Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLM-as-an-Interviewer: Beyond Static Testing Through Dynamic LLM Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.10424 v3 pith:HJ5HEY4F submitted 2024-12-10 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords frameworkinterviewllm-as-an-interviewerfeedbackfollow-upincludinginitialinsights
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce LLM-as-an-Interviewer, a novel paradigm for evaluating large language models (LLMs). This approach leverages multi-turn interactions where the LLM interviewer actively provides feedback on responses and poses follow-up questions to the evaluated LLM. At the start of the interview, the LLM interviewer dynamically modifies datasets to generate initial questions, mitigating data contamination. We apply the LLM-as-an-Interviewer framework to evaluate six models on the MATH and DepthQA tasks. Our results show that the framework effectively provides insights into LLM performance, including the quality of initial responses, adaptability to feedback, and ability to address follow-up queries like clarification or additional knowledge requests. The framework also addresses key limitations of conventional methods like LLM-as-a-Judge, including verbosity bias and inconsistency across runs. Finally, we propose the Interview Report, which aggregates insights from the interview process, providing examples and a comprehensive analysis of the LLM's strengths and weaknesses. This report offers a detailed snapshot of the model's real-world applicability. The code for our framework is publicly available at https://github.com/interview-eval/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI Self-preferencing in Algorithmic Hiring: Empirical Evidence and Insights

    cs.CY 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs that screen resumes systematically prefer their own generated summaries over human-written ones, with simulated shortlisting advantages of 23 to 60 percent for same-model users.

  2. Flex-TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Flexible Planning with Language Agents

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new multi-turn benchmark shows LLMs struggle to keep global constraints satisfied when local constraints are added later, and often sacrifice budget to satisfy soft preferences.

Pith tools