Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 74 references

Moiré density modulations can make fractional Chern insulator gaps arbitrarily large while rescaling their excitation spectra to match fractional quantum Hall states.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 20:32 UTC pith:HKXAMIYX

load-bearing objection The paper claims small-q density components hurt FCI gaps while large-q ones help them enough for arbitrary enhancement and full spectrum rescaling to FQH states, but the independent tuning needed for this is not shown to preserve flatness and Chern number. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.07323 v1 pith:HKXAMIYX submitted 2026-06-05 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

How Similar Can Fractional Chern Insulators Be to Fractional Quantum Hall States? Moir\'e-Enhanced Gaps and Excitation-Spectrum Correspondence

Siddhartha Sarkar , Yitong Zhang , Kai Sun This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords fractional chern insulatorsmoiré bandsdensity modulationsexcitation spectrumfractional quantum hall statesgap enhancementflat chern bands
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that periodic electron-density modulations in flat Chern bands affect fractional Chern insulators through their reciprocal-lattice Fourier components. Components at smaller wavevectors suppress the many-body gap, while those at larger wavevectors enhance it. Suppressing the harmful small-wavevector pieces and amplifying the beneficial large-wavevector pieces allows the gap to grow without bound inside the projected flat-band theory. The same enhancement factor then uniformly rescales the entire low-energy excitation spectrum, so that FCI states can be mapped directly onto corresponding Landau-level problems. The relation extends to non-Abelian states and supplies concrete diagnostics for identifying which moiré Chern bands will support robust FCIs.

Core claim

Different reciprocal-lattice Fourier components of the density modulation in flat Chern bands play sharply distinct roles: those at smaller wavevectors suppress the FCI gap whereas those at larger wavevectors enhance it. Suppressing the former and amplifying the latter makes the gap enhancement arbitrarily large in the projected flat-band theory, and the same enhancement factor rescales the full low-energy spectrum so that FCI excitations can be predicted from the corresponding Landau-level problem. This correspondence generalizes to non-Abelian states.

What carries the argument

Reciprocal-lattice Fourier components of the periodic electron-density modulations, classified by wavevector magnitude, which control gap size and rescale the excitation spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The reciprocal-lattice Fourier components of the density modulation can be independently tuned or suppressed while keeping the band flat and preserving its Chern number.

What would settle it

A concrete lattice-model calculation in which suppressing small-wavevector density components and amplifying large-wavevector ones fails to increase the gap or rescale the spectrum by the predicted factor, or in which the tuning destroys band flatness or the Chern number.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • FCI gaps can be increased without upper limit by appropriate engineering of density modulations.
  • The full low-energy excitation spectrum of an FCI becomes a rescaled copy of the corresponding fractional quantum Hall spectrum.
  • The same rescaling relation holds for non-Abelian fractional states.
  • Reciprocal-lattice density components become practical diagnostics for selecting moiré Chern bands that host robust FCIs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Moiré potentials could be designed to favor specific large-wavevector Fourier components, potentially producing experimentally accessible FCIs whose gaps rival those of fractional quantum Hall states.
  • Numerical methods and trial wavefunctions developed for Landau levels could be imported to lattice models once the rescaling factor is known.
  • The component-tuning principle may apply to other flat-band systems outside the moiré setting, offering a route to test the projected-theory limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that reciprocal-lattice Fourier components of density modulations in flat Chern bands play distinct roles: small-q components suppress the FCI gap while large-q components enhance it. By independently suppressing harmful small-q and amplifying beneficial large-q components, the gap enhancement can in principle be made arbitrarily large within the projected flat-band theory; the same factor rescales the entire low-energy spectrum, allowing FCI excitations to be predicted from the corresponding Landau-level problem. The correspondence is generalized to non-Abelian states and applied to moiré Chern bands as a diagnostic for robust FCIs.

Significance. If the central tuning principle holds, the work would supply both a practical diagnostic for gap robustness in moiré FCIs and a direct spectral correspondence to Landau-level problems, which would be a notable advance for the field. The manuscript does not, however, supply machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or explicit parameter-free derivations that would strengthen the assessment.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and opening paragraphs: the claim that 'the gap enhancement can, in principle, be made arbitrarily large within the projected flat-band theory' rests on the assumption that small-q and large-q reciprocal-lattice Fourier components of the density modulation can be tuned independently while exactly preserving band flatness and Chern number. No explicit lattice potential, Hamiltonian, or projected-model construction is supplied that realizes the required component ratios without inducing dispersion or altering topology; this is load-bearing for the 'arbitrarily large' statement.
  2. [Abstract] The rescaling argument for the full low-energy spectrum (including the generalization to non-Abelian states) inherits the same tuning assumption. Without a concrete demonstration that the enhancement factor acts uniformly across the spectrum inside the projected theory, the predictive correspondence to Landau-level problems remains conditional on an unproven decoupling of Fourier components.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful review and for identifying areas where the assumptions in our claims require further clarification. We respond to the major comments point by point below. Our revisions will focus on making the scope of the projected flat-band theory explicit and adding supporting arguments for the rescaling.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and opening paragraphs: the claim that 'the gap enhancement can, in principle, be made arbitrarily large within the projected flat-band theory' rests on the assumption that small-q and large-q reciprocal-lattice Fourier components of the density modulation can be tuned independently while exactly preserving band flatness and Chern number. No explicit lattice potential, Hamiltonian, or projected-model construction is supplied that realizes the required component ratios without inducing dispersion or altering topology; this is load-bearing for the 'arbitrarily large' statement.

    Authors: We note that all claims are qualified as holding inside the projected flat-band theory, in which the band is constrained to be perfectly flat with a fixed Chern number. The Fourier components enter solely through the form factors in the projected interaction; within this effective theory these components are independent parameters. An explicit microscopic lattice model that achieves arbitrary ratios without dispersion would indeed be desirable but is not required for the validity of the principle we establish. We will revise the abstract and main text to emphasize this distinction and add a brief discussion of possible routes to realization in moiré systems. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The rescaling argument for the full low-energy spectrum (including the generalization to non-Abelian states) inherits the same tuning assumption. Without a concrete demonstration that the enhancement factor acts uniformly across the spectrum inside the projected theory, the predictive correspondence to Landau-level problems remains conditional on an unproven decoupling of Fourier components.

    Authors: The rescaling of the spectrum follows directly because the enhancement multiplies the strength of the entire projected interaction uniformly. Consequently, all energy scales in the low-energy manifold are multiplied by the same factor, including for non-Abelian states. We will insert a short derivation showing this uniform action on the spectrum in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The provided abstract and claims establish a physical principle distinguishing roles of small-q vs large-q Fourier components of density modulations within the projected flat-band model, leading to gap enhancement and spectrum rescaling. No equations, fitting procedures, self-citations, or ansatzes are visible that would reduce any prediction to an input by construction. The 'in principle' enhancement is framed as a consequence of the model's assumptions rather than a tautological redefinition or fitted output renamed as prediction. The central correspondence to Landau-level problems is presented as an external benchmark, not derived from self-referential steps. This is the expected honest non-finding for a theoretical proposal without visible self-referential structure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review is abstract-only; the ledger is therefore incomplete. The central claim rests on the validity of the projected flat-band approximation and the assumption that Fourier components can be controlled independently.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Projected flat-band theory remains valid when density-modulation Fourier components are selectively suppressed or amplified.
    The enhancement is stated to hold within the projected flat-band theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5737 in / 1269 out tokens · 22151 ms · 2026-06-27T20:32:17.340403+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) realize fractional quantum Hall topology in lattice bands, but their excitation spectra remain far less understood than their ground states. Here we establish a theoretical principle relating the periodic electron-density modulations of flat Chern bands to the many-body gap and excitation spectrum of FCIs. Contrary to the conventional view that such density modulations are detrimental to fractional topology, we show that different reciprocal-lattice Fourier components play sharply distinct roles: components at smaller reciprocal lattice vectors suppress the FCI gap, whereas components at larger reciprocal lattice vectors enhance it. By suppressing the harmful small-wave-vector components and amplifying the beneficial large-wave-vector components, the gap enhancement can, in principle, be made arbitrarily large within the projected flat-band theory. Moreover, the same enhancement factor rescales the full low-energy spectrum, making the FCI excitation spectrum predictable from the corresponding Landau-level problem. We further generalize this correspondence to non-Abelian states. Applying this principle to moir\'e Chern bands, we identify these reciprocal-lattice density components as practical diagnostics for robust FCIs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07323 by Kai Sun, Siddhartha Sarkar, Yitong Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, and A. C. Gossard, Reviews of Modern Physics71, S298 (1999)

    1999

  2. [2]

    R. B. Laughlin, Reviews of Modern Physics71, 863 (1999). 6

    1999

  3. [3]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236802 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    K. Sun, Z. Gu, H. Katsura, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236803 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    D. N. Sheng, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun, and L. Sheng, Nat. Comm.2, 389 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. X1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    D. Xiao, W. Zhu, Y. Ran, N. Nagaosa, and S. Okamoto, Nature Communications2(2011)

    2011

  9. [9]

    B. A. Bernevig and N. Regnault, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics85, 075128 (2012)

    2012

  10. [10]

    Y.-H. Wu, J. K. Jain, and K. Sun, Phys. Rev. B86, 165129 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Comptes Rendus Physique14, 816 (2013)

    2013

  12. [12]

    Roy, Physical Review B90, 165139 (2014)

    R. Roy, Physical Review B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    Repellin, T

    C. Repellin, T. Neupert, Z. Papić, and N. Regnault, Physical Review B90, 045114 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    Y.-H. Wu, J. K. Jain, and K. Sun, Phys. Rev. B91, 041119 (2015)

    2015

  15. [15]

    Repellin and T

    C. Repellin and T. Senthil, Physical Review Research2, 023238 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    P. J. Ledwith, G. Tarnopolsky, E. Khalaf, and A. Vish- wanath, Physical Review Research2, 023237 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    S. H. Simon and M. S. Rudner, Physical Review B102, 165148 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Z. Liu, A. Abouelkomsan, and E. J. Bergholtz, Physical Review Letters126, 026801 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Mera and T

    B. Mera and T. Ozawa, Physical Review B104, 115160 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    H. Li, U. Kumar, K. Sun, and S.-Z. Lin, Physical Review Research3, L032070 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V. Crépel, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu, Nature Communications12, 6730 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    P. J. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, and A. Vishwanath, Annals of Physics435, 168646 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Physical Review Letters127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, et al., Nature600, 439 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe,et al., Nature622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Knüppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Nature622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu,et al., Nature 622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong,et al., Physical Review X13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Phys- ical Review B108, 205144 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    A.-K. Wu, S. Sarkar, X. Wan, K. Sun, and S.-Z. Lin, Physical Review Research6, L032063 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Nature 626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    J. Xie, Z. Huo, X. Lu, Z. Feng, Z. Zhang, W. Wang, Q. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Liu,et al., Na- ture Materials , 1 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Y.-H. Wu, J. Jain, and K. Sun, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics86, 165129 (2012)

    2012

  34. [34]

    Lu, H.-Q

    H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, B.-B. Chen, K. Sun, and Z. Y. Meng, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03258 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Schleith, T

    M.-L. Schleith, T. Soejima, and E. Khalaf, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.11211 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Z. Yan, Q. Li, T. Soejima, and E. Khalaf, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15863 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    K. Iyer, A. Feuerpfeil, V. Crépel, N. Regnault, and C. Mora, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.24859 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    See supplementary materials, which includes Ref. []

  39. [39]

    B. M. Kousa, N. Morales-Durán, T. M. Wolf, E. Khalaf, and A. H. MacDonald, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17574 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    J. Shi, J. Cano, and N. Morales-Durán, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15900 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    H. Liu, K. Yang, A. Abouelkomsan, Z. Liu, and E. J. Bergholtz, Physical Review B111, L201105 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Instability of Laughlin FQH liquids into gapless power-law correlated states with continuous exponents in ideal Chern bands: rigorous results from plasma mapping

    S. Moitra and I. S. Villadiego, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.18265 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Aharonov and A

    Y. Aharonov and A. Casher, Physical Review A19, 2461 (1979)

    1979

  44. [44]

    Guerci, J

    D. Guerci, J. Wang, and C. Mora, Physical Review B 112, L041108 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    (2) where a unit cell contains multiple flux quanta is also possible [60, 61], leading to multiple flat bands and unconventional frac- tional phases

    Note that a generalization of Eq. (2) where a unit cell contains multiple flux quanta is also possible [60, 61], leading to multiple flat bands and unconventional frac- tional phases

  46. [46]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Physical Review Letters51, 605 (1983)

    1983

  47. [47]

    S. A. Trugman and S. Kivelson, Physical Review B31, 5280 (1985)

    1985

  48. [48]

    F. D. M. Haldane, inThe Quantum Hall Effect, edited by R. E. Prange and S. M. Girvin (Springer, New York, 1987)

    1987

  49. [49]

    For pseudopotentials, the FCI ground state wavefunction is known to be the Laughlin wavefunction modulated byQNe i=1 h(ri)[16]

  50. [50]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. Sarkar, X. Wan, D. E. Parker, S.-Z. Lin, and K. Sun, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.22831 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    E. H. Rezayi and F. D. M. Haldane, Physical Review Letters84, 4685 (2000)

    2000

  52. [52]

    A. P. Reddy, N. Paul, A. Abouelkomsan, and L. Fu, Physical Review Letters133, 166503 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    In momentum space, the three-body pseudopotential is V(q 1,q 2)∝q 4 1q2

  54. [54]

    (7), one generates anisotropic terms and lower- order contributions such asq4 1,q 2 1q2 2,q 4 2,q 2 1, andq 2

    Under shiftsq→q−Ganalogous to Eq. (7), one generates anisotropic terms and lower- order contributions such asq4 1,q 2 1q2 2,q 4 2,q 2 1, andq 2

  55. [55]

    Their matrix elements vanish identically in the LLL because fermionic three-particle wavefunctions necessarily contain the fac- tor(z 1 −z 2)(z2 −z 3)(z3 −z 1)

    In real space these correspond to derivatives acting on the two delta functionsδ(r 1 −r 2)δ(r2 −r 3). Their matrix elements vanish identically in the LLL because fermionic three-particle wavefunctions necessarily contain the fac- tor(z 1 −z 2)(z2 −z 3)(z3 −z 1)

  56. [56]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Physical Review Letters132, 036501 (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    J. Dong, J. Wang, P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Physical Review Letters131, 136502 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    Morales-Durán, J

    N. Morales-Durán, J. Wang, G. R. Schleder, M. Angeli, 7 Z. Zhu, E. Kaxiras, C. Repellin, and J. Cano, Physical Review Research5, L032022 (2023)

    2023

  59. [59]

    The approximation scheme is akin to [62], see SM [38] for details

  60. [60]

    Based on this, tMoTe2 ED spec- tra have been compared with ED spectra of Dirac par- ticles under inhomogeneous magnetic field [65]

    Note that previously an adiabatic approximation to the continuum Hamiltonian of tMoTe2 was proposed [63, 64], which effectively maps the top valence band to Aharonov-Casher band. Based on this, tMoTe2 ED spec- tra have been compared with ED spectra of Dirac par- ticles under inhomogeneous magnetic field [65]. Here we are directly comparing with LLL under ...

  61. [61]

    In SM [38] we show that for this contin- uum model, the charge neutral gap atν= 1/3is smaller thanν= 2/3duetononzerobandwidthandparticle-hole asymmetry

    In experiments on twisted MoTe 2, the FCI is most prominent nearν h = 2/3, while the FCI is weaker at νh = 1/3[66]. In SM [38] we show that for this contin- uum model, the charge neutral gap atν= 1/3is smaller thanν= 2/3duetononzerobandwidthandparticle-hole asymmetry

  62. [62]

    Sarkar, X

    S. Sarkar, X. Wan, S.-Z. Lin, and K. Sun, Physical Re- view Letters135, 016501 (2025)

    2025

  63. [63]

    Sarkar, X

    S. Sarkar, X. Wan, A.-K. Wu, S.-Z. Lin, and K. Sun, Physical Review Letters135, 216501 (2025)

    2025

  64. [64]

    Q. Gao, J. Dong, P. Ledwith, D. Parker, and E. Khalaf, Physical Review Letters131, 096401 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    N.Morales-Durán, N.Wei, J.Shi, andA.H.MacDonald, Physical Review Letters132, 096602 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    J. Shi, N. Morales-Durán, E. Khalaf, and A. H. Mac- Donald, Physical Review B110, 035130 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    B. Li, Y. Ouyang, and F. Wu, Physical Review B113, 195129 (2026)

    2026

  68. [68]

    H. Pan, S. Yang, Y. Wang, X. Cai, W. Wang, Y. Zhao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Zhang, Y. Liu,et al., Physical Review Letters136, 056601 (2026)

    2026

  69. [69]

    X. Wan, S. Sarkar, S.-Z. Lin, and K. Sun, Physical Re- view Letters130, 216401 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    Haldane, Physical Review Letters55, 2095 (1985)

    F. Haldane, Physical Review Letters55, 2095 (1985)

    2095

  71. [71]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. MacDon- ald, Physical Review Letters122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  72. [72]

    J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, M. Wang, O. Vafek, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Physical Review B109, 045147 (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    Z. Liu, B. Mera, M. Fujimoto, T. Ozawa, and J. Wang, Physical Review X15, 031019 (2025)

    2025

  74. [74]

    M(0) 2 2 d− M(0) 2 +M (1) 2 6 d3 + 2M(0) 2 + 4M(1) 2 +M (2) 2 15 d5 # +O(d 7),(S68) V LL0 1 =E C

    A. M. Läuchli, Z. Liu, E. J. Bergholtz, and R. Moessner, Physical Review Letters111, 126802 (2013) Appendix A. Details of the (higher)-vortexable bands studied in main text Here we give a details of the conventions as well as the single particle bands we used for the ED results shown in the main text. Fig. A1(a) shows how the Fourier coefficientswG are or...

    2013