Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

InfinityMATH: A Scalable Instruction Tuning Dataset in Programmatic Mathematical Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.07089 v1 pith:HPFQJ35S submitted 2024-08-09 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords infinitymathmathematicalmodelsdatadatasetinstructionreasoningtuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT) and Program-of-Thoughts (PoT) methods have greatly enhanced language models' mathematical reasoning capabilities, facilitating their integration into instruction tuning datasets with LLMs. However, existing methods for large-scale dataset creation require substantial seed data and high computational costs for data synthesis, posing significant challenges for scalability. We introduce InfinityMATH, a scalable instruction tuning dataset for programmatic mathematical reasoning. The construction pipeline emphasizes decoupling numbers from mathematical problems to synthesize number-independent programs, enabling efficient and flexible scaling while minimizing dependency on specific numerical values. Fine-tuning experiments with open-source language and code models, such as Llama2 and CodeLlama, demonstrate the practical benefits of InfinityMATH. These fine-tuned models, showed significant relative improvements on both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks, ranging from 184.7% to 514.3% on average. Additionally, these models exhibited high robustness on the GSM8K+ and MATH+ benchmarks, which are enhanced version of test sets with simply the number variations. InfinityMATH ensures that models are more versatile and effective across a broader range of mathematical problems. The data is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/flagopen/InfinityMATH.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AIMO-2 Winning Solution: Building State-of-the-Art Mathematical Reasoning Models with OpenMathReasoning dataset

    cs.AI 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A three-part recipe, built from a 540K-problem open dataset, long reasoning distillations, tool-integrated reasoning, and GenSelect, produces open-weight models that top most math-reasoning baselines and win AIMO-2.

  2. DeepDistill: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities via Large-Scale Difficulty-Graded Data Training

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-stage SFT recipe using pass-rate and coefficient-of-variation based data selection from a 40M-response distilled dataset lifts Qwen2.5-72B to 79.2% on AIME2024, nearly matching RL-trained reasoning models.

  3. Valley2: Exploring Multimodal Models with Scalable Vision-Language Design

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Valley2, a 7B-scale open-source multimodal model, reports second-best OpenCompass average (67.4) among sub-10B models and the highest score (79.66) on its own in-house Ecom-VQA benchmark.

  4. Exploring the Potential of Offline RL for Reasoning in LLMs: A Preliminary Study

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Applying LD-DPO to the DeepDistill-32B model improves average benchmark scores by 3.3 points, but the gains are uneven, the tables are inconsistent, and the evidence is preliminary.

Pith tools