Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comprehensive Survey on Visual Question Answering Datasets and Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.11150 v1 pith:H2BWFATF submitted 2024-11-17 cs.CV

A Comprehensive Survey on Visual Question Answering Datasets and Algorithms

classification cs.CV
keywords datasetsmodelsvisualinformationquestionreasoningunderstandingdiscuss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Visual question answering (VQA) refers to the problem where, given an image and a natural language question about the image, a correct natural language answer has to be generated. A VQA model has to demonstrate both the visual understanding of the image and the semantic understanding of the question, demonstrating reasoning capability. Since the inception of this field, a plethora of VQA datasets and models have been published. In this article, we meticulously analyze the current state of VQA datasets and models, while cleanly dividing them into distinct categories and then summarizing the methodologies and characteristics of each category. We divide VQA datasets into four categories: (1) available datasets that contain a rich collection of authentic images, (2) synthetic datasets that contain only synthetic images produced through artificial means, (3) diagnostic datasets that are specially designed to test model performance in a particular area, e.g., understanding the scene text, and (4) KB (Knowledge-Based) datasets that are designed to measure a model's ability to utilize outside knowledge. Concurrently, we explore six main paradigms of VQA models: fusion, where we discuss different methods of fusing information between visual and textual modalities; attention, the technique of using information from one modality to filter information from another; external knowledge base, where we discuss different models utilizing outside information; composition or reasoning, where we analyze techniques to answer advanced questions that require complex reasoning steps; explanation, which is the process of generating visual and textual descriptions to verify sound reasoning; and graph models, which encode and manipulate relationships through nodes in a graph. We also discuss some miscellaneous topics, such as scene text understanding, counting, and bias reduction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MESH -- Understanding Videos Like Human: Measuring Hallucinations in Large Video Models

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    MESH, a three-layer video hallucination benchmark, shows LVMs ace basic objects and coarse traits but slip badly on fine character details and multi-subject actions in longer clips.