Pith. sign in

REVIEW

DualLQR: Efficient Grasping of Oscillating Apples using Task Parameterized Learning from Demonstration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.16957 v3 pith:HH3DMSEN submitted 2024-09-25 cs.RO

DualLQR: Efficient Grasping of Oscillating Apples using Task Parameterized Learning from Demonstration

classification cs.RO
keywords oscillatingduallqrgraspingtargetaccuracyfinalmethodrequired
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning from Demonstration offers great potential for robots to learn to perform agricultural tasks, specifically selective harvesting. One of the challenges is that the target fruit can be oscillating while approaching. Grasping oscillating targets has two requirements: 1) close tracking of the target during the final approach for damage-free grasping, and 2) the complete path should be as short as possible for improved efficiency. We propose a new method called DualLQR. In this method, we use a finite horizon Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) on a moving target, without the need of refitting the LQR. To make this possible, we use a dual LQR set-up, with an LQR running in two separate reference frames. Through extensive simulation testing, it was found that the state-of-art method barely meets the required final accuracy without oscillations and drops below the required accuracy with an oscillating target. DualLQR, on the other hand, was found to be able to meet the required final accuracy even with high oscillations, while travelling the least distance. Further testing on a real-world apple grasping task showed that DualLQR was able to successfully grasp oscillating apples, with a success rate of 99%.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.