Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

PropaInsight: Toward Deeper Understanding of Propaganda in Terms of Techniques, Appeals, and Intent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.18997 v2 pith:HOYZWIOZ submitted 2024-09-19 cs.CL cs.AIcs.SI

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.SI
keywords propagandaanalysisdatapropagazepropainsighttechniquesappealshigher
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Propaganda plays a critical role in shaping public opinion and fueling disinformation. While existing research primarily focuses on identifying propaganda techniques, it lacks the ability to capture the broader motives and the impacts of such content. To address these challenges, we introduce propainsight, a conceptual framework grounded in foundational social science research, which systematically dissects propaganda into techniques, arousal appeals, and underlying intent. propainsight offers a more granular understanding of how propaganda operates across different contexts. Additionally, we present propagaze, a novel dataset that combines human-annotated data with high-quality synthetic data generated through a meticulously designed pipeline. Our experiments show that off-the-shelf LLMs struggle with propaganda analysis, but training with propagaze significantly improves performance. Fine-tuned Llama-7B-Chat achieves 203.4% higher text span IoU in technique identification and 66.2% higher BertScore in appeal analysis compared to 1-shot GPT-4-Turbo. Moreover, propagaze complements limited human-annotated data in data-sparse and cross-domain scenarios, showing its potential for comprehensive and generalizable propaganda analysis.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automating Financial Statement Audits with Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A five-stage benchmark shows LLMs detect financial statement errors well but fail at explanation, standards citation, and statement revision.

Pith tools