Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Powerful Design of Small Vision Transformer on CIFAR10

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.06220 v1 pith:HNDLU2FT submitted 2025-01-07 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords vitsdatasetsperformancecompressiondesignlow-ranksmalltiny
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision Transformers (ViTs) have demonstrated remarkable success on large-scale datasets, but their performance on smaller datasets often falls short of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). This paper explores the design and optimization of Tiny ViTs for small datasets, using CIFAR-10 as a benchmark. We systematically evaluate the impact of data augmentation, patch token initialization, low-rank compression, and multi-class token strategies on model performance. Our experiments reveal that low-rank compression of queries in Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA) incurs minimal performance loss, indicating redundancy in ViTs. Additionally, introducing multiple CLS tokens improves global representation capacity, boosting accuracy. These findings provide a comprehensive framework for optimizing Tiny ViTs, offering practical insights for efficient and effective designs. Code is available at https://github.com/erow/PoorViTs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Expansions in Vision Transformers for Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    KAN-based ViTs show slight average incremental accuracy gains over MLP-ViTs in continual learning, but the paper's own data show worse forgetting on CIFAR-100 and worse last-task accuracy on MNIST.

Pith tools