Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MFC-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Fact-Checking with Large Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11288 v3 pith:HP2FXBTN submitted 2024-06-17 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords mfc-benchlvlmsmultimodalmodelsfact-checkingcontentfactuallarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have significantly improved multimodal reasoning tasks, such as visual question answering and image captioning. These models embed multimodal facts within their parameters, rather than relying on external knowledge bases to store factual information explicitly. However, the content discerned by LVLMs may deviate from factuality due to inherent bias or incorrect inference. To address this issue, we introduce MFC-Bench, a rigorous and comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the factual accuracy of LVLMs across three stages of verdict prediction for MFC: Manipulation, Out-of-Context, and Veracity Classification. Through our evaluation on MFC-Bench, we benchmarked a dozen diverse and representative LVLMs, uncovering that current models still fall short in multimodal fact-checking and demonstrate insensitivity to various forms of manipulated content. We hope that MFC-Bench could raise attention to the trustworthy AI potentially assisted by LVLMs in the future. The MFC-Bench and accompanying resources are publicly accessible at https://github.com/wskbest/MFC-Bench, contributing to ongoing research in the multimodal fact-checking field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MMOOC: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Out-of-Context Evaluation in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MMOOC, a 41K-pair benchmark, shows current multimodal LLMs struggle to both refuse truly out-of-context questions and correctly answer questions that remain answerable despite misleading or shifted context.

  2. LocalSearchBench: Benchmarking Agentic Search in Real-World Local Life Services

    cs.AI 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LocalSearchBench—1.3M merchant records and 900 multi-hop local-life QA tasks across 9 Chinese cities—shows the best reasoning agent reaches only 35.6% correctness.

  3. RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new 6K-claim benchmark evaluates LLMs and multimodal LLMs on real-world fact-checking with an explicit 'unknown' option and shows web search and multimodal input improve performance.

  4. RAMA: Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Agent Framework for Misinformation Detection in Multimodal Fact-Checking

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    RAMA, a retrieval-augmented multi-agent detector, reports 0.910 accuracy and F1 on the ICMR 2024 public test set, placing it behind the top published method on the same benchmark.

Pith tools