Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 73 references

CNN-powered micro- to macro-scale flow modeling in deformable porous media

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A convolutional neural network predicts the anisotropic permeability tensor and porosity of deforming sandstone directly from binarized micro-CT images, matching pore-scale simulations with an R^2 near 0.985.

desk verdict Useful application paper, but the central R2 claim rests on a crop-level split that likely inflates generalization; needs group-wise evaluation before that claim is credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06466 v1 pith:HKH2432H submitted 2025-01-11 physics.flu-dyn cs.CVcs.LG

Yousef Heider , Fadi Aldakheel , Wolfgang Ehlers This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyncs.CVcs.LG MSC 76S0568T07 PACS 47.56.+r
keywords machinelearningconvolutionalneuralnetworkspermeabilitytensorporousmediaflowmultiscalemodelingdeformablelatticeBoltzmannmethodmicro-CTimaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a convolutional neural network can learn the mapping from binarized micro-CT images of a deformable sandstone to the macroscopic intrinsic permeability tensor and porosity, reproducing lattice-Boltzmann simulation results with $R^2$ scores around $0.985$ on held-out subvolumes. If correct, the CNN becomes a fast surrogate for pore-scale flow simulations, allowing a macroscopic porous-media model to update permeability at each deformation state without rerunning expensive fluid dynamics. The study builds the dataset from Bentheim sandstone imaged at eight volumetric strain levels, computes ground-truth permeability with lattice-Boltzmann simulations, and tests three CNN variants, including one informed by physical parameters and one pretrained on synthetic microstructures.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a 3D convolutional neural network, a network that slides learned filters over grid-like image data, with four convolutional blocks with increasing filter counts and kernel sizes, each followed by max pooling, then a flatten layer, two dense layers, and a linear output layer for porosity and the three permeability components. The input is a binarized 3D CT subvolume; the training target is produced by lattice-Boltzmann simulations in which average fluid velocities under imposed pressure gradients are converted to intrinsic permeability through Darcy's law. This architecture lets the network act as a learned homogenization map from a fixed microgeometry to effective hydraulic properties, with deformation entering only through the changed binary pore structure at each strain level.

What would settle it

Retrain the same models using leave-one-strain-out or leave-one-sample-out splitting, so that all crops from one deformation state or one original scan are held out together, and compare the $R^2$ scores. If the score drops well below $0.985$, the high accuracy partly reflects information leakage across shared microstructures rather than a learned microstructure-to-permeability mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the deformation-dependent anisotropic permeability tensor can be predicted directly from microstructure images. A 3D CNN with four convolutional blocks and two dense layers takes binarized CT subvolumes as input and outputs porosity together with the three diagonal intrinsic permeability components $K^S_{11}$, $K^S_{22}$, $K^S_{33}$, reaching $R^2 \approx 0.985$ for Model 1 and $R^2 \approx 0.983$ for Model 2 on unseen data. Ground truth is generated by single-phase lattice-Boltzmann simulations under two boundary-condition settings, with permeability recovered by inverting Darcy's law; the off-diagonal components are found to be much smaller than the diagonal ones and are omitted from the learning target. The informed model, which feeds porosity and specific surface area as extra inputs, does not meaningfully outperform the plain image-driven model, while transfer learning from synthetic GAN-generated microstructures mainly accelerates convergence rather than improving final accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

The reported accuracy rests on the assumption that randomly shuffling 448 cropped subvolumes, many taken from the same original CT scans, produces independent training and test sets.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A trained CNN can replace lattice-Boltzmann simulations inside a macroscopic porous-media model, making deformation-dependent permeability updates effectively instantaneous.
  • The same pipeline, binarized CT volumes in and permeability tensor out, can supply material laws for reservoir, hydrology, and geotechnical simulations without repeated pore-scale computation.
  • Jointly predicting porosity with permeability gives the surrogate model a consistent deformation state variable, matching how porosity changes with volumetric strain in the full theory.
  • Pretraining on synthetic microstructures offers a practical route to faster training when real CT data are scarce, even though it did not raise final accuracy on this dataset.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension would be to train on the full permeability tensor including off-diagonal components, which would test whether the CNN can capture shear-driven anisotropy rather than only the nearly isotropic diagonal case shown here.
  • The same image-to-property architecture should transfer to other porous materials such as foams or biological tissues, but cross-material generalization remains untested because only one sandstone type is used.
  • Because the CNN maps a microstructure to several effective properties at once, it could plausibly be extended to predict electrical conductivity, elastic stiffness, or other homogenized quantities from the same CT inputs.
  • The transfer-learning result suggests that on even smaller real datasets synthetic pretraining could shift from a speed convenience to a necessity, a hypothesis the paper states but does not test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes convolutional neural network (CNN) surrogates that take binarized micro-CT images of Bentheim sandstone as input and predict porosity and the diagonal components of the intrinsic permeability tensor at different volumetric strain levels. Three models are studied: a baseline CNN that outputs nF and K_11, K_22, K_33; an 'informed' CNN that adds porosity and specific surface area as auxiliary inputs; and a transfer-learning variant pretrained on GAN-generated synthetic microstructures and fine-tuned on the real data. The LBM is used to compute reference permeabilities, and the TPM framework provides the macroscopic flow context. Reported test-set R² values are about 0.985 for Model 1 and 0.983 for Model 2, with Model 3 mainly showing faster convergence. The authors conclude that CNN-based permeability prediction is accurate enough for use in multiscale porous-media modeling.

Significance. If the reported accuracy holds under correctly designed validation, the work would be a useful and practical surrogate for pore-scale LBM permeability computations, with a clear path toward embedding deformation-dependent permeability in TPM models. The strengths of the paper are its use of real µ-CT data, LBM-generated ground truth, reproducible open-source code, and a physics-aware baseline in the form of the TPM/Darcy-Brinkman formulation. The regression task itself is not circular: the CNN is fitted to LBM outputs and compared with independent held-out LBM simulations. However, the central generalization claim is currently undermined by the random crop-level splitting scheme and by the mismatch between the claimed 'permeability tensor' output and the actually predicted diagonal-only tensor.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1, data preparation] The manuscript states: 'Before splitting into training, validation, and test subsets, data indices are shuffled to randomize the samples.' Because the 448 3D samples are crops extracted from a small number of parent µ-CT volumes (Section 3.1), a purely random crop-level split places subvolumes from the same parent rock volume and the same strain level in both training and test sets. These subvolumes share pore structure and deformation state, so the reported R² values in Sections 4.2 and 5 measure interpolation within familiar volumes rather than generalization to unseen microstructures or unseen strain levels. The authors should re-evaluate using group-wise splits (for example, leave-one-parent-volume-out and leave-one-strain-level-out) and report the resulting R² values, including the dispersion across repeated splits.
  2. [Section 3.3, Eq. (26)] The manuscript computes the full symmetric off-diagonal components in Eq. (25) and then states that 'the non-diagonal components computed for Bentheim sandstone are much smaller than the diagonal components. Thus, we neglect them for simplicity from the ML model.' Yet the abstract and conclusions claim that the CNN predicts 'the symmetric second-order permeability tensor' and 'anisotropic intrinsic permeability tensor.' If only K_11, K_22, and K_33 are trained and predicted, the output is a diagonal tensor, not a general anisotropic permeability tensor. Either the off-diagonal components should be included in the training targets, or the claims and title should be revised to say that diagonal permeability components are predicted; in addition, the magnitude of the neglected off-diagonal components should be quantified.
  3. [Sections 4.2 and 5, R² results] The reported R² values are based on a single randomly chosen test split, with no confidence intervals, no repeated cross-validation, and no trivial baseline comparison. Figures 2 and 3 show that porosity and permeability vary strongly and nearly monotonically with strain level; under a random split, a model that only regresses the strain-level mean could achieve a high R². The authors should report repeated k-fold splits with standard deviations and compare against baselines such as the strain-level mean or a porosity-only regression, so that the reader can assess the added value of the CNN beyond the known strain-dependence of permeability.
  4. [Section 6.1 and Section 6.2] For the synthetic GAN data, the binarization threshold is selected 'to ensure that the resulting porosity matches that of the ground truth.' This is a calibration step that introduces a free parameter, but its sensitivity is not analyzed and no threshold value is reported for the real CT images in Section 3.1. In addition, the transfer-learning experiment shows faster convergence (initial loss around 0.03 versus 1) but the final loss values of the two models are similar; therefore the conclusion that transfer learning 'improves model performance' should be limited to learning efficiency unless final accuracy on a held-out set is shown to improve.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (28) and (30)] The loss definitions appear to use the index k without an explicit summation over k = 1, 2, 3; as written, k is a free index. The equations should include an explicit sum over the three permeability components.
  2. [Figures 4 and 7, and Section 3.1] The input dimensions are inconsistent: Section 3.1 states that the 3D samples have size 150×150×150 voxels, while Figures 4 and 7 show an input of 256×256×32 voxels, and Section 6.2 refers to samples of 108×108×108 voxels. The authors should unify the reported input dimensions.
  3. [Section 4.1] The description 'data indices are shuffled' should specify the random seed, the train/validation/test split ratio, and whether any stratification by strain level or parent volume was used.
  4. [Section 3.1] The binarization threshold for the real µ-CT images is not reported, whereas the threshold for the synthetic images in Section 6.1 is tied to porosity matching; reporting the threshold and its sensitivity would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CNN permeability predictions are surrogate regressions validated against independent LBM simulations, and no load-bearing claim reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is empirical: a CNN maps binarized µ-CT subvolumes to LBM-computed intrinsic permeability components, with R^2 ≈ 0.985/0.983 on held-out data. This is a supervised regression task, not a derivation from first principles. The ground-truth permeability is produced by independent lattice Boltzmann simulations (Sections 3.2–3.3, Darcy filter law Eqs. 24–25), and the reported accuracy is evaluated against those LBM outputs (Figs. 6 and 9). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the CNN weights themselves are the fitted model, and the held-out test set is the check. The porosity output in Model 1 is a trivial function of the binarized input, and the informed Model 2 feeds nF and SSA as additional inputs; neither step is used to justify the permeability predictions. Self-citations (e.g., Heider et al. [44], Aldakheel et al. [4], Ehlers [25]) provide prior architecture choices, TPM background, or earlier neural-network surrogates, but none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the evidence that the CNN works; the evidence is the LBM comparison. The random crop-level split and resulting potential information leakage is a statistical-validity concern about generalization claims, not a circularity of derivation, and therefore does not raise the circularity score under the stated rules. The availability of source code permits independent reproduction, further supporting a non-circular assessment.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard physics (Darcy, LBM, TPM) and on a set of data-preparation choices. No new physical entities are introduced. The main burden is the representativeness and independence of the cropped subvolumes used for training and testing.

free parameters (2)
  • Binarization threshold for synthetic images = Not reported, matched to ground-truth porosity
    Section 6.1: 'The binarization threshold is selected to ensure that the resulting porosity matches that of the ground truth.' This choice affects the input images and thus the trained model.
  • CNN hyperparameters = Learning rate 1e-5, batch size 16, 500 epochs, kernel sizes 3^3 to 7^3
    Section 4.1 lists hand-chosen hyperparameters. They are standard choices but directly affect the reported accuracy.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Darcy's law is valid for the pore-scale creeping flow simulated by LBM
    Used in Section 3.3 to convert LBM average velocities into permeability components via Eq. (24).
  • domain assumption The permeability tensor is symmetric and positive definite
    Invoked in Section 3.3 following Kuhn et al. [50].
  • domain assumption Off-diagonal permeability components are negligible for Bentheim sandstone
    Section 3.3 states 'the non-diagonal components computed for Bentheim sandstone are much smaller than the diagonal components. Thus, we neglect them for simplicity', but this is only justified for this specific rock type.
  • domain assumption 150x150x150 voxel subvolumes are representative of the macroscopic permeability
    Section 3.1 crops the original volumes into smaller samples without a rigorous RVE analysis.
  • standard math The Theory of Porous Media provides the correct macroscopic flow equations
    Section 2 uses TPM to derive Darcy and Darcy-Brinkman models, which is established background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CNN-powered micro- to macro-scale flow modeling in deformable porous media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKH2432H

@misc{pith2026250106466,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CNN-powered micro- to macro-scale flow modeling in deformable porous media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKH2432H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06466}
}
read the original abstract

This work introduces a novel application for predicting the macroscopic intrinsic permeability tensor in deformable porous media, using a limited set of micro-CT images of real microgeometries. The primary goal is to develop an efficient, machine-learning (ML)-based method that overcomes the limitations of traditional permeability estimation techniques, which often rely on time-consuming experiments or computationally expensive fluid dynamics simulations. The novelty of this work lies in leveraging Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to predict pore-fluid flow behavior under deformation and anisotropic flow conditions. Particularly, the described approach employs binarized CT images of porous micro-structure as inputs to predict the symmetric second-order permeability tensor, a critical parameter in continuum porous media flow modeling. The methodology comprises four key steps: (1) constructing a dataset of CT images from Bentheim sandstone at different volumetric strain levels; (2) performing pore-scale simulations of single-phase flow using the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) to generate permeability data; (3) training the CNN model with the processed CT images as inputs and permeability tensors as outputs; and (4) exploring techniques to improve model generalization, including data augmentation and alternative CNN architectures. Examples are provided to demonstrate the CNN's capability to accurately predict the permeability tensor, a crucial parameter in various disciplines such as geotechnical engineering, hydrology, and material science. An exemplary source code is made available for interested readers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.06466 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the major steps of the 2D CNN model to predict porous media effective properties (mainly the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of data sampling (left). Mean and standard deviation of the porosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of data generation using LBM with prescribed pressure difference and no-slip/natural slip BCs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Architecture of the 3D CNN illustrating the flow of information from the input image through multiple con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Model (1): Loss function value over the number of weight updates (Epoch). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Model (1): CNN-predictions vs. ground-truth values of the intrinsic permeability components and porosity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of the “Informed KS -CNN model” architecture (see, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Model (2): Loss function value over the number of weight updates (Epoch). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Model (2): CNN-predictions vs. ground-truth values of the intrinsic permeability components. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: 2D slices and 3D volume representations of real microstructures with those generated by GANs. The synthetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Model (3): Loss function value over the number of weight updates (Epoch) with training on synthetic data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Model (3): Loss function value over the number of weight updates (Epoch) with no transfer learning (left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (2016) Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems

    Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, et al. (2016) Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint:160304467

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Appl Sci 11(14):6483

    Aldakheel F, Satari R, Wriggers P (2021) Feed-forward neural networks for failure mechanics problems. Appl Sci 11(14):6483

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Comput Mech 72:155–171, DOI 10.1007/s00466-023-02324-9

    Aldakheel F, Elsayed E, Zohdi T, Wriggers P (2023) Efficient multiscale modeling of heterogeneous materials using deep neural networks. Comput Mech 72:155–171, DOI 10.1007/s00466-023-02324-9

    doi:10.1007/s00466-023-02324-9 2023

  4. [4]

    Mech Mater 184:104726, DOI 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104726

    Aldakheel F, Soyarslan C, Palanisamy HS, Elsayed ES (2023) Machine learning aided multiscale magnetostatics. Mech Mater 184:104726, DOI 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104726

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Appl Mech 3(2):496–516, DOI 10.3390/applmech3020029

    Archut JL, Kins R, Heider Y , Cloppenburg F, Markert B, Gries T, Corves B (2022) A study of the mechanical response of nonwovens excited by plate vibration. Appl Mech 3(2):496–516, DOI 10.3390/applmech3020029

    work page doi:10.3390/applmech3020029 2022

  6. [6]

    Bhatnagar PL, Gross EP, Krook M (1954) A model for collision processes in gases. I. small amplitude processes in charged and neutral one-component systems. Phys Rev 94:511–525, DOI 10.1103/PhysRev.94.511

    doi:10.1103/physrev.94.511 1954

  7. [7]

    Arch Computat Methods Eng 30:191–222, DOI 10.1007/ s11831-022-09795-8

    Bishara D, Xie Y , Liu WK, Li S (2023) A state-of-the-art review on machine learning-based multiscale modeling, simulation, homogenization and design of materials. Arch Computat Methods Eng 30:191–222, DOI 10.1007/ s11831-022-09795-8

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Teknisk Ukeblad 39:859–863

    Bishop AW (1959) The effective stress principle. Teknisk Ukeblad 39:859–863

    work page 1959

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Acta Mech 83:77–92

    de Boer R, Ehlers W (1990) The development of the concept of effective stresses. Acta Mech 83:77–92

    1990

  2. [10]

    Dover Publications, New York, translated by Stephen G

    Boltzmann L (1964) Lectures on Gas Theory, reprint edition edn. Dover Publications, New York, translated by Stephen G. Brush. Originally published as V orlesungen¨uber Gastheorie in 1896-1898. Dover reprint edition

    1964

  3. [11]

    In: Eringen AC (ed) Continuum Physics, vol III, Academic Press, New York, pp 1–127

    Bowen RM (1976) Theory of Mixtures. In: Eringen AC (ed) Continuum Physics, vol III, Academic Press, New York, pp 1–127

    1976

  4. [12]

    Appl Sci Res A 1:27–34

    Brinkman H (1949) A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles. Appl Sci Res A 1:27–34

    1949

  5. [13]

    Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 21(5):1–24

    Cai C, Vlassis N, Magee L, Ma R, Xiong Z, Bahmani B, Wong TF, Wang Y , Sun W (2023) Equivariant geometric learning for digital rock physics: Estimating formation factor and effective permeability tensors from morse graph. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 21(5):1–24

    2023

  6. [14]

    Int J Heat Fluid Flow 83:108566

    Chaaban M, Heider Y , Markert B (2020) Upscaling LBM-TPM simulation approach of Darcy and non-Darcy fluid flow in deformable, heterogeneous porous media. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 83:108566

    2020

  7. [15]

    Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 46(14):2698–2724, DOI 10.1002/nag

    Chaaban M, Heider Y , Markert B (2022) A multiscale LBM–TPM–PFM approach for modeling of multiphase fluid flow in fractured porous media. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 46(14):2698–2724, DOI 10.1002/nag. 3423

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    PAMM 23(1):e202200129

    Chaaban M, Heider Y , Markert B (2023) A multiscale study of the retention behavior and hydraulic anisotropy in deformable porous media. PAMM 23(1):e202200129

    2023

  9. [17]

    Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech pp 1–22, DOI 10.1002/nag.3668

    Chaaban M, Heider Y , Sun W, Markert B (2023) A machine-learning supported multi-scale LBM-TPM model of unsaturated, anisotropic, and deformable porous materials. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech pp 1–22, DOI 10.1002/nag.3668

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    https://github.com/fchollet/keras

    Chollet F (2015) Keras. https://github.com/fchollet/keras

    2015

  11. [19]

    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 293:131–154

    Choo J, Borja RI (2015) Stabilized mixed finite elements for deformable porous media with double porosity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 293:131–154

    2015

  12. [20]

    J Comput Phys 510:113082, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113082 A multiscale CNN-based intrinsic permeability prediction in deformable porous media 19

    De Marchi N, Xotta G, Ferronato M, Salomoni V (2024) An efficient multi-field dynamic model for 3d wave propagation in saturated anisotropic porous media. J Comput Phys 510:113082, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113082 A multiscale CNN-based intrinsic permeability prediction in deform...

    2024

  13. [21]

    Geosphere 6(5):470–481

    Degruyter W, Burgisser A, Bachmann O, Malaspinas O (2010) Synchrotron X-ray microtomography and lattice Boltzmann simulations of gas flow through volcanic pumices. Geosphere 6(5):470–481

    2010

  14. [22]

    Prog Artif Intell 9:85–112, DOI 10.1007/s13748-019-00203-0

    Dhillon A, Verma G (2020) Convolutional neural network: a review of models, methodologies and applications to object detection. Prog Artif Intell 9:85–112, DOI 10.1007/s13748-019-00203-0

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    In: Ehlers W, Bluhm J (eds) Porous Media: Theory, Experiments and Numerical Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 3–86

    Ehlers W (2002) Foundations of multiphasic and porous materials. In: Ehlers W, Bluhm J (eds) Porous Media: Theory, Experiments and Numerical Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 3–86

    2002

  16. [24]

    Geomech Energy Environ 15:35–46, DOI 10

    Ehlers W (2018) Effective stresses in multiphasic porous media: A thermodynamic investigation of a fully non- linear model with compressible and incompressible constituents. Geomech Energy Environ 15:35–46, DOI 10. 1016/j.gete.2017.11.004

    2018

  17. [25]

    Arch Appl Mech 92:619–639, DOI 10.1007/s00419-020-01802-3

    Ehlers W (2022) Darcy, Forchheimer, Brinkman and Richards: classical hydromechanical equations and their significance in the light of the TPM. Arch Appl Mech 92:619–639, DOI 10.1007/s00419-020-01802-3

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 315:348 – 368

    Ehlers W, Luo C (2017) A phase-field approach embedded in the Theory of Porous Media for the description of dynamic hydraulic fracturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 315:348 – 368

    2017

  19. [27]

    Arch Appl Mech 89(4):609–628

    Ehlers W, Wagner A (2019) Modelling and simulation methods applied to coupled problems in porous-media mechanics. Arch Appl Mech 89(4):609–628

    2019

  20. [28]

    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(27):2885 – 2910

    Ehlers W, Graf T, Ammann M (2004) Deformation and localization analysis of partially saturated soil. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(27):2885 – 2910

    2004

  21. [29]

    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 403:115741

    Eidel B (2023) Deep CNNs as universal predictors of elasticity tensors in homogenization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 403:115741

    2023

  22. [30]

    Comput Struct 249:106505

    Fuchs A, Heider Y , Wang K, Sun W, Kaliske M (2021) DNN2: A hyper-parameter reinforcement learning game for self-design of neural network based elasto-plastic constitutive descriptions. Comput Struct 249:106505

    2021

  23. [31]

    Int J Solids Struct 206:322–339

    Gawin D, Pesavento F, Koniorczyk M, Schrefler BA (2020) Poro-mechanical model of strain hysteresis due to cyclic water freezing in partially saturated porous media. Int J Solids Struct 206:322–339

    2020

  24. [32]

    Communications of the ACM 63:139–144

    Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2020) Gener- ative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM 63:139–144

    2020

  25. [33]

    Comput Sci Eng pp 60–74, DOI 10.1109/MCSE.2016.49

    Gostick J, Aghighi M, Hinebaugh J, Tranter T, Hoeh MA, Day H, Spellacy B, Sharqawy MH, Bazylak A, Burns L, Werner H, Putz A (2016) OpenPNM: a pore network modeling package. Comput Sci Eng pp 60–74, DOI 10.1109/MCSE.2016.49

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    Pattern Recognit 77:354–377, DOI 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013

    Gu J, Wang Z, Kuen J, Ma L, Shahroudy A, Shuai B, Liu T, Wang X, Wang G, Cai J, Chen T (2018) Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognit 77:354–377, DOI 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    In: Hutter K (ed) Continuum Mechanics in Environmental Sciences and Geophysics, CISM Courses and Lectures No

    Haupt P (1993) Foundation of continuum mechanics. In: Hutter K (ed) Continuum Mechanics in Environmental Sciences and Geophysics, CISM Courses and Lectures No. 337, Springer-Verlag, Wien, pp 1–77

    1993

  28. [36]

    Phys Rev E 56:6811–6817, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.6811

    He X, Luo LS (1997) Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: From the Boltzmann equation to the lattice Boltzmann equation. Phys Rev E 56:6811–6817, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.6811

    1997 doi

  29. [37]

    Habilitation, Report No.IAM-13 of Institute of General Mechanics, RWTH Aachen University, DOI 10.18154/RWTH-2021-10362

    Heider Y (2021) Multi-field and multi-scale computational fracture mechanics and machine-learning material modeling. Habilitation, Report No.IAM-13 of Institute of General Mechanics, RWTH Aachen University, DOI 10.18154/RWTH-2021-10362

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Eng Fract Mech 253:107881, DOI 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107881

    Heider Y (2021) A review on phase-field modeling of hydraulic fracturing. Eng Fract Mech 253:107881, DOI 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107881

    2021

  31. [39]

    Mech Res Commun 80:38 – 46

    Heider Y , Markert B (2017) A phase-field modeling approach of hydraulic fracture in saturated porous media. Mech Res Commun 80:38 – 46

    2017

  32. [40]

    hydraulic cracking

    Heider Y , Sun W (2020) A phase field framework for capillary-induced fracture in unsaturated porous media: Drying-induced vs. hydraulic cracking. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 359:112647

    2020

  33. [41]

    PAMM 22(1):e202200203, DOI 10.1002/pamm.202200203

    Heider Y , Sun W (2023) Objectivity and accuracy enhancement within ANN-based multiscale material modeling. PAMM 22(1):e202200203, DOI 10.1002/pamm.202200203

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 63:120 – 137, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn

    Heider Y , Avci O, Markert B, Ehlers W (2014) The dynamic response of fluid-saturated porous materials with application to seismically induced soil liquefaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 63:120 – 137, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn. 2014.03.017

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 363:112875

    Heider Y , Wang K, Sun W (2020) So (3)-invariance of informed-graph-based deep neural network for anisotropic elastoplastic materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 363:112875

    2020

  36. [44]

    Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 45(9):1212–1237, DOI 10.1002/ nag.3196 20 Yousef Heider1,∗ et al

    Heider Y , Suh HS, Sun W (2021) An offline multi-scale unsaturated poromechanics model enabled by self- designed/self-improved neural networks. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 45(9):1212–1237, DOI 10.1002/ nag.3196 20 Yousef Heider1,∗ et al

    2021

  37. [45]

    Comput Mech DOI 10.1007/s00466-023-02434-4

    Herrmann L, Kollmannsberger S (2024) Deep learning in computational mechanics: a review. Comput Mech DOI 10.1007/s00466-023-02434-4

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Comput Geosci 24:1523–1739

    Hong J, Liu J (2020) Rapid estimation of permeability from digital rock using 3d convolutional neural network. Comput Geosci 24:1523–1739

    2020

  39. [47]

    Multiscale Model Simul 3(1):50–64

    Jenny P, Lee SH, Tchelepi HA (2005) Adaptive multiscale finite-volume method for multiphase flow and transport in porous media. Multiscale Model Simul 3(1):50–64

    2005

  40. [48]

    Appl Mech Rev 75(6):061001, DOI 10.1115/1.4062966

    Jin H, Zhang E, Espinosa HD (2023) Recent Advances and Applications of Machine Learning in Experimental Solid Mechanics: A Review. Appl Mech Rev 75(6):061001, DOI 10.1115/1.4062966

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Springer Int Publ 10(978-3):4–15

    Kr ¨uger T, Kusumaatmaja H, Kuzmin A, Shardt O, Silva G, Viggen EM (2017) The lattice Boltzmann method. Springer Int Publ 10(978-3):4–15

    2017

  42. [50]

    Acta Geotech 10(4):399–419

    Kuhn MR, Sun W, Wang Q (2015) Stress-induced anisotropy in granular materials: fabric, stiffness, and perme- ability. Acta Geotech 10(4):399–419

    2015

  43. [51]

    Comput Math Appl DOI 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.03.022

    Latt J, Malaspinas O, Kontaxakis D, Parmigiani A, Lagrava D, Brogi F, Belgacem MB, Thorimbert Y , Leclaire S, Li S, Marson F, Lemus J, Kotsalos C, Conradin R, Coreixas C, Petkantchin R, Raynaud F, Beny J, Chopard B (2020) Palabos: Parallel Lattice Boltzmann Solver. Comput Math...

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 179:105363, DOI 10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105363

    Linden L, Klein DK, Kalina KA, Brummund J, Weeger O, K ¨astner M (2023) Neural networks meet hyper- elasticity: A guide to enforcing physics. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 179:105363, DOI 10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105363

    2023

  45. [53]

    Transp Porous Media 70(3):427

    Markert B (2007) A constitutive approach to 3-d nonlinear fluid flow through finite deformable porous continua. Transp Porous Media 70(3):427

    2007

  46. [54]

    Springer Science & Busi- ness Media

    Markert B (2011) Advances in Extended and Multifield Theories for Continua, vol 59. Springer Science & Busi- ness Media

    2011

  47. [55]

    J Coupled Syst Multiscale Dyn 27:22–48

    Markert B (2013) A survey of selected coupled multifield problems in computational mechanics. J Coupled Syst Multiscale Dyn 27:22–48

    2013

  48. [56]

    Int J Numer Meth Eng 82:1341–1383

    Markert B, Heider Y , Ehlers W (2010) Comparison of monolithic and splitting solution schemes for dynamic porous media problem. Int J Numer Meth Eng 82:1341–1383

    2010

  49. [57]

    part III

    Miehe C, Mauthe S (2016) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. part III. crack driving forces in hydro-poro-elasticity and hydraulic fracturing of fluid-saturated porous media. Comput Method Appl M 304:619 – 655

    2016

  50. [58]

    http://www.digitalrocksportal.org/ projects/223, DOI 10.17612/1a36-rn45

    Moon C, Andrew M (2019) Bentheimer networks. http://www.digitalrocksportal.org/ projects/223, DOI 10.17612/1a36-rn45

    2019 doi

  51. [59]

    Water Resour Res 47(10):doi = 10.1029/2011WR010685

    Mosthaf K, Baber K, Flemisch B, Helmig R, Leijnse A, Rybak I, Wohlmuth B (2011) A coupling concept for two-phase compositional porous-medium and single-phase compositional free flow. Water Resour Res 47(10):doi = 10.1029/2011WR010685

    2011 doi

  52. [60]

    Sci Rep 12(1):9034, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-12845-7

    Nguyen PCH, Vlassis NN, Bahmani B, Sun W, Udaykumar HS, Baek SS (2022) Synthesizing controlled microstructures of porous media using generative adversarial networks and reinforcement learning. Sci Rep 12(1):9034, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-12845-7

    2022 doi

  53. [61]

    (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python

    Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V , Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V , et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830

    2011

  54. [62]

    PAMM 23(2):e202300209, DOI 10.1002/pamm.202300209

    Peters S, Heider Y , Markert B (2023) Numerical simulation of miscible multiphase flow and fluid–fluid interaction in deformable porous media. PAMM 23(2):e202300209, DOI 10.1002/pamm.202300209

    2023 doi

  55. [63]

    PAMM 24(1):e202300154, DOI 10.1002/pamm

    Phu NT, Navrath U, Heider Y , Carmai J, Markert B (2024) Investigating the impact of deformation on foam permeability through ct scans and the lattice-Boltzmann method. PAMM 24(1):e202300154, DOI 10.1002/pamm. 202300154

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    Continuum Mech Thermodyn pp doi = 10.1007/s00161–019–00764–4

    Sweidan AH, Heider Y , Markert B (2019) Modeling of PCM-based enhanced latent heat storage systems using a phase-field-porous media approach. Continuum Mech Thermodyn pp doi = 10.1007/s00161–019–00764–4

    2019 doi

  57. [65]

    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 372:113358, DOI 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113358

    Sweidan AH, Heider Y , Markert B (2020) A unified water/ice kinematics approach for phase-field thermo-hydro- mechanical modeling of frost action in porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 372:113358, DOI 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113358

    2020

  58. [66]

    Comput Mech DOI 10.1007/s00466-023-02317-8

    Tandale S, Stoffel M (2023) Recurrent and convolutional neural networks in structural dynamics: a modified attention steered encoder–decoder architecture versus LSTM versus GRU versus TCN topologies to predict the response of shock wave-loaded plates. Comput Mech DOI 10.1007/s...

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    Arch Appl Mech pp 1–14, DOI 10.1007/s00419-024-02589-3 A multiscale CNN-based intrinsic permeability prediction in deformable porous media 21

    Tragoudas A, Alloisio M, Elsayed ES, Gasser TC, Aldakheel F (2024) An enhanced deep learning approach for vascular wall fracture analysis. Arch Appl Mech pp 1–14, DOI 10.1007/s00419-024-02589-3 A multiscale CNN-based intrinsic permeability prediction in deformable porous media 21

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 334:337–380

    Wang K, Sun W (2018) A multiscale multi-permeability poroplasticity model linked by recursive homogeniza- tions and deep learning. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 334:337–380

    2018

  61. [69]

    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:276–305

    Wang K, Sun W (2019) An updated Lagrangian LBM–DEM–FEM coupling model for dual-permeability fissured porous media with embedded discontinuities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:276–305

    2019

  62. [70]

    Wessels H, B ¨ohm C, Aldakheel F, H ¨upgen M, Haist M, Lohaus L, Wriggers P (2022) Computational homoge- nization using convolutional neural networks. In: Aldakheel F, Hudobivnik B, Soleimani M, Wessels H, Weißen- fels C, Marino M (eds) Current Trends and Open Problems in Comp...

    2022 doi

  63. [71]

    Springer

    Wolf-Gladrow DA (2004) Lattice-gas cellular automata and lattice Boltzmann models: an introduction. Springer

    2004

  64. [72]

    Sci Bull 63(18):1215–1222, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2018.08.006

    Wu J, Yin X, Xiao H (2018) Seeing permeability from images: fast prediction with convolutional neural networks. Sci Bull 63(18):1215–1222, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2018.08.006

    2018 doi

  65. [73]

    Phys Fluids 9(6):1591–1598

    Zou Q, He X (1997) On pressure and velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann BGK model. Phys Fluids 9(6):1591–1598

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.