REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning Best Combination for Efficient N:M Sparsity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
By forcing at most N out of M consecutive weights to be non-zero, the recent N:M network sparsity has received increasing attention for its two attractive advantages: 1) Promising performance at a high sparsity. 2) Significant speedups on NVIDIA A100 GPUs. Recent studies require an expensive pre-training phase or a heavy dense-gradient computation. In this paper, we show that the N:M learning can be naturally characterized as a combinatorial problem which searches for the best combination candidate within a finite collection. Motivated by this characteristic, we solve N:M sparsity in an efficient divide-and-conquer manner. First, we divide the weight vector into $C_{\text{M}}^{\text{N}}$ combination subsets of a fixed size N. Then, we conquer the combinatorial problem by assigning each combination a learnable score that is jointly optimized with its associate weights. We prove that the introduced scoring mechanism can well model the relative importance between combination subsets. And by gradually removing low-scored subsets, N:M fine-grained sparsity can be efficiently optimized during the normal training phase. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that our learning best combination (LBC) performs consistently better than off-the-shelf N:M sparsity methods across various networks. Our project is released at \url{https://github.com/zyxxmu/LBC}.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Neural Architecture Codesign for Fast Physics Applications
An automated two-stage neural architecture search and compression pipeline discovers FPGA-efficient models for Bragg peak finding and jet classification, beating or matching hand-crafted baselines on accuracy, latency...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.