Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

A one-unit-cell La3Ni2O7 film superconducts via hole doping and intra-layer d-wave pairing, not the interlayer s± mechanism of bulk nickelates.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-03 14:38 UTC pith:HIKIMXLQ

load-bearing objection Reproducible RPA study that plausibly explains thin-film nickelate superconductivity via hole doping, but the doping inference rests on one ARPES measurement and the substrate mechanism is asserted, not calculated. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.19520 v1 pith:HIKIMXLQ submitted 2025-12-22 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Compressive Strain Turns s^(pm) into d-Wave Pairing in One-unit-cell La₃Ni₂O₇ Thin Film Via Substrate-Induced Hole Doping

Yang Zhang , Ling-Fang Lin , Adriana Moreo , Satoshi Okamoto , Thomas A. Maier , Elbio Dagotto This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el PACS 74.20.-z74.25.Jb74.70.-b74.78.-w
keywords nickelate superconductivitythin-film superconductivityd-wave pairingspin fluctuationshole dopingcompressive strainRPALa3Ni2O7
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper explains ambient-pressure superconductivity in ultra-thin La3Ni2O7 films on a compressively strained substrate. The authors argue that the stoichiometric film has almost no pairing tendency, but hole doping—likely from the substrate—restores strong spin-fluctuation pairing. The leading gap is d_x2-y2 at moderate doping (n≈2.75) and d_xy at higher doping (n≈2.5), both arising from scattering within the γ pocket at the M point and dominated by the Ni layer farther from the substrate. This would mean thin-film superconductivity is intrinsically different from the inter-layer s± pairing of the pressurized bulk compound.

Core claim

The central claim: in a one-unit-cell La3Ni2O7 thin film, compressive strain reduces the inter-layer d3z2-r2 hopping relative to intra-layer d_x2-y2 hopping and enlarges the eg crystal-field splitting, pushing the γ pocket below the Fermi level at stoichiometry. Hole doping brings the γ pocket back to the Fermi surface, and spin-fluctuation scattering within this pocket—dominated by the Ni2 layer—produces a leading d_x2-y2 pairing at n≈2.75 and d_xy at n≈2.5. The authors conclude that the superconducting films are hole-doped and that pairing is intra-layer, in contrast to the s± inter-layer pairing of pressurized bulk La3Ni2O7.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on a four-band tight-binding model of the eg orbitals (d3z2-r2 and d_x2-y2 on each of two Ni sites) fitted to DFT slab calculations of the 1UC film. Pairing is evaluated with random phase approximation (RPA) spin-fluctuation exchange: the effective pairing vertex is dominated by the RPA spin susceptibility, and leading eigenvalues and gap structures come from diagonalizing the pairing kernel on the Fermi surface. The key quantity is the static susceptibility χ'(q,ω=0), which at n≈2.75 and 2.5 peaks near q≈(π/3,π/3) with q_z=0, corresponding to intra-band scattering within the γ pocket.

Load-bearing premise

The hole-doping level n≈2.8 is inferred by matching the computed γ-pocket area to one ARPES study, while another ARPES study reports the γ band does not cross the Fermi level; if the actual carrier density is not this hole-doped value, the d-wave pairing conclusion would not follow.

What would settle it

Measure the Fermi surface of the same 1UC films with ARPES at high resolution: if the area of the γ pocket at the M point corresponds to n=3.0 (or if no γ pocket is present), the hole-doping scenario is contradicted. Alternatively, a phase-sensitive measurement of the gap sign structure on the thin film that finds no sign change within the γ pocket (i.e., nodeless) would rule out the predicted d-wave states.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If correct, thin-film La3Ni2O7 is a hole-doped d-wave superconductor with gap nodes, unlike the nodeless s± bulk.
  • The stoichiometric film is predicted to be weakly pairing; superconductivity requires hole doping, e.g., from Sr migration or oxygen vacancies.
  • Pairing lives mostly in the Ni layer farther from the substrate, so interface engineering could tune Tc.
  • Thick films on the same substrate would need additional doping (e.g., La→Sr substitution) to superconduct; without it, no superconductivity at ambient pressure.
  • The doping dependence predicts a pairing dome: d_x2-y2 at moderate doping, d_xy at higher doping.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The d-wave state with nodes inside a single pocket is cuprate-like; this could unify nickelate film physics with cuprate phenomenology, though the spin-fluctuation mechanism is specific to the Ni2 layer.
  • A direct test would be a phase-sensitive gap measurement (e.g., Josephson interferometry) on 1UC films; a sign change within the γ pocket would confirm the d-wave prediction.
  • The claim suggests substrate choice is a doping lever; other substrates with different Sr content might tune Tc continuously, which is testable by growing films on LSAO variants.
  • Since the γ pocket is absent at n=3 in the calculation, a stoichiometric film (if it could be made without doping) should not superconduct—could be tested by blocking Sr diffusion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper investigates superconducting pairing in one-unit-cell (1UC) La3Ni2O7 thin films on LaSrAlO4 (LSAO) substrates using DFT-based tight-binding models and RPA. The authors find that compressive strain suppresses inter-layer d3z2-r2 hopping and enhances the eg crystal-field splitting relative to pressurized bulk. For the stoichiometric case (n=3) the RPA pairing strength is negligible, but upon hole doping a d_x2-y2 state becomes leading at moderate doping (n≈2.75) and d_xy at higher doping (n≈2.5). The pairing is driven by intra-band spin-fluctuation scattering within the γ pocket and originates primarily from the Ni layer farther from the substrate. By matching the γ-pocket area to one ARPES study (Ref. [88]), the authors infer n≈2.8 and conclude that the superconducting films are hole-doped and that pairing is intra-layer d-wave.

Significance. If the central inference is correct, the paper provides a concrete resolution of the pairing symmetry in ambient-pressure thin-film nickelates and identifies hole doping as the key control parameter, with a different mechanism (intra-layer d-wave) than the pressurized bulk s± state. The manuscript includes reproducible artifacts: hopping parameters are supplied in the SM/Zenodo and the RPA code is publicly available on GitHub. The RPA eigenvalue calculation is internally consistent and the d-wave solution is a genuine result of the model, not an imposed input. However, the conclusion that the films are hole-doped rests on a single ARPES measurement, a conflicting ARPES report is not addressed, and the substrate-induced doping mechanism is never computed; the significance of the paper is therefore conditional on these fragile steps.

major comments (3)
  1. [Introduction; 'Compressive strain with the LSAO substrate' (Fig. 2)] The hole-doping assignment n=2.8 is based on matching the γ-pocket area to a single ARPES study (Ref. [88]), while the authors themselves note in the Introduction that Ref. [87] reports no γ pocket crossing the Fermi level. The manuscript neither explains this discrepancy nor quantifies the sensitivity of the RPA results to the doping value. Since Fig. 3(a) shows negligible pairing strength at n=3, the central 'hole-doped d-wave' conclusion collapses if Ref. [87] is correct or if the pocket assignment is ambiguous. Please provide an uncertainty range for n from Ref. [88], show how λ and the leading channel vary within that range, and discuss possible reasons (e.g., Pr content, surface conditions) for the disagreement with Ref. [87].
  2. [Fig. 3(a) and footnote [103]] The RPA interaction U=0.7 eV is chosen just below the SDW instability at U=0.8 eV at n=3 (footnote [103]). The strong increase of λ upon hole doping therefore occurs dangerously close to a magnetic critical point, and the d-wave dominance may be artificially enhanced by this proximity. To make the central claim robust, the authors should show that the leading d-wave solutions persist for a range of U (e.g., U=0.6 and 0.75 eV) and report the corresponding λ values. Without such a U-sweep, the statement that 'hole doping turns on pairing' is not clearly separated from the effect of tuning U near the instability.
  3. [Title; 'Compressive strain...' and Conclusion] The title and abstract attribute the hole doping to the substrate ('Substrate-Induced Hole Doping'), yet no calculation of interfacial charge transfer is presented. The DFT slab uses the substrate only to fix the in-plane lattice constant, and the tight-binding model is doped by hand to n=2.8. The suggested sources of doping ('Sr migration from substrate to sample', 'oxygen vacancies') are speculative and not investigated. Either include a supercell calculation with the LSAO interface (or at least a quantitative charge-transfer estimate) to support the mechanism, or moderate the causal language in the title and conclusion.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption and text] The terms '1UC' and '1 BL' are used somewhat interchangeably. The slab contains four Ni layers (1UC = two bilayers), while the model is a single bilayer (two Ni layers). Please clarify this distinction explicitly when the model is introduced.
  2. [Title] The phrasing 'Turns s± into d-Wave Pairing' implies a direct transition between two ordered states; in the thin-film calculation the stoichiometric state has negligible pairing rather than an s± state. Consider rephrasing the title to reflect the actual comparison with the pressurized bulk.
  3. [Fig. 2(b)] The text states that the bonding d3z2-r2 band is ~10 meV below the Fermi level, but this feature is difficult to discern in the projected band plot. A zoomed-in panel or an arrow marking the band would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the d-wave pairing state is a genuine RPA eigenvalue output, while the hole-doping level is an explicit fit to ARPES, not a model-derived prediction.

full rationale

The claimed derivation is a DFT-to-tight-binding-to-RPA chain. The leading pairing symmetries (d_{x^2-y^2} and d_xy) are obtained as eigenvectors of the RPA pairing kernel, Eq. (1), with the spin susceptibility computed via Eq. (2); the tight-binding hoppings and chosen U do not by themselves dictate the sign structure of the gap eigenvector. The n=2.8 doping level is selected by matching the TB gamma-pocket area to ARPES Ref. [88], i.e. a parameter fit to external data, and the paper labels this as a comparison/suggestion rather than a first-principles prediction. The doping-dependence argument (pairing weak at n=3, strong for n<3, negligible for n>3) is a model output; using it together with observed superconductivity to infer hole doping is an abduction, not a reduction to inputs. Caveats exist: the paper itself notes the ARPES controversy (Ref. [87] sees no gamma pocket at the Fermi level), the discrepancy is not quantitatively resolved, U=0.7 eV is chosen just below the magnetic-instability value U=0.8 eV, and substrate-induced charge transfer is not computed. These affect robustness and certainty, but they do not make any derived quantity identical to an input by construction. Self-citations to earlier bulk s± work are used for comparison and parameter conventions, not as load-bearing evidence for the thin-film d-wave claim. Therefore no circular step is established.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central calculation depends on several tunable inputs: the RPA interaction U and its ratios, the DFT+U parameters, and the doping level n fitted to one ARPES dataset. No new physical entities are introduced. The most consequential assumptions are that spin-fluctuation RPA is adequate, that the four-orbital model captures the relevant bands, and that the adopted ARPES pocket correctly sets the hole doping.

free parameters (4)
  • RPA on-site Coulomb U = 0.7 eV
    Chosen just below the SDW instability (U=0.8 eV at n=3.0) to keep the λ-vs-filling curves continuous (footnote [103]); pairing strength is very sensitive to this value near the magnetic instability.
  • RPA interaction ratios U', J, J' = U'=0.35 eV, J=J'=0.175 eV (U/2, U/4)
    Standard ratios from previous nickelate RPA studies (Refs [18,47]); not fitted here but free in the model.
  • Electron density n (hole doping) = n=2.8
    Chosen so the tight-binding γ-pocket area matches ARPES (Ref [88]); the paper then uses this as evidence that the films are hole doped.
  • DFT+U parameters U, J = U=3.8 eV, J=0.6 eV
    Taken from constrained RPA for bulk La3Ni2O7 (Ref [48]); not refitted for the strained film, a potential source of error.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption RPA spin-fluctuation-mediated pairing mechanism
    The paper assumes singlet pairing is driven by the RPA spin susceptibility (Eq. 2); phonons, charge fluctuations, and other pairing channels are not considered.
  • domain assumption Validity of weak-coupling RPA for this strongly correlated nickelate
    RPA is a perturbative expansion in U; nickelates are correlated, and the calculation relies on this approximation being adequate.
  • domain assumption DFT+U with Liechtenstein double-counting describes the strained film
    The slab electronic structure (Fig. 2b) is obtained with U=3.8 eV, J=0.6 eV from bulk cRPA; no verification that these parameters hold for the 1-UC film.
  • domain assumption Four-orbital eg tight-binding model captures the low-energy physics
    Only Ni eg orbitals are retained in the model; ligand orbitals and other states are folded into the Wannier hoppings.
  • ad hoc to paper Hole transfer from substrate or oxygen vacancies is the doping source
    The paper does not calculate charge transfer from LaSrAlO4; it invokes 'probably caused by Sr migration from substrate to sample' to explain n=2.8.
  • domain assumption ARPES Ref [88] γ-pocket area is the correct experimental reference
    Ref [87] reports the γ band does not cross the Fermi level; the paper adopts the pocket from [88] without quantitatively resolving the conflict.

reviewed 2026-08-03 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Compressive Strain Turns $s^{\pm}$ into $d$-Wave Pairing in One-unit-cell La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ Thin Film Via Substrate-Induced Hole Doping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HIKIMXLQ

@misc{pith2026251219520,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Compressive Strain Turns $s^\pm$ into $d$-Wave Pairing in One-unit-cell La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ Thin Film Via Substrate-Induced Hole Doping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HIKIMXLQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.19520}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent reports of ambient-pressure superconductivity in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ films grown on LaSrAlO$_4$, we investigate the superconducting instability in a one-unit cell thin film using {\it ab initio} and random-phase approximation techniques. Compared to the high-pressure bulk system, the ratio of inter-layer $d_{3z^2-r^2}$ hopping to intra-layer $d_{x^2-y^2}$ hopping is suppressed in the 1UC thin film, and the crystal-field splitting of the $e_g$ orbitals is increased. Our calculation indicates that spin-fluctuation-driven pairing correlations are weak for the stoichiometric case at ambient pressure, but increase significantly under hole doping. The leading pairing symmetry is also found to change by hole doping. Specifically, we obtain a leading $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing state at moderate hole doping, followed by a $d_{xy}$ state at higher doping. These states are driven by intra-band spin-fluctuation scattering {\it within} the $\gamma$ hole pocket centered around the M point, and arise primarily from states in the Ni layer {\it farther} from the substrate. These results strongly suggest that the thin-film superconducting samples are hole-doped and that pairing in this system predominantly arises in the layer, as opposed to the inter-layer pairing in the pressurized bulk system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.19520 by Adriana Moreo, Elbio Dagotto, Ling-Fang Lin, Satoshi Okamoto, Thomas A. Maier, Yang Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of lattice modifications under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Schematic structural slab model and crystal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The RPA calculated pairing strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a-b) The RPA calculated static spin susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Tight-binding band structures of the thick film [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nearly perfect Fermi surface nesting in hole-doped La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ enables bulk superconductivity without pressure or strain

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hole doping at x ≈ 0.4 in La3-xSrxNi2O7 produces nearly perfect Fermi-surface nesting at Q = (π, π), raising the superconducting eigenvalue to experimentally accessible levels at ambient pressure.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 13 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    correlations. We find that for both of these fillings, theq z = 0 susceptibility is stronger than the qz =π(odd layer combination) susceptibility, which represents out-of-plane antiferromagnetic correlations. This is in stark contrast to the pressurized bulk system, for which we previously found that the oddq z = πantiferromagnetic fluctuations dominate, ...

  2. [2]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure Nature621493 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Y. Zhu, E. Zhang, B. Pan, X. Chen, D. Peng, L. Chen, H. Ren, F. Liu, N. Li, Z. Xing, J. Han, J. Wang, D. Jia, H. Wo, Y. Gu, Y. Gu, L. Ji, W. Wang, H. Gou, Y. Shen, T. Ying, X. Chen, W. Yang, C. Zheng, Q. Zeng, J.-G. Guo, and J. Zhao, Superconductivity in pressurized trilayer La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals Nature 631531 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Li, Y.-J

    Q. Li, Y.-J. Zhang, Z.-N. Xiang, Y. Zhang, X. Zhu and H.-H. Wen, Signature of Superconductivity in Pressurized La 4Ni3O10 Chinese Phys. Lett.41, 017401 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. Su, Y. Huang, H. Sun, M. Huo, Z. Shan, K. Ye, Z. Yang, R. Li, M. Smidman, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La 3Ni2O7−δ Nat. Phys.201269 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    J. Hou, P. T. Yang, Z. Y. Liu, J. Y. Li, P. F. Shan, L. Ma, G. Wang, N. N. Wang, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, Y. Uwatoko, M. Wang, G.-M. Zhang, B. S. Wang, and J.-G. Cheng, Emergence of High-Temperature Superconducting Phase in Pressurized La 3Ni2O7 Crystals Chin. Phys. Lett.40117302 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Sakakibara, M

    H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, H. Nagata, Y. Ueki, H. Sakurai, R. Matsumoto, K. Terashima, K. Hirose, H. Ohta, M. Kato, Y. Takano, and K. Kuroki, Theoretical analysis on the possibility of superconductivity in the trilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate La4Ni3O10 under pressure and its experimental examination: Comparison with La3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. B109144511 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y. D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y. Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y. Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Pressure-Induced Superconductivity In Polycrystalline La3Ni2O7−δ Phys. Rev. X14011040 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y. Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y. Uwatoko, and J. Cheng, Bulk high-temperature superconductivity in pressurized tetragonal La 2PrNi...

    2024

  10. [10]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Pei, X. Du, Y. Cao, Q. Wang, J. Wu, Y. Li, Y. Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, S. Zhu, Q. Zhang, N. Yu, P. Cheng, J. Zhao, Y. Chen, H. Guo, L. Yang, and Y. 6 Qi, Superconductivity in trilayer nickelate La 4Ni3O10 under pressure Phys. Rev. X15, 021005 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Electronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate superconductor La 3Ni2O7 under pressure Phys. Rev. B108, L180510 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Z. Liu, M. Huo, J. Li, Q. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Dai, X. Zhou, J. Hao, Y. Lu, M. Wang, and W.-H. Wen, Electronic correlations and partial gap in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7 Nat. Commun.157570 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, Y. Huang, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Xu, T. Qian, D.-X. Yao, M. Wang, L. Zhao, and X. J. Zhou, Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La 3Ni2O7 Nat. Commun.154373 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Electronic structure, magnetic correlations, and superconducting pairing in the reduced Ruddlesden-Popper bilayer La 3Ni2O6 under pressure: Different role ofd 3z2−r2 orbital compared with La3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. B109, 045151 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Z. Dong, M. Huo, J. Li, J. Li, P. Li, H. Sun, Y. Lu, M. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z. Chen, Visualization of oxygen vacancies and self-doped ligand holes in La 3Ni2O7−δ Nature630847 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    T. Xie, M. Huo, X. Ni, F. Shen, X. Huang, H. Sun, H. C. Walker, D. Adroja, D. Yu, B. Shen, L. He, K. Cao, and M. Wang, Strong interlayer magnetic exchange coupling in La 3Ni2O7−δ revealed by inelastic neutron scattering Science Bulletin693221 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    X. Chen, J. Choi, Z. Jiang, J. Mei, K. Jiang, J. Li, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, X. Huang, H. Sun, D. Shen, M. Wang, J. Hu, Y. Lu, K.-J. Zhou, and D. Feng, Electronic and magnetic excitations in La 3Ni2O7 Nat. Commun.15, 9597 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Z. Dan, Y. Zhou, M. Huo, Y. Wang, L. Nie, M. Wang, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Pressure-enhanced spin-density-wave transition in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7−δ Science Bulletin70, 1239 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Trends in electronic structures ands ±-wave pairing for the rare-earth series in bilayer nickelate superconductorsR 3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. B108, 165141 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Jiao, M. Zou, C. Jiang, X. Li, Y. Luo, Q. Wu, N. Zhang, Y. Guo, and L. Shu, Evidence of Spin Density Waves in La 3Ni2O7−δ Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 256503 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Sakakibara, N

    H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Possible HighT c Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under High Pressure through Manifestation of a Nearly Half-Filled BL Hubbard Model Phys. Rev. Lett.132 106002 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    L.-F. Lin, Y. Zhang, N. Kaushal, G. Alvarez, T. A. Maier, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Magnetic phase diagram of a two-orbital model for bilayer nickelates with varying doping Phys. Rev. B110, 195135 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    H. Oh, B. Zhou, and Y.-H. Zhang, Type-IIt−Jmodel in charge transfer regime in bilayer La 3Ni2O7 and trilayer La4Ni3O10 Phys. Rev. B110, 195135 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Yi, Y. Hikita,and H. Y. Hwang, Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate Nature 572, 624 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, W. Hu, A. Moreo, S. Dong, and E. Dagotto, Similarities and differences between nickelate and cuprate films grown on a SrTiO 3 substrate Phys. Rev. B102, 195117 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Nomura and R

    Y. Nomura and R. Arita, Superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelatesRep. Prog. Phys.85, 052501 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    G. A. Pan, D. F. Segedin, H. LaBollita, Q. Song, E. M. Nica, B. H. Goodge, A. T. Pierce, S. Doyle, S. Novakov, D. C. Carrizales, A. T. N’Diaye, P. Shafer, H. Paik, J. T. Heron, J. A. Mason, A. Yacoby, L. F. Kourkoutis, O. Erten, C. M. Brooks, A. S. Botana and J. A. Mundy, Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate Nat. Mater.21, 160 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    J. Chen, F. Yang, and W. Li, Spin-density wave and superconductivity in La4Ni3O10 under ambient pressure Phys. Rev. B110, L041111 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, and T. O. Wehling, Quenched Pair Breaking by Interlayer Correlations as a Key to Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096002 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    J. Zhan, Y. Gu, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Cooperation between Electron-Phonon Coupling and Electronic Interaction in bilayer Nickelates La 3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 136002 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    LaBollita, V

    H. LaBollita, V. Pardo, M. R. Norman, and A. S. Botana, Assessing spin-density wave formation in La3Ni2O7 from electronic structure calculations Phys. Rev. Mater.8, L111801 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Lu, and T

    M. Lu, and T. Zhou, Assessing spin-density wave formation in La 3Ni2O7 from electronic structure calculations Phys. Rev. B111, 094504 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    G. Duan, Z. Liao, L. Chen, Y. Wang, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Orbital-selective correlation effects and superconducting pairing symmetry in a multiorbitalt− Jmodel for bilayer nickelatesarXiv 2502.09195 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    L. B. Braz, G. B. Martins, and L. G. G. V. Dias da Silva, Interlayer interactions in La 3Ni2O7 under pressure: froms ± tod xy-wave superconductivityPhys. Rev. Research7, 033023 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. Wu, and D.-X. Yao, Bilayer Two-Orbital Model of La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Prediction ofs ±-wave superconductivity enhanced by electronic doping in trilayer nickelates La4Ni3O10 under pressure Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136001 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    LaBollita, J

    H. LaBollita, J. Kapeghian, M. R. Norman, and A. S. Botana, Electronic structure and magnetic tendencies of trilayer La 4Ni3O10 under pressure: Structural transition, molecular orbitals, and layer differentiation Phys. Rev. B109, 195151 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Qu, D.-W

    X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, J. Chen, C. Wu, F. Yang, W. Li, and G. Su, BLt−J−J ⊥ Model and Magnetically Mediated Pairing in the Pressurized Nickelate La3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036502 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interlayer-Coupling-Driven High-Temperature Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 146002 (2024). 7

    2024

  40. [40]

    Y.-H. Tian, Y. Chen, J.-M. Wang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, Correlation effects and concomitant two-orbital s±-wave superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure Phys. Rev. B109, 165154 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    H. Liu, C. Xia, S. Zhou, H. Chen, Sensitive dependence of pairing symmetry on Ni-eg crystal field splitting in the nickelate superconductor La 3Ni2O7 Nat. Commun. 16, 1054 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Magnetic Correlations and Pairing Tendencies of the Hybrid Stacking Nickelate Superlattice La7Ni5O17 (La3Ni2O7/La3Ni4O10)under Pressure Phys. Rev. B112, 024508 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    M. Shi, D. Peng, K. Fan, Z. Xing, S. Yang, Y. Wang, H. Li, R. Wu, M. Du, B. Ge, Z. Zeng, Q. Zeng, J. Ying, T. Wu, X. Chen, Superconductivity of the hybrid Ruddlesden-Popper La 5Ni3O11 single crystals Nat. Phys.24, 1780 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, S. Okamoto, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Electronic Structure, Magnetic and Pairing Tendencies of Alternating Single-layer BL Stacking Nickelate La 5Ni3O11 Under Pressure Phys. Rev. B112, 094515 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Electronic structure, self-doping, and superconducting instability in the alternating single-layer trilayer stacking nickelates La3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. B110L060510 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Takegami, K

    D. Takegami, K. Fujinuma, R. Nakamura, M. Yoshimura, K.-D. Tsuei, G. Wang, N. N. Wang, J.-G. Cheng, Y. Uwatoko, and T. Mizokawa, Absence of Ni2+/Ni3+ charge disproportionation and possible roles of O 2pholes in La 3Ni2O7−δ revealed by hard x-ray photoemission spectroscopy Phys. Rev. B109, 125119 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Xu, C.-Q

    S. Xu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, D. Hu, H. Wang, Q. Wu, R. Li, D. Wu, M. Wang, D.-X. Yao, T. Dong, and N. Wang, Origin of the density wave instability in trilayer nickelate La 4Ni3O10 revealed by optical and ultrafast spectroscopy Phys. Rev. B111, 075140 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Structural phase transition,s ±-wave pairing, and magnetic stripe order in BLed superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure Nat. Commun.15, 2470 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Christiansson, F

    V. Christiansson, F. Petocchi and P. Werner, Correlated Electronic Structure of La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 206501 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Q.-G. Yang, D. Wang, and Q.-H. Wang, Possible s±-wave superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. B 108, L140505 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Liu, J.-W

    Y.-B. Liu, J.-W. Mei, F. Ye, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang,s ±-Wave Pairing and the Destructive Role of Apical-Oxygen Deficiencies in La3Ni2O7 under Pressure Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 236002 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    Y.-F. Yang, . G.-M. Zhang, and F.-C. Zhang, Interlayer valence bonds and two-component theory for high-T c superconductivity of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure Phys. Rev. B108, L201108 (2023)

    2023

  53. [53]

    Oh and Y

    H. Oh and Y. H. Zhang, Type-IIt−Jmodel and shared superexchange coupling from Hund’s rule in superconducting La 3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. B108, 174511 (2023)

    2023

  54. [54]

    Z. Liao, L. Chen, G. Duan, Y. Wang, C. Liu, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Electron correlations and superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under pressure tuning Phys. Rev. B108, 214522 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    S. Fan, M. Ou, M. Scholten, Q. Li, Z. Shang, Y. Wang, J. Xu, H. Yang, I. M. Eremin, H.-H. Wen, Superconducting gaps revealed by STM measurements on La 2PrNi2O7 thin films at ambient pressure arXiv 2506.01788 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Lechermann, J

    F. Lechermann, J. Gondolf, S. B¨ otzel, and I. M. Eremin, Electronic correlations and superconducting instability in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure Phys. Rev. B108, L201121 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    D. A. Shilenko, and I. V. Leonov, Correlated electronic structure, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic correlations in double-layer under pressure Phys. Rev. B108, 125105 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    Huang, Z

    J. Huang, Z. D. Wang, and T. Zhou, Impurity and vortex states in the BL high-temperature superconductor La 3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. B108, 174501 (2023)

    2023

  59. [59]

    Qin, and Y.-F

    Q. Qin, and Y.-F. Yang, High-T c superconductivity by mobilizing local spin singlets and possible route to higherT c in pressurized La 3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. B108, L140504 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    Yang, K.-Y

    Q.-G. Yang, K.-Y. Jiang, D. Wang, H.-Y. Lu, and Q.-H. Wang, Effective model ands ±-wave superconductivity in trilayer nickelate La 4Ni3O10 Phys. Rev. B109, 165140 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Cao, and Y.-F

    Y. Cao, and Y.-F. Yang, Flat bands promoted by Hund’s rule coupling in the candidate double-layer high-temperature superconductor La 3Ni2O7 Phys. Rev. B109, L081105 (2024)

    2024

  62. [62]

    T. A. Maier, P. Doak, L.-F. Lin, Y. Zhang, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Interlayer Pairing in bilayer Nickelates arXiv:2506.07741 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    J. Li, C. Chen, C. Huang, Y. Han, M. Huo, X. Huang, P. Ma, Z. Qiu, J. Chen, X. Hu, L. Chen, T. Xie, B. Shen, H. Sun, D. Yao, and M. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 117403 (2024)

    2024

  64. [64]

    F. Li, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, C. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Ambient pressure growth of bilayer nickelate single crystals with superconductivity over 90 K under high pressure arXiv:2501.14584 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    J. Li, P. Ma, H. Zhang, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D.Hu, Z. Dong, C. He, J. Liao, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Sun, M. Wang, Identification of superconductivity in bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7 under high pressure up to 100 GPa Nat. Sci. Rev., nwaf220 (2025)

    2025

  66. [66]

    Z. Qiu, J. Chen, D. V. Semenok, Q. Zhong, D. Zhou, J. Li, P. Ma, X. Huang, M. Huo, T. Xie, X. Chen, H.-k. Mao, V. Struzhkin, H. Sun, and M. Wang, Interlayer coupling enhanced superconductivity near 100 K in La3−xNdxNi2O7 arXiv:2510.12359 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    J. Guo, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Sun, D. Hu, M. Wang, X. Huang, and T. Cu, Revealing superconducting gap in La3Ni2O7−δ by Andreev reflection spectroscopy under high pressure arXiv:2509.12601 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Z. Dong, G. Wang, N. Wang, W.-H. Dong, L. Gu, Y. Xu, J. Cheng, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, Interstitial oxygen order and its competition with superconductivity in La2PrNi2O7+δ arXiv:2508.03414 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    E. K. Ko, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V. Thampy, 8 C.-T. Kuo, B. Y. Wang, Y. Lee, K. Lee, J.-S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, and H. Y. Hwang, Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7 Nature638, 935 (2025)

    2025

  70. [70]

    Y. Liu, E. K. Ko, Y. Tarn, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V. Thampy, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, S. Raghu, Y. Yu, and H. Y. Hwang, Superconductivity and normal-state transport in compressively strained La 2PrNi2O7 thin films Nat, Mater.24, 1221 (2025)

    2025

  71. [71]

    G. Zhou, W. Lv, H. Wang, Z. Nie, Y. Chen, Y. Li, H. Huang, W.-Q. Chen, Y.-J. Sun, Q.-K. Xue and Z. Chen Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 films Nature640, 641 (2025)

    2025

  72. [74]

    B. Hao, M. Wang, W. Sun, Y. Yang, Z. Mao, S. Yan, H. Sun, H. Zhang, L. Han, Z. Gu, J. Zhou, D. Ji, and Y. Nie, Superconductivity and phase diagram in Sr-doped La3Ni2O7 thin films arXiv:2505.12603 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [75]

    Xiong, Y

    Y. Xiong, Y. Cai, and T. Ma, Pairing Symmetry Crossover fromd-wave tos ±-wave in a bilayer Nickelate Driven by Hund’s Coupling and Crystal Field Splitting arXiv:2510.19406 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [76]

    Ushio, S

    K. Ushio, S. Kamiyama, Y. Hoshi, R. Mizuno, M. Ochi, K. Kuroki, and H. Sakakibara, Theoretical study on ambient pressure superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 thin films : structural analysis, model construction, and robustness ofs ±-wave pairing arXiv:2506.20497 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [77]

    W. Qiu, Z. Luo, X. Hu, and D.-X. Yao, Pairing symmetry and superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 thin filmsarXiv:2506.20727 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [78]

    Cao, K.-Y

    Y.-H. Cao, K.-Y. Jiang, H.-Y. Lu, D. Wang, and Q.-H. Wang, Strain-Engineered Electronic Structure and Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 Thin Films arXiv:2507.13694 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [79]

    Z.-Y. Shao, C. Lu, M. Liu, Y.-B. Liu, Z. Pan, C. Wu, and F. Yang, Pairing withoutγ-Pocket in the La 3Ni2O7 Thin Films arXiv:2507.20287 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [80]

    Xiang, S

    L. Xiang, S. Lei, X. Ren, Z. Han, Z. Xu, X. J. Zhou, and Z. Zhu, Stabilizing and Tuning Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7−δ Films: Oxygen Recycling Protocol Reveals Hole-Doping Analogue arXiv:2508.11581 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  79. [81]

    H. Ji, Z. Xie, Y. Chen, G. Zhou, L. Pan, H. Wang, H. Huang, J. Ge, Y. Liu, G.-M. Zhang, Z. Wang, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, and J. Wang, Signatures of spin-glass superconductivity in nickelate (La, Pr, Sm)3Ni2O7 films arXiv:2508.16412 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  80. [82]

    W. Lv, Z. Nie, H. Wang, H. Huang, Q. Xue, G. Zhou, Z. Chen, Growth optimization of Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate high-temperature superconducting thin films arXiv:2508.18107 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.