Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 45 references

The plane wave matrix model has a double-scaling limit that produces an explicit eigenvalue integral for the 1/4-BPS sector of little string theory on R×S⁵.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 00:46 UTC pith:HLIO77BC

load-bearing objection Analytical gauge-theory derivation of the NS5 double-scaling limit, with an explicit 1/4-BPS eigenvalue integral for LST; the scale-separation assumption is self-consistent and the only real soft spot is an uncomputed higher-genus claim that is standard but not proved. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25116 v1 pith:HLIO77BC submitted 2026-07-27 hep-th

Derivation of the NS5-brane limit of the plane wave matrix model

Yuhma Asano , Goro Ishiki , Shinji Shimasaki This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords plane wave matrix modelBMN matrix modellittle string theoryNS5-branedouble scaling limitlocalization1/4 BPSgauge/gravity duality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Gravity duals had predicted that a special double-scaling limit of the plane wave (BMN) matrix model should describe type IIA little string theory on R×S⁵, but that limit looked unlike any ordinary large-N limit. This paper proves the limit exists on the gauge-theory side for the partition function and for a 1/4-BPS sector. Starting from the localized eigenvalue integral around a fixed vacuum, the authors integrate out the eigenvalues of the largest SU(2) representation and obtain a concrete effective integral whose free energy is controlled by a single fixed coupling identified with the maximum dilaton. The resulting integral is therefore offered as a Lagrangian description of the 1/4-BPS sector of little string theory, opening the door to both weak-coupling perturbation theory and direct comparison with the NS5-brane geometry.

Core claim

In the double-scaling limit N₁→∞, λ₁→∞ with n₁ A(n₁) N₁ exp(−π(8λ₁)^{1/4}/n₁)/(π(8λ₁)^{5/8}) held fixed (other moduli fixed), the PWMM eigenvalue integral reduces to an explicit effective integral Z_DSL whose large-N saddle-point equations reproduce the electrostatic problem that determines the gravity dual of IIA little string theory on R×S⁵.

What carries the argument

The large-N₁ free-energy expansion of the localized eigenvalue integral, obtained from the loop equation for the resolvent of the largest representation; after the double-scaling truncation only the cosh potential and a universal interaction kernel survive, yielding Z_DSL.

Load-bearing premise

The remaining eigenvalues must stay much closer to the origin than the edge of the cloud being integrated out, so that only the leading exponential term in the interaction kernel matters and higher corrections can be dropped.

What would settle it

A direct Monte-Carlo evaluation of the original PWMM eigenvalue integral at large N₁ and λ₁ that fails to reproduce the predicted scaling of 1/4-BPS correlators with the single combination N₁ λ₁^{-5/8} exp(−π(8λ₁)^{1/4}/n₁), or a large-N₂ saddle of Z_DSL whose charge density does not solve the known electrostatic equation of the NS5 dual.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Weak-coupling expectation values of 1/4-BPS operators in LST become ordinary Gaussian matrix-model correlators expandable in powers of the fixed coupling g₀.
  • The same double-scaling procedure extends immediately to general multi-representation vacua, producing a family of eigenvalue integrals labelled by the residual NS5 and D2 fluxes.
  • Finite-n₁ corrections retained in the analytic solution supply string-scale and finite-NS5-charge corrections that can be compared with the gravity side.
  • An analogous limit is expected for other SU(2|4)-symmetric theories (SYM on R×S², R×S³/Z_k) and possibly for the polarized IKKT model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the final integral is an ordinary finite-dimensional matrix model, non-perturbative effects in g₀ (eigenvalue tunneling, resurgence) become accessible with standard matrix-model technology and could give the first controlled non-perturbative window into LST.
  • The factor-of-two mismatch noted between the weak-coupling action and the Euclidean D2-instanton action suggests that Z_DSL computes a bounce rather than a pure instanton; clarifying that dictionary would fix the precise relation between the matrix-model free energy and the NS5 probe-brane action.
  • If the same edge-regime Laplace-transform technique works for the polarized IKKT model, one would obtain a candidate matrix formulation of little string theory in a different background without ever invoking the gravity dual.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper gives an analytic, gauge-theory-side derivation of the double-scaling limit of the plane wave (BMN) matrix model that was previously predicted from gravity [10] and supported numerically [11]. Starting from the localization eigenvalue integral (2.5) for a fixed vacuum, the authors derive the finite-n loop equation (3.7) for the ν=1 theory, solve it at strong 't Hooft coupling in bulk and edge regimes using the methods of Volin and Marino–Reis (App. A, with numerical checks), and extract the edge resolvent (3.10). For ν≥2 they integrate out the N₁ eigenvalues of the largest SU(2) block: the hole/genus expansion of F(Y) is computed through F₀₁ (4.20) and F₀₂ (4.26), and in the limit (4.28) with N₁λ₁^{-5/8}e^{-π(8λ₁)^{1/4}/n₁} fixed, the integral reduces to an explicit effective eigenvalue integral Z_DSL (4.30), generalized to arbitrary vacua in (4.42). Its large-N₂ saddle equation (4.36)/(4.44) is shown to coincide with the electrostatic problem determining the gravity dual of IIA LST on R×S⁵, identifying g₀ with the maximum dilaton.

Significance. If correct, this is the first analytic proof on the gauge theory side that the PWMM admits the NS5-brane double-scaling limit, and it delivers a concrete, parameter-free eigenvalue integral proposed to describe the 1/4-BPS sector of type IIA little string theory — a theory with no known Lagrangian formulation. Strengths: the derivation is fully explicit and internal to the matrix model (gravity is used only for motivation and final identification, not inserted into the derivation); the strong-coupling resolvent analysis in App. A is carried out with the controlled bulk/edge matching technology of [12–14] and is checked numerically (Figs. 1–2); the result makes falsifiable contact with the known LST electrostatic saddle equations and with the predicted scaling of 1/N₁ corrections (λ₁^{5/8}e^{π(8λ₁)^{1/4}/n₁})ⁿ, previously seen only numerically. The instanton/bounce discussion in §5 gives an additional quantitative cross-check (factor-of-two relative to [16], with a plausible interpretation).

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.1.5, sentence above Eq. (4.27); also §4.1.4 below (4.24)] The reduction to Z_DSL rests on the assertion that all F_gh with g+h≥2 (and R^(1)_gh generally) 'should not exhibit exponential growth with respect to x_m for the same reason as R^(1)_gh(z)', justified only by the iterative loop-insertion relation to R₀₀, whose explicit evaluation the paper itself says 'seems to be difficult' (§4.1.1). This is load-bearing: F_gh enters (4.27) at order N₁^{2−2g−h}, so any coefficient growing as e^{+πx_m/n₁} would survive the limit (4.28) — e.g. a genus-1 zero-hole term would contribute at O(N₁⁰)·e^{πx_m/n₁} and destroy Z_DSL. The claim is physically plausible — exponential x_m-sensitivity can only enter through convolutions with the smearing kernel S_{n₁,n₂} (4.16), which decays as e^{-π|y−x|/n₁} and can only suppress, while higher-genus resolvents from the loop equation are built algebraically from R₀₀ and inherit at most power-law x_m behavior — but as
minor comments (6)
  1. [§4.1.3, below (4.18)] The truncation to the k=1 term of the kernel (4.17), based on |y_a| ≪ x_m, is in fact parametrically self-consistent, and it would reassure the reader to say so explicitly: the truncation itself generates the confining potential cosh(πy/n₁) in (4.20), whose typical scale is |y| ~ n₁ log(1/g₀), fixed in the limit (4.28), while x_m = (8λ₁)^{1/4} → ∞; moreover the dropped k≥2 terms enter (4.27) as N₁e^{−2πx_m/n₁} = (N₁e^{−πx_m/n₁})·e^{−πx_m/n₁} → 0 since the first factor is held fixed. A one-line remark to this effect would close the gap flagged below (4.3).
  2. [Eq. (4.19)] In the definition of A(n₁) the prefactor is written 16√2 n^{3/2}; n should be n₁ (section 4 uses n for nothing else, but the slip is confusing given that n denotes n₁ throughout §3).
  3. [Eq. (4.30)] The measure is written as a product over a̸=b of B(J, y_a−y_b) with B carrying a power 1/2; please state explicitly that the square root compensates the double counting (i.e. the product effectively runs over unordered pairs), and similarly for the k≥1 factors, so that the exponentiation of (4.29) — which has 1/2 Σ_{a̸=b} — is unambiguous.
  4. [§4.1.6, footnote 6] The compatibility of the subsequent n₁→∞ limit with the double scaling (4.28) is explained only in a compressed footnote (A(n₁) ~ √n₁, so the scaling variables are N₁/n₁ and λ₁^{1/4}/n₁). Given that the identification with the LST electrostatic problem is a central result, this deserves a few lines in the main text.
  5. [§4.1.5, second bullet] Grammar: 'does not affect on the calculation' → 'does not affect the calculation'. Also 'seems difficult in general' / 'furthermore to gain insights' (§5) could be smoothed.
  6. [References] Refs. [26] and [27] cite semanticscholar URLs rather than the journal DOIs; please use standard journal references.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: double-scaling form and Z_DSL are derived from the PWMM loop equation and edge resolvent, not inserted from gravity or by definition.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 4.1.6 / Eq. (4.36); Sec. 4.2 / Eq. (4.44); also Intro and Sec. 5]
    "This is exactly the same integral equation that determines the gravity dual of a nontrivial vacuum of LST, where ρ^{(2)}_{DSL,0}(y) corresponds to the charge distribution of a conducting disk in the associated electrostatic problem. It is then found that the fixed constant g0 in (4.28) corresponds to the same parameter g0 of the NS5-brane solution in [8, 11]"

    The identification of Z_DSL as describing the 1/4-BPS sector of LST, and of g0 as the max dilaton, rests on matching saddles to gravity results in the authors' prior [11] (and [8]). This is a consistency check after an independent gauge-theory derivation of Z_DSL, not a step that forces the form of the limit or the integral; it slightly elevates interpretive claims about LST but does not make the reduction of (4.1) to (4.30) circular.

full rationale

The central chain runs from the localization eigenvalue integral (2.5), through the finite-n loop equation (3.7) and its strong-coupling edge solution (3.10)/(A.41–A.42), to the free-energy pieces F01 and F02 (4.20, 4.26) obtained via the kernel identity (4.15)/(B.4), and finally to the combination held fixed in (4.28) that produces Z_DSL (4.30)/(4.42). That combination is read off from the computed coefficient of the cosh potential; it is not fitted to data and not defined to equal the gravity answer. Gravity duals and prior self-citations supply motivation, the original prediction of a limit, and a post-hoc identification of g0 and of the large-N2 saddles (4.36)/(4.44) with the electrostatic problem—standard holographic consistency checks, not inputs that force the gauge-theory reduction. The scale-separation assumption used to drop k≥2 kernel terms is parametrically self-consistent inside the same limit. The only soft spot is the unproven claim that higher F_gh cannot grow as e^{+π x_m/n1}, justified only by appeal to the iterative loop-insertion structure; that is a gap in rigor, not a circular reduction of the result to its inputs. Score 1 reflects routine non-load-bearing self-citation only.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the localization reduction of PWMM to an eigenvalue integral, standard large-N loop-equation technology, and a bulk/edge strong-coupling method imported from integrable-model literature. No numerical free parameters are fitted to produce the limit; g₀ is a fixed combination defined by the limit itself. Invented entities are not introduced: NS5/LST and the dual electrostatic problem are taken from the existing Lin–Maldacena framework.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Localization reduces the PWMM partition function and 1/4-BPS correlators of φ around a fixed SU(2) vacuum to the eigenvalue integral (2.5).
    Taken from Asano–Ishiki–Okada–Shimasaki 2013 [17]; used as the starting point of every calculation in §§3–4.
  • domain assumption In the large-N₁ limit the eigenvalue density of the largest representation has a single cut (one-cut solution).
    Stated explicitly after (3.5) and reused for ρ^{(1)}_{00}; multi-cut saddles are not analyzed.
  • ad hoc to paper Higher-genus and higher-hole free-energy coefficients F_{gh} (except F_{01}, F_{02}) do not grow exponentially with x_m=(8λ₁)^{1/4}, so they are negligible in the double-scaling limit.
    Argued in §4.1.5 via the iterative loop-insertion structure and the non-exponential growth of R^{(1)}_{00}; not proved to all orders.
  • standard math Bulk/edge matched asymptotic expansion solves the finite-n loop equation at large λ (method of Volin; Marino–Reis; Reichert–Ristivojevic).
    Imported technique applied in App. A to (3.7) and (3.12); standard for this class of singular integral equations.
  • domain assumption Classical PWMM vacua labeled by partitions of N are quantum-mechanically protected (16 supercharges).
    Used to justify studying the theory around each fixed vacuum; cited from Dasgupta–Sheikh-Jabbari–Van Raamsdonk and Lin.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 38820 in / 3349 out tokens · 76878 ms · 2026-07-31T00:46:46.538043+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

From the gauge/gravity duality, it was predicted that there exists a nontrivial double scaling limit of the plane wave matrix model (the BMN matrix model), which describes the type IIA little string theory (LST) on $R\times S^5$. We show on the gauge theory side that such a limit indeed exists for the partition function and in a certain 1/4 BPS sector of the matrix model, and consequently derive an eigenvalue integral, which is expected to describe the 1/4 BPS sector of LST.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25116 by Goro Ishiki, Shinji Shimasaki, Yuhma Asano.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The left figure displays the entire range of the eigenvalue distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The figure shows the perturbative edge-regime solutions of the eigenvalue distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 37 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges,

    J. Polchinski, “Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 4724–4727,arXiv:hep-th/9510017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  2. [2]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114,arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,

    N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,” Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 046004,arXiv:hep-th/9802042

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    A Brief review of ’little string theories’,

    O. Aharony, “A Brief review of ’little string theories’,” Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 929–938, arXiv:hep-th/9911147

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Introduction to little string theory,

    D. Kutasov, “Introduction to little string theory,” ICTP Lect. Notes Ser.7(2002) 165–209

    2002

  8. [8]

    Fivebranes from gauge theory,

    H. Lin and J. M. Maldacena, “Fivebranes from gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 084014, arXiv:hep-th/0509235

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  9. [9]

    Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,

    D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena, and H. S. Nastase, “Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,” JHEP04(2002) 013,arXiv:hep-th/0202021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  10. [10]

    Little string theory from a double-scaled matrix model,

    H. Ling, A. R. Mohazab, H.-H. Shieh, G. van Anders, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Little string theory from a double-scaled matrix model,” JHEP10(2006) 018,arXiv:hep-th/0606014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    On the existence of the NS5-brane limit of the plane wave matrix model,

    Y. Asano, G. Ishiki, T. Matsumoto, S. Shimasaki, and H. Watanabe, “On the existence of the NS5-brane limit of the plane wave matrix model,” PTEP2023no. 4, (2023) 043B01, arXiv:2211.13716 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Quantum integrability and functional equations: Applications to the spectral problem of AdS/CFT and two-dimensional sigma models,

    D. Volin, “Quantum integrability and functional equations: Applications to the spectral problem of AdS/CFT and two-dimensional sigma models,” J. Phys. A44(2011) 124003,arXiv:1003.4725 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  13. [13]

    Exact perturbative results for the Lieb-Liniger and Gaudin-Yang models,

    M. Marino and T. Reis, “Exact perturbative results for the Lieb-Liniger and Gaudin-Yang models,” arXiv:1905.09575 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  14. [14]

    Analytical results for the capacitance of a circular plate capacitor,

    B. Reichert and Z. Ristivojevic, “Analytical results for the capacitance of a circular plate capacitor,” Phys. Rev. Research.2(2020) 013289,arXiv:2001.01142 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Matrix perturbation theory for M theory on a PP wave,

    K. Dasgupta, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Matrix perturbation theory for M theory on a PP wave,” JHEP05(2002) 056,arXiv:hep-th/0205185

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  16. [16]

    Instantons, supersymmetric vacua, and emergent geometries,

    H. Lin, “Instantons, supersymmetric vacua, and emergent geometries,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 125013,arXiv:hep-th/0609186. 33

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [17]

    Exact results for perturbative partition functions of theories withSU(2|4) symmetry,

    Y. Asano, G. Ishiki, T. Okada, and S. Shimasaki, “Exact results for perturbative partition functions of theories withSU(2|4) symmetry,” JHEP02(2013) 148,arXiv:1211.0364 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Emergent bubbling geometries in the plane wave matrix model,

    Y. Asano, G. Ishiki, T. Okada, and S. Shimasaki, “Emergent bubbling geometries in the plane wave matrix model,” JHEP05(2014) 075,arXiv:1401.5079 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Emergent bubbling geometries in gauge theories with SU(2|4) symmetry,

    Y. Asano, G. Ishiki, and S. Shimasaki, “Emergent bubbling geometries in gauge theories with SU(2|4) symmetry,” JHEP09(2014) 137,arXiv:1406.1337 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Spherical transverse M5-branes in matrix theory,

    Y. Asano, G. Ishiki, S. Shimasaki, and S. Terashima, “Spherical transverse M5-branes in matrix theory,” Phys. Rev. D96no. 12, (2017) 126003,arXiv:1701.07140 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Spherical transverse M5-branes from the plane wave matrix model,

    Y. Asano, G. Ishiki, S. Shimasaki, and S. Terashima, “Spherical transverse M5-branes from the plane wave matrix model,” JHEP02(2018) 076,arXiv:1711.07681 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Exact analysis of an interacting Bose gas. 1. The General solution and the ground state,

    E. H. Lieb and W. Liniger, “Exact analysis of an interacting Bose gas. 1. The General solution and the ground state,” Phys. Rev.130(1963) 1605–1616

    1963

  23. [23]

    Exact Analysis of an Interacting Bose Gas. 2. The Excitation Spectrum,

    E. H. Lieb, “Exact Analysis of an Interacting Bose Gas. 2. The Excitation Spectrum,” Phys. Rev. 130(1963) 1616–1624

    1963

  24. [24]

    V. E. Korepin, N. M. Bogoliubov, and A. G. Izergin, Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Functions. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993

    1993

  25. [25]

    Quantum Giant Magnons,

    K. Zarembo, “Quantum Giant Magnons,” JHEP05(2008) 047,arXiv:0802.3681 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    The electrostatic field of two equal circular co-axial conducting disks,

    R. R. Love, “The electrostatic field of two equal circular co-axial conducting disks,” Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics2(1949) 428–451. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:120353413

    1949

  27. [27]

    The circular plate condenser at small separations,

    V. Hutson, “The circular plate condenser at small separations,” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society59(1963) 211 – 224. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:120683705

    1963

  28. [28]

    Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string theory,

    P. H. Ginsparg and G. W. Moore, “Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string theory,” in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, pp. 277–469. 10, 1993.arXiv:hep-th/9304011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  29. [29]

    Lectures on non-perturbative effects in largeNgauge theories, matrix models and strings,

    M. Mari˜ no, “Lectures on non-perturbative effects in largeNgauge theories, matrix models and strings,” Fortsch. Phys.62(2014) 455–540,arXiv:1206.6272 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Boundary correlation numbers in one matrix model,

    G. Ishiki and C. Rim, “Boundary correlation numbers in one matrix model,” Phys. Lett. B694 (2011) 272–277,arXiv:1006.3906 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Nonperturbative effects in matrix models and vacua of two-dimensional gravity,

    F. David, “Nonperturbative effects in matrix models and vacua of two-dimensional gravity,” Phys. Lett. B302(1993) 403–410,arXiv:hep-th/9212106

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  32. [32]

    The Strength of nonperturbative effects in string theory,

    S. H. Shenker, “The Strength of nonperturbative effects in string theory,” in Cargese Study Institute: Random Surfaces, Quantum Gravity and Strings, pp. 809–819. 8, 1990. 34

    1990

  33. [33]

    Loops versus matrices: The Nonperturbative aspects of noncritical string,

    M. Hanada, M. Hayakawa, N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, T. Kuroki, Y. Matsuo, and T. Tada, “Loops versus matrices: The Nonperturbative aspects of noncritical string,” Prog. Theor. Phys.112(2004) 131–181,arXiv:hep-th/0405076

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  34. [34]

    Higher genus correlators and W infinity from the Hermitian one matrix model,

    J. Ambjorn, L. Chekhov, and Y. Makeenko, “Higher genus correlators and W infinity from the Hermitian one matrix model,” Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 341–348,arXiv:hep-th/9203009

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  35. [35]

    Matrix model calculations beyond the spherical limit,

    J. Ambjørn, L. Chekhov, C. F. Kristjansen, and Y. Makeenko, “Matrix model calculations beyond the spherical limit,” Nucl. Phys. B404(1993) 127–172,arXiv:hep-th/9302014. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 449, 681–681 (1995)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  36. [36]

    Resurgence and 1/N Expansion in Integrable Field Theories,

    L. Di Pietro, M. Mari˜ no, G. Sberveglieri, and M. Serone, “Resurgence and 1/N Expansion in Integrable Field Theories,” JHEP10(2021) 166,arXiv:2108.02647 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    D-brane charges in five-brane backgrounds,

    J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and N. Seiberg, “D-brane charges in five-brane backgrounds,” JHEP 10(2001) 005,arXiv:hep-th/0108152

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  38. [38]

    D-brane instantons and K theory charges,

    J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and N. Seiberg, “D-brane instantons and K theory charges,” JHEP 11(2001) 062,arXiv:hep-th/0108100

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  39. [39]

    Little String Theory from Double-Scaling Limits of Field Theories,

    H. Ling, H.-H. Shieh, and G. van Anders, “Little String Theory from Double-Scaling Limits of Field Theories,” JHEP02(2007) 031,arXiv:hep-th/0611019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    Matrix strings in pp wave backgrounds from deformed superYang-Mills theory,

    G. Bonelli, “Matrix strings in pp wave backgrounds from deformed superYang-Mills theory,” JHEP 08(2002) 022,arXiv:hep-th/0205213

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  41. [41]

    A Large N reduced model as superstring,

    N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, “A Large N reduced model as superstring,” Nucl. Phys. B498(1997) 467–491,arXiv:hep-th/9612115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  42. [42]

    The polarised IKKT matrix model,

    S. A. Hartnoll and J. Liu, “The polarised IKKT matrix model,” JHEP03(2025) 060, arXiv:2409.18706 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Einstein gravity from a matrix integral – Part I,

    S. Komatsu, A. Martina, J. a. Penedones, A. Vuignier, and X. Zhao, “Einstein gravity from a matrix integral – Part I,”arXiv:2410.18173 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Einstein gravity from a matrix integral – Part II,

    S. Komatsu, A. Martina, J. Penedones, A. Vuignier, and X. Zhao, “Einstein gravity from a matrix integral – Part II,”arXiv:2411.18678 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Statistical Physics of the Polarised IKKT Matrix Model,

    S. A. Hartnoll and J. Liu, “Statistical Physics of the Polarised IKKT Matrix Model,” arXiv:2504.06481 [hep-th]. 35

    arXiv