Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Ambiguous World of Emotion Representation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.00360 v1 pith:H2PVLXJM submitted 2019-09-01 cs.HC cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.LG
keywords frameworkamberemotionaffectivecomputingrepresentationrepresentationsambiguous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning systems have demonstrated huge improvements and human-level parity in a range of activities, including speech recognition, face recognition and speaker verification. However, these diverse tasks share a key commonality that is not true in affective computing: the ground truth information that is inferred can be unambiguously represented. This observation provides some hints as to why affective computing, despite having attracted the attention of researchers for years, may not still be considered a mature field of research. A key reason for this is the lack of a common mathematical framework to describe all the relevant elements of emotion representations. This paper proposes the AMBiguous Emotion Representation (AMBER) framework to address this deficiency. AMBER is a unified framework that explicitly describes categorical, numerical and ordinal representations of emotions, including time varying representations. In addition to explaining the core elements of AMBER, the paper also discusses how some of the commonly employed emotion representation schemes can be viewed through the AMBER framework, and concludes with a discussion of how the proposed framework can be used to reason about current and future affective computing systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Indeterminacy in Affective Computing: Considering Meaning and Context in Data Collection Practices

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Affective labels inherit four qualities of indeterminacy from human interpretation, and the paper argues that data collection must track the context of those interpretations to make emotion prediction reliable.

  2. Meta-PerSER: Few-Shot Listener Personalized Speech Emotion Recognition via Meta-learning

    eess.AS 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Meta-PerSER uses MAML-style meta-training with combined-set training, derivative annealing, and per-layer learning rates to personalize speech emotion recognition to unseen annotators from 32 labeled examples, outperf...

  3. Emotions as Ambiguity-aware Ordinal Representations

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Ordinal representations based on the rate of change of ambiguous emotion annotations improve prediction of directional changes in continuous emotion traces, especially for unbounded labels like engagement.

Pith tools