REVIEW 1 cited by
Direction Dependence of the Deceleration Parameter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Direction Dependence of the Deceleration Parameter
read the original abstract
In this paper we study the possibly existing anisotropy in the acceleration expansion by use of the full sample of Union2 data. Using the hemisphere comparison method to search for a preferred direction, we take the deceleration parameter q0 as the diagnostic to quantify the anisotropy level in the wCDM model. We find that the maximum accelerating expansion direction is $(l,b)=(314_{+20^{\circ}}^{\circ-13^{\circ}},28_{+11^{\circ}}^{\circ-33^{\circ}})$,with the maximum anisotropy level of $\delta q_{0,max}/\bar{q}_0=0.79_{+0.27}^{-0.28}$, and that the anisotropy is more prominent when only low redshift data ($z\leq0.2$) are used. We also discuss this issue in the $CPL$ parameterized model, showing a similar result.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Covariant cosmography in the presence of local structures: comparing exact solutions and perturbation theory
Off-center observers in a spherical LTB overdensity get accurate cosmographic distances up to δc≈2.5 near the structure, while linear perturbation theory is better beyond ~3Rs; a gauge dictionary links the two.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.