Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 75 references

The paper claims that an effective operator coupling an active neutrino, a sterile neutrino, and two photons — active–sterile neutrino polarizability — can produce a distinctive single-photon signal at neutrino experiments, and that a light

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 17:51 UTC pith:HFL7N77P

load-bearing objection Genuinely new operator and useful constraints, but the MiniBooNE 'best fit' is not a single model: energy and angular histograms use two different coupling values, so the central claim is not yet demonstrated. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.07691 v2 pith:HFL7N77P submitted 2025-12-08 hep-ph hep-ex

Enhanced active-sterile neutrino polarizability at the intensity frontier

Julia Gehrlein , Anil Thapa , Adrian Thompson This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords active-sterile neutrino polarizabilitydimension-7 operatorneutrino-photon interactionsMiniBooNE low-energy excessneutrino-induced inverse Primakoff scatteringsingle-photon eventssterile neutrino decaylight mediator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces and studies a new kind of neutrino interaction: a dimension-7 operator in which one active neutrino and one sterile neutrino meet two photons. If this operator exists, neutrinos scattering off nuclei can emit a single forward photon, and a heavy sterile neutrino gains a new decay into a neutrino and two photons. The authors derive the first constraints on this operator from existing NOMAD and MiniBooNE single-photon data, and they show that a UV realization with a light scalar mediator can reproduce both the energy and angular distributions of the MiniBooNE excess with a sterile mass around 350 MeV and a mediator around 50 MeV. If correct, this is a viable new-physics explanation of the anomaly that upcoming liquid-argon detectors (SBND, ICARUS, DUNE) will directly test, and it adds a new channel to sterile-neutrino searches.

Core claim

The dimension-7 operator L_pol = (C_ij/Λ^3) N_j ν_i F^{μν}\tilde F_{μν}, coupling an active and a sterile neutrino to two photons, produces a coherent single-photon process ν A → N A γ whose photon energy and angular distributions depend strongly on the sterile mass m_N. Matching this process to NOMAD and MiniBooNE data yields constraints reaching ~5×10^-7 GeV^-3 for m_N below 1 GeV, with DUNE projected to reach one to three orders of magnitude deeper. Replacing the contact interaction by a light pseudo-scalar φ changes the momentum-transfer structure, softening the forward peak; the authors show this model fits the MiniBooNE excess at m_N ≈ 350 MeV, m_φ ≈ 50 MeV, coupling product c^μ_ν g_{φ

What carries the argument

The central object is the dimension-7 operator L_pol = (C_ij/Λ^3) N_j ν_i F^{μν}\tilde F_{μν} (plus its F F variant), which couples two neutrinos — one sterile, one active — to two photons. Its main phenomenological consequence is the coherent single-photon scattering process ν A → N A γ, called neutrino-induced inverse Primakoff (νIIP): it is enhanced by the atomic charge number Z^2, strongly forward-peaked, and the sterile mass m_N controls how much of the incoming neutrino energy goes into the photon. For the MiniBooNE explanation, the paper replaces the contact interaction with a light (pseudo)scalar φ coupled via g_{φγ} φ F\tilde F and c_ν (N ν) φ; the propagator factor (q^2 − m_φ^2)^{-

Load-bearing premise

The MiniBooNE explanation assumes that the light-mediator signal is not already ruled out by MicroBooNE's neutral-current coherent single-photon search, but the paper does not perform the dedicated reanalysis needed to verify that assumption.

What would settle it

A MicroBooNE or SBN analysis that uses the light-mediator νIIP signal template and finds no excess at m_N ≈ 350 MeV, m_φ ≈ 50 MeV with the predicted event rate would falsify the MiniBooNE explanation; a null mono-photon search at SBND or ICARUS at O(10^20) POT would also exclude the model.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the operator is real, neutrino experiments with good photon identification will see a mono-photon signal in neutral-current scattering; existing NOMAD data already exclude couplings above ~5×10^-7 GeV^-3 (muon flavor) for sterile masses below ~1 GeV.
  • The sterile neutrino gains a decay mode N → ν γ γ with rate proportional to m_N^7, independent of active–sterile mixing; for m_N ~ 1 GeV the decay length is tens of centimeters, which could produce a 'double-bang' signature in large detectors.
  • Because a sterile neutrino is in the final state, the new-physics signal does not interfere with Standard Model NC1γ production, so the contribution adds incoherently to the expected background.
  • Projected sensitivities at SBND, ICARUS, and especially DUNE (down to C/Λ^3 ~ 10^-8–10^-9 GeV^-3) can improve current accelerator constraints by one to three orders of magnitude for m_N below ~1 GeV.
  • If the light-mediator explanation is correct, its best-fit point will be testable at SBND and ICARUS with about 10^20 protons-on-target.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A dedicated MicroBooNE reanalysis that implements the light-mediator νIIP signal template will either validate or exclude the best-fit region; if validated, the same template predicts a measurable mono-photon rate at SBND and ICARUS within a few years.
  • The m_N^7 scaling of N → ν γ γ suggests that beam-dump experiments producing sterile neutrinos could search for displaced two-photon vertices; this decay channel is a complementary probe that the paper notes only briefly.
  • The same light-mediator couplings imply self-interactions in the sterile-neutrino sector, which could affect early-universe cosmology and the production of sterile neutrino dark matter beyond the BBN/CMB mass bound cited in the paper.
  • Because the singly-charged-scalar realization generates dipole moments and radiative Dirac masses in the same loop, existing limits on neutrino magnetic moments provide an indirect bound on the polarizability coefficient in that specific UV completion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the dimension-7 active-sterile neutrino polarizability operator ν N F \tilde F, focusing on the mono-photon scattering process ν A → N γ A (νIIP). The authors compute the cross section in coherent, incoherent, and DIS regimes, and derive constraints from NOMAD and MiniBooNE data, with projections for SBND, ICARUS, DUNE, JUNO-TAO, and PROSPECT-II. They then propose a light-mediator realization of the operator and claim it can explain the MiniBooNE low-energy excess with m_N ≈ 350 MeV, m_φ ≈ 50 MeV, and a coupling product c_ν^μ g_φγ ≈ 2.5 × 10⁻⁶ GeV⁻¹, while remaining consistent with other constraints. The paper also discusses two UV completions: a charged-lepton-loop mixing model and a singly charged scalar singlet model.

Significance. The EFT constraints in Fig. 5 potentially open a new probe of active-sterile neutrino interactions at intensity-frontier experiments, and the distinction between contact and light-mediator kinematics is conceptually interesting. The cross-section implementation leverages existing methods and public tools (FeynRules/MadGraph), and the projections are a useful step. However, the central MiniBooNE claim is not currently established: the energy and angular fits use different coupling products, the reported χ² values are not for a single model point, and the evasion of the MicroBooNE coherent-search bound is asserted rather than demonstrated. These issues are load-bearing for the abstract's main claim but are fixable with a dedicated combined fit and a quantitative recast.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV B, Fig. 6] The best-fit benchmark is not a single-model fit. The text quotes c_ν^μ g_φγ = 2.48×10⁻⁶ GeV⁻¹, but the angular panels of Fig. 6 use c_ν^μ g_φγ = 3.46×10⁻⁶ GeV⁻¹. Since the event rate scales as (c_ν^μ g_φγ)², the angular distributions correspond to roughly 1.95 times the event rate of the energy distributions. The reported χ²/dof values (1.81, 2.34, 3.45, 0.86) are therefore not the quality of a single model prediction; they come from independent one-dimensional fits with different normalizations. A simultaneous fit over the MiniBooNE energy and angular spectra in both the ν and \bar ν modes with one coupling product must be performed and the resulting χ²/dof reported. Without that, the claim that the model 'can explain the MiniBooNE low-energy excess' is not supported.
  2. [§IV B, MicroBooNE coherent bound] The paper states that the light-mediator νIIP signal can evade the MicroBooNE coherent single-photon search because the (E_γ, cos θ_γ) template differs from the SM coherent template, but no quantitative estimate is given. This is not a minor detail: MicroBooNE's coherent NC1γ search is a direct constraint on coherent single-photon production at overlapping energies. The claim that the model 'can therefore satisfy this bound' needs a recast that accounts for MicroBooNE's efficiency as a function of the signal template, or at least a conservative estimate based on the fraction of signal events passing the analysis cuts. Without this, the MiniBooNE explanation is not yet shown to be consistent with an existing experimental constraint.
  3. [§IV A vs §IV B] The light-mediator benchmark is not checked against the NOMAD or MiniBooNE exclusions derived in Section IV A for the contact operator. For q² ≪ m_φ², the light-mediator model matches to the dimension-7 operator with C/Λ³ ≈ c_ν g_φγ / m_φ², which for c_ν g_φγ = 2.48×10⁻⁶ GeV⁻¹ and m_φ = 50 MeV gives C/Λ³ ≈ 10⁻³ GeV⁻³, many orders of magnitude above the NOMAD bound shown in Fig. 5. Even if the finite-mediator propagator changes the q² dependence, a dedicated comparison of the light-mediator signal rate to NOMAD and MiniBooNE data is required to substantiate the claim that the benchmark is 'consistent with other experimental constraints.'
minor comments (4)
  1. [§IV B, text] There is a typo: 'a the product of couplings' should read 'the product of couplings'.
  2. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption does not state that the energy histograms use c_ν^μ g_φγ = 2.48×10⁻⁶ GeV⁻¹ while the angular histograms use 3.46×10⁻⁶ GeV⁻¹. The figure should either use one coupling or explicitly discuss the separate normalizations.
  3. [§IV B, Fig. 7] The quality of the fit is quoted as χ²/dof without specifying the number of bins or degrees of freedom. Reporting the number of data points and the fit dimension would make the goodness-of-fit assessment more informative.
  4. [Eq. (5)] The notation E is used for both the exposure factor and the photon energy E_γ; this is potentially confusing and should be disambiguated.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

MiniBooNE 'best fit' is a tuned fit with two different coupling normalizations, so the central 'explanation' reduces to fitting the excess rather than predicting it.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV B, Fig. 6 and Abstract]
    "From a fit to the photon energy and angular spectrum in the neutrino and antineutrino run of MiniBooNE, we find a best fit point in our model (see Fig. 6) with mN = 350 MeV, mφ = 50 MeV, and a the product of couplings cµν gφγ = 2.48×10−6 GeV−1."

    The abstract's load-bearing claim that a light-mediator realization 'can explain the MiniBooNE low-energy excess' rests on this fit: mN, mφ, and cµν gφγ are chosen to reproduce the excess, not derived from independent data. Moreover, Fig. 6 uses cµν gφγ = 2.48×10−6 GeV−1 for the photon-energy histograms but cµν gφγ = 3.46×10−6 GeV−1 for the angular histograms. A single Lagrangian parameter cannot take both values, so the reported χ2/dof ≈ 2 is not the quality of one model prediction; it is an aggregate of separately normalized fits. The central explanation therefore reduces to parameter fitting, not prediction.

full rationale

The paper's new EFT constraints (NOMAD, MiniBooNE exclusion curves, and future sensitivities in Fig. 5) are computed from external experimental data and do not reduce to the fitted MiniBooNE benchmark; those parts are self-contained and would merit a low circularity score. The circular element is confined to the advertised MiniBooNE 'solution': the benchmark point in §IV B is tuned to the same data it is said to explain, and the energy and angular distributions are separately normalized with different coupling products (2.48×10−6 vs 3.46×10−6 GeV−1), so no single point in the model parameter space is shown to reproduce both spectra simultaneously. I also flag the passage near ref. [81] — 'The νIIP coherent signal in presence of the light-mediator can therefore satisfy this bound, although deriving a precise constraint would require a dedicated reanalysis' — as a load-bearing consistency assumption that is explicitly unquantified; that is a correctness risk rather than a circularity. Self-citations ([16], [49]) are used for technical details (form factors, cross-section regimes) but the core matrix elements are implemented here with FeynRules/MadGraph, so they do not independently drive the circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central EFT analysis scans the Wilson coefficient rather than fitting it, but the MiniBooNE benchmark introduces three genuinely fitted parameters. The sterile neutrino, light mediator, and scalar UV completion are posited without independent evidence. Several inputs, especially the cross-section implementation, are borrowed from the same authors' prior work, creating a verification gap.

free parameters (3)
  • m_N (sterile neutrino mass) = 350 MeV (MiniBooNE benchmark)
    Chosen to fit the MiniBooNE photon spectrum; it controls how incoming neutrino energy is shared between the photon and final-state neutrino.
  • m_φ (light mediator mass) = 50 MeV
    Chosen to soften the extreme forward peaking of the contact interaction and reproduce the MiniBooNE angular distribution.
  • c_ν^μ g_φγ coupling product = 2.48e-6 GeV^-1 (energy fit); 3.46e-6 GeV^-1 (angular fit)
    Fitted to MiniBooNE photon energy and angular spectra in §IV B; the two values are not reconciled in a combined fit.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The dimension-7 operator L = C_ij/Λ^3 N_j ν_i F μν F̃_μν captures new low-energy physics below the weak scale.
    Used in Eq. (1); assumes no other operators contribute significantly to the single-photon process.
  • standard math Atomic/nuclear form factors are described by the combined dipole form for a screened atomic potential with the Helm parameterization.
    Used for coherent scattering in §II, following refs [47,48].
  • ad hoc to paper The coherent/incoherent/DIS cross-section implementation is correct as given in the appendix of ref [16].
    The paper relies on a same-author prior work without reproducing or independently validating the calculation.
  • domain assumption The N→νγγ decay rate is Γ = m_N^7/(1920π^3)|C/Λ^3|^2 from ref [67].
    Used in §II Eq. (3); assumes no other decay channels dominate the sterile-neutrino lifetime.
  • ad hoc to paper The Z-mediated ν+A→N+2γ+A channel is negligible relative to νIIP.
    Stated in §IV B with qualitative reasoning but no numerical comparison.
  • domain assumption Beam-dump and SN1987A constraints force g_φγ ≲ 10^-11 GeV^-1 for m_φ < 20 MeV.
    Used to discard the low-m_φ region in Fig. 7; these bounds are extrapolated from ALP literature [15,78-80] and may not exactly apply to a neutrino-coupled scalar.
  • standard math Appendix A's loop matching uses the Crewther-Finjord-Minkowski result for the axial-vector-current two-photon matrix element.
    Eq. (A2) is adopted without independent derivation; the paper explicitly follows ref [6].
invented entities (3)
  • Heavy sterile neutrino N no independent evidence
    purpose: Final-state heavy neutrino in νIIP and in the decay N→νγγ; enables the active-sterile operator.
    No confirmed experimental evidence is provided; the paper proposes parameter space to be tested by future experiments.
  • Light (pseudo-)scalar mediator φ no independent evidence
    purpose: Realizes the polarizability operator with a q^2-dependent propagator and fits the MiniBooNE excess.
    No independent detection exists; its predicted signatures at SBND/ICARUS and the double-bang topology are proposed within this paper.
  • Singly charged scalar S+ no independent evidence
    purpose: UV completion that generates the polarizability operator at one loop via neutrino/charged-lepton couplings.
    Introduced in §V B as a model-building illustration; no experimental handle outside the effective operator is established.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19616 in / 14530 out tokens · 134860 ms · 2026-08-03T17:51:43.725689+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Electromagnetic probes of neutrinos can provide insights into physics beyond the Standard Model. Among the possible electromagnetic interactions of neutrinos is neutrino polarizability, a dimension-7 effective operator that couples two neutrinos to two photons. In this manuscript, we study a realization of the neutrino polarizability operator in which one of the active neutrinos is replaced by a sterile neutrino. We derive new constraints on this active-sterile neutrino polarizability from its contribution to neutrino-nucleus scattering with a single photon in the final state at neutrino experiments. We show that a realization of this operator via a light mediator can explain the MiniBooNE low-energy excess while remaining consistent with other experimental constraints. Finally, we comment on additional model realizations of this higher-dimensional operator.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.07691 by Adrian Thompson, Anil Thapa, Julia Gehrlein.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The polarizability effective vertex between two pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The differential cross section, divided by the in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Heat maps of the two-dimensional differential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Neutrino-induced inverse Primakoff ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Exclusion region and future sensitivity from different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Photon energy (top) and angular distribution (bottom) spectrum from the MiniBooNE neutrino (left) and antineutrino [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Allowed parameter space in the plane of the mediator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The leading 1-loop diagram contributing to the 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Typical one-loop diagram contributing to the neu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 52 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    JUNO–T AO JUNO–TAO is a ton-scale Gd-doped liquid scintillator (GdLS) detector located at a short baseline (L∼30–40 m) from one of theP th ≃4.6 GW th Taishan reactor cores and serves as a high-resolution near detector for JUNO [24]. The central spherical acrylic vessel contains 2.8 tons of GdLS, with a 1 ton fiducial target corre- sponding toN T ≃1.2×10 2...

    2000

  2. [2]

    In phase II, a future run at a GW-scale low enriched ura- nium (LEU) reactor could also be possible

    PROSPECT-II at HFIR PROSPECT-II is a short-baseline detector at the 85 MW th HFIR research reactor, with baselinesL≃ 7–12 m from the compact, highly-enriched235U core [25]. In phase II, a future run at a GW-scale low enriched ura- nium (LEU) reactor could also be possible. The detec- tor consists of a segmented 6Li-doped liquid-scintillator (LiLS) target ...

  3. [3]

    Because the detector cannot distinguish an electron from a single photon shower, electron–neutrino interactions and NC1γevents produce indistinguishable signatures

    MiniBooNE MiniBooNE was a short baseline experiment that used a pure mineral-oil (CH 2) Cherenkov detector, which si- multaneously served as neutrino target and scintillating medium. Because the detector cannot distinguish an electron from a single photon shower, electron–neutrino interactions and NC1γevents produce indistinguishable signatures. The beam ...

  4. [4]

    The target material was a mixture of carbon (64%), oxygen (22%), nitrogen (6%), and hydrogen (5%), corresponding to an effective atomic massA≃12.8 [32]

    NOMAD The NOMAD experiment carried out a dedicated search for single-photon events using a drift-chamber tar- get with a fiducial mass of 2.7 tons. The target material was a mixture of carbon (64%), oxygen (22%), nitrogen (6%), and hydrogen (5%), corresponding to an effective atomic massA≃12.8 [32]. The neutrino beam spectrum used in our simulation is tak...

  5. [5]

    For SBND we use the BNB flux prediction from 12 Ref

    SBND and ICARUS SBND is located 110 m downstream of the BNB tar- get, while ICARUS sits at a baseline of 600 m; both sam- ple the same Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) as Micro- BooNE. For SBND we use the BNB flux prediction from 12 Ref. [95], and obtain the BNB flux at ICARUS by rescal- ing the SBND flux by the geometric factor (110/600) 2. Neither SBND nor I...

  6. [6]

    For our purposes we focus on the liquid- argon near detector (LAr ND), located 574 m from the LBNF target

    DUNE The DUNE near detector complex will feature excel- lent energy reconstruction and particle-identification ca- pabilities, including the ability to distinguish photons from electrons. For our purposes we focus on the liquid- argon near detector (LAr ND), located 574 m from the LBNF target. We assume a fiducial mass of 67 tons, which corresponds to app...

  7. [7]

    Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys

    L. Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 2369

    1978

  8. [8]

    Gell-Mann,The Reactionγ+γ→nu+ ¯ν,Phys

    M. Gell-Mann,The Reactionγ+γ→nu+ ¯ν,Phys. Rev. Lett.6(1961) 70

    1961

  9. [9]

    M. J. Levine,The processγ+γ→ν+ ¯ν(∗),Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)48(1967) 67

    1965

  10. [10]

    Karl and V

    G. Karl and V. Novikov,Photon-neutrino interactions, JETP Lett.81(2005) 249 [hep-ph/0411176]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  11. [11]

    Liu,Low-energy neutrino-two-photon interactions, Phys

    J. Liu,Low-energy neutrino-two-photon interactions, Phys. Rev. D44(1991) 2879

    1991

  12. [12]

    R. J. Crewther, J. Finjord and P. Minkowski,The annihilation processν¯ν→γγwith massive neutrinos in cosmology,Nucl. Phys. B207(1982) 269

    1982

  13. [13]

    Dodelson and G

    S. Dodelson and G. Feinberg,Neutrino-two-photon vertex,Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 913

    1991

  14. [14]

    D. A. Dicus and W. W. Repko,Photon neutrino scattering,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 5106 [hep-ph/9305284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  15. [15]

    D. A. Dicus and W. W. Repko,Photon - neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.79(1997) 569 [hep-ph/9703210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  16. [16]

    D. A. Dicus and W. W. Repko,Neutrino photon scattering in a magnetic field,Phys. Lett. B482(2000) 141 [hep-ph/0003305]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  17. [17]

    M. V. Chistyakov and N. V. Mikheev,Photon neutrino interactions in strong magnetic field,Mod. Phys. Lett. A17(2002) 2553 [hep-ph/0211146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    Mohammadi and S.-S

    R. Mohammadi and S.-S. Xue,Laser photons acquire circular polarization by interacting with a Dirac or Majorana neutrino beam,Phys. Lett. B731(2014) 272 [1312.3862]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Petropavlova and A

    M. Petropavlova and A. Smetana,Towards interferometry of neutrino electromagnetism,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 053003 [2204.02886]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Ahmadiniaz, R

    N. Ahmadiniaz, R. Shaisultanov and R. Sch¨ utzhold, Assisted neutrino pair production in combined external fields,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 036003 [2304.05711]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Bansal, G

    S. Bansal, G. Paz, A. Petrov, M. Tammaro and J. Zupan,Enhanced neutrino polarizability,JHEP05 (2023) 142 [2210.05706]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Gehrlein, I

    J. Gehrlein, I. M. Shoemaker and A. Thapa, Monophotons at neutrino experiments from neutrino polarizability,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 075010 [2506.14881]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Carey, P

    S. Carey, P. Machado, G. Paz, A. A. Petrov, A. Sousa, M. Tammaro and J. Zupan,Searching for neutrino polarizability at DUNE,2508.16724

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Coloma, E

    P. Coloma, E. Fern´ andez-Mart ´ ınez, J. L´ opez-Pav´ on, X. Marcano, D. Naredo-Tuero and S. Urrea,Improving the global SMEFT picture with bounds on neutrino NSI, JHEP02(2025) 137 [2411.00090]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Li, X.-D

    T. Li, X.-D. Ma and M. A. Schmidt,Constraints on the charged currents in general neutrino interactions with sterile neutrinos,JHEP10(2020) 115 [2007.15408]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Operator bases in effective field theories with sterile neutrinos: d≤9,JHEP11(2021) 003 [2105.09329]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    P. A. Machado, O. Palamara and D. W. Schmitz,The Short-Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69(2019) 363 [1903.04608]. [22]DUNECollaboration, B. Abi et al.,Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume II: DUNE Physics,2002.03005. [23]DUNECollaboration, V. Hewes et al.,Deep Underground...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [37]

    Brdar and J

    V. Brdar and J. Kopp,Can standard model and experimental uncertainties resolve the MiniBooNE anomaly?,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 115024 [2109.08157]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [38]

    K. J. Kelly and J. Kopp,More ingredients for an Altarelli cocktail at MiniBooNE,JHEP05(2023) 113 [2210.08021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [39]

    J. A. Harvey, C. T. Hill and R. J. Hill,Standard Model Gauging of the Wess-Zumino-Witten Term: Anomalies, Global Currents and pseudo-Chern-Simons Interactions, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 085017 [0712.1230]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  31. [40]

    J. A. Harvey, C. T. Hill and R. J. Hill,Anomaly mediated neutrino-photon interactions at finite baryon density,Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 261601 [0708.1281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  32. [41]

    Alvarez-Ruso and E

    L. Alvarez-Ruso and E. Saul-Sala,Neutrino interactions with matter and the MiniBooNE anomaly, Eur. Phys. J. ST230(2021) 4373 [2111.02504]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [42]

    Abdallah, R

    W. Abdallah, R. Gandhi and S. Roy,Requirements on common solutions to the LSND and MiniBooNE excesses: a post-MicroBooNE study,JHEP06(2022) 160 [2202.09373]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [43]

    A. N. Ioannisian,Ratio ofγ/π0 production rates in neutrino-nucleus interactions in the∆resonance mass region,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 094034 [2505.04332]

    arXiv 2025

  35. [44]

    Dutta, A

    B. Dutta, A. Karthikeyan, D. Kim, A. Thompson and R. G. Van de Water,Photon Excess from Dark Matter and Neutrino Scattering at MiniBooNE and MicroBooNE,2504.08071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [45]

    N. W. Kamp,Experimental and Phenomenological Investigations of the MiniBooNE Anomaly, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, MIT, 2023.2308.12015

    arXiv 2023

  37. [46]

    A. M. Abdullahi, J. Hoefken Zink, M. Hostert, D. Massaro and S. Pascoli,Panorama of new-physics explanations to the MiniBooNE excess,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 035028 [2308.02543]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [47]

    Tsai,Pair production and bremsstrahlung of charged leptons,Rev

    Y.-S. Tsai,Pair production and bremsstrahlung of charged leptons,Rev. Mod. Phys.46(1974) 815

    1974

  39. [48]

    Engel, S

    J. Engel, S. Pittel and P. Vogel,Nuclear physics of dark matter detection,Int. J. Mod. Phys. E1(1992) 1

    1992

  40. [49]

    Brdar, B

    V. Brdar, B. Dutta, W. Jang, D. Kim, I. M. Shoemaker, Z. Tabrizi, A. Thompson and J. Yu, Finding BSM Needles in Electromagnetic Haystacks at DUNE,2507.21228. [50]MicroBooNECollaboration, C. Adams et al., Reconstruction and Measurement ofO(100) MeV Energy Electromagnetic Activity fromπ 0 →γγDecays in the MicroBooNE LArTPC,JINST15(2020) P02007 [1910.02166]

    arXiv 2020

  41. [51]

    Caratelli et al.,Low-Energy Physics in Neutrino LArTPCs,2203.00740

    D. Caratelli et al.,Low-Energy Physics in Neutrino LArTPCs,2203.00740

    arXiv

  42. [52]

    S. N. Gninenko,The MiniBooNE anomaly and heavy neutrino decay,Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 241802 [0902.3802]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  43. [53]

    S. N. Gninenko,A resolution of puzzles from the LSND, KARMEN, and MiniBooNE experiments,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 015015 [1009.5536]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [54]

    S. N. Gninenko,New limits on radiative sterile neutrino decays from a search for single photons in neutrino interactions,Phys. Lett. B710(2012) 86 [1201.5194]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [55]

    Radionov,Constraints on electromagnetic properties of sterile neutrinos from MiniBooNE results,Phys

    A. Radionov,Constraints on electromagnetic properties of sterile neutrinos from MiniBooNE results,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 015016 [1303.4587]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [56]

    Masip, P

    M. Masip, P. Masjuan and D. Meloni,Heavy neutrino decays at MiniBooNE,JHEP01(2013) 106 [1210.1519]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [57]

    Schwetz, A

    T. Schwetz, A. Zhou and J.-Y. Zhu,Constraining active-sterile neutrino transition magnetic moments at DUNE near and far detectors,JHEP21(2020) 200 [2105.09699]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [58]

    Magill, R

    G. Magill, R. Plestid, M. Pospelov and Y.-D. Tsai, Dipole Portal to Heavy Neutral Leptons,Phys. Rev. D 98(2018) 115015 [1803.03262]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [59]

    Fischer, ´A

    O. Fischer, ´A. Hern´ andez-Cabezudo and T. Schwetz, Explaining the MiniBooNE excess by a decaying sterile neutrino with mass in the 250 MeV range,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 075045 [1909.09561]. 14

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  50. [60]

    N. W. Kamp, M. Hostert, A. Schneider, S. Vergani, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, J. M. Conrad, M. H. Shaevitz and M. A. Uchida,Dipole-coupled heavy-neutral-lepton explanations of the MiniBooNE excess including constraints from MINERvA data,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 055009 [2206.07100]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [61]

    Vergani, N

    S. Vergani, N. W. Kamp, A. Diaz, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, J. M. Conrad, M. H. Shaevitz and M. A. Uchida, Explaining the MiniBooNE excess through a mixed model of neutrino oscillation and decay,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 095005 [2105.06470]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [62]

    Datta, S

    A. Datta, S. Kamali and D. Marfatia,Dark sector origin of the KOTO and MiniBooNE anomalies,Phys. Lett. B807(2020) 135579 [2005.08920]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [63]

    Dutta, D

    B. Dutta, D. Kim, A. Thompson, R. T. Thornton and R. G. Van de Water,Solutions to the MiniBooNE Anomaly from New Physics in Charged Meson Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 111803 [2110.11944]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [64]

    C.-H. V. Chang, C.-R. Chen, S.-Y. Ho and S.-Y. Tseng, Explaining the MiniBooNE anomalous excess via a leptophilic ALP-sterile neutrino coupling,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 015030 [2102.05012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [65]

    M. A. Acero et al.,White paper on light sterile neutrino searches and related phenomenology,J. Phys. G51 (2024) 120501 [2203.07323]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [66]

    E. Wang, L. Alvarez-Ruso and J. Nieves,Photon emission in neutral current interactions at intermediate energies,Phys. Rev. C89(2014) 015503 [1311.2151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [67]

    Larios, M

    F. Larios, M. A. Perez and G. Tavares-Velasco, Constraints on neutrino photon interactions from rare Z decays,Phys. Lett. B531(2002) 231 [hep-ph/0201024]. [68]XENONCollaboration, E. Aprile et al.,Search for New Physics in Electronic Recoil Data from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 161805 [2207.11330]. [69]BorexinoCollaboration, M. Agostini et al.,Limit...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  58. [70]

    N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr,FeynRules - Feynman rules made easy,Comput. Phys. Commun.180(2009) 1614 [0806.4194]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  59. [71]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli and M. Zaro,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,JHEP07(2014) 079 [1405.0301]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [72]

    Alves, A

    A. Alves, A. G. Dias and D. D. Lopes,Probing ALP-Sterile Neutrino Couplings at the LHC,JHEP08 (2020) 074 [1911.12394]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [73]

    de Giorgi, L

    A. de Giorgi, L. Merlo and J.-L. Tastet,Probing HNL-ALP couplings at colliders,Fortsch. Phys.71 (2023) 2300027 [2212.11290]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  62. [74]

    A. M. Abdullahi, A. de Gouvˆ ea, B. Dutta, I. M. Shoemaker and Z. Tabrizi,Heavy Neutral Leptons via Axionlike Particles at Neutrino Facilities,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 261802 [2311.07713]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [75]

    Bonilla, B

    J. Bonilla, B. Gavela and J. Machado-Rodr ´ ıguez, Limits on ALP-neutrino couplings from loop-level processes,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 055023 [2309.15910]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [76]

    Heeck and H

    J. Heeck and H. H. Patel,Majoron at two loops,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 095015 [1909.02029]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [77]

    Sabti, J

    N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn and D. Blas,Addendum: Refined bounds on MeV-scale thermal dark sectors from BBN and the CMB,JCAP 08(2021) A01 [2107.11232]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  66. [78]

    Lucente, P

    G. Lucente, P. Carenza, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi,Heavy axion-like particles and core-collapse supernovae: constraints and impact on the explosion mechanism,JCAP12(2020) 008 [2008.04918]

    arXiv 2020

  67. [79]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano, Strong Supernova 1987A Constraints on Bosons Decaying to Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 021001 [2209.11773]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  68. [80]

    M. J. Dolan, T. Ferber, C. Hearty, F. Kahlhoefer and K. Schmidt-Hoberg,Revised constraints and Belle II sensitivity for visible and invisible axion-like particles, JHEP12(2017) 094 [1709.00009]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 190 (2021)]. [81]MicroBooNECollaboration, P. Abratenko et al., First Search for Neutral Current Coherent Single-Photon Production in MicroBooNE...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [82]

    E. Wang, L. Alvarez-Ruso and J. Nieves,Photon emission in neutral-current interactions at intermediate energies,Phys. Rev. C89(2014) 015503. [83]MicroBooNECollaboration, P. Abratenko et al., Enhanced search for neutral current∆radiative single-photon production in MicroBooNE,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) L091101 [2502.05750]. [84]SBNDCollaboration, R. Acciarri e...

    arXiv 2014

  70. [86]

    De Gouvˆ ea, M

    A. De Gouvˆ ea, M. Sen, W. Tangarife and Y. Zhang, Dodelson-Widrow Mechanism in the Presence of Self-Interacting Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 081802 [1910.04901]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  71. [87]

    J. M. Berryman, A. de Gouvˆ ea, K. J. Kelly and Y. Zhang,Dark Matter and Neutrino Mass from the Smallest Non-Abelian Chiral Dark Sector,Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 075010 [1706.02722]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [88]

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw,A PCAC puzzle:π 0 →γγin theσmodel,Nuovo Cim. A60(1969) 47

    1969

  73. [89]

    S. L. Adler,Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2426

    1969

  74. [90]

    T. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Fallot, A. Letourneau, S. Cormon, M. Fechner, L. Giot, T. Lasserre, J. Martino, G. Mention, A. Porta and F. Yermia, Improved predictions of reactor antineutrino spectra, Phys. Rev. C83(2011) 054615. [91]TEXONOCollaboration, M. Deniz et al., Measurement of Nu(e)-bar -Electron Scattering Cross-Section with a CsI(Tl) Scintilla...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [95]

    J. Nowak. SBND and Short-Baseline Neutrino Program. [96]ICARUSCollaboration, L. Di Noto,ICARUS at the Short-Baseline Neutrino program: first results,PoS ICHEP2024(2025) 181

    2025