Coupled Spin-Orbital $p$-Wave Magnetism via Structural and Magnetic Chirality

B\"orge G\"obel; Ersoy \c{S}a\c{s}{\i}o\u{g}lu; Samir Lounis; Tom G. Saunderson

arxiv: 2607.02378 · v1 · pith:HLI4BSDYnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Coupled Spin-Orbital p-Wave Magnetism via Structural and Magnetic Chirality

Tom G. Saunderson , B\"orge G\"obel , Ersoy \c{S}a\c{s}{\i}o\u{g}lu , Samir Lounis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 06:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords p-wave magnetismspin-orbit couplingstructural chiralitymagnetic chiralityorbital polarizationhelical spin texturelongitudinal conductivityrelative chirality

0 comments

The pith

Spin-orbit coupling couples structural and magnetic chirality to create two distinct p-wave phases classified by relative chirality.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that spin-orbit coupling connects the momentum-odd orbital polarization present in structurally chiral crystals with the momentum-odd spin polarization of helical magnets. This connection produces an additional contribution to the p-wave spin splitting. The resulting states fall into two categories depending on whether the structural and magnetic chiralities have the same or opposite sign. These homochiral and heterochiral configurations display different behaviors in longitudinal conductivity, turning the relative chirality into a measurable symmetry property.

Core claim

Spin-orbit coupling couples the orbital polarization of a chiral crystal to the spin polarization in a helical texture, adding to the p-wave spin splitting. The spin-orbital state is classified by the relative chirality η=χ_c χ_m. This gives two symmetry-distinct p-wave phases, homochiral and heterochiral, that are distinguishable by longitudinal conductivity measurements.

What carries the argument

Relative chirality η = χ_c χ_m that classifies homochiral versus heterochiral p-wave phases produced by spin-orbit coupling between structural and magnetic degrees of freedom.

Load-bearing premise

Structural orbital polarization and magnetic spin polarization act as independent chirality sources that are then linked by spin-orbit coupling, with their relative sign producing observable conductivity differences.

What would settle it

If experiments on a chiral magnet with switchable relative chirality find no difference in longitudinal conductivity between the two configurations, the distinction between the phases would be ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02378 by B\"orge G\"obel, Ersoy \c{S}a\c{s}{\i}o\u{g}lu, Samir Lounis, Tom G. Saunderson.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Helical spin textures represent the minimal realization of $p$-wave magnetism which is characterized by momentum-odd spin polarization. Independently, structurally chiral crystals exhibit momentum-odd orbital polarization arising from broken inversion symmetry. Here, we demonstrate that spin-orbit coupling couples these two independent microscopic chirality degrees of freedom, allowing the orbital polarization of a chiral crystal to generate an additional contribution to the $p$-wave spin splitting. The resulting spin-orbital state is naturally classified by the relative chirality $\eta=\chi_{\mathrm c}\chi_{\mathrm m}$, giving rise to two symmetry-distinct $p$-wave phases corresponding to homochiral and heterochiral configurations which can be directly probed by the longitudinal conductivity. These phases exhibit distinct transport signatures, establishing relative chirality as an experimentally accessible symmetry degree of freedom in chiral magnetic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

SOC couples structural and magnetic chirality to produce two p-wave phases with distinct longitudinal conductivity tensors derived from point-group symmetry.

read the letter

The main point is that spin-orbit coupling links the orbital polarization from a chiral crystal lattice to the spin polarization in a helical magnetic texture. This creates a relative chirality η = χ_c χ_m that labels homochiral and heterochiral p-wave states, each with its own longitudinal conductivity tensor.

The authors set up a model Hamiltonian and use point-group analysis to list the symmetry-allowed terms. They then compute the conductivity response and show the tensors differ between the two η cases exactly as the symmetry demands. The steps are straightforward and do not introduce extra parameters or circular definitions.

The limitation is that the work stays at the level of a general model. No specific material is examined, no ab initio numbers are given, and there is no estimate of effect size against competing mechanisms. The claim that conductivity can probe relative chirality is therefore plausible but not yet tested in a concrete setting.

This is for people working on chiral magnets and spintronic transport. A reader who follows symmetry classifications in mesoscopic systems will find the framing and the transport distinction useful. The symmetry analysis holds up on its own terms, so the paper deserves a serious referee.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that spin-orbit coupling couples two independent microscopic chirality degrees of freedom—structural orbital polarization (χ_c) from broken inversion symmetry in chiral crystals and magnetic spin polarization (χ_m) from helical spin textures—producing an additional contribution to p-wave spin splitting. The resulting spin-orbital state is classified by the relative chirality η = χ_c χ_m, yielding two symmetry-distinct p-wave phases (homochiral and heterochiral). These phases are derived via point-group analysis of a model Hamiltonian whose symmetry-allowed terms produce distinct longitudinal conductivity tensors, providing an experimental probe of relative chirality.

Significance. If the result holds, the work is significant because it establishes relative chirality as an experimentally accessible symmetry degree of freedom in chiral magnetic systems, with direct transport signatures in longitudinal conductivity. Strengths include the use of a model Hamiltonian with symmetry-allowed terms enumerated by point-group analysis and the explicit demonstration that the conductivity tensors differ between homochiral and heterochiral cases exactly as required by the η label. The derivation is parameter-free in its symmetry classification and provides falsifiable predictions for transport measurements.

minor comments (1)

The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the specific point group(s) used in the analysis to allow readers to immediately connect the symmetry classification to known materials.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive assessment of our manuscript. The referee's summary accurately reflects the central claims regarding the coupling of structural and magnetic chirality via spin-orbit coupling and the resulting distinct p-wave phases distinguished by relative chirality η. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the significance of the transport signatures as an experimental probe and the parameter-free nature of the symmetry classification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; symmetry classification of coupled chiralities is independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper performs a standard point-group symmetry analysis on a model Hamiltonian to enumerate SOC-allowed terms that couple independent structural (χ_c) and magnetic (χ_m) chiralities. The relative chirality η = χ_c χ_m is introduced as a label for the resulting homochiral vs. heterochiral phases, with distinct longitudinal conductivity tensors following directly from the symmetry-allowed terms. No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and the classification does not reduce any claimed result to its own definitional inputs. The derivation chain is self-contained against external symmetry benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to assumptions explicitly stated there. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned. The central mechanism rests on the stated independence of the two chirality degrees of freedom.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The orbital polarization from structural chirality and the spin polarization from magnetic chirality are independent microscopic degrees of freedom prior to spin-orbit coupling.
Stated directly in the abstract as the starting point for the coupling mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5699 in / 1401 out tokens · 38100 ms · 2026-07-03T06:36:05.096704+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism,

Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Libor ˇSmejkal, Karel V´ yborn´ y, Yuta Yahagi, Jairo Sinova, Tom´ aˇ s Jungwirth, and Jakub ˇZelezn´ y, “Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021), arXiv:2002.07073

work page arXiv 2021
[2]

Be- yond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromag- netism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry,

Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Be- yond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromag- netism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

2022
[3]

ˇSmejkal, J

Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022), arXiv:2204.10844

work page arXiv 2022
[4]

Altermagnetism Then and Now,

I I Mazin, “Altermagnetism Then and Now,” Phys. Rev. X (2024)

2024
[5]

Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- magnetism in MnTe,

O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Za- kharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempask´ y, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. ˇSmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P. Wadley, “Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- magnetism in MnTe,” Nature6...

2024
[6]

Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO2,

Olena Fedchenko, Jan Min´ ar, Akashdeep Akashdeep, Sunil Wilfred D’Souza, Dmitry Vasilyev, Olena Tkach, Lukas Odenbreit, Quynh Nguyen, Dmytro Kutnyakhov, Nils Wind, Lukas Wenthaus, Markus Scholz, Kai Ross- nagel, Moritz Hoesch, Martin Aeschlimann, Benjamin Stadtm¨ uller, Mathias Kl¨ aui, Gerd Sch¨ onhense, Tomas Jungwirth, Anna Birk Hellenes, Gerhard Jako...

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

All-electrically controlled spintronics in altermagnetic heterostructures,

Pei Hao Fu, Qianqian Lv, Yong Xu, Jorge Cayao, Jun Feng Liu, and Xiang Long Yu, “All-electrically controlled spintronics in altermagnetic heterostructures,” npj Quantum Mater. 2025 10110, 111– (2025), arXiv:2506.05504

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

Chiral-Angle-Controlled Altermagnetic Spin Splitting in Nanotubes

Ersoy S S ¸a¸ sıo˘ glu, Tom G Saunderson, B¨ orge G¨ obel, Ingrid Mertig, and Samir Lounis, “Chiral-Angle- Controlled Altermagnetic Spin Splitting in Nanotubes,” (2026), arXiv:2606.08757

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[9]

P-wave magnets

Anna Birk Hellenes, Tom´ aˇ s Jungwirth, Rodrigo Jaeschke-Ubiergo, Atasi Chakraborty, Jairo Sinova, and Libor ˇSmejkal, “P-wave magnets,” arXiv2309.01607 (2023), arXiv:2309.01607 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[10]

Minimal Mod- els and Transport Properties of Unconventionalp-Wave Magnets,

Bjørnulf Brekke, Pavlo Sukhachov, Hans Hans Gl¨ ockner Giil, Arne Brataas, and Jacob Linder, “Minimal Mod- els and Transport Properties of Unconventionalp-Wave Magnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 236703 (2024)

2024
[11]

Emergence ofp-wave collinear magnetism in antiferromagnets with reflection- asymmetric magnetic motifs,

Reynel C´ ardenas, Valeria Quintana, Lin-Ding Yuan, and Carlos Mera Acosta, “Emergence ofp-wave collinear magnetism in antiferromagnets with reflection- asymmetric magnetic motifs,” Phys. Rev. B113, 94431 (2026)

2026
[12]

Electrical switching of a p-wave magnet,

Qian Song, Srdjan Stavri´ c, Riccardo Comin, and Others, “Electrical switching of a p-wave magnet,” Nature642, 349–355 (2025)

2025
[13]

Highly efficient non- relativistic Edelstein effect in nodal p-wave magnets,

Atasi Chakraborty, Anna Birk Hellenes, Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Others, “Highly efficient non- relativistic Edelstein effect in nodal p-wave magnets,” Nat. Commun.16(2025), 10.1038/s41467-025-62516-0

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62516-0 2025
[14]

P-wave magnetism in a metal,

Daniel McNally, “P-wave magnetism in a metal,” Nat. Mater.25, 16 (2026)

2026
[15]

Floquet Odd-Parity Collinear Mag- nets,

Tongshuai Zhu, Di Zhou, Huaiqiang Wang, Su Huai Wei, and Jiawei Ruan, “Floquet Odd-Parity Collinear Mag- nets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 126704 (2026)

2026
[16]

Rolling Two-Dimensional Collinear Magnets into Chiral Nanotubes with $p$-Wave Magnetism

Zhejunyu Jin, Robin R. Neumann, Rodrigo Jaeschke- Ubiergo, Jairo Sinova, and Alexander Mook, “Rolling Two-Dimensional Collinear Magnets into Chiral Nanotubes withp-Wave Magnetism,” (2026), arXiv:2606.30214

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[17]

Chirality-dependentp-wave anti-altermagnetism and edelstein effect in analytically solvable spin-spiral model,

B¨ orge G¨ obel, Tom G. Saunderson, Lennart Schimpf, Freia Opfermann, Ersoy S ¸a¸ sıo˘ glu, and Samir Lou- nis, “Chirality-dependentp-wave anti-altermagnetism and edelstein effect in analytically solvable spin-spiral model,” (2026), manuscript in preparation

2026
[18]

Orbital Topology of Chiral Crystals for Orbitronics,

Kenta Hagiwara, Ying Jiun Chen, Dongwook Go, Xin Liang Tan, Sergii Grytsiuk, Kui Hon Ou Yang, Guo Jiun Shu, Jing Chien, Yi Hsin Shen, Xiang Lin Huang, Iulia Cojocariu, Vitaliy Feyer, Minn Tsong Lin, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, Claus Michael Schneider, Yuriy Mokrousov, and Christian Tusche, “Orbital Topology of Chiral Crystals for Orbitronics,” Adv. Mater.37, 2418040...

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Intrinsic Spin and Orbital Hall Effects from Orbital Texture

Dongwook Go, Daegeun Jo, Changyoung Kim, and Hyun Woo Lee, “Intrinsic Spin and Orbital Hall Ef- fects from Orbital Texture,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 86602 (2018), arXiv:1804.02118

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[20]

Orbitronics: Orbital currents in solids,

Dongwook Go, Daegeun Jo, Hyun Woo Lee, Mathias Kl¨ aui, and Yuriy Mokrousov, “Orbitronics: Orbital currents in solids,” Europhys. Lett.135, 37001 (2021), arXiv:2107.08478

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Chirality-induced Orbital Edelstein Effect in an Analyt- ically Solvable Model,

B¨ orge G¨ obel, Lennart Schimpf, and Ingrid Mertig, “Chirality-induced Orbital Edelstein Effect in an Analyt- ically Solvable Model,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, 33180 (2025)

2025
[22]

Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi-band insulators, Chern insulators, and met- als,

Davide Ceresoli, T Thonhauser, David Vanderbilt, and Raffaele Resta, “Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi-band insulators, Chern insulators, and met- als,” Phys. Rev. B74, 24408 (2006)

2006
[23]

Berry Phase Effects on Electronic Properties

Di Xiao, Ming Che Chang, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase effects on electronic properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959–2007 (2010), arXiv:0907.2021. 6

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1959
[24]

Quantum Theory of Orbital Magnetization and its Generalization to Interacting Systems

Junren Shi, G. Vignale, Di Xiao, and Qian Niu, “Quan- tum Theory of Orbital Magnetization and Its Generaliza- tion to Interacting Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 197202 (2007), arXiv:0704.3824

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[25]

Current-induced Orbital and Spin Magnetizations in Crystals with Helical Structure,

Taiki Yoda, Takehito Yokoyama, and Shuichi Murakami, “Current-induced Orbital and Spin Magnetizations in Crystals with Helical Structure,” Sci. Rep.5, 12024– (2015)

2015
[26]

Chirality-induced selectivity of angular momentum by orbital Edelstein effect in carbon nanotubes,

B¨ orge G¨ obel, Ingrid Mertig, and Samir Lounis, “Chirality-induced selectivity of angular momentum by orbital Edelstein effect in carbon nanotubes,” Commun. Phys.8, 395– (2025), arXiv:2504.07665

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

See Supplemental Material
[28]

Controlling the helicity of magnetic skyrmions in aβ-Mn-type high-temperature chiral mag- net,

K Karube, K Shibata, J S White, T Koretsune, X Z Yu, Y Tokunaga, H M Rønnow, R Arita, T Arima, Y Tokura, and Y Taguchi, “Controlling the helicity of magnetic skyrmions in aβ-Mn-type high-temperature chiral mag- net,” Phys. Rev. B98, 155120 (2018)

2018
[29]

A new class of chiral materials hosting magnetic skyrmions beyond room temperature,

Y Tokunaga, X Z Yu, J S White, H M Rønnow, D Morikawa, Y Taguchi, and Y Tokura, “A new class of chiral materials hosting magnetic skyrmions beyond room temperature,” Nat. Commun.6, 7638 (2015)

2015
[30]

Chiral Properties of Structure and Magnetism in Mn 1−xFexGe Compounds: When the Left and the Right are Fighting, Who Wins?

S V Grigoriev, N M Potapova, S.-A. Siegfried, V A Dyad- kin, E V Moskvin, V Dmitriev, D Menzel, C D De- whurst, D Chernyshov, R A Sadykov, L N Fomicheva, and A V Tsvyashchenko, “Chiral Properties of Structure and Magnetism in Mn 1−xFexGe Compounds: When the Left and the Right are Fighting, Who Wins?” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 207201 (2013)

2013
[31]

Control of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Mn1−xFexGe: A First-Principles Study,

Takashi Koretsune, Naoto Nagaosa, and Ryotaro Arita, “Control of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Mn1−xFexGe: A First-Principles Study,” Sci. Rep.5, 13302 (2015)

2015
[32]

Towards control of the size and helicity of skyrmions in helimagnetic alloys by spin–orbit coupling,

K. Shibata, X. Z. Yu, T. Hara, D. Morikawa, N. Kanazawa, K. Kimoto, S. Ishiwata, Y. Matsui, and Y. Tokura, “Towards control of the size and helicity of skyrmions in helimagnetic alloys by spin–orbit coupling,” Nat. Nanotechnol.8, 723–728 (2013)

2013

[1] [1]

Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism,

Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Libor ˇSmejkal, Karel V´ yborn´ y, Yuta Yahagi, Jairo Sinova, Tom´ aˇ s Jungwirth, and Jakub ˇZelezn´ y, “Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021), arXiv:2002.07073

work page arXiv 2021

[2] [2]

Be- yond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromag- netism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry,

Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Be- yond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromag- netism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

2022

[3] [3]

ˇSmejkal, J

Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022), arXiv:2204.10844

work page arXiv 2022

[4] [4]

Altermagnetism Then and Now,

I I Mazin, “Altermagnetism Then and Now,” Phys. Rev. X (2024)

2024

[5] [5]

Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- magnetism in MnTe,

O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Za- kharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempask´ y, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. ˇSmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P. Wadley, “Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- magnetism in MnTe,” Nature6...

2024

[6] [6]

Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO2,

Olena Fedchenko, Jan Min´ ar, Akashdeep Akashdeep, Sunil Wilfred D’Souza, Dmitry Vasilyev, Olena Tkach, Lukas Odenbreit, Quynh Nguyen, Dmytro Kutnyakhov, Nils Wind, Lukas Wenthaus, Markus Scholz, Kai Ross- nagel, Moritz Hoesch, Martin Aeschlimann, Benjamin Stadtm¨ uller, Mathias Kl¨ aui, Gerd Sch¨ onhense, Tomas Jungwirth, Anna Birk Hellenes, Gerhard Jako...

work page arXiv 2024

[7] [7]

All-electrically controlled spintronics in altermagnetic heterostructures,

Pei Hao Fu, Qianqian Lv, Yong Xu, Jorge Cayao, Jun Feng Liu, and Xiang Long Yu, “All-electrically controlled spintronics in altermagnetic heterostructures,” npj Quantum Mater. 2025 10110, 111– (2025), arXiv:2506.05504

work page arXiv 2025

[8] [8]

Chiral-Angle-Controlled Altermagnetic Spin Splitting in Nanotubes

Ersoy S S ¸a¸ sıo˘ glu, Tom G Saunderson, B¨ orge G¨ obel, Ingrid Mertig, and Samir Lounis, “Chiral-Angle- Controlled Altermagnetic Spin Splitting in Nanotubes,” (2026), arXiv:2606.08757

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[9] [9]

P-wave magnets

Anna Birk Hellenes, Tom´ aˇ s Jungwirth, Rodrigo Jaeschke-Ubiergo, Atasi Chakraborty, Jairo Sinova, and Libor ˇSmejkal, “P-wave magnets,” arXiv2309.01607 (2023), arXiv:2309.01607 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[10] [10]

Minimal Mod- els and Transport Properties of Unconventionalp-Wave Magnets,

Bjørnulf Brekke, Pavlo Sukhachov, Hans Hans Gl¨ ockner Giil, Arne Brataas, and Jacob Linder, “Minimal Mod- els and Transport Properties of Unconventionalp-Wave Magnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 236703 (2024)

2024

[11] [11]

Emergence ofp-wave collinear magnetism in antiferromagnets with reflection- asymmetric magnetic motifs,

Reynel C´ ardenas, Valeria Quintana, Lin-Ding Yuan, and Carlos Mera Acosta, “Emergence ofp-wave collinear magnetism in antiferromagnets with reflection- asymmetric magnetic motifs,” Phys. Rev. B113, 94431 (2026)

2026

[12] [12]

Electrical switching of a p-wave magnet,

Qian Song, Srdjan Stavri´ c, Riccardo Comin, and Others, “Electrical switching of a p-wave magnet,” Nature642, 349–355 (2025)

2025

[13] [13]

Highly efficient non- relativistic Edelstein effect in nodal p-wave magnets,

Atasi Chakraborty, Anna Birk Hellenes, Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Others, “Highly efficient non- relativistic Edelstein effect in nodal p-wave magnets,” Nat. Commun.16(2025), 10.1038/s41467-025-62516-0

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62516-0 2025

[14] [14]

P-wave magnetism in a metal,

Daniel McNally, “P-wave magnetism in a metal,” Nat. Mater.25, 16 (2026)

2026

[15] [15]

Floquet Odd-Parity Collinear Mag- nets,

Tongshuai Zhu, Di Zhou, Huaiqiang Wang, Su Huai Wei, and Jiawei Ruan, “Floquet Odd-Parity Collinear Mag- nets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 126704 (2026)

2026

[16] [16]

Rolling Two-Dimensional Collinear Magnets into Chiral Nanotubes with $p$-Wave Magnetism

Zhejunyu Jin, Robin R. Neumann, Rodrigo Jaeschke- Ubiergo, Jairo Sinova, and Alexander Mook, “Rolling Two-Dimensional Collinear Magnets into Chiral Nanotubes withp-Wave Magnetism,” (2026), arXiv:2606.30214

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[17] [17]

Chirality-dependentp-wave anti-altermagnetism and edelstein effect in analytically solvable spin-spiral model,

B¨ orge G¨ obel, Tom G. Saunderson, Lennart Schimpf, Freia Opfermann, Ersoy S ¸a¸ sıo˘ glu, and Samir Lou- nis, “Chirality-dependentp-wave anti-altermagnetism and edelstein effect in analytically solvable spin-spiral model,” (2026), manuscript in preparation

2026

[18] [18]

Orbital Topology of Chiral Crystals for Orbitronics,

Kenta Hagiwara, Ying Jiun Chen, Dongwook Go, Xin Liang Tan, Sergii Grytsiuk, Kui Hon Ou Yang, Guo Jiun Shu, Jing Chien, Yi Hsin Shen, Xiang Lin Huang, Iulia Cojocariu, Vitaliy Feyer, Minn Tsong Lin, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, Claus Michael Schneider, Yuriy Mokrousov, and Christian Tusche, “Orbital Topology of Chiral Crystals for Orbitronics,” Adv. Mater.37, 2418040...

work page arXiv 2025

[19] [19]

Intrinsic Spin and Orbital Hall Effects from Orbital Texture

Dongwook Go, Daegeun Jo, Changyoung Kim, and Hyun Woo Lee, “Intrinsic Spin and Orbital Hall Ef- fects from Orbital Texture,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 86602 (2018), arXiv:1804.02118

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[20] [20]

Orbitronics: Orbital currents in solids,

Dongwook Go, Daegeun Jo, Hyun Woo Lee, Mathias Kl¨ aui, and Yuriy Mokrousov, “Orbitronics: Orbital currents in solids,” Europhys. Lett.135, 37001 (2021), arXiv:2107.08478

work page arXiv 2021

[21] [21]

Chirality-induced Orbital Edelstein Effect in an Analyt- ically Solvable Model,

B¨ orge G¨ obel, Lennart Schimpf, and Ingrid Mertig, “Chirality-induced Orbital Edelstein Effect in an Analyt- ically Solvable Model,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, 33180 (2025)

2025

[22] [22]

Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi-band insulators, Chern insulators, and met- als,

Davide Ceresoli, T Thonhauser, David Vanderbilt, and Raffaele Resta, “Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi-band insulators, Chern insulators, and met- als,” Phys. Rev. B74, 24408 (2006)

2006

[23] [23]

Berry Phase Effects on Electronic Properties

Di Xiao, Ming Che Chang, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase effects on electronic properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959–2007 (2010), arXiv:0907.2021. 6

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1959

[24] [24]

Quantum Theory of Orbital Magnetization and its Generalization to Interacting Systems

Junren Shi, G. Vignale, Di Xiao, and Qian Niu, “Quan- tum Theory of Orbital Magnetization and Its Generaliza- tion to Interacting Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 197202 (2007), arXiv:0704.3824

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[25] [25]

Current-induced Orbital and Spin Magnetizations in Crystals with Helical Structure,

Taiki Yoda, Takehito Yokoyama, and Shuichi Murakami, “Current-induced Orbital and Spin Magnetizations in Crystals with Helical Structure,” Sci. Rep.5, 12024– (2015)

2015

[26] [26]

Chirality-induced selectivity of angular momentum by orbital Edelstein effect in carbon nanotubes,

B¨ orge G¨ obel, Ingrid Mertig, and Samir Lounis, “Chirality-induced selectivity of angular momentum by orbital Edelstein effect in carbon nanotubes,” Commun. Phys.8, 395– (2025), arXiv:2504.07665

work page arXiv 2025

[27] [27]

See Supplemental Material

[28] [28]

Controlling the helicity of magnetic skyrmions in aβ-Mn-type high-temperature chiral mag- net,

K Karube, K Shibata, J S White, T Koretsune, X Z Yu, Y Tokunaga, H M Rønnow, R Arita, T Arima, Y Tokura, and Y Taguchi, “Controlling the helicity of magnetic skyrmions in aβ-Mn-type high-temperature chiral mag- net,” Phys. Rev. B98, 155120 (2018)

2018

[29] [29]

A new class of chiral materials hosting magnetic skyrmions beyond room temperature,

Y Tokunaga, X Z Yu, J S White, H M Rønnow, D Morikawa, Y Taguchi, and Y Tokura, “A new class of chiral materials hosting magnetic skyrmions beyond room temperature,” Nat. Commun.6, 7638 (2015)

2015

[30] [30]

Chiral Properties of Structure and Magnetism in Mn 1−xFexGe Compounds: When the Left and the Right are Fighting, Who Wins?

S V Grigoriev, N M Potapova, S.-A. Siegfried, V A Dyad- kin, E V Moskvin, V Dmitriev, D Menzel, C D De- whurst, D Chernyshov, R A Sadykov, L N Fomicheva, and A V Tsvyashchenko, “Chiral Properties of Structure and Magnetism in Mn 1−xFexGe Compounds: When the Left and the Right are Fighting, Who Wins?” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 207201 (2013)

2013

[31] [31]

Control of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Mn1−xFexGe: A First-Principles Study,

Takashi Koretsune, Naoto Nagaosa, and Ryotaro Arita, “Control of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Mn1−xFexGe: A First-Principles Study,” Sci. Rep.5, 13302 (2015)

2015

[32] [32]

Towards control of the size and helicity of skyrmions in helimagnetic alloys by spin–orbit coupling,

K. Shibata, X. Z. Yu, T. Hara, D. Morikawa, N. Kanazawa, K. Kimoto, S. Ishiwata, Y. Matsui, and Y. Tokura, “Towards control of the size and helicity of skyrmions in helimagnetic alloys by spin–orbit coupling,” Nat. Nanotechnol.8, 723–728 (2013)

2013