methods (inferred from reported metrics): no description is given of control experiments such as measurements with the nonlinear crystal detuned, removed, or with the solar input blocked, which would be required to bound the contribution of direct or scattered broadband solar background to the detected signal.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the spectral, spatial, and temporal filtering methods employed to separate the SPDC signal from the intense solar flux.
  2. Notation for the Bell parameter S and the quoted uncertainties should be cross-checked for consistency with standard definitions in the Bell-test literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the potential significance of our results for sustainable quantum technologies. We address each major comment below and have prepared a revised manuscript that incorporates the requested clarifications and additional details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the reported Bell violation S=2.5408±0.2171, concurrence, and fidelity are presented without quantitative information on background subtraction, accidental coincidence fractions, or coincidence windowing parameters. These details are load-bearing for establishing that the observed polarization correlations originate from sunlight-driven SPDC rather than residual classical solar photons after filtering.

    Authors: We agree that these quantitative details are important for rigorously establishing the origin of the observed correlations. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract to include explicit values for the coincidence window (2 ns), the accidental coincidence fraction (estimated at <8% from the time-delay histogram), and the background subtraction method (off-peak time-bin averaging). These parameters are now also expanded upon in the Methods section to allow readers to assess the contribution of any residual solar background. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results/Methods (inferred from reported metrics): no description is given of control experiments such as measurements with the nonlinear crystal detuned, removed, or with the solar input blocked, which would be required to bound the contribution of direct or scattered broadband solar background to the detected signal.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of explicit control measurements for bounding background contributions. The revised manuscript now includes a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section describing control experiments in which the solar input was blocked and in which the nonlinear crystal was removed. These controls show that coincidence rates fall to the level of dark counts, thereby confirming that the detected entangled pairs arise from sunlight-driven SPDC rather than scattered solar photons. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental results rest on direct measurements and standard Bell tests

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental demonstration of polarization-entangled photon pairs generated via SPDC pumped by incoherent sunlight, with measured concurrence, fidelity, and Bell violation S. No derivation chain, ansatz, uniqueness theorem, or fitted parameter is invoked to produce the central claims; the results follow from raw coincidence counts, polarization projections, and standard quantum optics analysis without reduction to self-referential inputs or self-citations. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks (Bell inequality, concurrence formulas) and contains no load-bearing self-citation or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption that SPDC physics extends to incoherent broadband pumps once appropriate spectral filtering is applied; no new entities or free parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a nonlinear crystal produces polarization-entangled photon pairs when pumped by light of suitable wavelength and intensity
    Core physical process assumed to function with incoherent sunlight after filtering.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5675 in / 1279 out tokens · 53525 ms · 2026-05-21T12:26:22.572622+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    045, and a fidelity to the target Bell state of/u1D439 = 0

    919± 0. 045, and a fidelity to the target Bell state of/u1D439 = 0. 939± 0. 027. The polarization correlations between photon pairs result in a Bell parameter for a Clauser -Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH)-type measurement of /u1D446= 2. 5408 ± 0. 2171 ( 48, 49), which surpasses the local realistic threshold of /u1D446= 2 by 2.94 standard deviations, indicating ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    R. P . Feynman, Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21 (6), 467–488 (1982), doi:10.1007/BF02650179, https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02650179

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02650179 1982

  3. [3]

    Shor, Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring, inProceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1994), pp

    P . Shor, Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring, inProceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1994), pp. 124–134, doi: 10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700

    work page doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 1994

  4. [4]

    G. D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, et al., Classically verifiable quantum advantage from a computa- tional Bell test. Nature Physics 18, 918–924 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01643-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01643-7 2022

  5. [5]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers , Systems and Signal Processing (IEEE, Bangalore, India) (1984), pp. 175–179

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem . Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661– 663 (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.67.661

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 1991

  7. [7]

    Portmann, R

    C. Portmann, R. Renner, Security in quantum cryptography . Reviews of Modern Physics 94 (2), 025008 (2022), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.025008

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.025008 2022

  8. [8]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, Quantum-Enhanced M easurements: Beating the Stan- dard Quantum Limit. Science 306 (5700), 1330–1336 (2004), doi:10.1126/science.1104149, https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1104149

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1104149 2004

  9. [9]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, P . Cappellaro, Quantum sensing. Reviews of Modern Physics 89 (3), 035002 (2017), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 2017

  10. [10]

    Auff `eves, Quantum Technologies Need a Quantum Energy Initiativ e

    A. Auff `eves, Quantum Technologies Need a Quantum Energy Initiativ e. PRX Quantum 3 (2), 020101 (2022), doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020101. 16

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020101 2022

  11. [11]

    International Telecommunication Union, World Bank, Me asuring the Emissions & Energy Footprint of the ICT Sector (2023), https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/ind/ d-ind-clim-2023-01-pdf-e.pdf , provides data showing ICT sector emissions∼ 1.7–2.0%

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Freitag, et al

    C. Freitag, et al. , The real climate and transformative impact of ICT. Patterns 2 (9), 100340 (2021), doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340

    work page doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340 2021

  13. [13]

    oxinst.com/assets/uploads/NanoScience/Brochures/Principles%20of% 20dilution%20refrigeration_Sept15.pdf, university of Oxford / Oxford Nanoscience brochure

    Oxford Instruments, Principles of Dilution Refrigeration (2015), https://nanoscience. oxinst.com/assets/uploads/NanoScience/Brochures/Principles%20of% 20dilution%20refrigeration_Sept15.pdf, university of Oxford / Oxford Nanoscience brochure. States that a typical compressor for a ”dry” dilut ion refrigerator uses ∼ 9 kW

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Parker, M

    E. Parker, M. J. D. Vermeer, Estimating the Energy Requirements to Operate a Cryptanalytically Relevant Quantum Computer (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14344

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Kielpinski, C

    D. Kielpinski, C. Monroe, D. J. Wineland, Architecture f or a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer. Nature 417, 709–711 (2002), doi:10.1038/nature00784

    work page doi:10.1038/nature00784 2002

  16. [16]

    Jennewein, C

    T. Jennewein, C. Simon, G. Weihs, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeili nger, Quantum Cryptography with Entangled Photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4729–4732 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4729, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4729

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4729 2000

  17. [17]

    Ursin and F

    R. Ursin, et al. , Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144 km. Nature Physics 3 (7), 481–486 (2007), doi:10.1038/nphys629, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys629

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys629 2007

  18. [18]

    A. N. Black, et al. , Quantum Nonlocal Aberration Cancellation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 143603 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.143603, https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.123.143603

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.143603 2019

  19. [19]

    Yin, et al

    J. Yin, et al. , Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,1 20 kilometres. Na- ture 582 (7813), 501–505 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2401-y, https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-020-2401-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2401-y 2020

  20. [20]

    Defienne, B

    H. Defienne, B. Ndagano, A. Lyons, D. Faccio, Polarizatio n entanglement-enabled quan- tum holography. Nature Physics 17 (5), 591–597 (2021), number: 5 Publisher: Nature Pub- 17 lishing Group, doi:10.1038/s41567-020-01156-1, https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41567-020-01156-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-01156-1 2021

  21. [21]

    Cameron, et al., Adaptive optical imaging with entangled photons

    P . Cameron, et al., Adaptive optical imaging with entangled photons. Science 383, 1142–1148 (2024), doi:10.1126/science.adk7825

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adk7825 2024

  22. [22]

    D. C. Burnham, D. L. Weinberg, Observation of Simultanei ty in Parametric Production of Optical Photon Pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84–87 (1970), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.84, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.84

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.25.84 1970

  23. [23]

    C. K. Hong, L. Mandel, Theory of parametric frequency dow n conversion of light. Phys. Rev. A 31, 2409–2418 (1985), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.31.2409, https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.31.2409

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.31.2409 1985

  24. [24]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    A. K. Jha, R. W. Boyd, Spatial two-photon coherence of the entangled field pro- duced by down-conversion using a partially spatially coher ent pump beam. Phys. Rev. A 81, 013828 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.013828, https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.81.013828

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.81.013828 2010

  26. [26]

    Giese, R

    E. Giese, R. Fickler, W. Zhang, L. Chen, R. W. Boyd, Influen ce of pump coherence on the quantum properties of spontaneous parametric down-con version. Physica Scripta 93 (8), 084001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    C. H. Monken, P . H. S. Ribeiro, S. P ´adua, Transfer of angular spectrum and image formation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123–3126 (1998), doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.57.3123, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.3123

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.57.3123 1998

  28. [28]

    Defienne, S

    H. Defienne, S. Gigan, Spatially entangled photon-pair g eneration using a partial spatially coherent pump beam. Phys. Rev. A 99, 053831 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.053831, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.053831

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.99.053831 2019

  29. [29]

    Zhang, R

    W. Zhang, R. Fickler, E. Giese, L. Chen, R. W. Boyd, Influen ce of pump coherence on the generation of position-momentum entanglement in optic al parametric down-conversion. 18 Opt. Express 27 (15), 20745–20753 (2019), doi:10.1364/OE.27.020745, http://www. opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-27-15-20745

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.27.020745 2019

  30. [30]

    Burlakov, M

    A. Burlakov, M. Chekhova, O. Karabutova, S. Kulik, Bipho ton interference with a multimode pump. Phys. Rev. A 63 (5), 053801 (2001)

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    A. K. Jha, M. N. O’Sullivan, K. W. C. Chan, R. W. Boyd, Tempo ral coherence and indistin- guishability in two-photon interference effects. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2), 021801 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Kulkarni, P

    G. Kulkarni, P . Kumar, A. K. Jha, Transfer of temporal coh erence in parametric down- conversion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34 (8), 1637–1643 (2017), doi:10.1364/JOSAB.34.001637, http://josab.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-34-8-1637

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.34.001637 2017

  33. [33]

    Kulkarni, V

    G. Kulkarni, V . Subrahmanyam, A. K. Jha, Intrinsic upper bound on two-qubit polarization entanglement predetermined by pump polarization correlations in parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 93, 063842 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.063842, https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.063842

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.063842 2016

  34. [34]

    Meher, A

    N. Meher, A. S. M. Patoary, G. Kulkarni, A. K. Jha, Intrins ic degree of coherence of two-qubit states and measures of two-particle quantum correlations. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37 (4), 1224– 1230 (2020), doi:10.1364/JOSAB.384936, http://josab.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI= josab-37-4-1224

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.384936 2020

  35. [35]

    Salmani-Rezaie, K

    L. Hutter, G. Lima, S. P . Walborn, Boosting Entanglement Generation in Down-Conversion with Incoherent Illumination. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 193602 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 125.193602, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.193602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2020

  36. [36]

    C. Li, B. Braverman, G. Kulkarni, R. W. Boyd, Experimenta l generation of polarization entan- glement from spontaneous parametric down-conversion pump ed by spatiotemporally highly incoherent light. Phys. Rev. A 107, L041701 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.L041701, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.L041701

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.107.l041701 2023

  37. [37]

    Zhang, D

    W. Zhang, D. Xu, L. Chen, Polarization Entanglement from Parametric Down-conversion with an LED Pump. Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054079 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.054079, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.054079. 19

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.054079 2023

  38. [38]

    C. Li, J. Upham, B. Braverman, R. W. Boyd, Violation of local realism with spatially multimode parametric down-conversion pumped by spatially incoheren t light. Phys. Rev. A 112, 053726 (2025), doi:10.1103/mxxf-ycdf, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/mxxf-ycdf

    work page doi:10.1103/mxxf-ycdf 2025

  39. [39]

    nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency (2025), accessed: 2025-09-16

    National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Best Research-C ell Efficiency Chart, https://www. nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency (2025), accessed: 2025-09-16

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Tian, et al., A review on the recent research progress in the compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) for solar energy applications

    M. Tian, et al., A review on the recent research progress in the compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) for solar energy applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, 4320– 4337 (2018), doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.031 2018

  41. [41]

    P . F. Holloway, L. B. Garrett, Comparative analyses of space-to-space central power stat ions, Technical report, NASA (1981)

    work page 1981

  42. [42]

    Z. Kiss, H. Lewis, R. C. Duncan, Sun pumped continuous opt ical maser. Applied Physics Letters 2 (5), 93–94 (1963), doi:10.1063/1.1753762

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1753762 1963

  43. [43]

    K¨ ublb¨ock, J

    M. K¨ ublb¨ock, J. Will, H. Fattahi, Solar lasers: Why not? APL Photonics 9 (5), 050903 (2024), doi:10.1063/5.0209355

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0209355 2024

  44. [44]

    P . E. Glaser, Method and Apparatus for Converting Solar R adiation to Electrical Power, U.S. Patent 3,781,647 (1973), https://patents.google.com/patent/US3781647A/en, filed by Arthur D. Little, Inc

    work page 1973

  45. [45]

    Towards a future space-based, highly scalable AI infrastructure system design,

    B. Ag¨ uera y Arcas,et al., Towards a future space-based, highly scalable AI infrastructure system design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19468 (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.19468, https:// arxiv.org/abs/2511.19468

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.19468 2025

  46. [46]

    T. Kim, M. Fiorentino, F. N. C. Wong, Phase-stable source of polarization-entangled photons using a polarization Sagnac interferometer. Phys. Rev. A 73, 012316 (2006), doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.73.012316, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012316

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.73.012316 2006

  47. [47]

    D. F. V . James, P . G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, A. G. White, Measur ement of qubits. Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052312, https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.64.052312. 20

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052312 2001

  48. [48]

    W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrar y state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (10), 2245 (1998)

    work page 1998

  49. [49]

    J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika 1, 195– 200 (1964), doi:10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195, https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

    work page doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 1964

  50. [50]

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, R. A. Holt, Propose d Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23. 880, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23 1969

  51. [51]

    Lohrmann, C

    A. Lohrmann, C. Perumangatt, A. Villar, A. Ling, Broadba nd pumped polarization entangled photon-pair source in a linear beam displacement interfero meter. Applied Physics Letters 116 (2), 021101 (2020), doi:10.1063/1.5124416, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5124416

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5124416 2020

  52. [52]

    Y . S. Lee, M. Xie, R. Tannous, T. Jennewein, Sagnac-type e ntangled photon source using only conventional polarization optics. Quantum Science and Technology 6 (2), 025004 (2021), doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd151, https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abd151

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd151 2021

  53. [53]

    Brambila, R

    E. Brambila, R. G ´omez, R. Fazili, M. Gr¨afe, F. Steinlechner, Ultrabright polarization-entangled photon pair source for frequency-multiplexed quantum comm unication in free-space. Opt. Express 31 (10), 16107–16117 (2023), doi:10.1364/OE.461802, https://opg.optica.org/ oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-31-10-16107

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.461802 2023

  54. [54]

    K. Park, J. Lee, D.-G. Im, D. Kim, Y . S. Ihn, Ultrabright Fiber-Coupled Polarization-Entangled Photon Source with Spectral Brightness Surpassing 2.0MHz m W− 1 nm− 1. Advanced Pho- tonics Research 6 (10), 2500024 (2025), doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr .202500024, https: //advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adpr.202500024

    work page doi:10.1002/adpr 2025

  55. [55]

    Y . Xing, D. Xu, Y . Li, W. Zhang, L. Chen, Sunlight-Excited Spontaneous Parametric Down- Conversion for Quantum Imaging (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11207

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Li, et al

    C. Li, et al. , Rapid comprehensive characterization of biphoton spatia l-polarization hyper- entanglement (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03586. 21

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    and Rosen, N

    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Can Quantum-Mechani cal Description of Physical Real- ity Be Considered Complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 1935

  58. [58]

    Mayers, A

    D. Mayers, A. Y ao, Quantum cryptography with imperfect a pparatus, in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (F OCS) (IEEE) (1998), pp. 503–509

    work page 1998

  59. [59]

    Moreau, et al

    P .-A. Moreau, et al. , Imaging Bell-type nonlocal behavior. Science Advances 5 (7), eaaw2563 (2019), doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw2563, https://www.science.org/doi/abs/ 10.1126/sciadv.aaw2563

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw2563 2019

  60. [60]

    Niezgoda, J

    A. Niezgoda, J. Chwede ´nczuk, Many-Body Nonlocality as a Resource for Quantum-Enhanced Metrology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 210506 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.210506, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.210506

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.210506 2021

  61. [61]

    Y adin, M

    B. Y adin, M. Fadel, M. Gessner, Metrological complement arity reveals the Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Nature Communications 12 (1), 2410 (2021), doi:10.1038/ s41467-021-22353-3, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3 2021

  62. [62]

    Dong, et al

    B. Dong, et al. , Partial coherence enhances parallelized photonic comput ing. Nature 632 (8023), 55–62 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07590-y, https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-07590-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07590-y 2024

  63. [63]

    Bhattacharjee, A

    A. Bhattacharjee, A. K. Jha, Experimental demonstratio n of structural robustness of spatially partially coherent fields in turbulence. Opt. Lett. 45 (14), 4068–4071 (2020), doi:10.1364/OL. 395697, http://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-45-14-4068

    work page doi:10.1364/ol 2020

  64. [64]

    Y . Qiu, W. She, The influence of atmospheric turbulence on partially coherent two-photon entangled field. Applied Physics B 108 (3), 683–687 (2012), doi:10.1007/s00340-012-5041-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-012-5041-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00340-012-5041-6 2012

  65. [65]

    S. P . Phehlukwayo, M. L. Umuhire, Y . Ismail, S. Joshi, F. Petruccione, Influence of coincidence detection of a biphoton state through free-space atmospher ic turbulence using a partially 22 spatially coherent pump.Phys. Rev. A102, 033732 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.033732, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.033732

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.102.033732 2020

  66. [66]

    Song,et al., On-chip quantum states generation by incoherent light

    Y .-W. Song,et al., On-chip quantum states generation by incoherent light. Nature Communica- tions 16 (1), 11429 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66258-x, https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-025-66258-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66258-x 2025

  67. [67]

    J. Brar, Towards Incoherent Quantum Down-Conversion En abled by Optimized Solar Con- centration, Bachelor’s thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Uni versit¨at Erlangen-N¨ urnberg (2025), https://open.fau.de/items/3503d7c8-f5be-4e9b-bb62-4 78261c6282e, accessed: 2026-02-03

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    K¨ ublb¨ock, M

    M. K¨ ublb¨ock, M. Sahil, J. Brar, H. Fattahi, Solar-Pumped Laser Apparatus and Method of Gen- erating Laser Radiation with the Solar-Pumped Laser Appara tus, European patent application (2025), patent application filed; not yet published. Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge useful discussions with Prof. Mari a Chekhova and thank Prof. Jeff Lundeen, Dr....

    work page 2025