Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 2 cited by

Dispersion relations of relativistic radiation hydrodynamics

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives analytic dispersion relations for shear, heat, and sound waves in a relativistic radiating fluid, exact to first order in the radiation-to-matter stress-energy ratio for all real wavenumbers.

desk verdict Solid, explicit dispersion relations for relativistic radiation hydrodynamics; the sound-wave result is new, and the uniform-in-k claim is slightly stronger than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00275 v1 pith:HHMAVAWK submitted 2024-11-29 astro-ph.HE gr-qcnucl-th

Lorenzo Gavassino This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qcnucl-th MSC 76Y0585A25
keywords radiationhydrodynamicsrelativistickinetictheorygreyopacitydispersionrelationsshearwavesheatsoundM1closure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the five hydrodynamic modes of a relativistic matter-plus-photon fluid—two shear waves, one heat wave, and two sound waves—have closed-form dispersion relations that are exact to first order in the radiation-to-matter stress-energy ratio. The derivation solves the linearized photon Boltzmann equation with a grey absorption term coupled to the relativistic fluid equations, and it claims the resulting formulas are valid for every real wavenumber, not only in the long-wavelength limit. This matters because the analytic form of $\omega(k)$ yields direct predictions for damping rates, propagation speeds, covariant stability, and the fate of jump discontinuities in stellar and astrophysical radiation hydrodynamics. The same formulas also expose the quantitative failure of simpler two-moment closures at intermediate optical depths.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the linearized relativistic Boltzmann equation for photons with a grey BGK collision term, $p^\mu\partial_\mu f = p^\mu u_\mu (f-f_{\rm eq})/\tau$, coupled to ideal-fluid conservation laws for matter. All mode calculations reduce to angular integrals over the photon direction $\Omega$ with denominator $1 - i\omega\tau + ik\tau\Omega_1$, which are evaluated in closed form as arctangents; the small parameter is the radiation-to-matter stress-energy ratio, so each dispersion relation is a first-order expansion in the corresponding transport coefficient $D/\tau$. These integrals carry the full $k$-dependence, so the formulas remain valid in the optically thin regime where ordinary viscous hydrodynamics breaks down.

What would settle it

Measure the shear-wave damping rate in an optically thin, grey-absorbing relativistic plasma: equation (1) predicts a finite relaxation rate $-5iD_s/\tau^2$ independent of wavenumber, whereas ordinary diffusion predicts a $k^2$-dependent rate; observing the diffusive behavior would falsify the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that equations (1)–(3) give the exact-to-first-order dispersion relations for shear, heat, and sound waves in a relativistic matter-plus-radiation fluid with grey absorption, valid for all real $k$. Each $\omega(k)$ is a closed expression built from rational functions and arctangents of $k\tau$, obtained by expanding the exact linearized equations in the small parameter $\lambda \approx T^{00}_R/T^{00}_M$. The heat-wave result corrects the earlier coefficient from constant-volume to constant-pressure specific heat; the shear-wave formula reproduces a recent purely geometric derivation; and the sound-wave formula is new, derived under the additional assumption of vanishing isobaric thermal expansivity. Analytically, the formulas imply shear waves are covariantly stable for $\lambda$ up to about 2.5, heat waves are not covariantly stable at $q=\pm i$, and all three branches make jump discontinuities stand still and decay exponentially rather than propagate.

Load-bearing premise

The results hold only if the photon opacity is grey (a single constant mean free path), scattering is negligible, and radiation pressure is a small fraction of gas pressure; if any of these fails at leading order, the formulas no longer describe the system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the optically thick limit the three dispersion relations reproduce the standard relativistic Navier-Stokes transport coefficients for radiation: shear viscosity $\eta = 4aT^4\tau/15$, heat conductivity $\kappa = 4aT^3\tau/3$, and bulk viscosity $\zeta = 4aT^4\tau/9$.
  • M1-closure radiation hydrodynamics misses shear-wave damping entirely, overestimates heat-wave damping at intermediate optical depths, and gets the acoustic diffusivity wrong, although it reproduces the correct conglomerate sound speed.
  • Jump discontinuities in fluid velocity or temperature do not propagate as second sound; their fronts remain fixed and decay exponentially at a rate set by $D/\tau^2$.
  • The Chapman-Enskog expansion has finite radius of convergence $\tau^{-1}$ for diffusive modes and $\tau^{-1}/(1+c_s)$ for sound modes, so third-order (super-Burnett) viscous hydrodynamics is unstable in radiating fluids.
  • Shear-wave modes are covariantly stable for $\lambda$ up to about 2.5, while the heat-wave branch is not covariantly stable near $k\tau = \pm i$, marking where the perturbative derivation breaks down.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper: a frequency-dependent (non-grey) opacity would likely replace the constant $\tau$ by a spectrally averaged mean free path in the same arctangent structure, changing the quantitative damping but not the qualitative form; the paper does not state this.
  • Going beyond the paper: the predicted non-propagating decay of discontinuities could be tested in an existing radiation-hydrodynamics code by running a Riemann problem at $R\approx 0.01$ and comparing the temperature front with Eq. (75).
  • Going beyond the paper: the same perturbative machinery could be applied to neutrino radiation in core-collapse supernovae, where the grey approximation is known to be crude; the formulas here supply the baseline against which spectral opacity effects would appear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives analytic dispersion relations for the five hydrodynamic modes of a relativistic two-component system consisting of an ideal-fluid matter sector and a photon gas coupled by grey absorption/emission (a BGK-type collision term). Working at first order in the radiation-to-matter stress-energy ratio, the author obtains closed-form expressions (1)-(3) for shear, heat, and sound waves as functions of real wavenumber k. The derivation is explicit: after linearizing the coupled conservation and Boltzmann equations, each branch is obtained from an exact implicit equation [Eqs. (25), (37)-(39), (48)-(49)] by Taylor expansion in the small parameters λ or ν at fixed q=kτ. The resulting transport coefficients D_s and D_h are read off from the long-wavelength expansions and cross-checked against Weinberg's viscosity and conductivity coefficients. The paper then studies optically thick/thin limits, covariant stability, causality and localization of initial data, jump-discontinuity evolution, and the failure of the M1 closure for shear damping.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a valuable analytic benchmark for radiation hydrodynamics: it gives explicit first-order-in-λ formulas with nonperturbative dependence on kτ, including UV relaxation rates, and it supports concrete claims about stability, causality, and discontinuity evolution. The derivation is transparent and free of fitted parameters, and the paper ships exact implicit equations that make the perturbative step checkable. The independent cross-checks against Weinberg's transport coefficients and Spiegel's heat-wave formula are strong, as is the comparison with the M1 closure, which usefully exposes the M1 model's inability to damp shear modes. The treatment of the κ_p=0 restriction is honest but should be more prominently displayed.

minor comments (5)
  1. [II.D and abstract] The statement that Eq. (30) is "a good approximation ... for arbitrary values of k" should be read as a first-order asymptotic expansion at fixed q=kτ. The paper does not prove a uniform-in-q bound on the O(λ²) remainder; however, inspection of the exact implicit equation (25) suggests that the remainder does not blow up as q→∞ (for example, Γ=-2λ/3+O(λ/q+λ²/q²) for large q). Please add a clarifying sentence about the fixed-q versus uniform sense of the approximation so that the claim "for any k∈R" is not over-read.
  2. [IV.A, Eq. (71)] The assertion that G≥0 for shear waves "all the way to λ≳2.5" appears to be based on numerical plots (Figure 1). Please state explicitly that this is numerical evidence rather than an analytic proof.
  3. [II.F and footnote 2] Because Eq. (3) is derived under the additional assumption κ_p=0, the abstract and Section I should state this condition next to assumptions (a)-(c). The current placement in a footnote is easy to miss, especially since the abstract promises sound-wave dispersion relations without this qualification.
  4. [Eq. (3) and Section III.D] The complex arctangent in Eq. (3) should specify the chosen branch, so that the formula is unambiguous for real k and its optically thin limit reproduces Eq. (64).
  5. [Section II heading, footnote 7, Figure 3 caption] Typos: "DISPERISON" in the Section II heading, "detials" in footnote 7, "respectivly" in the Figure 3 caption, and "affectively" in footnote 7 should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dispersion relations are obtained by explicit perturbative solution of the linearized radiative Boltzmann equation, with transport coefficients defined from the resulting Taylor coefficients rather than fitted to the target curves.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. For shear waves, the exact implicit relation (25) comes directly from the linearized Boltzmann equation and conservation laws; the first-order coefficient Γ′(0) is obtained by differentiating the implicit function F(λ,Γ(λ))=0 at λ=0 (Eq. 27), and Ds is then defined from the leading Taylor coefficient (Eq. 29). For heat waves, the small-ν expansion is applied to the same linearized system, Γ′(0) is computed from an explicit angular integral (Eq. 40), and Dh is likewise defined from the k² coefficient (Eq. 44). For sound waves, w′(0) is computed from an explicit integral (Eq. 50) and then re-expressed in terms of the previously defined Ds. No dispersion relation or transport coefficient is fed back into the derivation, and no parameter is fitted to the quantities being predicted. The self-citations to [27], [38], and [39] are used for cross-checking or for invoking independently stated mathematical criteria; they do not carry the burden of the derivation. The agreement with Spiegel (1957) is explicitly acknowledged, with the difference in cp versus cv explained. The residual concern about the phrase 'valid for all real k' is a question of uniform remainder estimates in the Taylor expansion, which is a correctness/rigor issue rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data. The grey mean free path tau is an input; Ds, Dh, Da, eta, kappa, and zeta are derived outputs. The expansion parameters lambda and nu are physical ratios, not fits. The derivation assumes a grey BGK radiative collision term, a small radiation/matter ratio, and for sound waves a vanishing isobaric thermal expansivity. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Matter is a relativistic ideal fluid in local thermodynamic equilibrium with ideal-fluid stress-energy tensor and baryon current (Eq. 5).
    This is the foundation of the matter sector in Section II.A and enters the linearized conservation equations (9)-(13).
  • domain assumption Photons satisfy the grey BGK Boltzmann equation with constant mean free path tau and no scattering (Eq. 6).
    Assumptions (a) and (b) in Section I; this is the model from which all dispersion relations are computed.
  • domain assumption The radiation-to-matter stress-energy ratio is small, so first-order expansion in lambda or nu is valid (assumption (c)).
    Used in Sections II.D-E-F; controls the O(D^2/tau^2) error terms.
  • ad hoc to paper The isobaric thermal expansivity of matter vanishes for the sound-wave calculation (kappa_p = 0).
    Footnote 2 and Section II.F; removes thermal expansion coupling and limits the applicability of the sound formula.
  • domain assumption Perturbations are sinusoidal plane waves with real wavenumber k and complex frequency omega.
    Standard linear mode analysis; used from Eq. (15) onward.
  • standard math Standard thermodynamic identities and relativistic kinetic theory results, including the Kirchhoff-Planck relation and blackbody integrals, are assumed.
    Used in Eqs. (4), (7), (31), and (35); accepted background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dispersion relations of relativistic radiation hydrodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HHMAVAWK

@misc{pith2026241200275,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dispersion relations of relativistic radiation hydrodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HHMAVAWK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00275}
}
abstract

We compute the linearised dispersion relations of shear waves, heat waves, and sound waves in relativistic ''matter+radiation'' fluids with grey absorption opacities. This is done by solving radiation hydrodynamics perturbatively in the ratio ''radiation stress-energy''/''matter stress-energy''. The resulting expressions $\omega \, {=} \, \omega(k)$ accurately describe the hydrodynamic evolution for any $k\, {\in}\, \mathbb{R}$. General features of the dynamics (e.g., covariant stability, propagation speeds, and damping of discontinuities) are argued directly from the analytic form of these dispersion relations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00275 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Graph of the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Radiation energy density associated to a heat wave (with dispersion relation (2)) whose temperature fluctuation is a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Evolution of the discontinuous temperature profile (75) with dispersion relation (2) (blue) compared with ordinary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between the dispersion relation (2) computed directly from the radiative transport equation (blue) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between the dispersion relation (3) computed directly from the radiative transport equation (blue) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Causality constraints on radiative transfer

    nucl-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Including the finite travel time of photons fixes the acausal instability of Spiegel's radiative transfer formula and yields exact, hydrohedron-compatible transport coefficients.

  2. The quasi-normal modes of relativistic Fokker-Planck kinetic theory

    nucl-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The quasi-normal spectrum of ultrarelativistic Fokker-Planck kinetic theory consists of an exact diffusive hydrodynamic mode, continuous ballistic bands, and a hydrogenic discrete tower in three dimensions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Prialnik, An Introduction to the Theory of Stellar Structure and Evolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    D. Prialnik, An Introduction to the Theory of Stellar Structure and Evolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    G. C. Pomraning, The equations of radiation hydrodynamics (Dover Publications, Mineola, 1973)

    1973

  3. [3]

    Mihalas and B

    D. Mihalas and B. Weibel Mihalas, Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984)

    1984

  4. [4]

    J. I. Castor, Radiation Hydrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    2004

  5. [5]

    L. H. Thomas, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 1, 239 (1930)

    work page 1930

  6. [6]

    Weinberg, ApJ 168, 175 (1971)

    S. Weinberg, ApJ 168, 175 (1971)

    1971

  7. [7]

    Udey and W

    N. Udey and W. Israel, MNRAS 199, 1137 (1982)

    work page 1982

  8. [8]

    K. S. Thorne, MNRAS 194, 439 (1981)

    work page 1981

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    A. M. Anile, S. Pennisi, and M. Sammartino, Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique 56, 49 (1992)

    1992

  2. [10]

    B. D. Farris, T. K. Li, Y. T. Liu, and S. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. D 78, 024023 (2008), arXiv:0802.3210 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Sadowski, R

    A. Sadowski, R. Narayan, A. Tchekhovskoy, and Y. Zhu, MNRAS 429, 3533 (2013), arXiv:1212.5050 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    S. R. de Groot, W. A. van Leeuwen, and C. G. van Weert, Relativistic kinetic theory: principles and applications (1980)

    1980

  5. [13]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1973)

    1973

  6. [14]

    J. A. McLennan, Physics of Fluids 8, 1580 (1965)

    1965

  7. [15]

    Kurkela and U

    A. Kurkela and U. A. Wiedemann, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 776 (2019), arXiv:1712.04376 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Grozdanov, A

    S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas, and N. Poovuttikul, Phys. Rev. D 99, 086012 (2019), arXiv:1810.10016 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Romatschke, Eur

    P. Romatschke, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 352 (2016), arXiv:1512.02641 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056010 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042043 (2024), arXiv:2404.12327 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094012 (2024), arXiv:2408.14316 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    E. A. Spiegel, ApJ 126, 202 (1957)

    1957

  14. [22]

    Eckart, Phys

    C. Eckart, Phys. Rev. 58, 919 (1940)

    1940

  15. [23]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Physical Review D 102 (2020), 10.1103/physrevd.102.043018

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Israel and J

    W. Israel and J. Stewart, Annals of Physics 118, 341 (1979)

    1979

  17. [25]

    Becattini, Acta Physica Polonica B 47, 1819 (2016), arXiv:1606.06605 [gr-qc]

    F. Becattini, Acta Physica Polonica B 47, 1819 (2016), arXiv:1606.06605 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Gavassino, Found

    L. Gavassino, Found. Phys. 50, 1554 (2020), arXiv:2005.06396 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    acceleration

    was based on a purely geometrical argument, while here we have solved all the equations explicitly. 5 E. Heat waves Let us now derive the dispersion relation of heat waves. To this end, we go back to the original system (16)-(20). However, this time, we consider a longitudinal...

  20. [28]

    Gavassino, (2024), arXiv:2411.12929 [astro-ph.HE]

    L. Gavassino, (2024), arXiv:2411.12929 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, and B. Withers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 261601 (2023), arXiv:2212.07434 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Annals of Physics 151, 466 (1983)

    1983

  23. [31]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, v. 6, Second Edition (Pergamon Press, 1987)

    1987

  24. [32]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Theory of elasticity , v. 7 (Pergamon Press, 1970)

    1970

  25. [33]

    Rezzolla and O

    L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti, Relativistic Hydrodynamics, by L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti. Oxford University Press,

  26. [34]

    Rebetzky, H

    A. Rebetzky, H. Herold, G. Morfill, and H. Ruder, ApJ 350, 796 (1990)

    1990

  27. [35]

    C. W. Misner, ApJ 151, 431 (1968)

    1968

  28. [36]

    Hiscock and L

    W. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Physical review D: Particles and fields 31, 725 (1985)

    1985

  29. [37]

    I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus) , edited by C. Dewitt and B. S. Dewitt (1973) pp. 343–450

    1973

  30. [38]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Lett. B 840, 137854 (2023), arXiv:2301.06651 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041001 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    H ¨ormander, The analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I (second edition) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989)

    L. H ¨ormander, The analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I (second edition) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989)

    1989

  33. [41]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 162301 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    C. Cattaneo, Sur une forme de l’´ equation de la chaleur ´ eliminant le paradoxe d’une propagation instantan´ ee, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des s´ eances de l’Acad´ emie des sciences (Gauthier-Villars, 1958)

    1958

  35. [43]

    L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations (American Mathematical Society, Berkeley, 1997)

    1997

  36. [44]

    C. D. Levermore, J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf. 31, 149 (1984)

    1984

  37. [45]

    G. N. Minerbo, J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf. 20, 541 (1978)

    1978

  38. [46]

    P. C. Fragile, S. M. Etheridge, P. Anninos, B. Mishra, and W. Kluzniak, Astrophys. J. 857, 1 (2018), arXiv:1803.06423 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    P. C. Fragile, A. Olejar, and P. Anninos, Astrophys. J. 796, 22 (2014), arXiv:1408.4460 [astro-ph.IM]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Anninos and P

    P. Anninos and P. C. Fragile, ApJ 900, 71 (2020), arXiv:2007.12195 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [49]

    L. M. Murchikova, E. Abdikamalov, and T. Urbatsch, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 469, 1725 (2017), arXiv:1701.07027 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    J. L. Anderson and E. A. Spiegel, ApJ 171, 127 (1972). 17

    1972

  43. [51]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Symmetry 12, 1543 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    G. D. Moore, JHEP 05, 084 (2018), arXiv:1803.00736 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Gavassino and M

    L. Gavassino and M. Antonelli, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 8, 686344 (2021), arXiv:2105.15184 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Florkowski, M

    W. Florkowski, M. P. Heller, and M. Spali´ nski, Reports on Progress in Physics 81, 046001 (2018), arXiv:1707.02282 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1712.05815 (2017), arXiv:1712.05815 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dudy´ nski, Journal of Statistical Physics57, 199 (1989)

    M. Dudy´ nski, Journal of Statistical Physics57, 199 (1989)

    1989

  49. [57]

    G. S. Rocha, D. Wagner, G. S. Denicol, J. Noronha, and D. H. Rischke, (2023), arXiv:2311.15063 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, and B. Withers, Nature Physics (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Struchtrup and P

    H. Struchtrup and P. Taheri, IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics 76, 672 (2011), https://academic.oup.com/imamat/article-pdf/76/5/672/1835580/hxr004.pdf

    2011

  52. [60]

    Czajka and S

    A. Czajka and S. Jeon, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064906 (2017), arXiv:1701.07580 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Peliti, Statistical Mechanics in a Nutshell , In a nutshell (Princeton University Press, 2011)

    L. Peliti, Statistical Mechanics in a Nutshell , In a nutshell (Princeton University Press, 2011)

    2011

  54. [63]

    M. S. Shavaliev, Prikladnaia Matematika i Mekhanika 57, 168 (1993)

    1993

  55. [2013]

    ISBN-10: 0198528906; ISBN-13: 978-0198528906 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.