Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Why is BeGeN₂ different? A computational bonding analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.20980 v1 pith:HD55OUGP submitted 2024-10-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Why is BeGeN₂ different? A computational bonding analysis

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords analysisbegenbondingdifferentgroupmaterialsspaceanticipated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Until recently, all known ordered II-IV-N2 materials crystallised in the $\beta$-NaFeO$_2$-type in space group Pna2$_1$. BeGeN$_2$, however, crystallises in space group Pmc2$_1$, with a different cation ordering motif long anticipated for this materials class. Chemical bonding analysis is used to rationalise this particular behaviour.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.