REVIEW 1 cited by
Can Massive Gravitons be an Alternative to Dark Energy?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Can Massive Gravitons be an Alternative to Dark Energy?
read the original abstract
In this work, we explore some cosmological implications of the model proposed by M. Visser in 1998. In his approach, Visser intends to take in account mass for the graviton by means of an additional bimetric tensor in the Einstein's field equations. Our study has shown that a consistent cosmological model arises from Visser's approach. The most interesting feature is that an accelerated expansion phase naturally emerges from the cosmological model, and we do not need to postulate any kind of dark energy to explain the current observational data for distant type Ia supernovae (SNIa).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Breathing Black Hole Shadows in Modified Gravity (MOG)
In MOG gravity, gravitational waves would make a black hole's shadow breathe in area and then wobble translationally after a time delay, signatures absent in general relativity.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.