pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02355 · v1 · pith:HIZKSF4Jnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· physics.ins-det

New constraints on non-unitary neutrino mixing from 8 years of IceCube DeepCore atmospheric neutrino data

Sharmistha Chattopadhyay , Anil Kumar , Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 09:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exphysics.ins-det
keywords non-unitary neutrino mixingIceCube DeepCoreatmospheric neutrinossterile neutrinosneutrino oscillationsEarth matter effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Eight years of IceCube DeepCore atmospheric neutrino data show no deviation from unitary mixing and set the strongest limit to date of α33 > -0.027 at 90% CL.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Atmospheric neutrinos with their range of energies and baselines through Earth matter provide a sensitive test of whether the 3x3 mixing matrix is exactly unitary or modified by heavy sterile states. The analysis uses a high-purity sample of muon-neutrino charged-current events collected by IceCube DeepCore. The measured rates match predictions from standard three-flavor unitary oscillations with no significant excess or deficit. This agreement produces the tightest existing constraint on the non-unitary parameter α33 while placing competitive limits on the remaining parameters.

Core claim

The data sample is found to be consistent with the standard unitary mixing framework with no significant deviation. Using this data sample, the most stringent bound to date of α33 > -0.027 at 90% CL is placed, while the other non-unitary parameters are constrained at competitive levels.

What carries the argument

The non-unitary parameters αij that appear at leading order in the νμ survival probability, modified by the neutral-current Earth matter potential in the νμ → νμ channel.

If this is right

  • Any model introducing heavy sterile neutrinos must satisfy α33 > -0.027 at 90% CL.
  • Atmospheric neutrino data can now compete with or surpass reactor and accelerator bounds on certain non-unitary parameters.
  • The wide baseline and energy coverage of atmospheric neutrinos makes them especially sensitive to matter-enhanced non-unitary effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bound can be combined with short-baseline and long-baseline data to further restrict the parameter space of sterile-neutrino models.
  • Future IceCube upgrades that increase statistics or reduce systematics would directly tighten the α33 limit.
  • Similar analyses applied to other atmospheric detectors could provide independent cross-checks on the same non-unitary parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The high-purity νμ CC sample selection and the modeling of Earth matter effects accurately capture the leading-order non-unitary contributions in the νμ → νμ channel without significant systematic biases or unaccounted backgrounds.

What would settle it

A statistically significant mismatch between observed and predicted muon-neutrino event rates at specific energies and zenith angles that cannot be absorbed by known systematics would indicate non-unitary mixing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02355 by Anil Kumar, Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla, Sharmistha Chattopadhyay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The constraints on the non-unitary neutrino mixing parameters at 90% CL using 8 years of atmospheric neutrino [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The difference of the three-flavor neutrino oscillation probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The difference of the three-flavor neutrino oscillation probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Expected event-difference distributions between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Expected event-difference distributions between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The solid and dashed black curves represent the observed and expected ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Left: the constraints on the magnitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Left: the constraints on the magnitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Left: the constraints on the magnitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The mixing between flavor and mass eigenstates of active neutrinos is described by a $3\times3$ unitary matrix. However, the presence of additional heavy sterile neutrino states can lead to a non-unitary neutrino mixing scenario. Atmospheric neutrinos, with their wide range of baselines and energies, provide an excellent probe of such effects. In particular, Earth matter effects in neutrino oscillations play an important role, as the neutral-current potential contributes non-trivially in the presence of non-unitarity. In this work, we use 8 years of publicly available atmospheric neutrino data of IceCube DeepCore to probe this non-unitary neutrino mixing scenario. This high-purity $\nu_\mu$ CC sample provides strong sensitivity, especially to the non-unitary parameters appearing at leading order in the $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\mu$ channel. The data sample is found to be consistent with the standard unitary mixing framework with no significant deviation. Using this data sample, we place the most stringent bound to date of $\alpha_{33} > -0.027$ at 90% CL, while the other non-unitary parameters are constrained at competitive levels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes 8 years of publicly available IceCube DeepCore atmospheric neutrino data using a high-purity νμ CC sample. It augments the standard three-flavor oscillation probabilities with the usual α-parameterized non-unitary mixing matrix, incorporates Earth matter effects via the modified NC potential, and performs a profiled likelihood fit. The data are reported to be consistent with unitary mixing, yielding the bound α33 > −0.027 at 90% CL together with competitive limits on the remaining non-unitary parameters.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies the tightest existing constraint on α33 from atmospheric neutrinos and competitive bounds on the other parameters. The analysis re-uses public data and follows the statistical and systematic framework of prior IceCube publications, which aids reproducibility.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Methods] §3 (or equivalent methods section): the description of the Earth-matter potential modification for non-unitary mixing should explicitly state whether higher-order terms in the α parameters are retained or neglected, and justify the truncation.
  2. [Results] Table 1 or equivalent: the 90% CL intervals for all six α parameters should be listed together with the corresponding one-dimensional profiled limits from previous experiments for direct comparison.
  3. [Results] Figure 2 (or equivalent): the caption should clarify whether the displayed contours are two-dimensional profiled or marginalised, and whether the unitary point (all α=0) lies inside the 68% and 90% regions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the recognition of its significance in providing the tightest atmospheric-neutrino constraint on α33, and the recommendation for minor revision. We note that no specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental bound derivation

full rationale

The paper reports a standard profiled likelihood fit of non-unitary mixing parameters (αij) to 8 years of publicly available IceCube DeepCore atmospheric neutrino data in the high-purity νμ CC channel. The central result (consistency with unitary mixing and the bound α33 > −0.027 at 90% CL) is obtained directly from this external data sample using the usual three-flavor oscillation probabilities augmented by the standard α-parameterized non-unitary matrix and NC matter potential. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work; the analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks and follows prior IceCube methods without internal redefinition of the target quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions in neutrino oscillation physics and the validity of the non-unitary parameterization; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The neutral-current potential contributes non-trivially to neutrino oscillations in the presence of non-unitarity
    Invoked in abstract as key to Earth matter effects in the νμ → νμ channel.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5751 in / 1240 out tokens · 33868 ms · 2026-07-03T09:42:48.405601+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Search for a light sterile neu- trino with 7.5 years of IceCube DeepCore data, Phys

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Search for a light sterile neu- trino with 7.5 years of IceCube DeepCore data, Phys. Rev. D110, 072007 (2024), arXiv:2407.01314 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Limits on sterile neutrino mixing using atmospheric neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande

    K. Abeet al.(Super-Kamiokande), Limits on ster- ile neutrino mixing using atmospheric neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D91, 052019 (2015), arXiv:1410.2008 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Search for nu(mu)-->nu(e) Oscillations in the NOMAD Experiment

    P. Astieret al.(NOMAD), Search for nu(mu) —>nu(e) oscillations in the NOMAD experiment, Phys. Lett. B 570, 19 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0306037. 17 FIG. D3. Comparison of the observed data and the best- fit MC events as a function of reconstructed energy,E reco (top panel), and reconstructed cosine of zenith angle, cosθ reco (bottom panel). The left (right) pa...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    P. Astieret al.(NOMAD), Final NOMAD results on muon-neutrino− →electron-neutrino− →tau-neutrino oscillations including a new search for tau-neutrino ap- pearance using hadronic tau decays, Nucl. Phys. B611, 3 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0106102

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    Aielloet al.(KM3NeT), Study of tau neutrinos and non-unitary neutrino mixing with the first six detection units of KM3NeT/ORCA, JHEP07, 213, arXiv:2502.01443 [hep-ex]

    S. Aielloet al.(KM3NeT), Study of tau neutrinos and non-unitary neutrino mixing with the first six detection units of KM3NeT/ORCA, JHEP07, 213, arXiv:2502.01443 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Adamsonet al.(MINOS+, Daya Bay), Improved Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Mixing from Disappear- ance Searches in the MINOS, MINOS+, Daya Bay, and Bugey-3 Experiments, Phys

    P. Adamsonet al.(MINOS+, Daya Bay), Improved Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Mixing from Disappear- ance Searches in the MINOS, MINOS+, Daya Bay, and Bugey-3 Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 071801 (2020), arXiv:2002.00301 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    D. V. Forero, C. Giunti, C. A. Ternes, and M. Tor- tola, Nonunitary neutrino mixing in short and long- baseline experiments, Phys. Rev. D104, 075030 (2021), arXiv:2103.01998 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Goldhagen, M

    K. Goldhagen, M. Maltoni, S. E. Reichard, and T. Schwetz, Testing sterile neutrino mixing with present and future solar neutrino data, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 116 (2022), arXiv:2109.14898 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Blennow, E

    M. Blennow, E. Fern´ andez-Mart´ ınez, J. Hern´ andez- Garc´ ıa, J. L´ opez-Pav´ on, X. Marcano, and D. Naredo- Tuero, Bounds on lepton non-unitarity and heavy neu- trino mixing, JHEP08, 030, arXiv:2306.01040 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Blennow, P

    M. Blennow, P. Coloma, E. Fern´ andez-Mart´ ınez, J. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, J. L´ opez-Pav´ on, X. Marcano, D. Naredo-Tuero, and S. Urrea, Misconceptions in neu- trino oscillations in presence of non-unitary mixing, Nucl. Phys. B1017, 116944 (2025), arXiv:2502.19480 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos

    Y. Fukudaet al.(Super-Kamiokande), Evidence for os- cillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1562 (1998), arXiv:hep-ex/9807003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    NuFIT v6.1 (2025),http://www.nu-fit.org/

    2025

  13. [13]

    First measurement of reactor neutrino oscillations at JUNO,

    A. Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), First measurement of reactor neutrino oscillations at JUNO, (2025), arXiv:2511.14593 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Lessons from the first JUNO results

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, Lessons from the first JUNO results, JHEP04, 089, arXiv:2601.09791 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Abed Abudet al.(DUNE), DUNE Phase II: scientific opportunities, detector concepts, technological solutions, JINST19(12), P12005, arXiv:2408.12725 [physics.ins- det]

    A. Abed Abudet al.(DUNE), DUNE Phase II: scientific opportunities, detector concepts, technological solutions, JINST19(12), P12005, arXiv:2408.12725 [physics.ins- det]

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Heweset al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) Near Detector Conceptual De- sign Report, Instruments5, 31 (2021), arXiv:2103.13910 [physics.ins-det]

    V. Heweset al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) Near Detector Conceptual De- sign Report, Instruments5, 31 (2021), arXiv:2103.13910 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    B. Abiet al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume III: DUNE Far Detector Technical Co- ordination, JINST15(08), T08009, arXiv:2002.03008 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    B. Abiet al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume I Introduction to DUNE, JINST15(08), T08008, arXiv:2002.02967 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2002

  19. [19]

    B. Abiet al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume IV: Far Detector Single-phase Technology, JINST15(08), T08010, arXiv:2002.03010 [physics.ins- det]

    work page arXiv 2002

  20. [20]

    Abiet al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume II: DUNE Physics 10.2172/1599307 (2020), arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex]

    B. Abiet al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume II: DUNE Physics 10.2172/1599307 (2020), arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.2172/1599307 2020

  21. [21]

    Abiet al.(DUNE), Long-baseline neutrino oscillation physics potential of the DUNE experiment, Eur

    B. Abiet al.(DUNE), Long-baseline neutrino oscillation physics potential of the DUNE experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 978 (2020), arXiv:2006.16043 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Abiet al.(DUNE), Prospects for beyond the Stan- dard Model physics searches at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Eur

    B. Abiet al.(DUNE), Prospects for beyond the Stan- dard Model physics searches at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 322 (2021), arXiv:2008.12769 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    S. Schaelet al.(ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group), Precision electroweak mea- surements on theZresonance, Phys. Rept.427, 257 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0509008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Athanassopouloset al.(LSND), Candidate events in a search for anti-muon-neutrino− →anti-electron-neutrino oscillations, Phys

    C. Athanassopouloset al.(LSND), Candidate events in a search for anti-muon-neutrino− →anti-electron-neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 2650 (1995), arXiv:nucl- ex/9504002

    work page arXiv 1995

  25. [25]

    Evidence for Neutrino Oscillations from the Observation of Electron Anti-neutrinos in a Muon Anti-Neutrino Beam

    A. Aguilaret al.(LSND), Evidence for neutrino oscilla- tions from the observation of ¯νe appearance in a ¯νµ beam, Phys. Rev. D64, 112007 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0104049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    Reanalysis of the GALLEX solar neutrino flux and source experiments

    F. Kaether, W. Hampel, G. Heusser, J. Kiko, and T. Kirsten, Reanalysis of the GALLEX solar neutrino flux and source experiments, Phys. Lett. B685, 47 (2010), arXiv:1001.2731 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    J. N. Abdurashitovet al.(SAGE), Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III: Re- sults for the 2002–2007 data-taking period, Phys. Rev. C 80, 015807 (2009), arXiv:0901.2200 [nucl-ex]. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  28. [28]

    V. V. Barinovet al., Search for electron-neutrino tran- sitions to sterile states in the BEST experiment, Phys. Rev. C105, 065502 (2022), arXiv:2201.07364 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models, Phys. Rev. D34, 1642 (1986)

    1986

  30. [30]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980)

    1980

  31. [31]

    E. K. Akhmedov, M. Lindner, E. Schnapka, and J. W. F. Valle, Dynamical left-right symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D53, 2752 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9509255

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  32. [32]

    Non-unitarity effects in a realistic low-scale seesaw model

    M. Malinsky, T. Ohlsson, and H. Zhang, Non-unitarity effects in a realistic low-scale seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D79, 073009 (2009), arXiv:0903.1961 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B67, 421 (1977)

    1977

  34. [34]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D22, 2227 (1980)

    1980

  35. [35]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. D23, 165 (1981)

    1981

  36. [36]

    Pathways to Naturally Small Neutrino Masses

    E. Ma, Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1171 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9805219

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  37. [37]

    Pontecorvo, Mesonium and Antimesonium, Sov

    B. Pontecorvo, Mesonium and Antimesonium, Sov. Phys. JETP6, 429 (1958)

    1958

  38. [38]

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962)

    1962

  39. [39]

    Pontecorvo, Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge, Zh

    B. Pontecorvo, Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 53, 1717 (1967)

    1967

  40. [40]

    Okubo, Note on Unitary Symmetry in Strong Inter- action

    S. Okubo, Note on Unitary Symmetry in Strong Inter- action. II Excited States of Baryons, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 24 (1962)

    1962

  41. [41]

    S. K. Agarwalla, S. Das, A. Giarnetti, and D. Meloni, Model-independent constraints on non-unitary neutrino mixing from high-precision long-baseline experiments, JHEP07, 121, arXiv:2111.00329 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Soumya, Probing nonunitary neutrino mixing via long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments based at J-PARC, Phys

    C. Soumya, Probing nonunitary neutrino mixing via long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments based at J-PARC, Phys. Rev. D105, 015012 (2022), arXiv:2104.04315 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Non-Unitarity, sterile neutrinos, and Non-Standard neutrino Interactions

    M. Blennow, P. Coloma, E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Hernandez-Garcia, and J. Lopez-Pavon, Non- Unitarity, sterile neutrinos, and Non-Standard neutrino Interactions, JHEP04, 153, arXiv:1609.08637 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Sahoo, S

    S. Sahoo, S. Das, A. Kumar, and S. K. Agarwalla, Con- straining non-unitary neutrino mixing using matter ef- fects in atmospheric neutrinos at INO-ICAL, JHEP09, 184, arXiv:2309.16942 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    J. M. Celestino-Ram´ ırez, F. J. Escrihuela, L. J. Flores, and O. G. Miranda, Testing the nonunitarity of the lep- tonic mixing matrix at FASERv and FASERv2, Phys. Rev. D109, L011705 (2024), arXiv:2309.00116 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Probing unitarity violation of lepton flavor mixing matrix with reactor antineutrinos at JUNO and TAO,

    J. Huang and S. Zhou, Probing unitarity violation of lepton flavor mixing matrix with reactor antineutrinos at JUNO and TAO, Phys. Lett. B873, 140160 (2026), arXiv:2511.15525 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Probing non-unitary mixing and CP-violation at a Neutrino Factory

    S. Antusch, M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, and J. Lopez-Pavon, Probing non-unitary mixing and CP- violation at a Neutrino Factory, Phys. Rev. D80, 033002 (2009), arXiv:0903.3986 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [48]

    F. J. Escrihuela, D. V. Forero, O. G. Miranda, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, Probing CP violation with non-unitary mixing in long-baseline neutrino oscil- lation experiments: DUNE as a case study, New J. Phys. 19, 093005 (2017), arXiv:1612.07377 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Rahaman and S

    U. Rahaman and S. Razzaque, Non-Unitary Neutrino Mixing in the NOνA Near Detector Data, Universe8, 238 (2022), arXiv:2108.11783 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    A. M. G. Trzeciak, H. Nunokawa, and A. A. Quiroga, Impact of unitarity violation on sensitivity of the leptonic CP phase at Hyper-Kamiokande and DUNE, JHEP11, 059, arXiv:2502.10873 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    D. Kaur, N. R. Khan Chowdhury, and U. Rahaman, Ef- fect of non-unitary mixing on the mass hierarchy and CP violation determination at the Protvino to ORCA exper- iment, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 118 (2024), arXiv:2110.02917 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Global constraints on heavy neutrino mixing

    E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Hernandez-Garcia, and J. Lopez-Pavon, Global constraints on heavy neutrino mixing, JHEP08, 033, arXiv:1605.08774 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Declaiset al., Search for neutrino oscillations at 15- meters, 40-meters, and 95-meters from a nuclear power reactor at Bugey, Nucl

    Y. Declaiset al., Search for neutrino oscillations at 15- meters, 40-meters, and 95-meters from a nuclear power reactor at Bugey, Nucl. Phys. B434, 503 (1995)

    1995

  54. [54]

    Search for Sterile Neutrinos Mixing with Muon Neutrinos in MINOS

    P. Adamsonet al.(MINOS), Search for Sterile Neutrinos Mixing with Muon Neutrinos in MINOS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 151803 (2016), arXiv:1607.01176 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Replication Data for: Mea- surement of atmospheric neutrino mixing with im- proved IceCube DeepCore calibration and data process- ing (2025)

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Replication Data for: Mea- surement of atmospheric neutrino mixing with im- proved IceCube DeepCore calibration and data process- ing (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    Atifet al.(RENO, NEOS), Search for sterile neutrino oscillations using RENO and NEOS data, Phys

    Z. Atifet al.(RENO, NEOS), Search for sterile neutrino oscillations using RENO and NEOS data, Phys. Rev. D 105, L111101 (2022), arXiv:2011.00896 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Opher, Coherent scattering of cosmic neutrinos, As- tron

    R. Opher, Coherent scattering of cosmic neutrinos, As- tron. Astrophys.37, 135 (1974)

    1974

  58. [58]

    Langacker, J

    P. Langacker, J. P. Leveille, and J. Sheiman, On the De- tection of Cosmological Neutrinos by Coherent Scatter- ing, Phys. Rev. D27, 1228 (1983)

    1983

  59. [59]

    Wolfenstein, Neutrino Oscillations in Matter, Phys

    L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino Oscillations in Matter, Phys. Rev. D17, 2369 (1978)

    1978

  60. [60]

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov, Resonance Amplifica- tion of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.42, 913 (1985)

    1985

  61. [61]

    S. P. Mikheev and A. Y. Smirnov, Resonant amplifica- tion of neutrino oscillations in matter and solar neutrino spectroscopy, Nuovo Cim. C9, 17 (1986)

    1986

  62. [62]

    E. K. Akhmedov, A. Dighe, P. Lipari, and A. Y. Smirnov, Atmospheric neutrinos at Super-Kamiokande and para- metric resonance in neutrino oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B 542, 3 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9808270

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  63. [63]

    E. K. Akhmedov, Parametric resonance of neutrino os- cillations and passage of solar and atmospheric neutri- nos through the earth, Nucl. Phys. B538, 25 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9805272

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  64. [64]

    P. I. Krastev and A. Y. Smirnov, Parametric Effects in Neutrino Oscillations, Phys. Lett. B226, 341 (1989)

    1989

  65. [65]

    E. K. Akhmedov, Neutrino oscillations in inhomogeneous matter. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.47, 301 (1988)

    1988

  66. [66]

    C. Rott, A. Taketa, and D. Bose, Spectrometry of the Earth using Neutrino Oscillations, Sci. Rep.5, 15225 (2015), arXiv:1502.04930 [physics.geo-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  67. [67]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Computational tech- niques for the analysis of small signals in high-statistics neutrino oscillation experiments, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 19 977, 164332 (2020), arXiv:1803.05390 [physics.data-an]

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. Khatun, S. K. Agarwalla, and A. Dighe, From oscillation dip to oscillation valley in atmospheric neutrino experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 190 (2021), arXiv:2006.14529 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. Khatun, S. K. Agarwalla, and A. Dighe, A New Approach to Probe Non-Standard Interactions in Atmospheric Neutrino Experiments, JHEP04, 159, arXiv:2101.02607 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), The IceCube Neu- trino Observatory: Instrumentation and Online Systems, JINST12(03), P03012, [Erratum: JINST 19, E05001 (2024)], arXiv:1612.05093 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    The Design and Performance of IceCube DeepCore

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), The Design and Performance of IceCube DeepCore, Astropart. Phys.35, 615 (2012), arXiv:1109.6096 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  72. [72]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Measurement of atmospheric neutrino mixing with improved IceCube DeepCore cali- bration and data processing, Phys

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Measurement of atmospheric neutrino mixing with improved IceCube DeepCore cali- bration and data processing, Phys. Rev. D108, 012014 (2023), arXiv:2304.12236 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    J. H. Friedman, Greedy function approximation: A gra- dient boosting machine., Annals Statist.29, 1189 (2001)

    2001

  74. [74]

    Kozynets, P

    T. Kozynets, P. Eller, A. Zander, M. Ettengruber, and D. J. Koskinen, Constraints on non-unitary neutrino mix- ing in light of atmospheric and reactor neutrino data, JHEP05, 130, arXiv:2407.20388 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    Atmospheric neutrino flux calculation using the NRLMSISE00 atmospheric model

    M. Honda, M. Sajjad Athar, T. Kajita, K. Kasahara, and S. Midorikawa, Atmospheric neutrino flux calculation us- ing the NRLMSISE-00 atmospheric model, Phys. Rev. D 92, 023004 (2015), arXiv:1502.03916 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Measurement of Atmo- spheric Neutrino Oscillations at 6→56 GeV with Ice- Cube DeepCore, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 071801 (2018), arXiv:1707.07081 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    G. D. Barr, T. K. Gaisser, S. Robbins, and T. Stanev, Un- certainties in Atmospheric Neutrino Fluxes, Phys. Rev. D74, 094009 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0611266

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  78. [78]

    Tena-Vidal, C

    J. Tena-Vidal, C. Andreopoulos, A. Ashkenazi, C. Barry, S. Dennis, S. Dytman,et al.(GENIE Collaboration), Neutrino-nucleon cross-section model tuning in genie v3, Phys. Rev. D104, 072009 (2021)

    2021

  79. [79]

    Cooper-Sarkar, P

    A. Cooper-Sarkar, P. Mertsch, and S. Sarkar, The high energy neutrino cross-section in the Standard Model and its uncertainty, J. High Energy Phys.08, 042

  80. [80]

    Ishihara (IceCube), The IceCube Upgrade - De- sign and Science Goals, PoSICRC2019, 1031 (2021), arXiv:1908.09441 [astro-ph.HE]

    A. Ishihara (IceCube), The IceCube Upgrade - De- sign and Science Goals, PoSICRC2019, 1031 (2021), arXiv:1908.09441 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.