pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27048 · v1 · pith:HSNIC2UHnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

The Physical Nature of Regolith on Icy Moons

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords regoliththermalmoonsinertiaporositygrainwatergrains
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Estimating surface properties such as porosity and grain sizes is key for planning lander missions and landing site selection on icy moons. However, spaceborne instruments do not measure the regolith properties directly: instead, they record proxy measurements such as thermal flux, which are then interpreted through modeling to estimate thermal inertia, porosity, grain size, etc. A striking conclusion from all thermal measurements that probed the uppermost surface (first millimeters) of icy moons is they all show an exceptionally low thermal inertia, ranging from 9 to 20 J.m-2.K-1.s-0.5. This value is orders of magnitude lower than that of bulk hexagonal water ice (2000 J.m-2.K-1.s-0.5) at these temperatures. We demonstrate that a regolith thermally dominated by hexagonal water ice may only achieve such thermal inertia through a combination of extremely high porosity (>80%), small grain radii (<1 mm), and an unconsolidated regolith (minimal contact area between grains), consistent with previous photometry and spectroscopy studies. For the Galilean moons, deeper thermal observations (>1 cm) have revealed higher thermal inertia (>~50 J.m-2.K-1.s-0.5), indicating that the regolith compacts over centimeter scales. Since gravity has no effect on compaction on such scale, we propose three formation scenarios to account for vertical layering: deposition cover, degradation by impactors, and temperature gradient metamorphism. We discuss how monodisperse grains can reach such extreme porosities and provide examples of experimental analogs that could best represent the regolith. We propose that high porosity regolith are favored on icy moons due to the adhesive nature of water ice and their low-gravity environment.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.