Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Structured Review of Literature on Uncertainty in Machine Learning & Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00332 v1 pith:H3HMGN5N submitted 2024-06-01 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords uncertaintyreviewlearningquantificationunderstandingadaptationdeepdiscussion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The adaptation and use of Machine Learning (ML) in our daily lives has led to concerns in lack of transparency, privacy, reliability, among others. As a result, we are seeing research in niche areas such as interpretability, causality, bias and fairness, and reliability. In this survey paper, we focus on a critical concern for adaptation of ML in risk-sensitive applications, namely understanding and quantifying uncertainty. Our paper approaches this topic in a structured way, providing a review of the literature in the various facets that uncertainty is enveloped in the ML process. We begin by defining uncertainty and its categories (e.g., aleatoric and epistemic), understanding sources of uncertainty (e.g., data and model), and how uncertainty can be assessed in terms of uncertainty quantification techniques (Ensembles, Bayesian Neural Networks, etc.). As part of our assessment and understanding of uncertainty in the ML realm, we cover metrics for uncertainty quantification for a single sample, dataset, and metrics for accuracy of the uncertainty estimation itself. This is followed by discussions on calibration (model and uncertainty), and decision making under uncertainty. Thus, we provide a more complete treatment of uncertainty: from the sources of uncertainty to the decision-making process. We have focused the review of uncertainty quantification methods on Deep Learning (DL), while providing the necessary background for uncertainty discussion within ML in general. Key contributions in this review are broadening the scope of uncertainty discussion, as well as an updated review of uncertainty quantification methods in DL.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Prosocial Behavior Detection in Player Game Chat: From Aligning Human-AI Definitions to Efficient Annotation at Scale

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hybrid system using a calibrated SVM plus selective GPT-4o fallback detects prosocial game chat at roughly 0.90 precision while cutting LLM inference cost by about 70%.

  2. SurvUnc: A Meta-Model Based Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Survival Analysis

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SurvUnc trains a covariate-based meta-model on anchor-computed concordance errors to produce post-hoc uncertainty scores for any survival model.

Pith tools