Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 184 references

The Sun's atmosphere appears genuinely unusual in its volatile-to-refractory element mix, and the cause remains unresolved.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A review of the 10-20% solar volatile-to-refractory excess relative to solar twins, weighing galactic, protoplanetary, and planetary-ingestion explanations and finding no decisive answer.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A useful, honest review of the Meléndez effect that undercuts its own premise with the GCE/age-curvature alternative — the anomaly may be an artifact. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.03435 v1 pith:HRQBL6RG submitted 2025-09-03 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

Is the composition of the Solar atmosphere unusual, and if so, why? Possible interpretations

Bengt Gustafsson This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP
keywords Sun: abundancesStars: abundancessolar twinsMeléndez effectcondensation temperatureprotoplanetary disksplanet formationgalactic chemical evolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to establish that the Sun's photosphere is genuinely unusual among solar-type stars: it is richer in volatile elements (C, N, O, S, P, Zn) relative to refractory elements (Ba, Ca, Ti, Y, Al, Sc, Zr) by 10–20% compared with the average solar twin. The author reviews the evidence, finds the pattern survives scrutiny, and then assesses every proposed mechanism — galactic chemical evolution, dust–gas separation in clouds, protoplanetary-disk outflows and accretion, planet engulfment, and atomic diffusion. No single explanation is uniquely established; the paper concludes that several processes may act together. The stakes are that whichever mechanism is right, the effect is a fossil of Solar System formation and a potential diagnostic of planetary systems around other stars.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Sun's photosphere is anomalously rich in volatile elements relative to refractory ones when compared with most solar twins: a systematic offset of up to about 0.08 dex (10–20%) that scales with each element's condensation temperature. This Meléndez effect has been confirmed in independent samples, with roughly 5–15% of solar-type stars showing a similar pattern. The review finds that no proposed mechanism — galactic chemical evolution, dust-clearing in clouds, disk outflows and accretion, giant-planet pressure bumps, rocky-planet engulfment, or atomic diffusion — is both necessary and sufficient. The author's stated conclusion is that no definitive answer exists

What carries the argument

The key object is the Meléndez effect (ME): the correlation between the differential abundance offset Δ[X/Fe] for the Sun relative to solar twins and each element's condensation temperature Tc. The roughly two-branch correlation shown for the original 11 twins has an amplitude near 0.08 dex and is the single observational target that every candidate mechanism must reproduce. The method that makes it measurable is strictly differential spectroscopy of solar twins against asteroid-reflected sunlight, which cancels most systematic modeling errors and leaves a claimed error floor near 0.01–0.02 dex.

Load-bearing premise

The measured 10–20% volatile excess is a true difference in the Sun's photospheric composition rather than a residual systematic error of differential spectral analysis.

What would settle it

A high-precision differential re-analysis of the Sun against a large sample of solar twins, using 3D NLTE models for all elements and matching stars in age and birth radius, that returns a volatile-refractory slope indistinguishable from zero would falsify the claim that the Meléndez effect is real.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The Sun's pattern is shared by only a minority (roughly 5–15%) of solar-type stars, so it records an unusual formation history if real.
  • If the effect stems from a giant planet trapping pebbles outside a disk gap, volatile-rich stars should statistically host distant gas giants, a prediction that can be tested with existing exoplanet surveys.
  • Planet engulfment in binary stars reproduces refractory-rich companions and yields some ME-like patterns, but faces mixing time-scale constraints that limit how long the signature lasts.
  • Rocky planets as refractory reservoirs may contribute, but likely not alone, because disk dispersal times and the deep early solar convection zone weaken the visible signature.
  • No current mechanism uniquely explains the effect; the review points to cluster studies, cloud simulations, and co-moving pairs as the productive next tests.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The predicted rate of ME-like stars (about 5–15% of solar-type stars) suggests a direct test: if Jupiter-style pebble-trapping is responsible, those stars should show a statistically significant excess of giant planets at a few AU, a measurement within reach of current surveys.
  • Co-moving and wide-binary pairs may be the cleanest discriminator: ME-like differences within coeval pairs would rule out galactic chemical evolution as the whole story and point to local disk or accretion processes.
  • Repeating the differential analysis with 3D-NLTE predictions for every element, rather than just a handful, could reveal whether the residual 0.02-dex error floor hides an element-by-element pattern that identifies specific dust species or condensation sequences.
  • The habitability link is suggestive at most: the paper itself notes any connection is probably indirect, mediated by the same Jupiter–Saturn orbital architecture that may produce the ME.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review article assesses the evidence for and possible causes of the 'Meléndez effect' (ME): the claim that the solar photosphere is enhanced by 10–20% in volatile elements (C, N, O, S, P, Zn) relative to refractory elements (Ba, Ca, Ti, Y, Al, Sc, Zr) compared with most solar twins. The paper first discusses absolute and differential abundance determinations, then systematically reviews candidate explanations: galactic chemical evolution and solar migration, a local supernova, dust-cleansing and gas–dust separation in star-forming regions, protoplanetary disk fractionation and outflows, planet formation and engulfment, abundance differences in stellar pairs, atomic diffusion and mixing, and possible links to habitability. It concludes that no definitive explanation exists and that several mechanisms may contribute jointly.

Significance. If the Meléndez effect is real, it is an important boundary condition for Solar System formation and a potential tracer of planetary processes. The manuscript is valuable as a broad, up-to-date critical review: it covers independent work by several groups, includes quantitative time-scale and yield arguments (e.g., thermohaline mixing in §6, self-cleansing accretion limits in §4.3, supernova yield matching in §3.2), and identifies falsifiable tests (e.g., the Teff dependence of binary abundance differences, §6; M67 abundance patterns, §3.3). The review is also honest in admitting where models fail or remain speculative. However, the paper's central premise—that the ME is a genuine compositional anomaly—is never securely established against the strongest available counterargument (Cowley & Yüce 2022), and this undermines the framing of all subsequent sections.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 2.3 and 3.1] The paper's central premise is left in a contradictory state. Cowley & Yüce (2022) found that quadratic abundance–age relations for the Bedell et al. (2018) sample make the Sun non-anomalous among solar-age twins. The author dismisses this result only by saying it is 'affected by inclusion of stars with ages above 6.0 Gyrs' (§3.1), without providing a quantitative re-analysis or showing how the conclusion changes when those stars are removed. In the very next paragraph, the author's own Fig. 6 shows that the quadratic coefficients b correlate with condensation temperature and states that this 'would seem to explain the ME as an effect of the galactic chemical evolution.' That is precisely the GCE alternative that would dissolve the ME. Yet §2.3 states that 'it will be assumed that the ME reflects some processes' and §§4–7 discuss only Solar-System mechanisms. The manuscript needs either
  2. [Section 3.1, Fig. 6] The b–Tc regression that supports the GCE interpretation is computed after removing C, O, and Ba as 'outliers' (red crosses), without stating an outlier criterion or performing a sensitivity analysis. C and O are among the principal volatile elements that define the ME; excluding them is not neutral. The correlation may be an artifact of this selection. The author should report fits with and without all three points, quantify the influence of each excluded element, and justify the exclusions on grounds independent of the hypothesis being tested.
  3. [Section 2.2] The estimated differential error floor of ~0.02 dex (0.01 dex for some elements) is based on a limited set of elements: O, C, Fe, and Mn. This estimate is then extrapolated to all elements contributing to the ME, including S, P, and Zn, for which 3D-NLTE differential corrections are largely missing. Given that the ME amplitude is ~0.08 dex, a 0.02–0.03 dex floor is tolerable, but the paper should explicitly acknowledge that an error floor of ~0.04 dex for untested elements would make the ME non-significant for some elements. The current text moves too quickly from 'reasonable to assume' to 'it will be assumed that the ME reflects some processes.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1, Fig. 6] The figure would benefit from error bars on the b coefficients and from a clear statement of the fitted slope, intercept, and scatter. The text also says 'A fitted line to the rest of the points' but does not identify which points (beyond the three red crosses) are included or whether the fit is weighted.
  2. [Section 5.2] In the sentence beginning 'The authors modelled the resulting abundance effects...', the antecedent is unclear; it should be 'Hühn and Bitsch (2023) modelled...' for readability.
  3. [Section 8] 'as long as the PH value is kept' should be 'pH value'.
  4. [Section 2.3] Typographical spacing in 'Meléndez effect(ME )' and 'the Meléndez effect(ME )' appears inconsistent; unify.
  5. [Section 3.1] The phrase 'for a test' in 'This hypothesis can be tested by plotting...' is slightly awkward; consider rewording to 'This hypothesis can be tested directly by plotting...'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: a self-aware review of a contested observational effect; self-citations are supported by independent studies and the author explicitly declines to derive a forced explanation.

full rationale

This is a review, not a derivation. The Meléndez effect is an empirical differential-abundance pattern first reported in Meléndez et al. (2009), on which Gustafsson is a co-author, but §2.3 explicitly lists independent confirmations: Ramírez et al. (2010, 2014), Adibekyan et al. (2014), Nissen (2015, 2016), Bedell et al. (2018), Rampalli et al. (2024). The central premise is therefore not supported only by self-citation. The paper's own dust-cleansing models (Gustafsson 2018a,b) are cited as possible mechanisms and are ultimately assessed as 'not a very probable explanation' in §9; they are not load-bearing predictions. The working assumption in §2.3 — 'In the following it will be assumed that the ME reflects some processes in the Galaxy, in the early evolution of the solar nebula or the solar system' — is explicitly an assumption, not a derived conclusion; the paper repeatedly states that no definitive answer has been found (§9). The Cowley & Yüce (2022) quadratic age-fit alternative that would dissolve the ME is quoted and discussed in §3.1: the author notes it 'would seem to explain the ME as an effect of the galactic chemical evolution' but leaves it unresolved. That is an acknowledged internal tension/correctness risk, not a circular reduction: the review does not define the ME in terms of the explanations or fit a parameter and then rename it a prediction. The Nordlund (2025) disk-outflow model has a free parameter r whose value sets the curvature (Fig. 9), but the figure is presented as model outcomes for different r with an explicitly normalized amplitude, and the paper does not claim an independent prediction from it. No equation or fitted quantity is shown to be identical by construction to the phenomenon it is said to explain. Hence no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper itself introduces no new physical entities and no new free parameters beyond two illustrative fits (Fig. 6 regression and Fig. 9 normalization). Its conclusions rest mainly on the assumed reality of the Melendez effect and on standard time-scale or condensation-temperature assumptions inherited from the literature.

free parameters (2)
  • Linear regression slope and intercept of quadratic-coefficient vs Tc (Fig. 6) = not quoted numerically in text
    These coefficients are fit to the bb values from Cowley and Yuce (2022) after excluding C, O, and Ba; the resulting correlation is used to raise the possibility that the ME is a galactic evolution artifact.
  • Normalization amplitude for the Nordlund (2025) outflow-model curve in Fig. 9 = chosen to match the observed amplitude
    The theoretical delta-e amplitude is rescaled to match the observed ME amplitude, so the match shown does not test the model's predicted amplitude.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Differential abundance errors in solar twin comparisons are reduced to about 0.02 dex (0.01 dex in some cases) for most elements.
    The review assumes the ME is not dominated by residual systematic errors (Section 2.2), and later 'it will be assumed that the ME reflects some processes' (Section 2.3).
  • domain assumption The condensation temperature scale of Lodders (2003) provides a meaningful ordering of elements for the fractionation processes considered.
    Used throughout, e.g., Fig. 1 and all scenario discussions, as the independent variable for the ME.
  • domain assumption Published Galactic chemical evolution corrections (e.g., Bedell et al. linear fits, Cowley and Yuce quadratic fits) are valid representations of abundance-age relations.
    Sections 3.1 and 3.2 discuss the viability of these corrections; the curvature hypothesis in Fig. 6 depends on this assumption.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Is the composition of the Solar atmosphere unusual, and if so, why? Possible interpretations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HRQBL6RG

@misc{pith2026250903435,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Is the composition of the Solar atmosphere unusual, and if so, why? Possible interpretations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HRQBL6RG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03435}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The ongoing discussion about the atomic chemical composition of the Sun is commented on. The main focus in this review is on the deviation of the solar composition from that of most other solar-type stars in that its ratio of volatiles (like the elements C, N, O, S, P and Zn) to the refractories (most metals, like Ba, Ca, Ti, Y, Al, Sc and Zr) tends to be higher in the Sun by 10 to 20%. What does this tell about the formation and evolution of the Solar System? Scenarios in terms of galactic evolution, formation of the pre-solar nebula, of the evolution of the protoplanetary disk, of the engulfing of planets, and of other processes within the Solar System are considered, as well as the evolution of binary stars with similarly different chemical composition. Finally, implications, if any, on the habitability of the Solar System are commented on.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

184 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sent...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or or or or FUNCTION ...

  3. [3]

    In: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, p 268

    Abt HA, Levy SG (1975) The Binary Frequency Among Solar-Type Stars. In: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, p 268

    1975

  4. [4]

    T _ c trends and clues to Galactic evolution

    Adibekyan VZ, Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez JI, Delgado Mena E, et al (2014) On the origin of stars with and without planets. T _ c trends and clues to Galactic evolution . 564:L15. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423435, https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4514 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1404.4514 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    In: Beuther H, Klessen RS, Dullemond CP, et al (eds) Protostars and Planets VI, pp 475--496, doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch021, 1311.1819

    Alexander R, Pascucci I, Andrews S, et al (2014) The Dispersal of Protoplanetary Disks . In: Beuther H, Klessen RS, Dullemond CP, et al (eds) Protostars and Planets VI, pp 475--496, doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch021, 1311.1819

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Implications of 3D non-LTE spectral line formation

    Amarsi AM, Nissen PE, Sk \'u lad \'o ttir \'A (2019) Carbon, oxygen, and iron abundances in disk and halo stars. Implications of 3D non-LTE spectral line formation . 630:A104. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936265, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10319 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1908.10319 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    656:A113

    Amarsi AM, Grevesse N, Asplund M, et al (2021) The solar carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen abundances from a 3D LTE analysis of molecular lines . 656:A113. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141384, https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.04752 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2109.04752 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Amarsi AM, Liljegren S, Nissen PE (2022) 3D non-LTE iron abundances in FG-type dwarfs . 668:A68. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244542, https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13449 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2209.13449 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    43(1):481--530

    Asplund M (2005) New Light on Stellar Abundance Analyses: Departures from LTE and Homogeneity . 43(1):481--530. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134001

    arXiv 2005

  10. [10]

    In: Barnes TGIII, Bash FN (eds) Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, p 25

    Asplund M, Grevesse N, Sauval AJ (2005) The Solar Chemical Composition . In: Barnes TGIII, Bash FN (eds) Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, p 25

    2005

  11. [11]

    47(1):481--522

    Asplund M, Grevesse N, Sauval AJ, et al (2009) The Chemical Composition of the Sun . 47(1):481--522. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222, https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.0948 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0909.0948 [astro-ph.SR]

    arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    653:A141

    Asplund M, Amarsi AM, Grevesse N (2021) The chemical make-up of the Sun: A 2020 vision . 653:A141. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01661 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2105.01661 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    HC (2012) RNA Folding and Catalysis Mediated by Iron (II)

    Athavale SS, Petrov AS, et al. HC (2012) RNA Folding and Catalysis Mediated by Iron (II) . PLOS ONE 7(5):1--7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038024

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038024 2012

  14. [14]

    526(4):6088--6102

    Baba J, Saitoh TR, Tsujimoto T (2023) Exploring the Sun's birth radius and the distribution of planet building blocks in the Milky Way galaxy: a multizone Galactic chemical evolution approach . 526(4):6088--6102. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3188, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10335 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2310.10335 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    In: Inutsuka S, Aikawa Y, Muto T, et al (eds) Protostars and Planets VII, p 423, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2210.13314, 2210.13314

    Bae J, Isella A, Zhu Z, et al (2023) Structured Distributions of Gas and Solids in Protoplanetary Disks . In: Inutsuka S, Aikawa Y, Muto T, et al (eds) Protostars and Planets VII, p 423, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2210.13314, 2210.13314

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13314 2023

  16. [16]

    Nature Communications 7:13639

    Banerjee P, Qian YZ, Heger A, et al (2016) Evidence from stable isotopes and ^ 10 Be for solar system formation triggered by a low-mass supernova . Nature Communications 7:13639. doi:10.1038/ncomms13639, https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07162 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1611.07162 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Baraffe I, Chabrier G (2010) Effect of episodic accretion on the structure and the lithium depletion of low-mass stars and planet-hosting stars . 521:A44. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014979, https://arxiv.org/abs/1008.4288 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1008.4288 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    Barklem PS (2016) Accurate abundance analysis of late-type stars: advances in atomic physics . 24(1):9. doi:10.1007/s00159-016-0095-9, https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07659 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1604.07659 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    514(2):2145--2161

    Bate MR (2022) Dust coagulation during the early stages of star formation: molecular cloud collapse and first hydrostatic core evolution . 514(2):2145--2161. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1391, https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07681 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2205.07681 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Baumann P, Ram \' rez I, Mel \'e ndez J, et al (2010) Lithium depletion in solar-like stars: no planet connection . 519:A87. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015137, https://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0575 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1008.0575 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    865(1):68

    Bedell M, Bean JL, Mel \'e ndez J, et al (2018) The Chemical Homogeneity of Sun-like Stars in the Solar Neighborhood . 865(1):68. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad908, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02576 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1802.02576 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    521(2):2969--2987

    Behmard A, Dai F, Brewer JM, et al (2023) Planet engulfment detections are rare according to observations and stellar modelling . 521(2):2969--2987. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad745, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12121 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2210.12121 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    In: Niemczura E, Smalley B, Pych W (eds) Determination of Atmospheric Parameters of B

    Bergemann M, Serenelli A (2014) Solar Abundance Problem . In: Niemczura E, Smalley B, Pych W (eds) Determination of Atmospheric Parameters of B. p 245--258, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06956-2_21

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06956-2_21 2014

  24. [24]

    Bergemann M, Gallagher AJ, Eitner P, et al (2019) Observational constraints on the origin of the elements. I. 3D NLTE formation of Mn lines in late-type stars . 631:A80. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935811, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05200 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1905.05200 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    508(2):2236--2253

    Bergemann M, Hoppe R, Semenova E, et al (2021) Solar oxygen abundance . 508(2):2236--2253. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2160, https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.01143 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2109.01143 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    The Chemical Composition of the Sun

    Bergemann M, Lodders K, Palme H (2025) The Chemical Composition of the Sun . arXiv e-prints arXiv:2503.05402. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.05402, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05402 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2503.05402 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.05402 2025

  27. [27]

    855(2):115

    Berger TA, Howard AW, Boesgaard AM (2018) Identifying Young Kepler Planet Host Stars from Keck-HIRES Spectra of Lithium . 855(2):115. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab154, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.09529 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1802.09529 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1011, https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06293 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1804.06293 [astro-ph.SR]

    Bertelli Motta C, Pasquali A, Richer J, et al (2018) The Gaia-ESO Survey: evidence of atomic diffusion in M67? 478(1):425--438. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1011, https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06293 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1804.06293 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Biazzo K, Gratton R, Desidera S, et al (2015) The GAPS programme with HARPS-N at TNG. X. Differential abundances in the XO-2 planet-hosting binary . 583:A135. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526375, https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01614 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1506.01614 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    493(4):5079--5088

    Booth RA, Owen JE (2020) Fingerprints of giant planets in the composition of solar twins . 493(4):5079--5088. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa578, https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11135 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2002.11135 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Brucalassi A, Koppenhoefer J, Saglia R, et al (2017) Search for giant planets in M 67. IV. Survey results . 603:A85. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527562, https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04296 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1703.04296 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    686:A108

    Buldgen G, Noels A, Scuflaire R, et al (2024) In-depth analysis of solar models with high-metallicity abundances and updated opacity tables . 686:A108. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348312, https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10478 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2404.10478 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Caffau E, Ludwig HG, Steffen M, et al (2008) The photospheric solar oxygen project. I. Abundance analysis of atomic lines and influence of atmospheric models . 488(3):1031--1046. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809885, https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.4398 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0805.4398 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Solar Physics 268(2):255--269

    Caffau E, Ludwig HG, Steffen M, et al (2011) Solar Chemical Abundances Determined with a CO5BOLD 3D Model Atmosphere . Solar Physics 268(2):255--269. doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9541-4, https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1190 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1003.1190 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    Caffau E, Ludwig HG, Steffen M, et al (2015) The photospheric solar oxygen project. III. Investigation of the centre-to-limb variation of the 630 nm [O I]-Ni I blend . 579:A88. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526331, https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00931 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1506.00931 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Problems of Cosmogeny 7:91

    Cameron AGW (1964) Remarks on the Formation of the Solar System from the Point of View of Nucleogenesis . Problems of Cosmogeny 7:91

    1964

  37. [37]

    15(1):121--146

    Cameron AGW (1973) Abundances of the Elements in the Solar System . 15(1):121--146. doi:10.1007/BF00172440

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00172440 1973

  38. [38]

    arXiv e-prints arXiv:2505.22615

    Carlos M, Amarsi AM, Nissen PE, et al (2025) The peculiar composition of the Sun is not related to giant planets . arXiv e-prints arXiv:2505.22615. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22615 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2505.22615 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Carlsson M, Hansteen VH, Gudiksen BV, et al (2016) A publicly available simulation of an enhanced network region of the Sun . 585:A4. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527226, https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.07581 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1510.07581 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    94:1--11

    Cayrel de Strobel G, Knowles N, Hernandez G, et al (1981) In search of real solar twins. 94:1--11

    1981

  41. [41]

    724(1):92--97

    Chambers JE (2010) Stellar Elemental Abundance Patterns: Implications for Planet Formation . 724(1):92--97. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/92

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/724/1/92 2010

  42. [42]

    Living Reviews in Solar Physics 18(1):2

    Christensen-Dalsgaard J (2021) Solar structure and evolution . Living Reviews in Solar Physics 18(1):2. doi:10.1007/s41116-020-00028-3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.06488 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2007.06488 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    121(877):213

    Churchwell E, Babler BL, Meade MR, et al (2009) The Spitzer/GLIMPSE Surveys: A New View of the Milky Way . 121(877):213. doi:10.1086/597811

    doi:10.1086/597811 2009

  44. [44]

    Codella C, Podio L, Garufi A, et al (2020) ALMA chemical survey of disk-outflow sources in Taurus (ALMA-DOT). IV. Thioformaldehyde (H _ 2 CS) in protoplanetary discs: spatial distributions and binding energies . 644:A120. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039309, https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.02305 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2011.02305 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    512(3):3684--3690

    Cowley CR, Y \"u ce K (2022) Galactic chemical evolution of the solar neighbourhood, solar twins, and exoplanet indicators . 512(3):3684--3690. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac637, https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05592 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2203.05592 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Delbouille L, Roland G, Neven L (1973) Atlas photometrique du spectre solaire de [lambda] 3000 a [lambda] 10000

    1973

  47. [47]

    Extending the sample

    Delgado Mena E, Israelian G, Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez JI, et al (2014) Li depletion in solar analogues with exoplanets. Extending the sample . 562:A92. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321493, https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6414 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1311.6414 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    Delgado Mena E, Bertr \'a n de Lis S, Adibekyan VZ, et al (2015) Li abundances in F stars: planets, rotation, and Galactic evolution . 576:A69. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425433, https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.4618 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1412.4618 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Investigating line broadening, magnetic fields, and model effects

    Deshmukh SA, Ludwig HG, Ku c inskas A, et al (2022) The solar photospheric silicon abundance according to CO ^ 5 BOLD. Investigating line broadening, magnetic fields, and model effects . 668:A48. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142072, https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07485 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2212.07485 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    840(2):99

    Dotter A, Conroy C, Cargile P, et al (2017) The Influence of Atomic Diffusion on Stellar Ages and Chemical Tagging . 840(2):99. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d10, https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03465 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1704.03465 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    663(2):866--894

    Draine BT, Dale DA, Bendo G, et al (2007) Dust Masses, PAH Abundances, and Starlight Intensities in the SINGS Galaxy Sample . 663(2):866--894. doi:10.1086/518306, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0703213 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0703213 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    51(1):269--310

    Duch \^e ne G, Kraus A (2013) Stellar Multiplicity . 51(1):269--310. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602, https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3028 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1303.3028 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    p 39--43, doi:10.1007/3-540-54752-5_186

    Duquennoy A, Mayor M (1991) How Many Single Stars Among Solar Type Stars? In: Heidmann J, Klein MJ (eds) Bioastronomy: The Search for Extraterrestial Life The Exploration Broadens, vol 390. p 39--43, doi:10.1007/3-540-54752-5_186

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-54752-5_186 1991

  54. [54]

    Towards a consistent reference metallicity

    Fabbian D, Moreno-Insertis F, Khomenko E, et al (2012) Solar Fe abundance and magnetic fields. Towards a consistent reference metallicity . 548:A35. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219335, https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.2771 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1209.2771 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    874(1):81

    Fernandes RB, Mulders GD, Pascucci I, et al (2019) Hints for a Turnover at the Snow Line in the Giant Planet Occurrence Rate . 874(1):81. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0300, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.05569 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1812.05569 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    In: Gomes N, Ascenso J (eds) 24th Portuguese National Astronomy and Astrophysics Meeting, p 51

    Figueira P (2014) Lithium depletion of planetary-host stars . In: Gomes N, Ascenso J (eds) 24th Portuguese National Astronomy and Astrophysics Meeting, p 51

    2014

  57. [57]

    Astronomische Nachrichten 323:213--219

    Freytag B, Steffen M, Dorch B (2002) Spots on the surface of Betelgeuse -- Results from new 3D stellar convection models . Astronomische Nachrichten 323:213--219. doi:10.1002/1521-3994(200208)323:3/4<213::AID-ASNA213>3.0.CO;2-H

    doi:10.1002/1521-3994(200208)323:3/4 2002

  58. [58]

    922(2):129

    Galarza JY, L \'o pez-Valdivia R, Mel \'e ndez J, et al (2021) Evidence of Rocky Planet Engulfment in the Wide Binary System HIP 71726/HIP 71737 . 922(2):129. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2362

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2362 2021

  59. [59]

    Cell 168(6)

    Goldford JE, Hartman H, Smith TF, et al (2017) Remnants of an Ancient Metabolism without Phosphate . Cell 168(6)

    2017

  60. [60]

    285(2):403--412

    Gonzalez G (1997) The stellar metallicity-giant planet connection . 285(2):403--412. doi:10.1093/mnras/285.2.403

    doi:10.1093/mnras/285.2.403 1997

  61. [61]

    118(849):1494--1505

    Gonzalez G (2006) The Chemical Compositions of Stars with Planets: A Review . 118(849):1494--1505. doi:10.1086/509792, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609829 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0609829 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [62]

    443:L99--L103

    Gonzalez G (2014) Solar system chemical abundances corrected for systematics. 443:L99--L103. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu083, https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.0480 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1406.0480 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    In: Holt SS, Sonneborn G (eds) Cosmic Abundances, p 117

    Grevesse N, Noels A, Sauval AJ (1996) Standard Abundances . In: Holt SS, Sonneborn G (eds) Cosmic Abundances, p 117

    1996

  64. [64]

    doi:10.1023/A:1005164331058

    Gustafsson B (1998) Is the Sun a Sun-Like Star? 85:419--428. doi:10.1023/A:1005164331058

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005164331058 1998

  65. [65]

    Gustafsson B (2018 a ) Dust cleansing of star-forming gas. I. Has radiation from bright stars affected the chemical composition of the Sun and M 67? 616:A91. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732354, https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00547 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1805.00547 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Gustafsson B (2018 b ) Dust cleansing of star-forming gas. II. Did late accretion flows change the chemical composition of the solar atmosphere? 620:A53. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833353, https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02361 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1809.02361 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    328(1-2):185--191

    Gustafsson B, Mel \'e ndez J, Asplund M, et al (2010) The chemical composition of solar-type stars in comparison with that of the Sun . 328(1-2):185--191. doi:10.1007/s10509-009-0257-6

    doi:10.1007/s10509-009-0257-6 2010

  68. [68]

    Condensation of Dust Particles

    Hasegawa H, Kozasa T (1988) Chapter 9. Condensation of Dust Particles . Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 96:107--120. doi:10.1143/PTPS.96.107

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.96.107 1988

  69. [69]

    381:959--970

    Heiter U (2002) The abundance pattern of lambda Bootis stars . 381:959--970. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011593, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0112196 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0112196 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  70. [70]

    381:971--981

    Heiter U, Weiss WW, Paunzen E (2002) The accretion/diffusion theory for lambda Bootis stars in the light of spectroscopic data . 381:971--981. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011594, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0112198 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0112198 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  71. [71]

    526(1):534--547

    Higgins ER, Vink JS, Hirschi R, et al (2023) Stellar wind yields of very massive stars . 526(1):534--547. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2537, https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10941 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2308.10941 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    In: Dworetsky MM, Castelli F, Faraggiana R (eds) IAU Colloq

    Holweger H, Sturenburg S (1993) Carbon and Silicon in Normal A-Stars and in Lambda-Bootis Stars . In: Dworetsky MM, Castelli F, Faraggiana R (eds) IAU Colloq. 138: Peculiar versus Normal Phenomena in A-type and Related Stars, p 356

    1993

  73. [73]

    456(4):4174--4190

    Hopkins PF, Lee H (2016) The fundamentally different dynamics of dust and gas in molecular clouds . 456(4):4174--4190. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2745, https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02477 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1510.02477 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [74]

    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 487:9--20

    Huguet L, Van Orman JA, Hauck SA, et al (2018) Earth's inner core nucleation paradox . Earth and Planetary Science Letters 487:9--20. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2018.01.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2018.01.018 2018

  75. [75]

    H \"u hn LA, Bitsch B (2023) How accretion of planet-forming disks influences stellar abundances . 676:A87. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346604, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16461 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2306.16461 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    363(1):293--314

    Hurley JR, Pols OR, Aarseth SJ, et al (2005) A complete N-body model of the old open cluster M67 . 363(1):293--314. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09448.x, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0507239 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/0507239 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2005

  77. [77]

    462(7270):189--191

    Israelian G, Delgado Mena E, Santos NC, et al (2009) Enhanced lithium depletion in Sun-like stars with orbiting planets . 462(7270):189--191. doi:10.1038/nature08483, https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4198 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0911.4198 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  78. [78]

    800(2):L22

    Izidoro A, Raymond SN, Morbidelli A, et al (2015) Gas Giant Planets as Dynamical Barriers to Inward-Migrating Super-Earths . 800(2):L22. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/800/2/L22, https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06308 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1501.06308 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    470(2):1750--1770

    Izidoro A, Ogihara M, Raymond SN, et al (2017) Breaking the chains: hot super-Earth systems from migration and disruption of compact resonant chains . 470(2):1750--1770. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1232, https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03634 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1703.03634 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    Jofr \'e P, Heiter U, Soubiran C, et al (2015) Gaia FGK benchmark stars: abundances of and iron-peak elements . 582:A81. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526604, https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.00027 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1507.00027 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.