REVIEW 3 cited by
Legal Requirements Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Modern software has been an integral part of everyday activities in many disciplines and application contexts. Introducing intelligent automation by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) led to break-throughs in many fields. The effectiveness of AI can be attributed to several factors, among which is the increasing availability of data. Regulations such as the general data protection regulation (GDPR) in the European Union (EU) are introduced to ensure the protection of personal data. Software systems that collect, process, or share personal data are subject to compliance with such regulations. Developing compliant software depends heavily on addressing legal requirements stipulated in applicable regulations, a central activity in the requirements engineering (RE) phase of the software development process. RE is concerned with specifying and maintaining requirements of a system-to-be, including legal requirements. Legal agreements which describe the policies organizations implement for processing personal data can provide an additional source to regulations for eliciting legal requirements. In this chapter, we explore a variety of methods for analyzing legal requirements and exemplify them on GDPR. Specifically, we describe possible alternatives for creating machine-analyzable representations from regulations, survey the existing automated means for enabling compliance verification against regulations, and further reflect on the current challenges of legal requirements analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Engineering the Law-Machine Learning Translation Problem: Developing Legally Aligned Models
A five-stage interdisciplinary framework integrates legal reasoning with ML development to design, evaluate, and select legally aligned models, illustrated with a hypothetical AML case study.
-
Generative Language Models Potential for Requirement Engineering Applications: Insights into Current Strengths and Limitations
ChatGPT and Gemini generally underperform task-specific models on requirements engineering benchmarks, except ChatGPT achieves a new top F1 score on the REQuestA question answering dataset.
-
A Rapid Review Regarding the Concept of Legal Requirements in Requirements Engineering
A rapid review finds that requirements engineering research lacks a shared definition of legal requirements and that common claims about them are not backed by empirical evidence.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.