Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Mathesis: Towards Formal Theorem Proving from Natural Languages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.07047 v1 pith:HRUDOF67 submitted 2025-06-08 cs.AI

Mathesis: Towards Formal Theorem Proving from Natural Languages

classification cs.AI
keywords formaltheoremgaokao-formallanguagemathesisnaturalproblemsproving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models show strong promise for formal reasoning. However, most LLM-based theorem provers have long been constrained by the need for expert-written formal statements as inputs, limiting their applicability to real-world problems expressed in natural language. We tackle this gap with Mathesis, the first end-to-end theorem proving pipeline processing informal problem statements. It contributes Mathesis-Autoformalizer, the first autoformalizer using reinforcement learning to enhance the formalization ability of natural language problems, aided by our novel LeanScorer framework for nuanced formalization quality assessment. It also proposes a Mathesis-Prover, which generates formal proofs from the formalized statements. To evaluate the real-world applicability of end-to-end formal theorem proving, we introduce Gaokao-Formal, a benchmark of 488 complex problems from China's national college entrance exam. Our approach is carefully designed, with a thorough study of each component. Experiments demonstrate Mathesis's effectiveness, with the autoformalizer outperforming the best baseline by 22% in pass-rate on Gaokao-Formal. The full system surpasses other model combinations, achieving 64% accuracy on MiniF2F with pass@32 and a state-of-the-art 18% on Gaokao-Formal.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FormalRx: Rectify and eXamine Semantic Failures in Autoformalization

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    FormalRx diagnoses Lean autoformalization failures with a 28-category SCI taxonomy and an 8B model that jointly predicts alignment, error type, location, and correction.

  2. Aria: An Agent For Retrieval and Iterative Auto-Formalization via Dependency Graph

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    A graph-of-thought agent with retrieval and a term-grounded semantic checker auto-formalizes research-level math statements in Lean, hitting 68.5% on ProofNet and 6/14 homological conjectures where baselines score 0.

  3. AI for Mathematics: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects

    math.HO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    AI for math combines task-specific architectures and general foundation models to support research and advance AI reasoning capabilities.

  4. HERMES: Towards Efficient and Verifiable Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-11 conditional novelty 4.0

    Interleaving LLM reasoning with Lean4 verification of individual steps improves math-problem accuracy and cuts token budgets versus reward-model methods.