REVIEW 1 cited by
Arrival time and Bohmian Mechanics: It is the theory which decides what we can measure
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Arrival time and Bohmian Mechanics: It is the theory which decides what we can measure
read the original abstract
In this work we analyze recent proposals by Das and D\"{u}rr (DD) to measure the arrival time distributions of quantum particles within the framework of de Broglie Bohm theory (or Bohmian mechanics). We also analyze the criticisms made by Goldstein Tumulka and Zangh\`{i} (GTZ) of these same proposals, and show that each protagonist is both right and wrong. In fine, we show that DD's predictions are indeed measurable in principle, but that they will not lead to violations of the no-signalling theorem used in Bell's theorem, in contradiction with some of Das and Maudlin's hopes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Arrival-time distributions as a probe of the preferred foliation in relativistic Bohmian mechanics
Arrival-time statistics in spacelike-separated EPRB measurements depend on their order relative to the preferred foliation, offering a detectable signature and implying superluminal signaling.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.