Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Spatiotemporal Mapping of Anisotropic Thermal Transport in GaN Thin Films via Ultrafast X-ray Diffraction

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ultrafast X-ray diffraction can map lateral heat flow in thin GaN films and pinpoint the local slowdown caused by a wrinkle defect.

desk verdict A useful beam-offset ultrafast XRD metrology demonstration; the pristine-region numbers hold up, but the wrinkle-specific TBC drop is partly shaped by the SI's own regularization and needs explicit sensitivity analysis before being quoted. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02658 v1 pith:H5R45QNW submitted 2025-07-03 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Thanh Nguyen , Chuliang Fu , Mouyang Cheng , Buxuan Li , Tyra E. Espedal , Zhantao Chen , Kuan Qiao , Kumar Neeraj
show 12 more authors
Abhijatmedhi Chotrattanapituk Denisse Cordova Carrizales Eunbi Rha Tongtong Liu Shivam N. Kajale Deblina Sarkar Donald A. Walko Haidan Wen Svetlana V. Boriskina Gang Chen Jeehwan Kim Mingda Li
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 44.10.+i61.05.cp
keywords ultrafastx-raydiffractionthermalconductivityboundaryconductanceGaNthinfilmin-planetransportwrinkledefectlatticestrainmappingnon-contactmetrology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to turn spatially offset ultrafast X-ray diffraction into a thermal-metrology technique for thin films. By heating a 500 nm GaN film on silicon with an optical pump and scanning the pump position relative to a 1 µm X-ray probe, the authors reconstruct how lattice strain spreads laterally over time and fit the strain-derived temperature maps to a three-dimensional heat conduction model. In a smooth region they report an in-plane thermal conductivity of $92.8 \pm 22.0$ W/m·K and a GaN–Si interface conductance of $(2.8 \pm 0.2) \times 10^7$ W/m²·K, values corroborated by frequency-domain thermoreflectance and by previous literature. Near a single wrinkle the fit yields a four-fold drop in local thermal conductivity to $21.2 \pm 1.2$ W/m·K and a 25% drop in interface conductance, together with asymmetric heat dissipation across the defect. If the method works, it provides non-contact, layer-resolved access to lateral heat transport in multilayered microelectronics without a transducer layer.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the heat conduction equation with a diagonal, spatially varying conductivity tensor, $C\rho\, \partial T/\partial t = \nabla \cdot (\bar{k}\nabla T)$, solved by finite differences with a Neumann boundary condition at the GaN–Si interface that carries the thermal boundary conductance $G$. A second ingredient is the strain-to-temperature map: the measured (002) Bragg centroid shift is converted to a local temperature through Bragg diffraction and the linear thermal expansion coefficient, yielding micrometer-scale temperature snapshots at every pump–probe offset and time delay. The wrinkle is introduced as a localized (Gaussian- or triangle-shaped) reduction of the in-plane conductivity around the defect, and the wrinkle-region TBC is fitted together with the local conductivity under a curvature-regularized loss function that compares full spatiotemporal temperature maps and their derivatives.

What would settle it

Re-fit the wrinkle-region data with the curvature-regularization term removed and with a flat prior on the interface conductance change: if the unregularized optimum moves substantially away from $G_w = 2.12 \times 10^7$ W/m²·K (for example toward the single-parameter fits reported in the supplement, $G \approx 9.45 \times 10^6$ W/m²·K or $k_w \approx 9$ W/m·K), the claimed 25% drop and four-fold reduction would be artifacts of the prior.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the spatiotemporal evolution of pump-induced lattice strain, read as a shift of the (002) Bragg peak while the optical pump is displaced micrometer by micrometer from the X-ray probe, quantitatively encodes lateral heat flow in a 500 nm GaN-on-Si film. Fitting the strain-derived temperature profiles with the heat conduction equation, with the cross-plane conductivity fixed from frequency-domain thermoreflectance, gives $k_\parallel = 92.8 \pm 22.0$ W/m·K and $G = (2.8 \pm 0.2) \times 10^7$ W/m²·K; repeating the measurement with the probe 2 µm from a wrinkle gives a local $k_w = 21.2 \pm 1.2$ W/m·K and $G_w = (2.12 \pm 0.05) \times 10^7$ W/m²·K. The asymmetry in the angular shift across the wrinkle is taken as direct visualization of asymmetric heat dissipation, interpreted as the wrinkle acting as a locally reduced-conductivity barrier that also weakens the interface. Together the numbers imply that defects from the transfer process create local hotspots in an otherwise conductive film.

Load-bearing premise

The wrinkle results assume, before fitting, that the wrinkle changes the interface conductance only slightly; if the true wrinkle-induced change is not small, the reported 25% drop is pulled toward the homogeneous value by that prior and is not independently established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One non-contact, structurally specific measurement can yield both the in-plane thermal conductivity and the thermal boundary conductance of a thin-film stack, information normally split across different techniques.
  • Because X-rays penetrate and remain structure-specific, the approach should extend to buried or encapsulated layers where optical thermometry would require a metal transducer layer.
  • The wrinkle results show that a single transfer-induced defect can cut local in-plane conductivity by about a factor of four and reduce the interface conductance by about 25%, providing a concrete hotspot mechanism for device reliability models.
  • The anisotropy implied by the extracted in-plane and cross-plane conductivities is consistent with wurtzite GaN, so isotropic models of thin-film GaN underestimate lateral heat spreading.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The wrinkle-specific numbers are the least constrained part of the extraction: the fitting procedure adds a regularization term that assumes the wrinkle-induced change in interfacial conductance is small, so the reported 25% drop is partly shaped by that prior rather than freely measured.
  • An independent local probe of interface conductance under the wrinkle, or a re-fit without the regularization term, could test whether the reported $G_w$ is real or a bias from the prior.
  • The same beam-offset strain-mapping logic could be applied to phase-change memories or battery stacks, where the quantity that decides hotspot formation is the local interface conductance rather than the film conductivity.
  • Because the model discards the first 8 ns of data to avoid electronic-strain contamination, the extracted values are effective diffusive-regime parameters; a faster X-ray probe could test the assumed transition to diffusive transport.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a beam-offset ultrafast x-ray diffraction method to extract in-plane thermal conductivity and GaN/Si thermal boundary conductance in a 500 nm GaN thin film on silicon, and applies it to a single wrinkle defect. A three-dimensional heat-conduction model is fitted to spatiotemporal strain maps, yielding k∥ = (92.8 ± 22.0) W/m·K and G = (2.8 ± 0.2) × 10^7 W/m²K in a pristine region, consistent with FDTR measurements and literature. At a wrinkle, the authors report a four-fold local reduction of thermal conductivity (kw = 21.2 ± 1.2 W/m·K) and a 25% drop in TBC (Gw = 2.12 × 10^7 W/m²K) from a two-parameter fit with a regularization term. The raw data show a clear asymmetry across the wrinkle, supporting a qualitative reduction in local thermal transport, but the quantitative wrinkle-specific values are partially determined by the regularization assumption described in Supplementary S11.

Significance. If the pristine-region results are robust, the method is a valuable new thermal metrology tool: it offers non-contact, layer-resolved access to lateral heat transport in thin-film stacks, with micrometer spatial resolution, and the FDTR cross-check and literature benchmarking are notable strengths. The defect-mapping capability is qualitatively convincing and is the most novel aspect of the work. However, the quantitative wrinkle findings rest on a regularization prior whose strength is not varied, so the headline numbers (four-fold reduction, 25% TBC drop) need additional validation before the claims can be taken at face value. The paper provides a detailed supplement with the modeling framework, which facilitates the requested sensitivity analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [S11, Eqs. (S16)–(S17); main text 'Wrinkle-affected local thermal transport'] The reported 25% TBC drop is not an independent measurement. The loss function Ltot(GGaN,Si, kw) = L_non-wrinkle + L_wrinkle explicitly adds the pristine-region loss as a regularization, and the text states that the authors 'assume the change of the TBC due to the wrinkle is relatively small to avoid overfitting'. The fitted Gw = (2.12 ± 0.05) × 10^7 W/m²K is therefore pulled toward the homogeneous value 2.8 × 10^7 W/m²K by construction. The authors do not vary the regularization strength or report how Gw changes when the weight of L_non-wrinkle is reduced; the quoted uncertainty of ±0.05 × 10^7 reflects only the parameter scan with other parameters fixed. The abstract-level claim of a 25% drop is not supported unless this sensitivity is quantified or the claim is rephrased as a lower bound or as conditional on the stated prior.
  2. [S11, kw-only versus simultaneous fit; main text 'Wrinkle-affected local thermal transport'] The 'four-fold reduction' kw = (21.2 ± 1.2) W/m·K is likewise affected by the same regularization. S11 reports that a fit to the wrinkle data varying only kw yields kw = 9.00 W/m·K, a ten-fold reduction, and that varying only the TBC yields G = 9.45 × 10^6 W/m²K, showing that the simultaneous two-parameter fit with the TBC regularization substantially changes the inferred kw. The qualitative asymmetry in the raw data is convincing, but the quantitative '4 to 5 fold' statement is not robust against the choice of regularization. The authors should present a sensitivity analysis over the regularization weight, or report the range of (kw, Gw) pairs consistent with the data when the regularization is relaxed, and adjust the abstract accordingly.
  3. [Eq. (5) (Methods) and S11, Eq. (S15)] The loss function sums four terms with different physical units: |Tm - Ts| (K), the spatial derivative difference (K/µm), the time derivative difference (K/ns), and the max-min range difference (K). No weights or normalizations are specified, so the relative emphasis of the derivative and range terms is unit-dependent and not justified. This affects the one-parameter fit that yields k∥ = 92.8 W/m·K and the two-parameter wrinkle fit. The authors should either specify weights and normalizations or demonstrate that the fitted values are insensitive to reasonable reweighting (e.g., non-dimensionalizing each term).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Supplementary S12, Fig. S11 caption] The middle histogram is described as 'the cross-plane thermal conductivity of GaN (middle) fitted as k∥ = (92.8 ± 22.0) W/m·K'; this should be k⊥, since the FDTR measurement is cross-plane, while k∥ = 92.8 W/m·K is the in-plane value from the x-ray experiment.
  2. [Supplementary S11, text near Eqs. (S15)–(S17)] The text refers to 'TDTR experiments' when fixing k⊥ and G, whereas the main text and Methods use FDTR; the terminology should be made consistent.
  3. [Supplementary S10, wrinkle two-level model] The two-level model and the discussion of non-reciprocal transport are presented without quantitative definitions or tests, and are not needed for the data analysis. I suggest labeling this section as a qualitative/speculative microscopic picture or removing it to avoid over-interpretation.
  4. [Eqs. (6)–(7) (Methods)] The curvature regularization Lc in Eq. (6) is written as a single supremum-like expression without the summation and indices used in Eq. (5); the notation should be aligned with L so that the composition in Eq. (7) is unambiguous.
  5. [Fig. 2b inset and main text] The inset is described as showing 'the fitted maximum change in 2θ, A, immediately after the pump', but A is not defined in the main text or its caption; please define A explicitly or use a more descriptive label.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The reported 25% TBC drop at the wrinkle is partly a product of the paper's own regularization prior rather than a free, data-determined result.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplementary Information S11, Eqs. S16-S17 and surrounding text]
    "To address this issue of overfitting, we add regularization to the loss function and assume the change of the TBC is relatively small due to the possible residual strain field. ... We require the change of the TBC due to the wrinkle to be relatively small to avoid overfitting and the TBC is regularized by the case without a wrinkle."

    The wrinkle-specific TBC value Gw = (2.12 ± 0.05) × 10^7 W/m^2·K, presented in the main text as a 25% drop from the pristine G = 2.8 × 10^7 W/m^2·K, is not a free output of the data. The loss function Ltot(G, kw) = L_non-wrinkle + L_wrinkle is minimized while explicitly assuming that the TBC change is small and regularizing Gw toward the homogeneous, wrinkle-free value. The reported 25% reduction is therefore at least partly enforced by construction through the regularization prior, not independently established by the measured diffraction signal. The comparison fits reported in S11 do not lift this concern because the regularization strength and weighting are not varied, so the claimed quantitative defect finding remains prior-dependent.

full rationale

The homogeneous-region results are not circular. The in-plane conductivity k∥ = 92.8 ± 22.0 W/m·K is obtained by a one-parameter fit of a finite-difference heat-conduction model with the cross-plane conductivity fixed by an independent FDTR measurement, and the homogeneous GaN/Si TBC G = 2.8 × 10^7 W/m^2·K is corroborated both by the FDTR fit and by prior literature values. Those values are external anchors, not definitions of the target quantities, and the underlying heat equation is a standard physical model rather than a renamed version of the data. The wrinkle conductivity result kw = 21.2 W/m·K is also a fitted model parameter, but the local-conductivity reduction is supported by the observed asymmetry and is not itself defined by the regularization. The circularity is confined to the wrinkle TBC claim: S11 states that the fit assumes a small TBC change and regularizes the TBC with the wrinkle-free case, so the advertised 25% drop is partly imposed by the prior rather than freely determined by the data. Because this specific defect-level claim is central to the paper's abstract and conclusions, the partial circularity is material.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The extraction of k∥, Gw, kw, and G rests on several input values fitted to data (including the authors' own FDTR k⊥ and G), a discarded early-time window, an assumed wrinkle width and kernel shape, and a regularization prior on the wrinkle TBC. These are listed exhaustively above.

free parameters (10)
  • in-plane thermal conductivity k∥ = 92.8 ± 22.0 W/m·K
    One-parameter fit of the 3D heat conduction model to the full spatiotemporal XRD dataset, fixing k⊥ and G from FDTR.
  • thermal decay time constant τ = 45 ± 3 ns
    Single-exponential fit to the Δx=0 XRD decay; used to derive G = Cρl/τ = 2.8 × 10^7 W/m²K.
  • wrinkle-local thermal conductivity kw = 21.2 ± 1.2 W/m·K
    Two-parameter fit (with Gw) to the wrinkle scan data, with a regularization term.
  • wrinkle-local TBC Gw = 2.12 ± 0.05 × 10^7 W/m²K
    Fitted simultaneously with kw; regularization assumes the TBC change is small.
  • initial temperature profile parameters A, b, τ_exp = fitted per scan
    The initial profile is extracted from experimental data after discarding the first ~8 ns and smoothed with an exponential A·exp((x-b)/τ).
  • early-time cutoff = 8 ns
    Data before 8 ns are discarded to remove electronic strain; chosen by the authors.
  • cross-plane thermal conductivity k⊥ (from FDTR) = 65 ± 8 W/m·K
    Input to the XRD model; obtained from the authors' own FDTR measurement.
  • GaN/Si TBC (from FDTR) = 2.82 ± 0.45 × 10^7 W/m²K
    Input to the XRD model; obtained from the authors' own FDTR measurement.
  • loss function term weights = all 1
    Four terms with different units (K, K/m, K/s, K) are summed without normalization.
  • wrinkle width ε = ~1 µm (assumed)
    Gaussian or trapezoid kernel width Q(x,xw,ε); set to match the SEM-observed ~1 µm wrinkle, not fitted.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Fourier's law and the heat conduction equation describe the long-time lattice relaxation
    Used in Eq. 1 and S3; assumes diffusive phonon transport in a 500 nm film with MFP ~100 nm.
  • domain assumption Thermal conductivity tensor is diagonal with kxx=kyy=k∥ and kzz=k⊥
    Stated after Eq. 1; neglects off-diagonal terms.
  • domain assumption The measured 2θ shift converts to local temperature via cot(θ)Δθ = -αΔT
    S8 Eq. S2; linear thermal expansion coefficient; authors note a Poisson-ratio correction that does not change fits.
  • domain assumption After ~8 ns the film temperature is uniform along z and the substrate stays at 300 K
    S9 C and S11; used to set initial condition and boundary.
  • ad hoc to paper The wrinkle modifies thermal conductivity locally as k∥(x) = k∥,hom + Q(x,xw,ε)Δkw, with Q approximated as a triangle or trapezoid
    S10; the Gaussian kernel and δ-source approximation are introduced to model the wrinkle.
  • ad hoc to paper The TBC change at the wrinkle is small; regularization should keep Gw near the homogeneous value
    S11; explicitly assumed to avoid overfitting when fitting kw and Gw.
  • domain assumption The late-time centroid shift is dominated by lattice thermal expansion, with electronic strain removed by the 8 ns cutoff
    Main text 'Extraction' section and S4; supports the single-component diffusive model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatiotemporal Mapping of Anisotropic Thermal Transport in GaN Thin Films via Ultrafast X-ray Diffraction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H5R45QNW

@misc{pith2026250702658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatiotemporal Mapping of Anisotropic Thermal Transport in GaN Thin Films via Ultrafast X-ray Diffraction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H5R45QNW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02658}
}
read the original abstract

Efficient thermal management is essential for the reliability of modern power electronics, where increasing device density leads to severe heat dissipation challenges. However, in thin-film systems, thermal transport is often compromised by interfacial resistance and microscale defects introduced during synthesis or transfer, which are difficult to characterize using conventional techniques. Here we present a non-contact, spatiotemporal-resolved ultrafast x-ray diffraction method to extract in-plane thermal conductivity and thermal boundary conductance, using GaN thin films on silicon as a model system. By tracking the pump-induced lattice strain, we reconstruct the lateral heat flow dynamics and quantitatively probe thermal transport near a wrinkle defect. We uncover pronounced asymmetric heat dissipation across the wrinkle, with a four-fold reduction in the local thermal conductivity near the wrinkle and a 25% drop in interfacial conductance. Our work demonstrates that ultrafast x-ray diffraction can serve as a precise thermal metrology tool for characterizing heat transport in multilayered thin-film structures for next-generation microelectronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02658 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. GaN film characterization with ultrafast x-ray diffraction. a. Illustration of the experi￾mental setup. A displaceable 343 nm pump laser at 54 kHz illuminates a location on the epitaxial 500 nm thick GaN thin film on Si substrate. A 11 keV x-ray probe beam (at 6.5 MHz) at a fixed position ∆x and at a time delay ∆t relative to the pump laser measures the (002) diffraction peak. b. Optical image of the GaN thin film w… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Determination of the lateral thermal conductivity. a. Illustration of the measurement scheme. The x-ray probe is located at the origin. Time series measurements are taken as the pump laser is scanned horizontally along ∆y = 0. b. 2θ angular shift at spatial coincidence (∆x = 0) as a function of pump-probe time delay ∆t. Inset shows the fitted maximum change in 2θ, A, immediately after the pump and the measured power… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Wrinkle-affected asymmetric local thermal transport. a. Schematic of the measurement scheme. The x-ray probe is located at the origin and the vertical wrinkle is at ∆x = −2 µm. Time series measurements are taken as the pump laser is scanned horizontally along ∆y = 0. b. Optical image of the GaN thin film; light-colored area indicates the scan region. Scale bar is 100 µm. c. Images of the discernible ∼ 1 µm-wide wrin… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diffraction-based thermal metrology for thermal conductivity and literature compari￾son. a. Computational modeling of the thermal model (red dashed lines) plotted on the experimental x-ray data (green squares) in the absence (top) and presence (bottom) of the wrinkle t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. M. Sabry Aly, T. F. Wu, A. Bartolo, Y. H. Malviya, W. Hwang, G. Hills, I. Markov, M. Wootters, M. M. Shulaker, H.-S. Philip Wong, and S. Mitra, The N3XT Approach to Energy-Efficient Abundant- Data Computing, Proc. IEEE 107, 19 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Pop, Energy dissipation and transport in nanoscale devices, Nano Res

    E. Pop, Energy dissipation and transport in nanoscale devices, Nano Res. 3, 147 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    D. G. Cahill, P. V. Braun, G. Chen, D. R. Clarke, S. Fan, K. E. Goodson, P. Keblinski, W. P. King, G. D. Mahan, A. Majumdar, H. J. Maris, S. R. Phillpot, E. Pop, and L. Shi, Nanoscale thermal transport. II. 2003–2012, Appl. Phys. Rev. 1, 011305 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    D. G. Cahill, Analysis of heat flow in layered structures for time-domain thermoreflectance, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 5119 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    A. J. Schmidt, R. Cheaito, and M. Chiesa, Characterization of thin metal films via frequency-domain thermoreflectance, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 024908 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Jiang, X

    P. Jiang, X. Qian, and R. Yang, Tutorial: Time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR) for thermal property characterization of bulk and thin film materials, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 161103 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    D. G. Cahill, Thermal conductivity measurement from 30 to 750 K: the 3 ω method, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 802 (1990)

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    Malekpour and A

    H. Malekpour and A. A. Balandin, Raman-based technique for measuring thermal conductivity of graphene and related materials, J. Raman Spectrosc. 49, 106 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    H. D. Nguyen, I. Yamada, T. Nishimura, H. Pang, H. Cho, D.-M. Tang, J. Kikkawa, M. Mitome, D. Golberg, K. Kimoto, T. Mori, and N. Kawamoto, STEM in situ thermal wave observations for investigating thermal diffusivity in nanoscale materials and devices, Sci. Adv. 10, eadj3825 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    L. Shi, D. Li, C. Yu, W. Jang, D. Kim, Z. Yao, P. Kim, and A. Majumdar, Measuring Thermal and Thermoelectric Properties of One-Dimensional Nanostructures Using a Microfabricated Device, J. Heat Transfer 125, 881 (2003)

    2003

  3. [11]

    Rodin and S

    D. Rodin and S. K. Yee, Simultaneous measurement of in-plane and through-plane thermal conductivity using beam-offset frequency domain thermoreflectance, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 014902 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    J. L. Braun, D. H. Olson, J. T. Gaskins, and P. E. Hopkins, A steady-state thermoreflectance method 11 to measure thermal conductivity, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 024905 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Z. Chen, X. Shen, N. Andrejevic, T. Liu, D. Luo, T. Nguyen, N. C. Drucker, M. E. Kozina, Q. Song, C. Hua, G. Chen, X. Wang, J. Kong, and M. Li, Panoramic Mapping of Phonon Transport from Ultrafast Electron Diffraction and Scientific Machine Learning, Adv. Mater. 35, 2206997 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Thomsen, H

    C. Thomsen, H. T. Grahn, H. J. Maris, and J. Tauc, Surface generation and detection of phonons by picosecond light pulses, Phys. Rev. B 34, 4129 (1986)

    1986

  7. [15]

    Highland, B

    M. Highland, B. Gundrum, Y. K. Koh, R. S. A verback, D. G. Cahill, V. Elarde, J. Coleman, D. Walko, and E. Landahl, Ballistic-phonon heat conduction at the nanoscale as revealed by time-resolved x-ray diffraction and time-domain thermoreflectance, Phys. Rev. B 76, 075337 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    Y. Zhu, F. Chen, J. Park, K. Sasikumar, B. Hu, A. R. Damodaran, I. W. Jung, M. J. Highland, Z. Cai, I.-C. Tung, D. A. Walko, J. W. Freeland, L. W. Martin, S. K. R. S. Sankaranarayanan, P. G. Evans, A. M. Lindenberg, and H. Wen, Structural imaging of nanoscale phonon transport ...

    2017

  9. [17]

    C. Nyby, A. Sood, P. Zalden, A. J. Gabourie, P. Muscher, D. Rhodes, E. Mannebach, J. Corbett, A. Mehta, E. Pop, T. F. Heinz, and A. M. Lindenberg, Visualizing Energy Transfer at Buried Interfaces in Layered Materials Using Picosecond X-Rays, Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2002282 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Sokolowski-Tinten, C

    K. Sokolowski-Tinten, C. Blome, J. Blums, A. Cavalleri, C. Dietrich, A. Tarasevitch, I. Uschmann, E. Förster, M. Kammler, M. Horn-von Hoegen, and D. von der Linde, Femtosecond X-ray measurement of coherent lattice vibrations near the Lindemann stability limit, Nature 422, 287 (2003)

    2003

  11. [19]

    S. H. Lee, A. L. Cavalieri, D. M. Fritz, M. C. Swan, R. S. Hegde, M. Reason, R. S. Goldman, and D. A. Reis, Generation and Propagation of a Picosecond Acoustic Pulse at a Buried Interface: Time-Resolved X-Ray Diffraction Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 246104 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    H. Wen, P. Chen, M. P. Cosgriff, D. A. Walko, J. H. Lee, C. Adamo, R. D. Schaller, J. F. Ihlefeld, E. M. Dufresne, D. G. Schlom, P. G. Evans, J. W. Freeland, and Y. Li, Electronic Origin of Ultrafast Photoinduced Strain in BiFeO 3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 037601 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Schick, M

    D. Schick, M. Herzog, A. Bojahr, W. Leitenberger, A. Hertwig, R. Shayduk, and M. Bargheer, Ultrafast lattice response of photoexcited thin films studied by X-ray diffraction, Struct. Dyn. 1, 064501 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    D. Zhu, A. Robert, T. Henighan, H. T. Lemke, M. Chollet, J. M. Glownia, D. A. Reis, and M. Trigo, Phonon spectroscopy with sub-meV resolution by femtosecond x-ray diffuse scattering, Phys. Rev. B 92, 054303 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Pudell, A

    J. Pudell, A. A. Maznev, M. Herzog, M. Kronseder, C. H. Back, G. Malinowski, A. von Reppert, and M. Bargheer, Layer specific observation of slow thermal equilibration in ultrathin metallic nanostructures 12 by femtosecond X-ray diffraction, Nat. Commun. 9, 3335 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    R. L. Xu, M. Muñoz Rojo, S. M. Islam, A. Sood, B. Vareskic, A. Katre, N. Mingo, K. E. Goodson, H. G. Xing, D. Jena, and E. Pop, Thermal conductivity of crystalline AlN and the influence of atomic-scale defects, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 185105 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    M. S. B. Hoque, Y. R. Koh, J. L. Braun, A. Mamun, Z. Liu, K. Huynh, M. E. Liao, K. Hussain, Z. Cheng, E. R. Hoglund, D. H. Olson, J. A. Tomko, K. Aryana, R. Galib, J. T. Gaskins, M. M. M. Elahi, Z. C. Leseman, J. M. Howe, T. Luo, S. Graham, M. S. Goorsky, A. Khan, and P. E. Ho...

    2021

  18. [26]

    Perez, A

    C. Perez, A. J. McLeod, M. E. Chen, S.-i. Yi, S. Vaziri, R. Hood, S. T. Ueda, X. Bao, M. Asheghi, W. Park, A. A. Talin, S. Kumar, E. Pop, A. C. Kummel, and K. E. Goodson, High Thermal Conductivity of Submicrometer Aluminum Nitride Thin Films Sputter-Deposited at Low Temperatur...

    2023

  19. [27]

    H. Kim, C. S. Chang, S. Lee, J. Jiang, J. Jeong, M. Park, Y. Meng, J. Ji, Y. Kwon, X. Sun, W. Kong, H. S. Kum, S.-H. Bae, K. Lee, Y. J. Hong, J. Shi, and J. Kim, Remote epitaxy, Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2, 40 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    A. Y. Serov, Z.-Y. Ong, and E. Pop, Effect of grain boundaries on thermal transport in graphene, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 033104 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    A. Sood, R. Cheaito, T. Bai, H. Kwon, Y. Wang, C. Li, L. Yates, T. Bougher, S. Graham, M. Asheghi, M. Goorsky, and K. E. Goodson, Direct Visualization of Thermal Conductivity Suppression Due to Enhanced Phonon Scattering Near Individual Grain Boundaries, Nano Lett. 18, 3466 (2018)

    2018

  22. [31]

    C. Wang, Y. Liu, L. Li, and H. Tan, Anisotropic thermal conductivity of graphene wrinkles, Nanoscale 6, 5703 (2014)

    2014

  23. [32]

    S. E. Kim, F. Mujid, A. Rai, F. Eriksson, J. Suh, P. Poddar, A. Ray, C. Park, E. Fransson, Y. Zhong, D. A. Muller, P. Erhart, D. G. Cahill, and J. Park, Extremely anisotropic van der Waals thermal conductors, Nature 597, 660 (2021)

    2021

  24. [33]

    C. M. Neumann, K. L. Okabe, E. Yalon, R. W. Grady, H.-S. P. Wong, and E. Pop, Engineering thermal and electrical interface properties of phase change memory with monolayer MoS 2, Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 082103 (2019)

    2019

  25. [34]

    Deshmukh, M

    S. Deshmukh, M. M. Rojo, E. Yalon, S. Vaziri, C. Koroglu, R. Islam, R. A. Iglesias, K. Saraswat, and E. Pop, Direct measurement of nanoscale filamentary hot spots in resistive memory devices, Sci. Adv. 13 8, eabk1514 (2022)

    2022

  26. [35]

    H. Kim, Y. Liu, K. Lu, C. S. Chang, D. Sung, M. Akl, K. Qiao, K. S. Kim, B.-I. Park, M. Zhu, J. M. Suh, J. Kim, J. Jeong, Y. Baek, Y. J. Ji, S. Kang, S. Lee, N. M. Han, C. Kim, C. Choi, X. Zhang, H.-K. Choi, Y. Zhang, H. Wang, L. Kong, N. N. Afeefah, M. N. M. Ansari, J. Park, ...

    2023

  27. [36]

    Y. Kim, S. S. Cruz, K. Lee, B. O. Alawode, C. Choi, Y. Song, J. M. Johnson, C. Heidelberger, W. Kong, S. Choi, K. Qiao, I. Almansouri, E. A. Fitzgerald, J. Kong, A. M. Kolpak, J. Hwang, and J. Kim, Remote epitaxy through graphene enables two-dimensional material-based layer tr...

    2017

  28. [37]

    S. Lee, W. Jo, A. D. DiChiara, T. P. Holmes, S. Santowski, Y. C. Cho, and E. C. Landahl, Probing Electronic Strain Generation by Separated Electron-Hole Pairs Using Time-Resolved X-ray Scattering, Appl. Sci. 9, 4788 (2019)

    2019

  29. [38]

    W. Jo, Y. C. Cho, S. Kim, E. C. Landahl, and S. Lee, Reduced Thermal Conductivity in Ultrafast Laser Heated Silicon Measured by Time-Resolved X-ray Diffraction, Crystals 11, 186 (2021)

    2021

  30. [39]

    J. Lee, W. Jo, J.-H. Kwon, B. Griffin, B.-G. Cho, E. C. Landahl, and S. Lee, Time-Resolved Structural Measurement of Thermal Resistance across a Buried Semiconductor Heterostructure Interface, Materials 16, 7450 (2023)

    2023

  31. [41]

    Sarua, H

    A. Sarua, H. Ji, K. P. Hilton, D. J. Wallis, M. J. Uren, T. Martin, and M. Kuball, Thermal Bound- ary Resistance Between GaN and Substrate in AlGaN/GaN Electronic Devices, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 54, 3152 (2007)

    2007

  32. [42]

    J. Cho, Y. Li, W. E. Hoke, D. H. Altman, M. Asheghi, and K. E. Goodson, Phonon scattering in strained transition layers for GaN heteroepitaxy, Phys. Rev. B 89, 115301 (2014)

    2014

  33. [43]

    B. Sun, G. Haunschild, C. Polanco, J. Z.-J. Ju, L. Lindsay, G. Koblmüller, and Y. K. Koh, Dislocation- induced thermal transport anisotropy in single-crystal group-III nitride films, Nat. Mater. 18, 136 (2019)

    2019

  34. [44]

    P. W. Anderson, B. I. Halperin, and C. M. Varma, Anomalous low-temperature thermal properties of glasses and spin glasses, Philosophical Magazine 25, 1 (1972)

    1972

  35. [45]

    R. Wu, R. Hu, and X. Luo, First-principle-based full-dispersion Monte Carlo simulation of the anisotropic phonon transport in the wurtzite GaN thin film, J. Appl. Phys. 119, 145706 (2016)

    2016

  36. [46]

    D. Q. Tran, T. Paskova, V. Darakchieva, and P. P. Paskov, On the thermal conductivity anisotropy in 14 wurtzite GaN, AIP Adv. 13, 095009 (2023)

    2023

  37. [47]

    T. E. Beechem, A. E. McDonald, E. J. Fuller, A. A. Talin, C. M. Rost, J.-P. Maria, J. T. Gaskins, P. E. Hopkins, and A. A. Allerman, Size dictated thermal conductivity of GaN, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 095104 (2016)

    2016

  38. [49]

    A. J. Schmidt, R. Cheaito, and M. Chiesa, A frequency-domain thermoreflectance method for the characterization of thermal properties, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 094901 (2009)

    2009

  39. [50]

    J. Yang, C. Maragliano, and A. J. Schmidt, Thermal property microscopy with frequency domain ther- moreflectance, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84, 104904 (2013)

    2013

  40. [51]

    virtual layers

    J. Yang, E. Ziade, and A. J. Schmidt, Uncertainty analysis of thermoreflectance measurements, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 014901 (2016) . Author contributions : TN and ML conceived the experiments and ML supervised the project. TN, CF, MC, TEE, ZC, AC, DCC, ER, and ML performed the ...

    2016

  41. [52]

    Chen, Nanoscale energy transport and conversion: a parallel treatment of electrons, molecules, phonons, and photons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005)

    G. Chen, Nanoscale energy transport and conversion: a parallel treatment of electrons, molecules, phonons, and photons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005)

    2005

  42. [53]

    Weinan, Principles of multiscale modeling (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    E. Weinan, Principles of multiscale modeling (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  43. [54]

    N. M. Ravindra, S. R. Marthi, and A. Bañobre, Radiative Properties of Semiconductors (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2017)

    2017

  44. [55]

    Jeżowski, B

    A. Jeżowski, B. A. Danilchenko, M. Boćkowski, I. Grzegory, S. Krukowski, T. Suski, and T. Paszkiewicz, Thermal conductivity of GaN crystals in 4.2–300 K range, Solid State Commun. 128, 69 (2003)

    2003

  45. [56]

    C. Mion, J. F. Muth, E. A. Preble, and D. Hanser, Accurate dependence of gallium nitride thermal conductivity on dislocation density, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 092123 (2006)

    2006

  46. [57]

    R. B. Simon, J. Anaya, and M. Kuball, Thermal conductivity of bulk GaN—Effects of oxygen, magnesium doping, and strain field compensation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 202105 (2014)

    2014

  47. [58]

    Jeżowski, O

    A. Jeżowski, O. Churiukova, J. Mucha, T. Suski, I. A. Obukhov, and B. A. Danilchenko, Thermal conductivity of heavily doped bulk crystals GaN:O. Free carriers contribution, Mater. Res. Express 2, 085902 (2015)

    2015

  48. [59]

    Sarua, H

    A. Sarua, H. Ji, K. P. Hilton, D. J. Wallis, M. J. Uren, T. Martin, and M. Kuball, Thermal Boundary Resistance Between GaN and Substrate in AlGaN/GaN Electronic Devices, IEEE Trans. Electron De- 23 vices 54, 3152 (2007)

    2007

  49. [60]

    Y. R. Koh, M. S. B. Hoque, H. Ahmad, D. H. Olson, Z. Liu, J. Shi, Y. Wang, K. Huynh, E. R. Hoglund, K. Aryana, J. M. Howe, M. S. Goorsky, S. Graham, T. Luo, J. K. Hite, W. A. Doolittle, and P. E. Hopkins, High thermal conductivity and thermal boundary conductance of homoepitax...

    2021

  50. [61]

    H. Li, R. Hanus, C. A. Polanco, A. Zeidler, G. Koblmüller, Y. K. Koh, and L. Lindsay, GaN thermal transport limited by the interplay of dislocations and size effects, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014313 (2020)

    2020

  51. [62]

    Ziade, J

    E. Ziade, J. Yang, G. Brummer, D. Nothern, T. Moustakas, and A. J. Schmidt, Thickness dependent thermal conductivity of gallium nitride, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 031903 (2017)

    2017

  52. [63]

    J. Cho, Y. Li, W. E. Hoke, D. H. Altman, M. Asheghi, and K. E. Goodson, Phonon scattering in strained transition layers for GaN heteroepitaxy, Phys. Rev. B 89, 115301 (2014) . 24

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.