pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30759 · v1 · pith:HOMFAIC4new · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-ph

Quantum Information of Photon Pairs at Lepton Colliders

Kun Cheng , Tao Han , Guanghui Li , Bin Yan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords photon pairsBell inequalityquantum entanglementlepton colliderstwo-qubit descriptionphoton conversionquantum discordnonstabilizerness
0
0 comments X

The pith

A factorization framework and two-qubit model extract quantum information from photon pairs at lepton colliders.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates a factorization framework and effective two-qubit description to access quantum information encoded in photon pairs produced at lepton colliders. It exploits the photon conversion process for nearly on-shell photons to make the pairs amenable to this description. This enables estimates of Bell inequality violation and measurements of other quantum features using the existing Belle data set. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach extends entanglement studies from low-energy labs into the high-energy environment of particle colliders.

Core claim

Exploiting the photon conversion process for nearly on-shell photons, we formulate a factorization framework and an effective two-qubit description, which enable access to quantum information encoded in photon pairs. Using the existing Belle data set, we estimate that a 7.4σ violation of the Bell inequality could be achieved. The same framework can also probe quantum discord and nonstabilizerness, which could be measured with precisions of 5.6% and 1.6%, respectively. All the reconstructed results from photon conversion in the two-qubit framework are found to be consistent with the kinematic approach of real photons, and the formalism can apply to other spin-1 systems in an appropriate two-q

What carries the argument

The factorization framework and effective two-qubit description for photon pairs via the photon conversion process.

If this is right

  • A 7.4 sigma violation of the Bell inequality is achievable with the Belle data set.
  • Quantum discord can be measured with a precision of 5.6%.
  • Nonstabilizerness can be measured with a precision of 1.6%.
  • Reconstructed results remain consistent with the kinematic approach for real photons.
  • The formalism extends to other spin-1 systems in the two-qubit limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same framework could be applied to data from future lepton colliders to achieve higher precision on quantum measures.
  • This description may allow quantum information observables to be studied in other high-energy vector boson production processes.
  • It provides a route to test whether quantum discord or nonstabilizerness exhibit energy-dependent behavior in collider environments.

Load-bearing premise

The effective two-qubit description and factorization framework accurately capture the quantum state and information content of photon pairs produced at lepton colliders when using the photon conversion process for nearly on-shell photons.

What would settle it

An analysis of the Belle data set that yields a Bell inequality violation below 5 sigma significance or shows inconsistency between the two-qubit reconstruction and the kinematic approach would challenge the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30759 by Bin Yan, Guanghui Li, Kun Cheng, Tao Han.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams for photon-pair production at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spin analyzing power as a function of splitting kine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Reconstructed Bell variable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Reconstructed quantum discord [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Photon pairs have provided an ideal laboratory for exploring entanglement and Bell inequality violation in low-energy experiments. Extending such studies to high-energy colliders is of great interest but has yet to be explored. Exploiting the photon conversion process for nearly on-shell photons, we formulate a factorization framework and an effective two-qubit description, which enable access to quantum information encoded in photon pairs. Using the existing Belle data set, we estimate that a $7.4\sigma$ violation of the Bell inequality could be achieved. The same framework can also probe quantum discord and nonstabilizerness, which could be measured with precisions of 5.6\% and 1.6\%, respectively. All the reconstructed results from photon conversion in the two-qubit framework are found to be consistent with the kinematic approach of real photons, and the formalism can apply to other spin-1 systems in an appropriate two-qubit limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a factorization framework and effective two-qubit description for photon pairs at lepton colliders by exploiting the photon conversion process for nearly on-shell photons. It applies this to the existing Belle data set to estimate a 7.4σ violation of the Bell inequality, along with projected precisions of 5.6% for quantum discord and 1.6% for nonstabilizerness. The reconstructed results are stated to be consistent with a kinematic approach for real photons, and the formalism is claimed to extend to other spin-1 systems.

Significance. If the two-qubit reduction and factorization are shown to faithfully preserve the relevant coherences, the work would enable collider-based studies of quantum information measures in photon pairs using existing data, extending low-energy entanglement experiments to high energies. The explicit cross-check against the independent kinematic method for real photons is a positive feature that strengthens the internal consistency claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [section formulating the effective two-qubit description and factorization framework] The central 7.4σ Bell violation estimate and the discord/nonstabilizerness precision projections rest on the factorization framework plus two-qubit reduction accurately reconstructing the photon-pair density matrix from conversion events. The manuscript must supply an explicit derivation (in the section defining the effective two-qubit description) showing how the conversion amplitude maps the full QED helicity amplitudes onto the two-qubit basis while preserving off-diagonal coherences at Belle kinematics; the abstract's statement of consistency with the kinematic approach does not substitute for this step.
  2. [application to Belle data set and numerical estimates] No derivation steps, error analysis, or validation details are supplied for the numerical 7.4σ figure or the quoted precisions; without these, it is not possible to assess whether the projections follow from the stated framework or incorporate realistic experimental uncertainties in the Belle data set.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We agree that the two major comments identify areas where the manuscript requires additional explicit content to support its central claims. We will revise the paper to address both points fully.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [section formulating the effective two-qubit description and factorization framework] The central 7.4σ Bell violation estimate and the discord/nonstabilizerness precision projections rest on the factorization framework plus two-qubit reduction accurately reconstructing the photon-pair density matrix from conversion events. The manuscript must supply an explicit derivation (in the section defining the effective two-qubit description) showing how the conversion amplitude maps the full QED helicity amplitudes onto the two-qubit basis while preserving off-diagonal coherences at Belle kinematics; the abstract's statement of consistency with the kinematic approach does not substitute for this step.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the mapping from the full QED helicity amplitudes through the conversion amplitude to the two-qubit density matrix. The derivation will explicitly track the off-diagonal coherences and demonstrate their preservation at Belle kinematics, using the same photon-conversion process already employed in the paper. This will replace reliance on the abstract-level consistency statement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [application to Belle data set and numerical estimates] No derivation steps, error analysis, or validation details are supplied for the numerical 7.4σ figure or the quoted precisions; without these, it is not possible to assess whether the projections follow from the stated framework or incorporate realistic experimental uncertainties in the Belle data set.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of these details. The revised version will include the full step-by-step calculation of the 7.4σ Bell violation from the Belle data set, together with the error propagation that incorporates the reported experimental uncertainties. The same level of detail will be provided for the 5.6% and 1.6% precision projections on quantum discord and nonstabilizerness, including how the two-qubit framework propagates statistical and systematic errors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper formulates a factorization framework and effective two-qubit description as a new construction, then reports that reconstructed results are consistent with an independent kinematic approach for real photons. No load-bearing step reduces by definition or self-citation to its own inputs; the Bell-violation estimate and quantum-information projections are presented as outputs of the formulated framework rather than tautological re-expressions of fitted parameters or prior self-referential results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters or invented entities. The two-qubit limit is treated as an effective description whose validity is assumed rather than derived from first principles.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Photon conversion for nearly on-shell photons permits an accurate effective two-qubit description of the pair state.
    This premise is required for the factorization framework to grant access to quantum information quantities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5681 in / 1378 out tokens · 53320 ms · 2026-07-01T01:54:21.182440+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The same event selection as in the Belle analysis is adopted, except for a tighter requirementm ee <0.2 GeV to further suppress backgrounds

    at √s= 3.773 GeV using theeechannel, since the two-qubit approximation breaks down for the muon final state. The same event selection as in the Belle analysis is adopted, except for a tighter requirementm ee <0.2 GeV to further suppress backgrounds. Using the currently ac- 5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 ccut 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 D (a) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 ccut -0.1 ...

  2. [2]

    C. S. Wu and I. Shaknov, Phys. Rev.77, 136 (1950)

    1950

  3. [3]

    S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 938 (1972)

    1972

  4. [4]

    L. R. Kasday, J. D. Ullman, and C.-S. Wu, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)25, 633 (1975)

    1971

  5. [5]

    Aspect, J

    A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982)

    1982

  6. [6]

    Weihs, T

    G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Physical Review Letters81, 5039–5043 (1998)

    1998

  7. [7]

    Afik and J

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 907 (2021), arXiv:2003.02280 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, and G. Panizzo, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 161801 (2021), arXiv:2102.11883 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Severi, C

    C. Severi, C. D. E. Boschi, F. Maltoni, and M. Sioli, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 285 (2022), arXiv:2110.10112 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Quantum informa- tion with top quarks in QCD,

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova, Quantum6, 820 (2022), arXiv:2203.05582 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC,

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 221801 (2023), arXiv:2209.03969 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    T. Han, M. Low, and T. A. Wu, JHEP07, 192 (2024), arXiv:2310.17696 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 666 (2022), arXiv:2205.00542 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Z. Dong, D. Gon¸ calves, K. Kong, and A. Navarro, Phys. Rev. D109, 115023 (2024), arXiv:2305.07075 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han, and M. Low, Phys. Rev. D109, 116005 (2024), arXiv:2311.09166 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han, and M. Low, Phys. Rev. D111, 033004 (2025), arXiv:2407.01672 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    T. Han, M. Low, N. McGinnis, and S. Su, JHEP05, 081 (2025), arXiv:2412.21158 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Y. Afik, R. Demina, A. Herrera, O. Heinz Hin- drichs, J. R. M. de Nova, and B. Ravina, (2026), arXiv:2602.15115 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    M. M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari, and K. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. D107, 093002 (2023), arXiv:2211.10513 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Ehat¨ aht, M

    K. Ehat¨ aht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola, and C. Veelken, Phys. Rev. D109, 032005 (2024), arXiv:2311.17555 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Ma and T

    K. Ma and T. Li, Chin. Phys. C48, 103105 (2024), arXiv:2309.08103 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Fabbrichesi and L

    M. Fabbrichesi and L. Marzola, Phys. Rev. D110, 076004 (2024), arXiv:2405.09201 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    T. Han, M. Low, and Y. Su, (2025), arXiv:2501.04801 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    R. A. Morales, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 581 (2024), arXiv:2403.18023 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality in $\tau^+ \tau^-$ at the LHC using Machine Learning for Neutrino Reconstruction

    Y. Zhang, B.-H. Zhou, Q.-B. Liu, S. Li, S.-C. Hsu, T. Han, M. Low, and T. A. Wu, (2025), arXiv:2504.01496 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    T. Ai, Q. Bi, Y. He, J. Liu, and X.-P. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 241804 (2025), arXiv:2506.10673 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    A. J. Barr, Phys. Lett. B825, 136866 (2022), arXiv:2106.01377 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    A. J. Barr, P. Caban, and J. Rembieli´ nski, Quantum 7, 1070 (2023), arXiv:2204.11063 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Ashby-Pickering, A

    R. Ashby-Pickering, A. J. Barr, and A. Wierzchucka, JHEP05, 020 (2023), arXiv:2209.13990 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Bernal, J. A. Casas, and J. M. Moreno, Phys. Rev. D107, 016012 (2023), arXiv:2209.13441 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Mar- zola, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 823 (2023), arXiv:2302.00683 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Fabbri, J

    F. Fabbri, J. Howarth, and T. Maurin, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 20 (2024), arXiv:2307.13783 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Bi, Q.-H

    Q. Bi, Q.-H. Cao, K. Cheng, and H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D109, 036022 (2024), arXiv:2307.14895 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    R. A. Morales, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 1157 (2023), arXiv:2306.17247 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Bernal, P

    A. Bernal, P. Caban, and J. Rembieli´ nski, Sci. Rep.15, 23410 (2025), arXiv:2405.16525 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Grossi, G

    M. Grossi, G. Pelliccioli, and A. Vicini, JHEP12, 120 (2024), arXiv:2409.16731 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Gon¸ calves, A

    D. Gon¸ calves, A. Kaladharan, F. Krauss, and A. Navarro, (2025), arXiv:2505.12125 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Gon¸ calves, A

    D. Gon¸ calves, A. Kaladharan, and A. Navarro, (2025), arXiv:2506.19951 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Phys. Rev. D107, 076016 (2023), arXiv:2209.14033 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 969 (2025), arXiv:2505.11870 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    R. Ding, A. Ruzi, S. Qian, A. Levin, Y. Wu, and Q. Li, (2025), arXiv:2504.09832 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), (2026), arXiv:2603.26463 [hep- ex]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), (2026), arXiv:2603.26463 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Du, X.-G

    Y. Du, X.-G. He, C.-W. Liu, and J.-P. Ma, (2024), arXiv:2409.15418 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Y. Afik, Y. Kats, J. R. M. de Nova, A. Soffer, and D. Uzan, Phys. Rev. D111, L111902 (2025), arXiv:2406.04402 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    S. Chen, Y. Nakaguchi, and S. Komamiya, PTEP2013, 063A01 (2013), arXiv:1302.6438 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [46]

    J. Pei, X. Hao, X. Wang, and T. Li, (2025), arXiv:2505.09931 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    J. Pei, T. Li, L. Wu, X. Hao, and X. Wang, (2025), arXiv:2510.08031 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Fucilla and Y

    M. Fucilla and Y. Hatta, Phys. Rev. D113, L031504 (2026), arXiv:2509.05267 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Cheng and B

    K. Cheng and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 011902 (2025), arXiv:2501.03321 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Lin, M.-J

    S.-J. Lin, M.-J. Liu, D. Y. Shao, and S.-Y. Wei, (2025), arXiv:2507.15387 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han, M. Low, and T. A. Wu, (2025), arXiv:2507.12513 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Y.-C. Guo, T. Han, M. Low, and Y. Su, (2026), arXiv:2602.02719 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Y.-J. Fang, A. Bhoonah, K. Cheng, T. Han, Y. Liu, and 7 H. Zhang, (2026), arXiv:2604.11887 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    W. Qi, Z. Guo, and B.-W. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D113, 054048 (2026), arXiv:2506.12889 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han, and S. Trifinopoulos, (2025), arXiv:2510.23773 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Hatta and J

    Y. Hatta and J. Schoenleber, Phys. Rev. D113, 094016 (2026), arXiv:2511.04537 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    A. Ruzi, Y. Wu, R. Ding, and Q. Li, Chin. Phys. C50, 023103 (2026), arXiv:2506.16077 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Q.-H. Cao, G. Li, X.-K. Wen, and B. Yan, (2025), arXiv:2509.18276 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    H.-L. Feng, H. Tang, W.-z. Guo, and Q. Qin, Phys. Rev. D112, 036020 (2025), arXiv:2504.15798 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Quantum entanglement in electron-nucleus collisions: Role of the linearly polarized gluon distribution

    M. Fucilla, Y. Hatta, and B.-W. Xiao, (2026), arXiv:2604.11697 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Manipulating Bell nonlocality and entanglement in polarized electron-positron annihilation

    H.-W. Zhang, X. Cao, and T.-F. Feng, (2026), arXiv:2602.10389 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Y.-X. Liu, W. Qi, L.-T. He, and B.-W. Xiao, (2026), arXiv:2604.17756 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    D. Wang, X. Hao, L. Liu, L. Wu, and T. Li, (2026), arXiv:2605.13250 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Quantum Tomography and Entanglement in Semi-Leptonic $h\to VV^*$ Decays at Higher Orders

    D. Gon¸ calves, A. Kaladharan, and A. Navarro, (2026), arXiv:2604.16218 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Spin-flavor entanglement in $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda D$ and weak phase extraction

    Y. Du, C.-Q. Geng, X.-G. He, C.-W. Liu, S.-L. Liu, and X.-Y. Liu, (2026), arXiv:2605.09682 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    B. Yang, Y. Zhang, Z. S. Wang, and X. Zhou, (2026), arXiv:2603.05846 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    C. Li, X. Cao, A.-Q. Guo, C.-X. Yu, H.-W. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, (2026), arXiv:2602.10398 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    J. Pei, L. Wu, D. Wang, X. Hao, and T. Li, (2026), arXiv:2601.15748 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  69. [69]

    J. Pei, L. Wu, T. Li, and X. Hao, (2026), arXiv:2601.15747 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of quantum entanglement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector, Nature633, 542 (2024), arXiv:2311.07288 [hep-ex]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Nature633, 542 (2024), arXiv:2311.07288 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in proton–proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Rept

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Rept. Prog. Phys.87, 117801 (2024), arXiv:2406.03976 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    J. S. Bell, Physics Physique Fizika1, 195 (1964)

    1964

  73. [73]

    S. A. Abel, M. Dittmar, and H. K. Dreiner, Phys. Lett. B280, 304 (1992)

    1992

  74. [74]

    S. Li, W. Shen, and J. M. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1195 (2024), arXiv:2401.01162 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Bechtle, C

    P. Bechtle, C. Breuning, H. K. Dreiner, and C. Duhr, (2025), arXiv:2507.15947 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    S. A. Abel, H. K. Dreiner, R. Sengupta, and L. Ubaldi, (2025), arXiv:2507.15949 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Low, Phys

    M. Low, Phys. Rev. D112, 096008 (2025), arXiv:2508.10979 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, J. A. Casas, and J. M. Moreno, (2026), arXiv:2603.19389 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    Afiket al., Eur

    Y. Afiket al., Eur. Phys. J. Plus140, 855 (2025), arXiv:2504.00086 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han, and M. Low, Phys. Lett. B868, 139675 (2025), arXiv:2410.08303 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.