Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Crossing the Line: Active Galactic Nuclei in the Star-forming region of the BPT Diagram

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.11755 v2 pith:HI4WQK7J submitted 2018-11-28 astro-ph.GA

Crossing the Line: Active Galactic Nuclei in the Star-forming region of the BPT Diagram

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords x-raydiagramstar-forminggalaxiesonlytheyapparentbranch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we investigate the reliability of the BPT diagram for excluding galaxies that host an AGN. We determine the prevalence of X-ray AGN in the star-forming region of the BPT diagram and discuss the reasons behind this apparent misclassification, focusing primarily on relatively massive ($\log(M_{*})\gtrsim10$) galaxies. X-ray AGN are selected from deep XMM observations using a new method that results in greater samples with a wider range of X-ray luminosities, complete to $\log(L_{X})>41$ for $z<0.3$. Taking X-ray detectability into account, we find the average fraction of X-ray AGN in the BPT star-forming branch is 2$\%$, suggesting the BPT diagram can provide a reasonably clean sample of star-forming galaxies. However, the X-ray selection is itself rather incomplete. At the tip of the AGN branch of the BPT diagram, the X-ray AGN fraction is only 14$\%$, which may have implications for studies that exclude AGN based only on X-ray observations. Interestingly, the X-ray AGN fractions are similar for Seyfert and LINER populations, consistent with LINERs being true AGN. We find that neither the star-formation dilution nor the hidden broad-line components can satisfactorily explain the apparent misclassification of X-ray AGN. On the other hand, $\sim40\%$ of all X-ray AGN have weak emission lines such that they cannot be placed on the BPT diagram at all and often have low specific SFRs. Therefore, the most likely explanation for "misclassified" X-ray AGN is that they have intrinsically weak AGN lines, and are only placeable on the BPT diagram when they tend to have high specific SFRs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Too many quiescent late-type galaxies or a matter of misclassification?

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Quiescent late-type galaxies in SDSS morphological catalogues are overestimated by a factor of ~2 due to misclassified edge-on S0 galaxies.

  2. Fuelling the central region of galaxies with misaligned gas accretion

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Kinematically misaligned gas accretion sustains main-sequence-level star formation only below ~1e10 Msun; above that, central gas is present but dilution by pre-existing mass keeps specific star formation low.

  3. When X-ray Features Fail to Identify Intrinsic Emitters: Label Noise and Luminosity Overlap in Machine Learning Classification of AGN and Star-forming Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A controlled cross-validation decomposition attributes the apparent X-ray-induced accuracy drop in AGN/SFG classification to sample selection and label noise, not to the X-ray feature itself.