Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

EXSCLAIM! -- An automated pipeline for the construction of labeled materials imaging datasets from literature

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.10631 v1 pith:HC52WJ5R submitted 2021-03-19 cs.IR cond-mat.mtrl-sci

EXSCLAIM! -- An automated pipeline for the construction of labeled materials imaging datasets from literature

classification cs.IR cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords dataimagesexsclaimliteratureconstructionimaginglabeledmaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Due to recent improvements in image resolution and acquisition speed, materials microscopy is experiencing an explosion of published imaging data. The standard publication format, while sufficient for traditional data ingestion scenarios where a select number of images can be critically examined and curated manually, is not conducive to large-scale data aggregation or analysis, hindering data sharing and reuse. Most images in publications are presented as components of a larger figure with their explicit context buried in the main body or caption text, so even if aggregated, collections of images with weak or no digitized contextual labels have limited value. To solve the problem of curating labeled microscopy data from literature, this work introduces the EXSCLAIM! Python toolkit for the automatic EXtraction, Separation, and Caption-based natural Language Annotation of IMages from scientific literature. We highlight the methodology behind the construction of EXSCLAIM! and demonstrate its ability to extract and label open-source scientific images at high volume.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can Multimodal LLMs See Materials Clearly? A Multimodal Benchmark on Materials Characterization

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new 1,500-question benchmark shows multimodal LLMs score about 26 to 31 points below human experts on understanding materials characterization images.