Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

A generator of forward neutrons for ultra-peripheral collisions: $\textbf{n$\mathbf{_O^O}$n}$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The nOOn Monte Carlo program generates, event by event, the forward neutrons produced by electromagnetic dissociation in ultra-peripheral heavy-ion collisions.

desk verdict A useful UPC neutron generator that fills a real gap, but with an unvalidated high-energy extrapolation and no end-to-end benchmark against measured EMD data; worth peer review after that gap is addressed. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08263 v1 pith:HRA3N2YT submitted 2019-08-22 nucl-th hep-ph

M. Broz , J. G. Contreras , J. D. Tapia Takaki This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-ph
keywords ultra-peripheralcollisionsforwardneutronselectromagneticdissociationMonteCarlogeneratorphotonuclearcrosssectionsvectormesonphotoproductionnuclearbreak-upheavy-ion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a Monte Carlo program called nOOn (noon) for ultra-peripheral collisions, in which two heavy nuclei pass without touching and interact through photon exchange. It generates, event by event, the forward neutrons that are produced when such an interaction excites one or both nuclei and they break up. The motivation is that experiments use these neutrons as triggers and as tags to separate the two photon-energy solutions in vector-meson photoproduction, so simulations need them included. nOOn builds neutron emission from measured photonuclear cross sections and a few modelling assumptions, and can be attached to existing vector-meson event generators or to theoretical photonuclear cross-section predictions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the nOOn program itself, a C++ Monte Carlo generator for events with forward neutrons. Its load-bearing mechanism is the combination of three impact-parameter-dependent probabilities: the hard photoproduction probability $P_P(b)$, the nuclear break-up probability $P_{ij}(b)$, factorised as $P_i(b) P_j(b)$ and constructed from Poisson-distributed, independent Coulomb excitations, and the no-hadronic-interaction factor $\exp(-P_H(b))$; these are weighted by the semi-classical photon flux to assign neutron multiplicities for a given photon energy. The energy behaviour is carried by a branching-ratio map obtained by extrapolating the measured mean and dispersion of neutron multiplicity logarithmically up to photon energies of $10^9$ MeV, supplemented by a Gaussian approximation for the multiplicity shape and evaluated nuclear data tables for neutron energies.

What would settle it

Compare the generator's predicted fractions of events with 0, 1, or many forward neutrons against measured forward-neutron multiplicities in Pb-Pb ultra-peripheral collisions at LHC energies; a disagreement that grows with photon energy would falsify the logarithmic extrapolation from 140 MeV to $10^9$ MeV.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

nOOn claims to supply complete per-event simulation of the forward neutrons from Coulomb break-up in ultra-peripheral heavy-ion collisions. It starts from measured total and partial photonuclear cross sections for 208Pb, builds impact-parameter-dependent probabilities for each nucleus to emit any number of neutrons, treats multiple photon exchanges as independent Poisson excitations, and factorises the two sides. The photon-energy dependence is handled by a branching-ratio map built from a logarithmic extrapolation of the measured mean and dispersion of neutron multiplicity, with a Gaussian shape for the multiplicity distribution; neutron energies are sampled from evaluated nuclear data and then boosted to the laboratory frame. The output is a standard list of particles per event, ready for detector simulation.

Load-bearing premise

The generator assumes that the average and spread of neutron multiplicity, measured only up to photon energies of 140 MeV, continue to grow logarithmically all the way to about $10^9$ MeV; if that extrapolation is wrong, the produced neutron multiplicities at LHC energies will be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Simulated ultra-peripheral collision events can now include realistic forward-neutron signals, allowing trigger and acceptance studies for neutron-based selectors.
  • Vector-meson measurements can be separated into 0n0n, 0nXn, and XnXn neutron-tag classes, which helps pin down the photon energy when rapidity alone is ambiguous.
  • Theoretical photonuclear cross sections can be expanded into rapidity-dependent, neutron-tagged cross-section predictions, as the paper demonstrates for rho0 and J/psi.
  • The same program structure applies to other photon-induced processes in ultra-peripheral collisions, such as jet production and light-by-light scattering.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the neutron tag effectively selects the photon energy, this generator could also be used to correct the acceptance of forward J/psi measurements, not just to build triggers; the paper does not develop that use.
  • The Poisson and independence assumptions could be tested directly against measured forward-neutron multiplicity distributions from LHC Pb-Pb runs, a comparison the paper does not include.
  • The Gaussian shape used above 140 MeV is an interpolation; data at intermediate photon energies would either validate it or force a more detailed shape model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents nOOn, a ROOT-based Monte Carlo generator that produces forward neutrons from electromagnetic dissociation (EMD) in ultra-peripheral collisions (UPC) of heavy ions. The generator computes nuclear break-up probabilities using measured photoneutron cross sections, a logarithmic extrapolation of the mean and dispersion of neutron multiplicity from 140 MeV to 1e9 MeV, a Gaussian approximation for the multiplicity shape, and a Poisson-based convolution of multiple excitations with truncation and renormalisation. It can be used either as an afterburner for the STARlight generator or with theoretical photonuclear cross sections as input, and it outputs final-state neutrons in a TTree format. The paper includes examples for coherent rho0 and J/psi production and discusses the implementation details and program flow.

Significance. If the generator is validated, it fills a practical gap: STARlight, the most commonly used UPC Monte Carlo, does not produce final-state neutrons, while nOOn does, and it is designed for straightforward integration with the simulation frameworks of RHIC and LHC experiments. The paper's strengths are that it builds on established measured data for the GDR region, uses evaluated nuclear data from ENDF, and provides an open-source, GPL-licensed program with reproducible event-by-event output. The central physics risk is the large extrapolation of neutron-multiplicity parameters from 140 MeV to LHC energies and the absence of a direct end-to-end comparison of the generator output to measured Pb-Pb EMD data, which leaves the quantitative reliability of the generated neutron multiplicities at LHC conditions conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1, Fig. 7] The mean and dispersion of the neutron multiplicity are fitted to data only up to 140 MeV and then extrapolated logarithmically to 1e9 MeV, while at LHC energies a non-negligible fraction of the EMD cross section comes from photons above the fitted region. The only validation shown is the comparison to the RELDIS model in Fig. 7, not a comparison of nOOn output to a measured Pb-Pb observable. The paper should add a quantitative validation against the ALICE EMD cross-section measurement (Ref. [23]) or, at minimum, provide an estimate of the systematic uncertainty propagated from the extrapolation to the generated multiplicities.
  2. [Section 2.3, Eqs. (12) and (20), Fig. 5] The Poisson assumption for the number of Coulomb excitations (Eq. (12)) is introduced without justification, and the renormalisation procedure shown in Fig. 5 indicates that about 20% of the break-up probability is lost at small impact parameters before renormalisation. The claim that increasing the number of excitations to six would not significantly change predictions is not demonstrated quantitatively. Since the renormalisation reshapes the multiplicity distribution and could affect the impact-parameter dependence used in Eq. (10), the paper should justify the Poisson ansatz and quantify the effect of the truncation and renormalisation on, for example, the 0n0n and XnXn fractions.
  3. [Section 3.1, Fig. 8] The Gaussian shape of the neutron multiplicity distribution is inferred from deconvoluted data at only two photon energies, 199 and 390 MeV, as shown in Fig. 8. This Gaussian shape is then applied over the entire extrapolated range up to 1e9 MeV in constructing the branching-ratio map of Fig. 9. The paper should discuss whether the Gaussian approximation remains reasonable at higher photon energies where additional reaction channels open, and ideally compare the branching-ratio map with the predictions of a model such as RELDIS over a wider energy range.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1] The fit function for the logarithmic extrapolation of the mean and dispersion is described only verbally; the explicit functional form and the fit parameters should be stated in the text or in an appendix for reproducibility.
  2. [Program Summary and Abstract] The program is currently restricted to Pb only, yet the abstract and introduction refer to RHIC as a target application. The restriction should be stated more prominently in the abstract, or an indication of planned support for other nuclei (e.g., Au) should be given.
  3. [Section 4, 'Particle generation'] For photon energies above 140 MeV, the last bin of the ENDF emission spectrum is reused; the potential effect of this approximation on the generated neutron energies and on the response of zero-degree calorimeters should be commented on.
  4. [Fig. 13] The numerical labels in the heatmap of Fig. 13 are difficult to read at the published size; increasing the font size or using a different colour scale would improve readability.
  5. [Section 2, Eq. (6)] The photon flux expression contains a term proportional to 1/gamma^2 K0^2; the text says K1 is a Bessel function but does not state the order of K0, which is clear from context but should be specified for completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the generator's inputs are external measured/evaluated data and its outputs are simulated events; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the honest sense: the paper builds a Monte Carlo from external empirical inputs and does not tune those inputs to the tool's own output. The central equations (Eq. 7, Eq. 10, Eq. 14) combine the semi-classical photon flux with break-up probabilities obtained from measured photoneutron cross sections and evaluated nuclear data, which are all independent of the generated events. The neutron-multiplicity model is explicitly an extrapolation, not a hidden fit to the target: the text states that 'the average and dispersion, as a function of photon energy, was fitted to a logarithm and extrapolated to higher energies' (Sec. 3.1), and the result is checked against RELDIS and against measured multiplicity shapes at 199 and 390 MeV. The Program Summary openly says the code 'computes the probability of neutron emission based on existing measurements and some mild modelling; it then generates neutrons in a per-event basis.' There is no quantity labeled a prediction that is, by construction, equal to an input. The absence of an end-to-end comparison of nOOn output to ALICE EMD data is a validation gap and a correctness risk concerning the high-energy extrapolation, but it is not circular reasoning: the extrapolated model is not fitted to the ALICE result, and the generator's central claim is conditional rather than tautological.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The generator rests on external photoneutron cross-section data, ENDF evaluated spectra, and standard equivalent-photon and Poisson-statistics formalism. The only genuinely new modeling choices are the logarithmic extrapolation of average and dispersion of neutron multiplicity above 140 MeV, the Gaussian shape assumption, and numerical truncation with renormalisation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Mean neutron multiplicity log-extrapolation parameters = Not reported in paper
    Fit to measured multiplicity averages up to 140 MeV; extrapolated to 1e9 MeV to build branching ratios in Section 3.1.
  • Dispersion of neutron multiplicity log-extrapolation parameters = Not reported in paper
    Fit to measured multiplicity dispersion up to 140 MeV; used with Gaussian shape assumption for the branching-ratio map in Fig. 9.
  • Truncation limits: 50 neutrons and 5 excitations = 50 neutrons, 5 excitations
    Computational cutoffs in Section 2.3; renormalisation restores approximate unitarity.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Poisson statistics for multiple independent Coulomb excitations, Eq. (12)-(13)
    Used to convert the mean excitation number into probabilities for exactly L emitted neutrons.
  • standard math Equivalent photon approximation with semi-classical photon flux, Eq. (6)
    Standard result used in Eq. (5) and Eq. (14) to compute photon fluxes and excitation probabilities.
  • domain assumption Independence of hard photoproduction and electromagnetic dissociation
    Introduced in Eq. (1) and Eq. (11); the break-up probability factorises as Pij(b) = Pi(b) x Pj(b).
  • domain assumption Woods-Saxon nuclear density profile for 208Pb
    Used in the hadronic survival probability exp(-PH(b)) in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption Regge parametrisation of total photonuclear cross section above 16.4 GeV
    Extends the total cross section in Fig. 2 to LHC energies, as described in Section 2.3.
  • ad hoc to paper Logarithmic extrapolation of mean and dispersion of neutron multiplicity above 140 MeV
    No partial cross-section data exist above 140 MeV; the paper fits to 30-140 MeV data and extrapolates to 1e9 MeV.
  • ad hoc to paper Gaussian approximation for neutron multiplicity distribution at fixed photon energy
    Unfolded measured shapes at 199 and 390 MeV are consistent with Gaussians; used to build the branching-ratio map in Fig. 9.
  • ad hoc to paper Truncation of sums at 50 neutrons and 5 excitations with renormalisation to P_Xn
    Practical cutoff in Section 2.3; renormalisation ensures approximate unitarity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A generator of forward neutrons for ultra-peripheral collisions: $\textbf{n$\mathbf{_O^O}$n}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HRA3N2YT

@misc{pith2026190808263,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A generator of forward neutrons for ultra-peripheral collisions: $\textbfn$\mathbf_O^O$n$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HRA3N2YT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08263}
}
abstract

The study of photon-induced reactions in collisions of heavy nuclei at RHIC and the LHC has become an important direction of the research program of these facilities in recent years. In particular, the production of vector mesons in ultra-peripheral collisions (UPC) has been intensively studied. Owing to the intense photon fluxes, the two nuclei participating in such processes undergo electromagnetic dissociation producing neutrons at beam rapidities. Here, we introduce the $\textbf{n$\mathbf{_O^O}$n}$ (pronounced noon) Monte Carlo program, which generates events containing such neutrons. $\textbf{n$\mathbf{_O^O}$n}$ is a ROOT based program that can be interfaced with existing generators of vector meson production in UPC or with theoretical calculations of such photonuclear processes. $\textbf{n$\mathbf{_O^O}$n}$ can also be easily integrated with the simulation programs of the experiments at RHIC and the LHC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08263 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Colour online) Nuclear density as a function of the distance from the centre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Colour online) The cross section σγA→A0+Xn(k) for 208Pb. Various experiments and approaches are used to describe different energy ranges. See text for details. Let PXn be the probability of nuclear break-up of one nucleus to a state with any number (X) of neutrons (n). Under the assumption of a Poisson distribution, the probability of having exactly L neutrons is: PLn(b) = (P 1 Xn(b))L × exp(−P 1 Xn(b)) L! , (12) w… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. P 1 Xn(b) from Eq. (14) for the case of 208Pb. parametrisation from [39, 40] is used. The impact-parameter dependence of P 1 Xn(b) computed using this cross section is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Colour online) Nucleus break-up probabilities for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalisation ratio (P∞ N=1 PNn)/PXn as a function of impact parameter b. See text for details. the number of excitations to 6 or more would not significantly change the predictions of n O On. 3. Generation of neutron multiplicity and energy 3.1. Generation of neutron …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Colour online) Partial cross section for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Colour online) Arithmetic average (line) and dispersion (dashed area) of neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Colour online) Multiplicity distribution as measured by [32] at photon energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Colour online) Branching ratio (colour scale) of the total cross section to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (Colour online) Evaluated nuclear data. Emission spectra of secondary neutrons [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (Colour online) Properties of the generated neutrons in the rest frame of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: – Photon fluxes are computed as a function of energy and stored as a TGraph. This includes the full unmodified flux, the denominator from Eq. 10, and fluxes for every combination of i,j using the nucleus break-up probabilities from the previous step and Eq. (11). The s…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Properties of the generated neutrons in the LHC frame for Run 2 energies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (Colour online) Normalised neutron multiplicity distributions for coherent pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (Colour online) Expansion of the predictions for coherent photonuclear produc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modelling Coincident Particle Production in Ultraperipheral Heavy Ion Collisions

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new SuperChic Monte Carlo implementation reproduces the ATLAS-observed rate and kinematic dependence of coincident rho meson and dimuon production in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions.

  2. Inclusive photoproduction of vector quarkonium in ultra-peripheral collisions at the LHC

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Inclusive photoproduction of J/psi mesons in proton-lead collisions at the LHC can likely be separated from hadronic background using centrality, rapidity-gap, and forward-neutron veto selections, extending the measur...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [23]

    Abelev, et al., Measurement of the Cross Section for Electromagnetic Dissociation with Neutron Emission in Pb-Pb Collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys

    B. Abelev, et al., Measurement of the Cross Section for Electromagnetic Dissociation with Neutron Emission in Pb-Pb Collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 252302. arXiv:1203.2436, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.252302

    arXiv 2012

  2. [1]

    Fermi, On the Theory of the impact between atoms and electri- cally charged particles, Z.Phys

    E. Fermi, On the Theory of the impact between atoms and electri- cally charged particles, Z.Phys. 29 (1924) 315–327. doi:10.1007/ BF03184853

    work page 1924

  3. [2]

    Fermi, On the theory of collisions between atoms and electrically charged particles, Nuovo Cim

    E. Fermi, On the theory of collisions between atoms and electrically charged particles, Nuovo Cim. 2 (1925) 143–158. arXiv:hep-th/ 0205086, doi:10.1007/BF02961914

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02961914 1925

  4. [3]

    Krauss, M

    F. Krauss, M. Greiner, G. Soff, Photon and gluon induced processes in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39 (1997) 503–564. doi:10.1016/S0146-6410(97)00049-5

    doi:10.1016/s0146-6410(97)00049-5 1997

  5. [4]

    G. Baur, K. Hencken, D. Trautmann, S. Sadovsky, Y. Kharlov, Coherent gamma gamma and gamma-A interactions in very peripheral collisions at relativistic ion colliders, Phys.Rept. 364 (2002) 359–450. arXiv: hep-ph/0112211, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00101-6

    arXiv 2002

  6. [5]

    C. A. Bertulani, S. R. Klein, J. Nystrand, Physics of ultra-peripheral nuclear collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55 (2005) 271–310. arXiv: nucl-ex/0502005, doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151526

    arXiv 2005

  7. [6]

    A. J. Baltz, The Physics of Ultraperipheral Collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rept. 458 (2008) 1–171. arXiv:0706.3356, doi:10.1016/j.physrep. 2007.12.001. 20

    arXiv 2008

  8. [7]

    J. G. Contreras, J. D. Tapia Takaki, Ultra-peripheral heavy-ion collisions at the LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30 (2015) 1542012. doi:10.1142/ S0217751X15420129

    work page 2015

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    M. G. Ryskin, Diffractive J / psi electroproduction in LLA QCD, Z. Phys. C57 (1993) 89–92. doi:10.1007/BF01555742

    1993 doi

  2. [9]

    Agakishiev, et al., ρ0 Photoproduction in AuAu Collisions at√sNN =62.4 GeV with STAR, Phys

    G. Agakishiev, et al., ρ0 Photoproduction in AuAu Collisions at√sNN =62.4 GeV with STAR, Phys. Rev. C85 (2012) 014910. arXiv: 1107.4630, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.014910

    2012 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Adler, et al., Coherent rho0 production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions, Phys

    C. Adler, et al., Coherent rho0 production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 272302. arXiv:nucl-ex/0206004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.272302

    2002 arXiv

  4. [11]

    B. I. Abelev, et al., ρ0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral relativistic heavy ion collisions at√sNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C77 (2008) 034910. arXiv:0712.3320, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.034910

    2008 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Adamczyk, et al., Coherent diffractive photoproduction of ?0 mesons on gold nuclei at 200 GeV/nucleon-pair at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys

    L. Adamczyk, et al., Coherent diffractive photoproduction of ?0 mesons on gold nuclei at 200 GeV/nucleon-pair at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C96 (5) (2017) 054904. arXiv:1702.07705, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054904

    2017

  6. [13]

    Afanasiev, et al., Photoproduction of J/psi and of high mass e+e- in ultra-peripheral Au+Au collisions at s**(1/2) = 200-GeV, Phys

    S. Afanasiev, et al., Photoproduction of J/psi and of high mass e+e- in ultra-peripheral Au+Au collisions at s**(1/2) = 200-GeV, Phys. Lett. B679 (2009) 321–329. arXiv:0903.2041, doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2009.07.061

    2009 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Adam, et al., Coherent ρ0 photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb- Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, JHEP 09 (2015) 095

    J. Adam, et al., Coherent ρ0 photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb- Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, JHEP 09 (2015) 095. arXiv:1503. 09177, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)095

    2015 doi

  8. [15]

    A. M. Sirunyan, et al., Measurement of exclusive ρ(770)0 photopro- duction in ultraperipheral pPb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV arXiv: 1902.01339

    1902 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Abelev, et al., Coherent J/ψ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb- Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys

    B. Abelev, et al., Coherent J/ψ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb- Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B718 (2013) 1273–1283. arXiv:1209.3715, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.059. 21

    2013 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Abbas, et al., Charmonium and e+e− pair photoproduction at mid- rapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN=2.76 TeV, Eur

    E. Abbas, et al., Charmonium and e+e− pair photoproduction at mid- rapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN=2.76 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C73 (11) (2013) 2617. arXiv:1305.1467, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-013-2617-1

    2013 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Khachatryan, et al., Coherent J/ψ photoproduction in ultra- peripheral PbPb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV with the CMS ex- periment, Phys

    V. Khachatryan, et al., Coherent J/ψ photoproduction in ultra- peripheral PbPb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV with the CMS ex- periment, Phys. Lett. B772 (2017) 489–511. arXiv:1605.06966, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.001

    2017 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Acharya, et al., Energy dependence of exclusive J/ψ photoproduction off protons in ultra-peripheral pPb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, Eur

    S. Acharya, et al., Energy dependence of exclusive J/ψ photoproduction off protons in ultra-peripheral pPb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (5) (2019) 402. arXiv:1809.03235, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-019-6816-2

    2019 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Acharya, et al., Coherent J/ ψ photoproduction at forward rapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeVarXiv:1904

    S. Acharya, et al., Coherent J/ ψ photoproduction at forward rapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeVarXiv:1904. 06272

    1904

  14. [21]

    Adam, et al., Coherent ψ(2S) photo-production in ultra-peripheral Pb Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys

    J. Adam, et al., Coherent ψ(2S) photo-production in ultra-peripheral Pb Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B751 (2015) 358–370. arXiv:1508.05076, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.10.040

    2015 arXiv

  15. [22]

    A. M. Sirunyan, et al., Measurement of exclusive Υ photoproduc- tion from protons in pPb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (3) (2019) 277. arXiv:1809.11080, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-019-6774-8

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    I. A. Pshenichnov, J. P. Bondorf, I. N. Mishustin, A. Ventura, S. Masetti, Mutual heavy ion dissociation in peripheral collisions at ultrarelativistic energies, Phys. Rev. C64 (2001) 024903. arXiv:nucl-th/0101035, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.64.024903

    2001 arXiv

  17. [25]

    I. A. Pshenichnov, Electromagnetic excitation and fragmentation of ultrarelativistic nuclei, Phys. Part. Nucl. 42 (2011) 215–250. doi: 10.1134/S1063779611020067. 22

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    A. J. Baltz, S. R. Klein, J. Nystrand, Coherent vector meson pho- toproduction with nuclear breakup in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 012301. arXiv:nucl-th/0205031, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.012301

    2002 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Guzey, M

    V. Guzey, M. Strikman, M. Zhalov, Disentangling coherent and incoher- ent quasielastic J/ψ photoproduction on nuclei by neutron tagging in ultraperipheral ion collisions at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C74 (7) (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Guzey, E

    V. Guzey, E. Kryshen, M. Zhalov, Coherent photoproduction of vec- tor mesons in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions: Update for run 2 at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C93 (5) (2016) 055206. arXiv:1602.01456, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.055206

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    S. R. Klein, J. Nystrand, J. Seger, Y. Gorbunov, J. Butterworth, STARlight: A Monte Carlo simulation program for ultra-peripheral col- lisions of relativistic ions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 212 (2017) 258–268. arXiv:1607.03838, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.016

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Veyssiere, H

    A. Veyssiere, H. Beil, R. Bergere, P. Carlos, A. Lepretre, Photoneutron cross sections of 208 Pb and 197 Au, Nucl. Phys. A159 (1970) 561–576. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(70)90727-X

    1970 doi

  23. [31]

    Lepretre, H

    A. Lepretre, H. Beil, R. Bergere, P. Carlos, J. Fagot, A. De Miniac, A. Veyssiere, Measurements of the Total Photonuclear Cross-sections From 30-MeV to 140-MeV for SN, Ce, Ta, Pb and U Nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A367 (1981) 237–268. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(81)90516-9

    1981 doi

  24. [32]

    Carlos, H

    P. Carlos, H. Beil, R. Bergere, J. Fagot, A. Lepretre, A. de Miniac, A. Veyssiere, TOTAL PHOTONUCLEAR ABSORPTION CROSS- SECTION FOR PB AND FOR HEAVY NUCLEI IN THE DELTA RESONANCE REGION, Nucl. Phys. A431 (1984) 573–592. doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(84)90269-0

    1984 doi

  25. [33]

    T. A. Armstrong, et al., Total hadronic cross-section of gamma rays in hydrogen in the energy range 0.265-GeV to 4.215-GeV, Phys. Rev. D5 (1972) 1640–1652. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.5.1640. 23

    1972 doi

  26. [34]

    T. A. Armstrong, et al., The total photon deuteron hadronic cross- section in the energy range 0.265-4.215 gev, Nucl. Phys. B41 (1972) 445–473. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(72)90403-8

    1972 doi

  27. [35]

    Michalowski, D

    S. Michalowski, D. Andrews, J. Eickmeyer, T. Gentile, N. B. Mis- try, R. Talman, K. Ueno, Experimental Study of Nuclear Shadow- ing in Photoproduction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 737–740. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.737

    1977 doi

  28. [36]

    D. O. Caldwell, V. B. Elings, W. P. Hesse, R. J. Morrison, F. V. Mur- phy, D. E. Yount, Total Hadronic Photoabsorption Cross-Sections on Hydrogen and Complex Nuclei from 4-GeV to 18-GeV, Phys. Rev. D7 (1973) 1362. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.1362

    1973 doi

  29. [37]

    D. O. Caldwell, et al., Measurement of Shadowing in Photon - Nu- cleus Total Cross-sections From 20-GeV to 185-GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (1979) 553. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.553

    1979 doi

  30. [38]

    B. L. Berman, R. E. Pywell, S. S. Dietrich, M. N. Thompson, K. G. Mc- Neill, J. W. Jury, Absolute photoneutron cross sections for Zr, I, Pr, Au, and Pb, Phys. Rev. C36 (1987) 1286–1292.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.36. 1286

    1987 doi

  31. [39]

    A. J. Baltz, M. J. Rhoades-Brown, J. Weneser, Heavy ion partial beam lifetimes due to Coulomb induced processes, Phys. Rev. E54 (1996) 4233–4239. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.54.4233

    1996 doi

  32. [40]

    A. J. Baltz, C. Chasman, S. N. White, Correlated forward - backward dissociation and neutron spectra as luminosity monitor in heavy ion col- liders, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A417 (1998) 1–8.arXiv:nucl-ex/9801002, doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00575-0

    1998 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Lepretre, H

    A. Lepretre, H. Beil, R. Bergere, P. Carlos, J. Fagot, A. Veyssiere, I. Halpern, ANALYSIS OF NEUTRON MULTIPLICITIES IN PHO- TONUCLEAR REACTIONS FROM 30-MEV TO 140-MEV IN HEAVY ELEMENTS, Nucl. Phys. A390 (1982) 221–239.doi:10.1016/ 0375-9474(82)90159-2

    1982

  34. [42]

    J. D. T. Arruda-Neto, S. Simionatto, V. P. Likhachev, F. Garcia, J. Mesa, A. Deppman, O. Rodriguez, F. Guzman, Photoneutron multi- 24 plicities of preactinide nuclei at energies above the pion threshold, Nucl. Phys. A638 (1998) 701–713. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00215-2

    1998 doi

  35. [43]

    M. B. Chadwick, et al., ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data, Nucl. Data Sheets 112 (12) (2011) 2887–2996. doi:10. 1016/j.nds.2011.11.002

    2011

  36. [44]

    Herman, M

    M. Herman, M. of the Cross Sections Evaluation Working Group, Endf- 6 formats manual data formats and procedures for the evaluated nuclear data file endf/b-vi and endf/b-vii doi:10.2172/981813

    doi

  37. [45]

    Sjostrand, S

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P. Z. Skands, A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852–867. arXiv:0710.3820, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036

    2008 arXiv

  38. [46]

    L. A. Harland-Lang, V. A. Khoze, M. G. Ryskin, Exclusive LHC physics with heavy ions: SuperChic 3, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (1) (2019) 39. arXiv: 1810.06567, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6530-5

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cepila, J

    J. Cepila, J. G. Contreras, J. D. Tapia Takaki, Energy dependence of dissociative J/ψ photoproduction as a signature of gluon saturation at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B766 (2017) 186–191. arXiv:1608.07559, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.063

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Cepila, J

    J. Cepila, J. G. Contreras, M. Krelina, J. D. Tapia Takaki, Mass depen- dence of vector meson photoproduction off protons and nuclei within the energy-dependent hot-spot model, Nucl. Phys. B934 (2018) 330–

    2018

  41. [49]

    Cepila, J

    J. Cepila, J. G. Contreras, M. Krelina, Coherent and incoherent J/ψ photonuclear production in an energy-dependent hot-spot model, Phys. Rev. C97 (2) (2018) 024901. arXiv:1711.01855, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.97.024901

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    T. A. collaboration, Photo-nuclear dijet production in ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions

  43. [51]

    Aaboud, et al., Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Nature Phys

    M. Aaboud, et al., Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Nature Phys. 13 (9) (2017) 852–858. arXiv:1702.01625, doi:10.1038/nphys4208. 25

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Aad, et al., Observation of light-by-light scattering in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    G. Aad, et al., Observation of light-by-light scattering in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (5) (2019) 052001. arXiv:1904.03536, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123. 052001

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    A. M. Sirunyan, et al., Evidence for light-by-light scattering and searches for axion-like particles in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeVarXiv:1810.04602, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134826. 26

    2019 arXiv

  46. [340]

    arXiv:1804.05508, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.07.010

    2018 arXiv

  47. [2942]

    arXiv:1312.6486, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2942-z

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.