Pith. sign in

REVIEW

3-D Feature and Acoustic Modeling for Far-Field Speech Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.05504 v2 pith:H354N4OQ submitted 2019-11-13 eess.AS cs.LGcs.SD

3-D Feature and Acoustic Modeling for Far-Field Speech Recognition

classification eess.AS cs.LGcs.SD
keywords speechmulti-channelacousticfeaturesmodelingrecognitionapproacharchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic speech recognition in multi-channel reverberant conditions is a challenging task. The conventional way of suppressing the reverberation artifacts involves a beamforming based enhancement of the multi-channel speech signal, which is used to extract spectrogram based features for a neural network acoustic model. In this paper, we propose to extract features directly from the multi-channel speech signal using a multi variate autoregressive (MAR) modeling approach, where the correlations among all the three dimensions of time, frequency and channel are exploited. The MAR features are fed to a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture which performs the joint acoustic modeling on the three dimensions. The 3-D CNN architecture allows the combination of multi-channel features that optimize the speech recognition cost compared to the traditional beamforming models that focus on the enhancement task. Experiments are conducted on the CHiME-3 and REVERB Challenge dataset using multi-channel reverberant speech. In these experiments, the proposed 3-D feature and acoustic modeling approach provides significant improvements over an ASR system trained with beamformed audio (average relative improvements of 10 % and 9 % in word error rates for CHiME-3 and REVERB Challenge datasets respectively.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.