REVIEW 2 cited by
Uncertainty measures: The big picture
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Probability theory is far from being the most general mathematical theory of uncertainty. A number of arguments point at its inability to describe second-order ('Knightian') uncertainty. In response, a wide array of theories of uncertainty have been proposed, many of them generalisations of classical probability. As we show here, such frameworks can be organised into clusters sharing a common rationale, exhibit complex links, and are characterised by different levels of generality. Our goal is a critical appraisal of the current landscape in uncertainty theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Epistemic Wrapping for Uncertainty Quantification
A Bayesian weight posterior is wrapped into a belief-function posterior via interval masses and a fitted Dirichlet distribution, then used to initialize a Hybrid Interval Neural Network, with reported accuracy and OOD...
-
Epistemic Artificial Intelligence is Essential for Machine Learning Models to Truly 'Know When They Do Not Know'
Machine learning should use second-order uncertainty measures, such as credal sets and random sets, so models can explicitly represent ignorance and avoid overconfident predictions on unfamiliar data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.