Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 119 references

Probing the Weak Gravity Conjecture: Novel Aschenbach Signatures in Superextremal Non-Linear Charged AdS Black Holes

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Aschenbach effect survives beyond the extremal charge limit.

desk verdict One concrete extremal example of an Aschenbach-like angular velocity reversal, but the advertised superextremal persistence is not actually shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03185 v1 pith:HL55OQZY submitted 2025-08-05 gr-qc hep-th

Mohammad Reza Alipour , Mohammad Ali S Afshar , Saeed Noori Gashti , Behnam Pourhassan , Jafar Sadeghi This is my paper
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords AschenbacheffectWeakGravityConjecturephotonspheresmassivenonlinearelectrodynamicsAdSblackholesextremalangularvelocitynon-monotonicity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the Aschenbach effect—a non-monotonic drop in the angular velocity of orbiting particles, known from rotating Kerr black holes—also appears in a static, non-rotating, nonlinear charged AdS black hole in massive gravity, and that it persists past the extremal limit into the superextremal regime where the charge-to-mass ratio $Q/M$ exceeds one but a horizon remains. The authors exhibit an extremal configuration with $M=0.90861$, $Q=1$, $l=3$, $m=0.5$, $c_1=-1$, $c_2=1$, and $k=1.10058$ that has two photon spheres outside the horizon; between them the orbital angular velocity falls to a minimum near $r=5.7872$ and then rises again. They take this as evidence that the spacetime keeps its pre-extremal features—horizon, photon spheres, and the Aschenbach signature—even beyond extremality, which they connect to the Weak Gravity Conjecture and the Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture. A sympathetic reader would care because it suggests a purely geometric, curvature-driven signature that could mark ultra-compact objects whose parameters lie in a regime normally dismissed as naked-singularity territory.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the effective-potential criterion for photon spheres: circular photon orbits sit at stationary points of $f(r)/r^2$, with the sign of the second derivative distinguishing unstable from stable spheres. In a non-rotating, spherically symmetric spacetime, a stable photon sphere outside the event horizon acts as a potential minimum that reshapes timelike circular orbits in the region between it and the unstable sphere, producing the non-monotonic angular velocity profile. The computation runs through the angular velocity formula $\Omega = \sqrt{(f(r)-\beta(r))/r^2}$, where $\beta(r)$ is the auxiliary function from the timelike-circular-orbit analysis; negative $\beta$ forbids such orbits, so the allowed region is exactly the gap between the two photon spheres. The named object is the Aschenbach effect, defined here as a slope inversion in $\Omega(r)$ between two photon spheres rather than as the frame-dragging phenomenon originally found in Kerr.

What would settle it

Compute the angular velocity $\Omega(r)$ directly from the stated metric function $f(r)$ using the $\beta(r)$ relation cited from Ref. [122], and check whether $\Omega(r)$ is non-monotonic between the two photon sphere radii for the parameter set $M=0.90861$, $Q=1$, $l=3$, $m=0.5$, $c_1=-1$, $c_2=1$, and $k=1.10058$; if it is monotonic, the central claim fails. A simpler check: verify that this parameter set actually yields a horizon—two real positive roots of $f(r)$—because the entire superextremal-but-not-naked-singularity reading collapses if $f(r)$ has only one root or none.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Aschenbach-like non-monotonicity of the angular velocity profile is not an accident of sub-extremal black holes: for the nonlinear charged AdS black hole in massive gravity with the metric $f(r) = 1 - \frac{2M}{r} e^{-k/2r} + \frac{r^2}{l^2} + m^2\left(\frac{c c_1 r}{2} + c_2 c^2\right)$, the same signature appears at extremality and beyond, as long as the spacetime still has a horizon. The demonstration is geodesic: photons obey an effective potential $V_{\mathrm{eff}} = g(r)\left(\frac{L^2}{r^2} - \frac{E_p^2}{f(r)}\right)$; circular photon orbits solve $(f(r)/r^2)' = 0$; stability is set by the sign of the second derivative. For the chosen parameters, two photon spheres sit outside the horizon, one unstable and one stable, and the region between them supports timelike circular orbits with angular velocity $\Omega = \sqrt{(f(r)-\beta)/r^2}$ that decreases monotonically from the unstable photon sphere edge, reaches a minimum at $r=5.7872$, and then increases toward the stable photon sphere—the Aschenbach signature. The paper takes this persistence into the $Q/M>1$ regime with a surviving horizon to mean that the black hole retains its characteristic relativistic structure even as it crosses the classical extremal boundary, which it reads as support for the Weak Gravity Conjecture and as a constraint on the Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the Aschenbach effect in a static black hole is fully captured by the existence of a stable photon sphere outside the event horizon—a criterion imported from earlier studies rather than derived here for the extremal metric.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the effect persists at and beyond extremality, the conditions for observing it are not limited to sub-extremal black holes; superextremal but horizon-hiding configurations are also candidates.
  • The coexistence of two photon spheres outside the horizon gives a direct geometric fingerprint that could be probed with light-ring observations and lensing.
  • The result links the Aschenbach signature to the Weak Gravity Conjecture: parameter regions where $Q/M>1$ yet a horizon survives are exactly those where the effect appears, making it a potential observable proxy for WGC-compatible charges.
  • The stability classification of the photon spheres (one unstable, one stable) implies the spacetime has a stable light ring, which is not present in Schwarzschild; this affects the expected ringdown and stability properties of the compact object.
  • Because the effect is purely geometric, it does not require an accretion disk or electromagnetic process; any probe of the orbital motion in this spacetime would see the same velocity inversion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper checks a single hand-picked parameter set; testing adjacent parameters (for instance $c_1=1$, or $Q/M$ just above the extremal bound) would reveal whether the persistence is generic or an isolated example.
  • A testable extension: if the stable photon sphere is real, gravitational-wave echoes or a distinctive second light ring should appear in the ringdown of such an object, a signature absent from Schwarzschild black holes.
  • One implication the authors leave implicit: the same curvature-based mechanism should occur in other static theories with nonlinear electrodynamics wherever a stable photon sphere exists, so the Aschenbach effect may serve as a general criterion for WGC-compatible but WCCC-respecting horizons.
  • An observational route: measuring the location of the velocity minimum (about $r=5.79$ in this example) relative to the photon sphere radii could, in principle, constrain the massive-gravity and nonlinear-electrodynamics parameters if a candidate ultra-compact object exhibits the signature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the non-linear charged AdS black hole in massive gravity introduced in Refs. [107,108], with metric function f(r) given by Eq. (11). It first surveys parameter sets (Tables I-IV) for which extremal configurations satisfy Q/M > 1 while retaining a horizon, interpreting this as simultaneous consistency of the Weak Gravity Conjecture and the Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture. It then analyzes photon spheres via the effective potential and topological charge. The central example (Section III, Figs. 6-7) uses M=0.90861, Q=1, l=3, k=1.10058, c=1, c1=-1, c2=1, m=0.5: this extremal configuration has two photon spheres at r about 1.3341 and r about 17.6267, one unstable and one stable. The paper claims that between these spheres the timelike circular-orbit angular velocity Omega(r) decreases to a minimum at r about 5.7872 and then increases, and that this Aschenbach-like non-monotonicity persists not only at extremality but also in the superextremal regime where Q/M > 1.

Significance. If the central claim were fully supported, the paper would extend the Aschenbach signature from sub-extremal static black holes to configurations with Q > M that still possess horizons, and would tie this extension to the WGC/WCCC discussion. The model is explicit, and the extremal example is internally consistent: the metric (11), the photon-sphere condition (34), and the reported two-sphere configuration follow from the stated parameters. The paper also uses the established topological-charge classification of photon spheres. However, the advertised persistence into the superextremal regime is not demonstrated by the data presented, and the Omega(r) plot lacks the explicit input needed for independent verification. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are provided; the work is a concrete numerical example at the extremal boundary rather than the claimed robust extension across a superextremal window.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Figs. 6-7 and Table II] The advertised superextremal persistence is not demonstrated. The only explicit Aschenbach calculation uses M=0.90861, which is the extremal mass Me listed in Table II for c1=-1, c2=1, m=0.5. No computation is presented for any M > Me in the window where Q/M > 1 while two horizons still exist. A single boundary point cannot establish that the non-monotonic profile persists over an open superextremal region; the effect could terminate immediately away from Me. Please add at least one representative non-extremal case in that window (for example M=0.95 with Q=1) showing both the photon-sphere pair and the Omega(r) profile, or clearly delimit the parameter region in which the claimed persistence actually holds.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (44) and Fig. 7] The function beta(r) is never specified, so Fig. 7(c) cannot be reproduced from the manuscript. Equation (44) defines beta, E, L, and Omega in terms of one another, but no circular-orbit condition or explicit beta(r) is supplied; the text only states that beta > 0 between the two photon spheres. Since the Aschenbach signature is the shape of Omega(r), the plotted minimum at r=5.7872 is not independently verifiable. For a static spherically symmetric metric, timelike circular geodesics require Omega^2 = f'(r)/(2r) and hence beta = f(r) - r^2 Omega^2 = f(r) - r f'(r)/2; please provide the explicit beta(r) used in Fig. 7(b) or, equivalently, plot Omega(r) = sqrt(f'(r)/(2r)) directly and state the range of r over which beta > 0.
  3. [Section II.A and Section III] The central inference that a stable photon sphere outside the horizon implies the Aschenbach-like Omega profile is imported from Refs. [116,122,124,125] and is not re-derived or tested for the degenerate extremal metric. This is load-bearing because the entire conclusion rests on that equivalence. Please verify the profile by direct geodesic integration, or by the analytic formula in the previous comment, for the extremal and any added superextremal parameter sets, rather than checking only the effective-potential condition for photon spheres.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (11) and Eq. (7)] The notation c2c2 is ambiguous: c2 is the massive-gravity coupling and c is the reference-metric constant, but the text writes both as c2. Please use c_2 c^2 explicitly wherever the product appears.
  2. [Fig. 7(a)] The acronym MSCO is not defined. If it stands for marginally stable circular orbit, please define it in the text and state how it is computed.
  3. [Captions of Figs. 6 and 7] The captions write mg=0.5, but the text and Table II use m=0.5 for the graviton mass; please make the notation consistent.
  4. [Eq. (5) and Eq. (14)] The relation Q^2 = M k is used implicitly in the Lagrangian and in the mass formula, but it is not stated before Eq. (5); please introduce it explicitly when k first appears.
  5. [Tables I and II] The last columns report the consistency of WGC and WCCC with checkmarks and crosses, but the precise inequality or numerical criterion used to assign these entries is not stated; please specify it.
  6. [Eq. (30)] The expression for the temperature uses a Lambert W function whose argument is split across lines; please define W and ensure the formula is typeset unambiguously.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: the photon-sphere geometry is computed from the explicit metric, and the stable-photon-sphere/Aschenbach criterion has external support. The main weaknesses (unstated beta(r) and an extremal-only scan) are reproducibility and generalization gaps, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central existence demonstration is an in-paper computation: it solves Eq. (11) for horizon roots and Eq. (35) for photon spheres at a specified parameter set, then identifies one stable photon sphere from the sign of the second derivative of the effective potential; no quantity is fitted to the target effect. The premise that a stable photon sphere outside the horizon produces an Aschenbach-like non-monotonic angular-velocity profile in static, spherically symmetric spacetimes is imported from a combination of self-citations ([116], [122]) and independent external references ([124], [125]), so the conclusion is not forced by a self-citation chain alone. Eq. (44) is a definitional identity: beta = -r^2 Omega^2 + f(r) and Omega = sqrt((f-beta)/r^2). Because the paper does not write beta(r) explicitly, the plotted Omega profile is not reproducible from the paper alone, but this is a transparency and verification issue rather than a circular reduction; there is no evidence that beta was tuned to force the claimed minimum at r = 5.7872. The broader advertised claim of persistence throughout an open superextremal region is not established by the single near-extremal calculation presented; that is an evidential over-reach, not a circular step. Accordingly, no circular step is identified. The score of 2 acknowledges the overlapping-author citations used for the Aschenbach criterion and the Omega relations, while the central geometric computation retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the chosen Nam metric, the stable-photon-sphere criterion for the Aschenbach effect, and the angular-velocity construction borrowed from prior work. No new particle, force, or conserved quantity is introduced. The key free inputs are the model parameters and the nonlinear electrodynamics constant k, which are set by hand for one illustrative extremal configuration.

free parameters (3)
  • k (nonlinear electrodynamics parameter) = 1.10058 (equals Q^2/M for Q=1, M=0.90861)
    Chosen through the model relation Q^2 = M k; this exponential nonlinearity parameter controls the metric and affects horizon and photon sphere locations.
  • massive gravity couplings m, c, c1, c2 = m=0.5, c=1, c1=-1, c2=1
    Hand-picked parameter set that produces both a stable and an unstable photon sphere outside the extremal horizon; the sign of c1 controls the photon sphere structure in Tables III-IV.
  • AdS radius l and charge Q = l=3, Q=1
    Arbitrary units chosen for the demonstration; the extremal mass Me is then derived from the horizon conditions rather than chosen freely.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Nam 2018 metric is a valid solution of massive gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics.
    The action and solution are taken from references [107,108] and are not re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Aschenbach effect in static black holes is equivalent to the existence of a stable photon sphere outside the horizon.
    Used in Sec. III to infer non-monotonic angular velocity from Fig. 6; established in references [116,124,125], not derived here.
  • domain assumption The circular-orbit angular velocity construction with beta = -r^2 Omega^2 + f(r) and the associated energy and angular momentum expressions is valid for this metric.
    Eq. (44) is cited to reference [122]; the explicit beta profile used to make Fig. 7 is not shown in the paper.
  • domain assumption Extremality is defined by f(re)=0 and f'(re)=0, and solutions with Q/M greater than one but with a nonempty horizon satisfy both WGC and WCCC.
    Tables I-II encode this interpretation; the paper does not critically examine whether horizon existence alone is a sufficient WCCC condition.
  • standard math The topological charge of photon spheres, computed via the vector field construction of Wei, correctly classifies stability.
    The topological photon sphere method is imported from reference [113] and used to classify the photon spheres in Figs. 2-6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing the Weak Gravity Conjecture: Novel Aschenbach Signatures in Superextremal Non-Linear Charged AdS Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HL55OQZY

@misc{pith2026250803185,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing the Weak Gravity Conjecture: Novel Aschenbach Signatures in Superextremal Non-Linear Charged AdS Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HL55OQZY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03185}
}
read the original abstract

This study investigates the nonlinear charged Anti-de Sitter (AdS) black hole solution within the framework of massive gravity, motivated by recent advancements linking the Weak Gravity Conjecture (WGC) to phenomena such as Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture (WCCC) and photon sphere dynamics. Building on these foundations, we focus on the Aschenbach effect-a relativistic phenomenon intricately tied to the geometry of photon spheres and known to occur in some special sub-extremal non rotating black holes. Our primary objective is to determine whether this effect persists not only up to the extremal limit but also beyond, into the superextremal regime, thus probing the stability and validity of black hole characteristics in these extreme conditions. By analyzing the nonlinear charged AdS black hole solutions in massive gravity, we demonstrate that the Aschenbach effect remains a robust feature across both extremal and superextremal configurations. This extension suggests that key relativistic signatures and the underlying spacetime structures associated with high-spin black holes continue to hold beyond classical boundaries. Our results provide new insights into the behavior of ultra-compact objects and highlight promising directions for exploring the limits of general relativity, as well as potential generalizations of the WGC and WCC in strong gravitational fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.03185 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The metric function with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The normal vector in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The normal vector in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The normal vector in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The normal vector in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (6a): Metric function With [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Fig (7a): MSCO localization and space classification [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ”The swampland: introduction and review.” Fortschritte der Physik 67.6 (2019): 1900037

    Palti, Eran. ”The swampland: introduction and review.” Fortschritte der Physik 67.6 (2019): 1900037

    2019

  2. [2]

    ”Lectures on the swampland pro gram in string compactifications.” Physics Reports 989 (202 2): 1-50

    van Beest, Marieke, et al. ”Lectures on the swampland pro gram in string compactifications.” Physics Reports 989 (202 2): 1-50

  3. [5]

    ”The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force.” Journal of High Ener gy Physics 2007.06 (2007): 060

    Arkani-Hamed, Nima, et al. ”The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force.” Journal of High Ener gy Physics 2007.06 (2007): 060

    2007

  4. [6]

    ”Evi dence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2017.8 (2017): 1-40

    Heidenreich, Ben, Matthew Reece, and Tom Rudelius. ”Evi dence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2017.8 (2017): 1-40

    2017

  5. [7]

    ”The weak gravity conjecture and scalar fiel ds.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2017.8 (2017): 1-26

    Palti, Eran. ”The weak gravity conjecture and scalar fiel ds.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2017.8 (2017): 1-26

    2017

  6. [8]

    Oikonomou

    Odintsov, Sergei D., and Vasilis K. Oikonomou. ”Swampla nd implications of GW170817-compatible Einstein-Gauss-B onnet gravity.” Physics Letters B 805 (2020): 135437

    2020

  7. [9]

    ”On the Geometry of the S tring Landscape and the Swampland.” Nuclear physics B 766.1 -3 (2007): 21-33

    Ooguri, Hirosi, and Cumrun Vafa. ”On the Geometry of the S tring Landscape and the Swampland.” Nuclear physics B 766.1 -3 (2007): 21-33

    2007

  8. [10]

    ”RPS thermodynamics of Taub–NUT AdS black holes in the presence of central charge and the weak gravity conjecture.” General Relativity and Gravitation 5 4.10 (2022): 129

    Sadeghi, Jafar, et al. ”RPS thermodynamics of Taub–NUT AdS black holes in the presence of central charge and the weak gravity conjecture.” General Relativity and Gravitation 5 4.10 (2022): 129

    2022

Show all 119 references
  1. [11]

    ”The string landscape, blac k holes and gravity as the weakest force.” Journal of High Ene rgy Physics 2007.06 (2007): 060

    Arkani-Hamed, Nima, et al. ”The string landscape, blac k holes and gravity as the weakest force.” Journal of High Ene rgy Physics 2007.06 (2007): 060

    2007

  2. [13]

    ”WGC and WCC for charged black holes with quintessence and cloud of strings.” The European Physical Journal C 83.7 (202 3): 1-7

    Alipour, Mohammad Reza, Jafar Sadeghi, and Mehdi Shokr i. ”WGC and WCC for charged black holes with quintessence and cloud of strings.” The European Physical Journal C 83.7 (202 3): 1-7

  3. [14]

    ”WGC and WCCC of black holes with quintessence and cloud strings in RPS space.” Nuclear Physics B 990 (2023): 116184

    Alipour, Mohammad Reza, Jafar Sadeghi, and Mehdi Shokr i. ”WGC and WCCC of black holes with quintessence and cloud strings in RPS space.” Nuclear Physics B 990 (2023): 116184

    2023

  4. [15]

    ”Emerging WGC from the Dirac particle around black holes.” Modern Physics Letters A 38.26n27 (2023): 2350122

    Sadeghi, Jafar, Mohammad Reza Alipour, and Saeed Noori Gashti. ”Emerging WGC from the Dirac particle around black holes.” Modern Physics Letters A 38.26n27 (2023): 2350122

    2023

  5. [16]

    ”News from the Swampland—con straining string theory with astrophysics and cosmology.” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2023.10 (2023): 039

    Sch¨ oneberg, Nils, et al. ”News from the Swampland—con straining string theory with astrophysics and cosmology.” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2023.10 (2023): 039

    2023

  6. [17]

    Horowitz, and Jorge E

    Crisford, Toby, Gary T. Horowitz, and Jorge E. Santos. ” Testing the weak gravity-cosmic censorship connection.” P hysical Review D 97.6 (2018): 066005

    2018

  7. [18]

    Oikonomou, V. K. ”Rescaled Einstein-Hilbert gravity f rom f (R) gravity: Inflation, dark energy, and the swampland c riteria.” Physical Review D 103.12 (2021): 124028

    2021

  8. [19]

    ”de Sitter Swampland Conjecture in S tring Field Inflation.” The European Physical Journal C 83 (2 023) : (635)

    Sadeghi, J., et al. ”de Sitter Swampland Conjecture in S tring Field Inflation.” The European Physical Journal C 83 (2 023) : (635)

  9. [20]

    ”Weak gravity conjecture.” Revi ews of Modern Physics 95.3 (2023): 035003

    Harlow, Daniel, et al. ”Weak gravity conjecture.” Revi ews of Modern Physics 95.3 (2023): 035003

    2023

  10. [21]

    ”Hydrostatic equilibr ium and stellar structure in f (R) gravity.” Physical Review D 83.6 (2011): 064004

    Capozziello, Salvatore, et al. ”Hydrostatic equilibr ium and stellar structure in f (R) gravity.” Physical Review D 83.6 (2011): 064004

    2011

  11. [22]

    Noori, et al

    Gashti, S. Noori, et al. ”Swampland dS conjecture in mim etic f (R, T) gravity.” Communications in Theoretical Physi cs 74.8 (2022): 085402

    2022

  12. [23]

    ”Distance, de Sitter and Trans-Planckia n Censorship conjectures: the status quo of Warm Inflation.” Physics of the Dark Universe 27 (2020): 100432

    Das, Suratna. ”Distance, de Sitter and Trans-Planckia n Censorship conjectures: the status quo of Warm Inflation.” Physics of the Dark Universe 27 (2020): 100432

    2020

  13. [25]

    ”Trans-Planckian cens orship and the swampland.” Journal of High Energy Physics 20 20.9 (2020): 1-34

    Bedroya, Alek, and Cumrun Vafa. ”Trans-Planckian cens orship and the swampland.” Journal of High Energy Physics 20 20.9 (2020): 1-34

    2020

  14. [26]

    ”Can black holes cause cosmic exp ansion?.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12545 (2023)

    Sadeghi, Jafar, et al. ”Can black holes cause cosmic exp ansion?.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12545 (2023). 13

    2023 arXiv

  15. [27]

    ”Brane inflation and Trans-Planckian censorship conj ecture.” Physical Review D 104.12 (2021): 123515

    Mohammadi, Abolhassan, Tayeb Golanbari, and Jamil Ena yati. ”Brane inflation and Trans-Planckian censorship conj ecture.” Physical Review D 104.12 (2021): 123515

    2021

  16. [28]

    ”Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture in Super Yang-Mill s Inflationary Model.” Universe 8.12 (2022): 621

    Sadeghi, Jafar, Mohammad Reza Alipour, and Saeed Noori Gashti. ”Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture in Super Yang-Mill s Inflationary Model.” Universe 8.12 (2022): 621

    2022

  17. [29]

    ”dS Vacua and the Swampland.” Jo urnal of High Energy Physics 2019.3 (2019): 1-18

    Kallosh, Renata, et al. ”dS Vacua and the Swampland.” Jo urnal of High Energy Physics 2019.3 (2019): 1-18

    2019

  18. [30]

    ”On the Trans-Planckian Censorship Co njecture and the generalized non-minimal coupling.” Journ al of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics 2021.11 (2021): 043

    Guleryuz, Omer. ”On the Trans-Planckian Censorship Co njecture and the generalized non-minimal coupling.” Journ al of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics 2021.11 (2021): 043

    2021

  19. [31]

    Osses, Constanza, Nelson Videla, and Grigoris Panotop oulos. ”Reheating in small-field inflation on the brane: the s wampland criteria and observational constraints in light of the PLAN CK 2018 results.” The European Physical Journal C 81 (2021): 1-29

    2021

  20. [32]

    Noori Gashti, and M

    Sadeghi, J., S. Noori Gashti, and M. R. Alipour. ”Notes o n further refining de Sitter swampland conjecture with inflat ionary models.” Chinese Journal of Physics 79 (2022): 490-502

    2022

  21. [33]

    ”Trans-Planckian censorship, inflation, and excited initial states for perturbations.” P hysical Review D 101.2 (2020): 023526

    Brahma, Suddhasattwa. ”Trans-Planckian censorship, inflation, and excited initial states for perturbations.” P hysical Review D 101.2 (2020): 023526

    2020

  22. [34]

    ”Trans-Planckian censorship conjecture and early universe cosmology.” arXiv preprint a rXiv:2102.09641 (2021)

    Brandenberger, Robert. ”Trans-Planckian censorship conjecture and early universe cosmology.” arXiv preprint a rXiv:2102.09641 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  23. [35]

    Noori Gashti, and F

    Sadeghi, J., S. Noori Gashti, and F. Darabi. ”Swampland conjectures in hybrid metric-Palatini gravity.” Physics o f the Dark Universe (2022): 101090

    2022

  24. [36]

    ”E ntropy, entanglement and swampland bounds in DS/dS.” Journ al of High Energy Physics 2019.6 (2019): 1-16

    Geng, Hao, Sebastian Grieninger, and Andreas Karch. ”E ntropy, entanglement and swampland bounds in DS/dS.” Journ al of High Energy Physics 2019.6 (2019): 1-16

    2019

  25. [37]

    Noori, J

    Gashti, S. Noori, J. Sadeghi, and B. Pourhassan. ”Pleas ant behavior of swampland conjectures in the face of specific inflationary models.” Astroparticle Physics 139 (2022): 102703

    2022

  26. [38]

    Naghd Mezerji, and S

    Sadeghi, J., E. Naghd Mezerji, and S. Noori Gashti. ”Stu dy of some cosmological parameters in logarithmic correcte d f (R) gravitational model with swampland conjectures.” Modern P hysics Letters A 36.05 (2021): 2150027

    2021

  27. [39]

    Noori Gashti, and E

    Sadeghi, J., S. Noori Gashti, and E. Naghd Mezerji. ”The investigation of universal relation between corrections t o entropy and extremality bounds with verification WGC.” Physics of the Da rk Universe 30 (2020): 100626

    2020

  28. [40]

    ”On the cosmological implicat ions of the string swampland.” Physics Letters B 784 (2018): 271-276

    Agrawal, Prateek, et al. ”On the cosmological implicat ions of the string swampland.” Physics Letters B 784 (2018): 271-276

    2018

  29. [41]

    Oikonomou

    Odintsov, Sergei D., and Vasilis K. Oikonomou. ”Swampl and implications of GW170817-compatible Einstein-Gauss- Bonnet gravity.” Physics Letters B 805 (2020): 135437

    2020

  30. [42]

    Noori Gashti

    Sadeghi, J., and S. Noori Gashti. ”Investigating the lo garithmic form of f (R) gravity model from brane perspective and swampland criteria.” Pramana 95 (2021): 1-8

    2021

  31. [43]

    Sharma, Umesh Kumar. ”Reconstruction of quintessence field for the THDE with swampland correspondence in f (R, T) gr avity.” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physi cs 18.02 (2021): 2150031

    2021

  32. [44]

    ”Strong cosmic censorship in light of weak gravity c onjecture for charged black holes.” Journal of High Energy Physics 202 3.2 (2023): 1-14

    Sadeghi, Jafar, Mohammad Reza Alipour, and Saeed Noori Gashti. ”Strong cosmic censorship in light of weak gravity c onjecture for charged black holes.” Journal of High Energy Physics 202 3.2 (2023): 1-14

    2023

  33. [45]

    Odintsov, S. D., V. K. Oikonomou, and L. Sebastiani. ”Un ification of constant-roll inflation and dark energy with log arithmic R2-corrected and exponential F (R) gravity.” Nuclear Physi cs B 923 (2017): 608-632

    2017

  34. [46]

    ”de Sitter Swampland Conjecture in S tring Field Inflation.” The European Physical Journal C 83 (2 023): (635)

    Sadeghi, J., et al. ”de Sitter Swampland Conjecture in S tring Field Inflation.” The European Physical Journal C 83 (2 023): (635)

  35. [47]

    ” Quintessential constant-roll inflation.” Physics of the Da rk Universe 35 (2022): 100923

    Shokri, Mehdi, Jafar Sadeghi, and Saeed Noori Gashti. ” Quintessential constant-roll inflation.” Physics of the Da rk Universe 35 (2022): 100923

    2022

  36. [48]

    ”Swampland conjecture and inflation model from brane perspective.” Physica Scripta 96.12 (2021 ): 125317

    Sadeghi, J., et al. ”Swampland conjecture and inflation model from brane perspective.” Physica Scripta 96.12 (2021 ): 125317

    2021

  37. [49]

    Noori Gashti, Saeed, Mohammad Reza Alipour, and Mohamm ad Ali S. Afshar. ”Exploring the Parameter Space of Inflation Model on the Brane and its Compatibility with the Swampland C onjectures.” arXiv e-prints (2024): arXiv-2409

    2024

  38. [50]

    ”The emergence of universal relatio ns in the AdS black holes thermodynamics.” Physica Scripta 9 8.2 (2023): 025305

    Sadeghi, J., et al. ”The emergence of universal relatio ns in the AdS black holes thermodynamics.” Physica Scripta 9 8.2 (2023): 025305

    2023

  39. [51]

    Sadeghi, Jafar, and Saeed Noori Gashti. ”Influences of p erfect fluid dark matter on coinciding validity of the weak gr avity and weak cosmic censorship conjectures for Kerr-Newman black h ole.” Nuclear Physics B 1006 (2024): 116657

    2024

  40. [52]

    Noori, and J

    Gashti, S. Noori, and J. Sadeghi. ”Refined swampland con jecture in warm vector hybrid inflationary scenario.” The Eu ropean Physical Journal Plus 137.6 (2022): 1-13

    2022

  41. [53]

    ”Eternal inflation and the refined swa mpland conjecture.” Physical review letters 122.8 (2019): 081302

    Kinney, William H. ”Eternal inflation and the refined swa mpland conjecture.” Physical review letters 122.8 (2019): 081302

    2019

  42. [54]

    Sadeghi, Jafar, and Saeed Noori Gashti. ”Reissner-Nor dstr¨ om black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter: Testing the viability of weak gravity conjecture and weak cosmic cen sorship conjecture simultaneously.” Physics Letters B 853 (2024): 138651

    2024

  43. [55]

    ”Cosmic censorship and wea k gravity conjecture in the Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton theo ry.” Physics Letters B 781 (2018): 713-718

    Yu, Ten-Yeh, and Wen-Yu Wen. ”Cosmic censorship and wea k gravity conjecture in the Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton theo ry.” Physics Letters B 781 (2018): 713-718

    2018

  44. [56]

    Gashti, S. Noori. ”Two-field inflationary model and swam pland de Sitter conjecture.” Journal of Holography Applica tions in Physics 2 (1) (2022): 13-24

    2022

  45. [57]

    ”The String landscape and the swampland

    Vafa, Cumrun. ”The String landscape and the swampland. ” arXiv preprint hep-th/0509212 (2005)

    2005 arXiv

  46. [59]

    ”Lectures on the swampland pr ogram in string compactifications.” Physics Reports 989 (20 22): 1-50

    van Beest, Marieke, et al. ”Lectures on the swampland pr ogram in string compactifications.” Physics Reports 989 (20 22): 1-50

  47. [60]

    ”Weak gravity conjecture, black bra nes and violations of universal thermodynamics relation.” Annals of Physics 447 (2022): 169168

    Sadeghi, J., et al. ”Weak gravity conjecture, black bra nes and violations of universal thermodynamics relation.” Annals of Physics 447 (2022): 169168. 14

    2022

  48. [61]

    Long, and Evan McDonough

    Kolb, Edward W., Andrew J. Long, and Evan McDonough. ”Gr avitino swampland conjecture.” Physical Review Letters 12 7.13 (2021): 131603

    2021

  49. [62]

    ”Furth er Refining Swampland Conjecture on Inflation in General Scal ar-Tensor Theories of Gravity.” Fortschritte der Physik 70.6 (2022): 2200024

    Yuennan, Jureeporn, and Phongpichit Channuie. ”Furth er Refining Swampland Conjecture on Inflation in General Scal ar-Tensor Theories of Gravity.” Fortschritte der Physik 70.6 (2022): 2200024

    2022

  50. [63]

    ”The swampland: introduction and review

    Palti, Eran. ”The swampland: introduction and review. ” Fortschritte der Physik 67.6 (2019): 1900037

    2019

  51. [64]

    Sadeghi, and M

    Noori Gashti, S., J. Sadeghi, and M. R. Alipour. ”Furthe r refining swampland dS conjecture in mimetic f (G) gravity.” Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics D 32.03 (2023): 2350011

    2023

  52. [65]

    ”Weak gravity conjecture from co nformal field theory: a challenge from hyperscaling violati ng and Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes.” Chinese Physics C 47.1 (2023 ): 015103

    Sadeghi, Jafar, et al. ”Weak gravity conjecture from co nformal field theory: a challenge from hyperscaling violati ng and Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes.” Chinese Physics C 47.1 (2023 ): 015103

    2023

  53. [66]

    ”Cosmic evolution of the logarit hmic f (R) model and the dS swampland conjecture.” Universe 8 .12 (2022): 623

    Sadeghi, Jafar, et al. ”Cosmic evolution of the logarit hmic f (R) model and the dS swampland conjecture.” Universe 8 .12 (2022): 623

    2022

  54. [68]

    ”The interp lay of WGC and WCCC via charged scalar field fluxes in the RPST framework.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13784 (2024)

    Alipour, Mohammad Reza, and Jafar Sadeghi. ”The interp lay of WGC and WCCC via charged scalar field fluxes in the RPST framework.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13784 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  55. [69]

    ”Thermodynamic Extremality in Power-la w AdS Black Holes A Universal Perspective.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07079 (2024)

    Anand, Ankit. ”Thermodynamic Extremality in Power-la w AdS Black Holes A Universal Perspective.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07079 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  56. [70]

    Gashti, Saeed Noori, Izzet Sakallı, and Behnam Pourhas san. ”Thermodynamic topology, photon spheres, and evidenc e for weak gravity conjecture in charged black holes with perfect fluid within rastall theory.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14492 ( 2024)

    arXiv

  57. [71]

    Anand, Ankit, et al. ”Analyzing WGC and WCCC through cha rged scalar fields fluxes with charged AdS black holes surroun ded by perfect fluid dark matter in the CFT thermodynamics.” arXi v preprint arXiv:2411.04134 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  58. [72]

    ”The interplay of WGC and WCCC via charged scalar field fluxes in the RPST framework.” Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 45 (2025): 160-167

    Alipour, Mohammad Reza, et al. ”The interplay of WGC and WCCC via charged scalar field fluxes in the RPST framework.” Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 45 (2025): 160-167

    2025

  59. [73]

    ”Noncommutativity and its r ole in constant-roll inflation models with non-minimal coup ling con- strained by swampland conjectures.” Chinese Physics C 49.2 (2025): 025108-025108

    Gashti, Saeed Noori, et al. ”Noncommutativity and its r ole in constant-roll inflation models with non-minimal coup ling con- strained by swampland conjectures.” Chinese Physics C 49.2 (2025): 025108-025108

    2025

  60. [74]

    ”Weak Cosmic Censorship and Weak Gravity Conjectures in CFT Thermodynamics.” arXiv preprin t arXiv:2404.15981 (2024)

    Sadeghi, Jafar, et al. ”Weak Cosmic Censorship and Weak Gravity Conjectures in CFT Thermodynamics.” arXiv preprin t arXiv:2404.15981 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  61. [75]

    ”Weak Gravity Conjectur e Validation with Photon Spheres of Quantum Corrected AdS- Reissner-Nordstrom Black Holes in Kiselev Spacetime.” arX iv preprint arXiv:2410.14352 (2024)

    Alipour, Mohammad Reza, et al. ”Weak Gravity Conjectur e Validation with Photon Spheres of Quantum Corrected AdS- Reissner-Nordstrom Black Holes in Kiselev Spacetime.” arX iv preprint arXiv:2410.14352 (2024)

    2024

  62. [76]

    ”Swampland Conjectures and Nonc ommutative Phase Space in the Constant-roll Inflation with B rans-Dicke Cosmology.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 63.12 (2024): 1-20

    Sadeghi, Jafar, et al. ”Swampland Conjectures and Nonc ommutative Phase Space in the Constant-roll Inflation with B rans-Dicke Cosmology.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 63.12 (2024): 1-20

    2024

  63. [77]

    Afshar, Mohammad Ali S., and Jafar Sadeghi. ”Black Hole Orbit Classification: The Synergistic Effects of Cloud Strin gs, Gauss-Bonnet Terms, and Non-Commutative Parameters in Ide ntifying WGC candidate Models: WGC as WCCC protector.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00079 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  64. [78]

    Gashti, Saeed Noori, and Behnam Pourhassan. ”Cosmic-q uantum connections: Assessing the viability of weak gravit y and weak cosmic censorship conjectures in Kerr-Newman-Kiselev-Le telier black hole.” Physics Letters B (2025): 139730

    2025

  65. [79]

    ”Gravitational collapse and space-ti me singularities.” Physical Review Letters 14.3 (1965): 57

    Penrose, Roger. ”Gravitational collapse and space-ti me singularities.” Physical Review Letters 14.3 (1965): 57

    1965

  66. [80]

    ”The weak gravity conjecture: a r eview.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08380 (2022)

    Harlow, Daniel, et al. ”The weak gravity conjecture: a r eview.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08380 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  67. [81]

    Shaymatov, Sanjar, Bobomurat Ahmedov, and Mubasher Ja mil. ”Testing the weak cosmic censorship conjecture for a Re iss- ner–Nordstr¨ om–de Sitter black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter.” The European Physical Journal C 81 (2021) : 1-11

    2021

  68. [82]

    ”Observational evidence from sup ernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological con stant.” The astronomical journal 116.3 (1998): 1009

    Riess, Adam G., et al. ”Observational evidence from sup ernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological con stant.” The astronomical journal 116.3 (1998): 1009

    1998

  69. [83]

    Farrah, Duncan, et al. ”Observational evidence for cos mological coupling of black holes and its implications for a n astrophysical source of dark energy.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 9 44.2 (2023): L31

    2023

  70. [84]

    Kerr, R. P. ”Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics.” Physical Revie w Letters, vol. 11, no. 5, 1963, pp. 237

    1963

  71. [85]

    Thirring

    Lense, J., and H. Thirring. ” ¨Uber den Einfluss der Eigenrotation der Zentralk¨ orper auf d ie Bewegung der Planeten und Monde nach der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie.” Physikalis che Zeitschrift, vol. 19, 1918, p. 156

    1918

  72. [86]

    Mashhoon, B., F. W. Hehl, and D. S. Theiss. ”On the Influen ce of the Proper Rotation of Central Bodies on the Motions of Planets and Moons According to Einstein’s Theory of Gravi tation.” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 16, no. 8 , Aug. 1984, pp. 727–741

    1984

  73. [87]

    ”Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Gravi tational Fields.” Physical Review, vol

    Carter, B. ”Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Gravi tational Fields.” Physical Review, vol. 174, no. 5, 25 Oct. 1 968, pp. 1559

  74. [88]

    A., and P

    Abramowicz, M. A., and P. C. Fragile. ”Foundations of Bl ack Hole Accretion Disk Theory.” Living Reviews in Relativi ty, vol. 16, no. 1, Dec. 2013, p. 1

    2013

  75. [89]

    Thorne, K. S. ”Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. II. Evo lution of the Hole.” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 191, 1974, pp. 507–520

    1974

  76. [90]

    ”Measuring Mass and Angular Momentum of Black Holes with High-Frequency Quasi-Periodic Oscillati ons.” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol

    Aschenbach, B. ”Measuring Mass and Angular Momentum of Black Holes with High-Frequency Quasi-Periodic Oscillati ons.” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 425, no. 3, 1 Oct. 2004, pp. 10 75–1082

    2004

  77. [91]

    P., and J

    De Villiers, J. P., and J. F. Hawley. ”Global General Rel ativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Accretion T ori.” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 592, no. 2, 1 Aug. 2003, pp. 1060

    2003

  78. [92]

    ”Fourier Techniques in X-ray Timing.” T iming Neutron Stars, Springer Netherlands, 1989, pp

    Van der Klis, M. ”Fourier Techniques in X-ray Timing.” T iming Neutron Stars, Springer Netherlands, 1989, pp. 27–69

    1989

  79. [93]

    A., and J

    Balbus, S. A., and J. F. Hawley. ”A Powerful Local Shear I nstability in Weakly Magnetized Disks. I-Linear Analysis. II-Nonlinear Evolution.” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 376, July 1991, pp . 214–233. 15

    1991

  80. [94]

    Ingram, A., and C. Done. ”A Physical Model for the Contin uum Variability and Quasi-Periodic Oscillation in Accreti ng Black Holes.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 415, no. 3, 11 Aug. 2011, pp. 2323–2335

    2011

  81. [95]

    D., and K

    Novikov, I. D., and K. S. Thorne. ”Astrophysics of Black Holes.” Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus), vol. 1, Jan. 1973, p p. 343–450

    1973

  82. [96]

    I., and R

    Shakura, N. I., and R. A. Sunyaev. ”Black Holes in Binary Systems. Observational Appearance.” Astronomy and Astrop hysics, vol. 24, 1973, pp. 337–355

    1973

  83. [97]

    I., and R

    Shakura, N. I., and R. A. Sunyaev. ”Black Holes in Binary Systems: Observational Appearances.” Symposium - Interna tional Astronomical Union, vol. 55, Jan. 1973, pp. 155–164. Cambri dge University Press

    1973

  84. [98]

    Rezzolla, and J

    Zanotti, O., L. Rezzolla, and J. A. Font. ”Quasi-Period ic Accretion and Gravitational Waves from Oscillating ‘Tor oidal Neutron Stars’ Around a Schwarzschild Black Hole.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 341, no. 3, 21 May 200 3, pp. 832–848

  85. [99]

    Fragile, P. C., O. M. Blaes, P. Anninos, and J. D. Salmons on. ”Global General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Sim ulation of a Tilted Black Hole Accretion Disk.” The Astrophysical Jo urnal, vol. 668, no. 1, 10 Oct. 2007, pp. 417

    2007

  86. [100]

    Stuchl ´ ık, Z., and P. Slan´ y. ”Equatorial Circular Orbits in the Kerr–de Sitter Spacetimes.” Physical Review D, v ol. 69, no. 6, 1 Mar. 2004, p. 064001

    2004

  87. [101]

    E., et al

    Kinch, B. E., et al. ”Spin and Accretion Rate Dependenc e of Black Hole X-ray Spectra.” The Astrophysical Journal, v ol. 922, no. 2, 6 Dec. 2021, p. 270

    2021

  88. [102]

    S., and M

    Reynolds, C. S., and M. A. Nowak. ”Fluorescent Iron Lin es as a Probe of Astrophysical Black Hole Systems.” Physics R eports, vol. 377, no. 6, 1 Apr. 2003, pp. 389–466

    2003

  89. [103]

    Bardeen, J. M., W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky. ”Rotat ing Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extrac tion, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation.” Astrophysical Journal , vol. 178, 1972, pp. 347–370

    1972

  90. [104]

    D., and J

    Schnittman, J. D., and J. H. Krolik. ”X-ray Polarizati on from Accreting Black Holes: The Thermal State.” The Astro physical Journal, vol. 701, no. 2, 30 July 2009, pp. 1175

    2009

  91. [105]

    W., Kip S

    Misner, C. W., Kip S. Thorne, and John A. Wheeler. Gravi tation. W. H. Freeman and Company, 1973

    1973

  92. [106]

    Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan, and Kip S. Thorne. The M athematical Theory of Black Holes. Oxford University Press , 1985

    1985

  93. [107]

    ”Heat engine efficiency and Joule–Thomson ex pansion of nonlinear charged AdS black hole in massive gravi ty.” General Relativity and Gravitation 53.3 (2021): 30

    Nam, Cao H. ”Heat engine efficiency and Joule–Thomson ex pansion of nonlinear charged AdS black hole in massive gravi ty.” General Relativity and Gravitation 53.3 (2021): 30

    2021

  94. [108]

    ”Non-linear charged AdS black hole in massi ve gravity.” The European Physical Journal C 78.12 (2018): 1 016

    Nam, Cao H. ”Non-linear charged AdS black hole in massi ve gravity.” The European Physical Journal C 78.12 (2018): 1 016

    2018

  95. [109]

    ”Thermodynamics of black holes i n massive gravity.” Physical Review D 91.2 (2015): 024032

    Cai, Rong-Gen, et al. ”Thermodynamics of black holes i n massive gravity.” Physical Review D 91.2 (2015): 024032

    2015

  96. [110]

    ”A class of black holes in dRGT massive gravity and t heir thermodynamical properties.” The European Physical Journ al C 76.3 (2016): 119

    Ghosh, Suchant G., Lunchakorn Tannukij, and Pitayuth Wongjun. ”A class of black holes in dRGT massive gravity and t heir thermodynamical properties.” The European Physical Journ al C 76.3 (2016): 119

    2016

  97. [111]

    Hendi, S. H., S. Panahiyan, and B. Eslam Panah. ”Charge d black hole solutions in Gauss-Bonnet-massive gravity.” J ournal of High Energy Physics 2016.1 (2016): 1-35

    2016

  98. [112]

    Hendi, S. H., B. Eslam Panah, and S. Panahiyan. ”Massiv e charged BTZ black holes in asymptotically (a) dS spacetime s.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2016.5 (2016): 1-33

    2016

  99. [113]

    ”Topological charge and black hole pho ton spheres.” Physical Review D 102.6 (2020): 064039

    Wei, Shao-Wen. ”Topological charge and black hole pho ton spheres.” Physical Review D 102.6 (2020): 064039

    2020

  100. [114]

    ”Light-ring stability for ultracompact objects.” Physi cal review letters 119.25 (2017): 251102

    Cunha, Pedro VP, Emanuele Berti, and Carlos AR Herdeir o. ”Light-ring stability for ultracompact objects.” Physi cal review letters 119.25 (2017): 251102

    2017

  101. [115]

    ”Assessing WGC Compatibil ity in ModMax Black Holes via Photon Spheres Analysis and WCC C Validation.” arXiv e-prints (2025): arXiv-2504

    Noori Gashti, Saeed, et al. ”Assessing WGC Compatibil ity in ModMax Black Holes via Photon Spheres Analysis and WCC C Validation.” arXiv e-prints (2025): arXiv-2504

    2025

  102. [116]

    ”Mechanis ms behind the Aschenbach effect in non-rotating black hole sp acetime.” Annals of Physics (2025): 169953

    Afshar, Mohammad Ali S., and Jafar Sadeghi. ”Mechanis ms behind the Aschenbach effect in non-rotating black hole sp acetime.” Annals of Physics (2025): 169953

    2025

  103. [117]

    ”Mutual in fluence of photon sphere and non-commutative parameter in va rious non-commutative black holes: Towards evidence for WGC.” Ph ysics of the Dark Universe 47 (2025): 101814

    Afshar, Mohammad Ali S., and Jafar Sadeghi. ”Mutual in fluence of photon sphere and non-commutative parameter in va rious non-commutative black holes: Towards evidence for WGC.” Ph ysics of the Dark Universe 47 (2025): 101814

    2025

  104. [118]

    Alipour, Mohammad Reza, et al. ”Weak gravity conjectu re validation with photon spheres of quantum corrected Reis s- ner–Nordstrom–AdS black holes in Kiselev spacetime.” The E uropean Physical Journal C 85.2 (2025): 138

    2025

  105. [119]

    Sadeghi, Jafar, and Mohammad Ali S. Afshar. ”The role o f topological photon spheres in constraining the parameter s of black holes.” Astroparticle Physics 162 (2024): 102994

    2024

  106. [120]

    ”Reconciling the Weak G ravity and Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjectures in Einstein- Euler- Heisenberg-AdS Black Holes.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.0 3453 (2025)

    Alipour, Mohammad Reza, et al. ”Reconciling the Weak G ravity and Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjectures in Einstein- Euler- Heisenberg-AdS Black Holes.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.0 3453 (2025)

    2025

  107. [121]

    WGC as WCCC protector: The synerg istic effects of various parameters in non-commutative blac k holes for identifying WGC candidate models

    Afshar MA, Sadeghi J. WGC as WCCC protector: The synerg istic effects of various parameters in non-commutative blac k holes for identifying WGC candidate models. Nuclear Physics B. 20 25 May 1;1014:116872

  108. [122]

    Can Static B lack Holes in Massive Gravity Serve as Candidates for Aschen bach-Like Phenomena?

    Afshar MA, Sadeghi J, Azizi T, Sefiedgar AS. Can Static B lack Holes in Massive Gravity Serve as Candidates for Aschen bach-Like Phenomena?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15563. 2025 Jul 21

    2025

  109. [123]

    Measuring mass and angular momentum of b lack holes with high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillatio ns

    Aschenbach B. Measuring mass and angular momentum of b lack holes with high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillatio ns. Astron- omy , Astrophysics. 2004 Oct 1;425(3):1075-82

    2004

  110. [124]

    Aschenbach effect and circular orbits in static and spherically symmetric black hole backgrounds

    Wei SW, Liu YX. Aschenbach effect and circular orbits in static and spherically symmetric black hole backgrounds. P hysics of the Dark Universe. 2024 Feb 1;43:101409

    2024

  111. [125]

    Static spheres an d Aschenbach effect for black holes in massive gravity

    Yerra PK, Mukherji S, Bhamidipati C. Static spheres an d Aschenbach effect for black holes in massive gravity. Physi cal Review D. 2025 Jun 15;111(12):124018

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.