REVIEW 2 cited by
An Introductory Study on Time Series Modeling and Forecasting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
An Introductory Study on Time Series Modeling and Forecasting
read the original abstract
Time series modeling and forecasting has fundamental importance to various practical domains. Thus a lot of active research works is going on in this subject during several years. Many important models have been proposed in literature for improving the accuracy and effectiveness of time series forecasting. The aim of this dissertation work is to present a concise description of some popular time series forecasting models used in practice, with their salient features. In this thesis, we have described three important classes of time series models, viz. the stochastic, neural networks and SVM based models, together with their inherent forecasting strengths and weaknesses. We have also discussed about the basic issues related to time series modeling, such as stationarity, parsimony, overfitting, etc. Our discussion about different time series models is supported by giving the experimental forecast results, performed on six real time series datasets. While fitting a model to a dataset, special care is taken to select the most parsimonious one. To evaluate forecast accuracy as well as to compare among different models fitted to a time series, we have used the five performance measures, viz. MSE, MAD, RMSE, MAPE and Theil's U-statistics. For each of the six datasets, we have shown the obtained forecast diagram which graphically depicts the closeness between the original and forecasted observations. To have authenticity as well as clarity in our discussion about time series modeling and forecasting, we have taken the help of various published research works from reputed journals and some standard books.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The noiseless limit and improved-prior limit of the maximum entropy method and their implications for the analytic continuation problem
Maximum-entropy analytic continuation becomes linear, Bryan's algorithm becomes valid, and MSE scaling improves in the limit where the estimator sits close to the Bayesian prior.
-
A Survey on Data-Driven Models for Soil Moisture Regression and Classification
A structured survey categorizing AI models for soil moisture estimation into statistical time-series, geostatistical, classical ML, deep learning, and probabilistic/Bayesian approaches.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.