Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LIFBench: Evaluating the Instruction Following Performance and Stability of Large Language Models in Long-Context Scenarios

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.07037 v3 pith:H4LLEKWR submitted 2024-11-11 cs.CL

LIFBench: Evaluating the Instruction Following Performance and Stability of Large Language Models in Long-Context Scenarios

classification cs.CL
keywords long-contextlifbenchstabilityacrosslanguagellmsmethodperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve in natural language processing (NLP), their ability to stably follow instructions in long-context inputs has become critical for real-world applications. However, existing benchmarks seldom focus on instruction-following in long-context scenarios or stability on different inputs. To bridge this gap, we introduce LIFBench, a scalable dataset designed to evaluate LLMs' instruction-following capabilities and stability across long contexts. LIFBench comprises three long-context scenarios and eleven diverse tasks, featuring 2,766 instructions generated through an automated expansion method across three dimensions: length, expression, and variables. For evaluation, we propose LIFEval, a rubric-based assessment method that enables precise, automated scoring of complex LLM responses without reliance on LLM-assisted assessments or human judgment. This method allows for a comprehensive analysis of model performance and stability from multiple perspectives. We conduct detailed experiments on 20 prominent LLMs across six length intervals. Our work contributes LIFBench and LIFEval as robust tools for assessing LLM performance in complex and long-context settings, offering valuable insights to guide future advancements in LLM development.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Instruction Adherence in Coding Agent Configuration Files: A Factorial Study of Four File-Structure Variables

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A 1650-session factorial study found no measurable impact from config file size, instruction position, architecture, or conflicts on coding agent adherence, though compliance declined within sessions.

  2. Arbor: A Framework for Reliable Navigation of Critical Conversation Flows

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0

    Decomposing decision-tree navigation into node-level retrieval and separate evaluation/generation steps improves LLM triage accuracy, cost, and latency across ten models.