REVIEW 1 cited by
Investigating Privacy Attacks in the Gray-Box Setting to Enhance Collaborative Learning Schemes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The notion that collaborative machine learning can ensure privacy by just withholding the raw data is widely acknowledged to be flawed. Over the past seven years, the literature has revealed several privacy attacks that enable adversaries to extract information about a model's training dataset by exploiting access to model parameters during or after training. In this work, we study privacy attacks in the gray-box setting, where the attacker has only limited access - in terms of view and actions - to the model. The findings of our investigation provide new insights for the development of privacy-preserving collaborative learning solutions. We deploy SmartCryptNN, a framework that tailors homomorphic encryption to protect the portions of the model posing higher privacy risks. Our solution offers a trade-off between privacy and efficiency, which varies based on the extent and selection of the model components we choose to protect. We explore it on dense neural networks, where through extensive evaluation of diverse datasets and architectures, we uncover instances where a favorable sweet spot in the trade-off can be achieved by safeguarding only a single layer of the network. In one of such instances, our approach trains ~4 times faster compared to fully encrypted solutions, while reducing membership leakage by 17.8 times compared to plaintext solutions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On Understanding, Identifying, and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in Agentic Large Language Models
A PRISMA-based survey of 85 papers shows agentic LLM security research is attack-heavy and perception-focused, leaving action-layer and code-execution risks understudied.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.