REVIEW 2 cited by
Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We present a human-and-model-in-the-loop process for dynamically generating datasets and training better performing and more robust hate detection models. We provide a new dataset of ~40,000 entries, generated and labelled by trained annotators over four rounds of dynamic data creation. It includes ~15,000 challenging perturbations and each hateful entry has fine-grained labels for the type and target of hate. Hateful entries make up 54% of the dataset, which is substantially higher than comparable datasets. We show that model performance is substantially improved using this approach. Models trained on later rounds of data collection perform better on test sets and are harder for annotators to trick. They also perform better on HateCheck, a suite of functional tests for online hate detection. We provide the code, dataset and annotation guidelines for other researchers to use. Accepted at ACL 2021.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Unified Multi-Task Learning & Model Fusion for Efficient Language Model Guardrailing
Small discriminative classifiers trained on synthetic guardrail data, plus a bandit-based model merging search, beat GPT-4-level moderation systems on multiple safety benchmarks.
-
Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-generated Rewards and Multi-step Reinforcement Learning
An automated red-teaming method that uses LLM-generated per-goal rewards and multi-step RL with a style-diversity reward to produce diverse and effective attacks on language models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.