Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 77 references

Unveiling Discrete Clues: Superior Healthcare Predictions for Rare Diseases

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that rare disease prediction is substantially improved by transferring text knowledge into collaborative signal space through a discrete VQ-VAE variant, replacing sparse disease embeddings with reconstructed text-guided…

desk verdict A solid, well-executed method paper for rare-disease prediction whose central claim rests on single-run point estimates and a one-dataset subgroup analysis; deserves peer review but needs statistical rigor and a working code repo. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16373 v1 pith:HWEDY6ZL submitted 2025-01-23 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CE

Chuang Zhao , Hui Tang , Jiheng Zhang , Xiaomeng Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CE
keywords discreterepresentationlearninghealthcarepredictionrarediseasevectorquantizationcontrastiveco-teacherdistillationmedicationrecommendationdiagnosis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that the poor predictive performance of electronic health record (EHR) models on rare diseases can be repaired by using clinical text as a bridge into the space of collaborative signals. It proposes UDC, a discrete representation learning framework that aligns textual descriptions of diseases with their collaborative embeddings in a shared codebook, then substitutes the unreliable rare-disease embeddings with text-derived reconstructions. If correct, the method would lift worst-case performance on the rarest disease groups while preserving or improving average accuracy, and it would do so without changing the underlying prediction model. The paper reports state-of-the-art results on diagnosis prediction and medication recommendation across three datasets, with the largest gains concentrated in the rarest disease groups.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the discrete representation learning (DRL) module built on RQ-VAE, which maps both collaborative and textual disease embeddings into the same residual codebook of four code levels. Condition-aware calibration modulates each quantized code by normalized multi-head attention over the procedures and medications co-occurring in the same visit, making similar text descriptions produce distinct codes. Task-aware calibration adds contrastive losses whose negative samples are synthetic targets (randomly substituted next-visit entities) and mixed-domain targets (text counterparts of collaborative samples), pushing reconstructions toward task-relevant distinctions. Co-teacher distillation updates each codebook vector as an exponential moving average of the aggregated representations of both domains, with mutual cross-attention terms that enforce a shared code semantics. The final mapping $\hat{e}_d = \psi_{co}[\varphi(\phi_{te}(\tilde{e}_d); e_p, e_m)]$ for rare diseases $d \in \mathcal{D}_{rar}$ and the analogous reconstruction for common diseases transform text embeddings into collaborative-space embeddings that then replace the original embeddings during fine-tuning.

What would settle it

If UDC's rare-disease gains come from the Text-to-CO transfer, then feeding the frozen DRL scrambled or permuted text embeddings for rare diseases should collapse the reported G1 improvement to near baseline levels; a concrete test is to evaluate the authors' released code with shuffled rare-disease text descriptions on MIMIC-IV and see whether the Acc@K gain on the rarest 20% of diseases disappears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

UDC establishes that a tailored VQ-VAE variant, trained only on common diseases, can learn a Text-to-CO mapping that enriches rare disease representations enough to significantly improve downstream healthcare predictions. The framework refines the vector quantization process with condition-aware calibration, which injects visit-level co-occurring entities to distinguish clinically different diseases with similar text, and task-aware calibration, which uses synthetic and mixed-domain hard negatives to keep reconstructions relevant to the prediction target. A co-teacher distillation updates the shared codebook by aggregating both textual and collaborative signals, aligning them at the code level. After training, the model substitutes each rare disease's original collaborative embedding with the reconstruction obtained from its text description, then fine-tunes the prediction model. Experiments on MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, and eICU report the best Acc@K, Pres@K, AUPRC, and AUROC for diagnosis prediction and Jaccard, F1, AUPRC, and AUROC for medication recommendation, with group analysis showing the largest relative gains on the rarest disease group.

Load-bearing premise

The DRL is trained only on common diseases, so the method assumes that a text-to-collaborative mapping learned on common diseases transfers to rare diseases despite the distribution shift, and that Sap-BERT text embeddings of rare disease descriptions are informative enough to reconstruct useful collaborative representations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • UDC improves diagnosis prediction and medication recommendation across all three datasets, with the largest gains on the rarest disease group (G1), according to the reported group analysis.
  • The framework is plug-in: it works with different collaborative prediction backbones (GRU, Transformer, multi-head attention) and different clinical language models (Sap-BERT, BioGPT, Clinical-BERT), so the gains are not tied to one architecture.
  • The authors report that DRL training collapses when trained jointly with the prediction model, and that skipping fine-tuning loses most of the benefit, implying that a staged pipeline is necessary for the method to work.
  • The method achieves competitive time complexity, making it feasible to apply in large-scale EHR settings.
  • Ablations show that all three components—condition-aware calibration, task-aware calibration, and co-teacher distillation—contribute, with condition-aware calibration the most impactful for diagnosis prediction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The central assumption that a Text-to-CO map trained on common diseases transfers to rare diseases could be tested directly by evaluating UDC on rare diseases whose text descriptions are deliberately degraded; if the reported gains persist, the transfer is not the active mechanism.
  • The condition-aware calibration idea, treating co-occurring entities as contextual conditions for quantized representations, could generalize to other long-tail prediction problems beyond healthcare, such as sparse item recommendation or rare event forecasting.
  • Co-teacher distillation in a shared discrete space may be a general recipe for aligning two views of the same entities (e.g., text and behavior) under severe label sparsity, and its ablation sensitivity suggests the codebook update is a key bottleneck for such alignment.
  • The reported performance drop on the most common disease group (G5) hints that the method may trade some accuracy on high-frequency, low-specificity diagnoses for gains on rarer ones; whether this trade-off is clinically desirable depends on the deployment's cost structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes UDC, a discrete representation learning framework for healthcare predictions that aims to improve rare-disease performance. UDC first trains a standard collaborative model (PCM) to obtain CO embeddings, then trains a residual-quantization VQ-VAE (DRL) that reconstructs and aligns CO and text (Sap-BERT) embeddings in a shared codebook, using condition-aware calibration, task-aware contrastive learning with synthetic and mixed-domain hard negatives, and co-teacher distillation for codebook updates. The DRL is trained only on common diseases, and at inference time rare-disease text embeddings are mapped through the common-trained decoder to replace the original CO embeddings. The framework is evaluated on diagnosis prediction and medication recommendation over MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, and eICU, reporting consistent improvements over a broad set of baselines, along with ablations, plug-in experiments with different PCMs and PLMs, and a case study.

Significance. If the reported results hold, UDC offers a practically useful and conceptually appealing way to leverage textual descriptions as a bridge for rare diseases in EHR prediction, and its design as a plug-in module means it could benefit several existing architectures. The manuscript is strong in scope: it evaluates across three datasets and two tasks, compares against many recent baselines, and includes ablations that isolate condition-aware calibration, task-aware calibration, hard-negative sampling, and co-teacher distillation. The code is promised on GitHub, and the method is presented as model-agnostic. However, the central claim of significantly enriching rare-disease semantics currently rests on point estimates without variance or significance testing, and the rare-disease-specific analysis is shown for only one dataset, so the statistical strength of the headline claim is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1–§4.2, Tables 1–2] All reported results are single-run point estimates with no standard deviations, confidence intervals, or significance tests across seeds or test-set resamples. The paper's key contribution is worded as 'significantly enriched the semantics of rare diseases' (Section 1), but the improvements over the strongest baselines are often modest (for example, Diag Pred Acc@K gains of roughly 1–2 points on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV, and 0.5–1 point on several Med Rec metrics). Without repeated runs or a paired significance test, these margins cannot be distinguished from run-to-run noise. I ask the authors to report mean and standard deviation over at least five random seeds for the main tables and to run a paired significance test (e.g., Wilcoxon signed-rank on per-admission metrics or bootstrap over admissions) for the UDC-vs-strongest-baseline comparisons.
  2. [§4.3.2, Figure 3] The group-level rare-disease analysis, which is the direct evidence for the paper's central claim, is presented only for MIMIC-III and without any error bars or repeated-seed information. The main tables report aggregate metrics, so the rare-disease subgroup gains are not quantified on MIMIC-IV or eICU. Since the paper's title and contribution center on rare-disease prediction, the authors should provide group-level results (e.g., the G1–G5 breakdown used in Figure 3) for at least MIMIC-IV and ideally eICU, with variance estimates. Without this, the claim that UDC improves rare-disease predictions is supported by exactly one dataset and one split, which is insufficient evidence for the headline.
  3. [§3.5, Eq. (14)–(15)] The DRL is trained exclusively on common diseases (D_com), and rare-disease text embeddings are mapped through the common-trained decoder psi_co in Eq. (15). This transfer is the load-bearing assumption of the method: a Text→CO mapping learned on the head of the distribution must generalize to the tail. The manuscript does not directly test this assumption. I request a quantitative transfer analysis, for example: (a) reconstruction error (Eq. 14 components) for rare versus common diseases, (b) an ablation in which the DRL is trained on all diseases (D_com ∪ D_rar) instead of only D_com, and (c) rare-disease subgroup performance with this alternative training. This would show whether the rare-disease gains come from the common-to-rare transfer or simply from training the DRL on more data.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.3.1] The text refers to 'UDC-CO' as the configuration without condition-aware calibration, but Table 3 labels this configuration 'UDC-NCO'. Please make the naming consistent.
  2. [§4.3.4, Figure 6] The case study shows 'before DRL' and 'after DRL' representations but does not specify the visualization method (e.g., t-SNE, PCA) or how the plotted points are colored/selected. Please add this information so the figure can be interpreted precisely.
  3. [§4.1, Datasets] The sentence 'We retain patients with more than one visit in MIMIC-III and eICU, while for MIMIC-IV, we include patients with two or more visits' appears to say the same thing twice. Please clarify the intended inclusion criteria.
  4. [§2.2] The related work section states that our method 'aligns with the last genre' of generative retrieval and extends VQ-VAE, but the connection to generative retrieval is not made explicit in the method or experiments. A brief sentence connecting the discrete-code reconstruction to generative retrieval would help situate the contribution.
  5. [Appendix E.2, Figures 9–10] The hyperparameter study reports only MIMIC-III diagnosis-prediction results and does not break down performance by rare-disease group. Since the central claim concerns rare diseases, adding the G1-group or a rare/common split to at least the eta sensitivity analysis would strengthen the robustness story.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the rare-disease transfer claim is self-contained; the only self-citation (DEPOT, [62]) is a baseline/preprocessing reference and is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against the target results. UDC trains the DRL on common diseases D_com using Ltotal (Eq. 14), which combines reconstruction, contrastive, and commitment losses; rare-disease representations are then produced at inference by Eq. 15 from PLM text embeddings through the common-trained decoder psi_co. This is a learned transfer map, not a restatement of the target predictions. The task-aware contrastive loss (Eqs. 8-10) uses ground-truth next-visit targets only during training as a supervised regularizer, while all reported metrics are computed on the held-out 60/20/20 split, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only self-citation is the authors' earlier DEPOT work [62], used as a baseline and for standard preprocessing/partition conventions ('following [15, 62]' in Section 4.1 and 'pre-processing [54, 62]' in Appendix D); it is not invoked to justify the core mechanism or to exclude alternatives. The absence of error bars and the single-dataset rare-disease subgroup analysis are statistical-evidence limitations, not circularity. No equation was found that reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method rests on standard quantization machinery plus three domain assumptions: text semantics are consistent, common-disease co-occurrence is reliable for training, and the text-to-CO mapping transfers to rare diseases. The free parameters are standard hyperparameters, most with ablations; kappa is unreported.

free parameters (6)
  • Codebook size |C_l| = Set to 64.
    Chosen by hand in Section 4.1; ablation in Appendix E.2 (Fig 10a) shows sensitivity to this value.
  • Commitment weight alpha = Set to 0.25.
    Chosen in Section 4.1; ablation in Appendix E.2 (Fig 10b) shows a trade-off between alignment and reconstruction.
  • Rare-disease threshold eta = Set to 20% (common means appearing in at least 20% of cases).
    Section 4.1 sets this via the Pareto principle; Appendix E.2 (Fig 9) shows performance varies with eta, making it a hand-chosen boundary.
  • Number of code levels L = Set to 4.
    Following RQ-VAE in Section 4.1; not ablated in the paper.
  • Decay rate kappa in co-teacher updates = Not specified.
    Exponential moving average decay in Eq. 11-12; no value is reported in the paper.
  • Commitment-loss teacher ratio = Set to 50% (alpha/2 in Eq. 13).
    The new commitment term is weighted at half the original weight so the text code acts as a teacher; the ratio is stated in Section 3.4.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Residual vector quantization (RQ-VAE) provides valid discrete latent representations for EHR embeddings.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 (Eq. 4) as the foundation for the discrete code space; treated as background from [22,39].
  • domain assumption ICD and ATC code descriptions carry semantically consistent textual knowledge across diseases.
    Section 4.1 says text is obtained by parsing EHR entities according to ICD and ATC systems; the method assumes these descriptions are reliable and comparable.
  • domain assumption Sap-BERT embeddings of disease descriptions are consistent enough for code-level alignment.
    Section 3.1 Eq. 3 uses Sap-BERT as the PLM without verification on this corpus; the alignment depends on its semantic quality.
  • domain assumption A Text-to-CO mapping learned on common diseases transfers to rare diseases.
    Section 3.5 trains DRL on D_com only and Eq. 15 applies it to D_rar; this is the paper's key transfer assumption.
  • domain assumption Diseases appearing in at least 20% of cases define the reliable common set.
    Section 4.1 sets eta=20% following the Pareto principle; the split determines what the DRL sees and is the main boundary of the method.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling Discrete Clues: Superior Healthcare Predictions for Rare Diseases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HWEDY6ZL

@misc{pith2026250116373,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling Discrete Clues: Superior Healthcare Predictions for Rare Diseases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HWEDY6ZL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16373}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate healthcare prediction is essential for improving patient outcomes. Existing work primarily leverages advanced frameworks like attention or graph networks to capture the intricate collaborative (CO) signals in electronic health records. However, prediction for rare diseases remains challenging due to limited co-occurrence and inadequately tailored approaches. To address this issue, this paper proposes UDC, a novel method that unveils discrete clues to bridge consistent textual knowledge and CO signals within a unified semantic space, thereby enriching the representation semantics of rare diseases. Specifically, we focus on addressing two key sub-problems: (1) acquiring distinguishable discrete encodings for precise disease representation and (2) achieving semantic alignment between textual knowledge and the CO signals at the code level. For the first sub-problem, we refine the standard vector quantized process to include condition awareness. Additionally, we develop an advanced contrastive approach in the decoding stage, leveraging synthetic and mixed-domain targets as hard negatives to enrich the perceptibility of the reconstructed representation for downstream tasks. For the second sub-problem, we introduce a novel codebook update strategy using co-teacher distillation. This approach facilitates bidirectional supervision between textual knowledge and CO signals, thereby aligning semantically equivalent information in a shared discrete latent space. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate our superiority.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16373 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Disease occurrences across three datasets. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of UDC. We pre-train the PCM to establish a robust CO space and then obtain CO and text representations for diseases using PCM and a selected PLM. Next, we train the DRL to align the text and CO signals, followed by fine-tuning the PCM for downstream tasks while keeping the DRL frozen. Q, K, and V denote the parameters for multi-head attention. Pre-trained PCM & PLM. Initially, we train a conventional healt… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Group Analysis. 4.3.2 Group Analysis. To examine the model’s performance on rare diseases, we conduct a group-level analysis. Specifically, in Diag Pred, diseases are categorized into five prevalence groups: 0-20% (G1), 20-40%(G2), 40-60%(G3), 60-80%(G4), and 80-100%(G5), where G1 is the rarest disease group. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plug-in Application (Diverse PCM). We choose MoleRec, SHAPE, RAREMed, and SeqCare, as they are flexible to PCM. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plug-in Application (Diverse PLM). We select HAR, GraphCare, and SeqCare that utilize external knowledge. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Code Semantics. 4.3.4 Case Study. We visualize disease representations before and after DRL. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Different training methods (MIMIC-III). Please note [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: , all algorithms’ Acc@K improve with increasing K, as a larger Top-K captures more relevant medical entities, aiding in the challenging Diag Pred. Notably, regardless of the specific K value setting, our UDC consistently outperforms the strongest baseline. Moreover, wh…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Performance under different ratios. (MIMIC-III) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Performance under different codebook sizes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zafar Ali, Yi Huang, Irfan Ullah, Junlan Feng, Chao Deng, Nimbeshaho Thierry, Asad Khan, Asim Ullah Jan, Xiaoli Shen, Rui Wu, and Guilin Qi. 2023. Deep Learning for Medication Recommendation: A Systematic Survey. Data Intell. 5, 2 (2023), 303–354

    2023

  2. [2]

    Kamal Berahmand, Fatemeh Daneshfar, Elaheh Sadat Salehi, Yuefeng Li, and Yue Xu. 2024. Autoencoders and their applications in machine learning: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review 57, 2 (2024), 28

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Suman Bhoi, Mong Li Lee, Wynne Hsu, Hao Sen Andrew Fang, and Ngiap Chuan Tan. 2021. Personalizing medication recommendation with a graph-based ap- proach. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 40, 3 (2021), 1–23

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Tanujit Chakraborty, Ujjwal Reddy KS, Shraddha M Naik, Madhurima Panja, and Bayapureddy Manvitha. 2024. Ten years of generative adversarial nets (GANs): a survey of the state-of-the-art. Machine Learning: Science and Technology 5, 1 (2024), 011001

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Edward Choi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Le Song, Walter F Stewart, and Jimeng Sun. 2017. GRAM: graph-based attention model for healthcare representation learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 787–795

    2017

  6. [6]

    Edward Choi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Jimeng Sun, Joshua Kulas, Andy Schuetz, and Walter F. Stewart. 2016. RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanism. In Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems 29: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2016, December 5-10, 2016, Barcelona...

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    MICHAEL H Criqui, A Fronek, MRl Klauber, E Barrett-Connor, and S Gabriel

    work page

  8. [8]

    Yizhou Dang, Enneng Yang, Guibing Guo, Linying Jiang, Xingwei Wang, Xiaoxiao Xu, Qinghui Sun, and Hong Liu. 2023. Uniform sequence better: Time interval aware data augmentation for sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , Vol. 37. 4225–4232

    2023

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Anne A. H. de Hond, Artuur M. Leeuwenberg, Lotty Hooft, Ilse M. J. Kant, Steven W. J. Nijman, Hendrikus J. A. van Os, Jiska J. Aardoom, Thomas P. A. Debray, Ewoud Schuit, Maarten van Smeden, Johannes B. Reitsma, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Niels H. Chavannes, and Karel G. M. Moons. 2...

    2022

  2. [10]

    Linda Ekerljung, Apostolos Bossios, Jan Lötvall, Anna-Carin Olin, Eva Rönmark, Göran Wennergren, Kjell Torén, and Bo Lundbäck. 2011. Multi-symptom asthma as an indication of disease severity in epidemiology.European Respiratory Journal 38, 4 (2011), 825–832

    2011

  3. [11]

    Glass, and Jimeng Sun

    Junyi Gao, Cao Xiao, Yasha Wang, Wen Tang, Lucas M. Glass, and Jimeng Sun

  4. [12]

    Miguel Garcia-Argibay, Lin Li, Ebba Du Rietz, Le Zhang, Honghui Yao, Johan Jendle, Josep A Ramos-Quiroga, Marta Ribases, Zheng Chang, Isabell Brikell, et al

  5. [13]

    Kim Huat Goh, Le Wang, Adrian Yong Kwang Yeow, Hermione Poh, Ke Li, Joannas Jie Lin Yeow, and Gamaliel Yu Heng Tan. 2021. Artificial intelligence in sepsis early prediction and diagnosis using unstructured data in healthcare. Nature communications 12, 1 (2021), 711

    2021

  6. [14]

    Longbin Ji, Pengfei Wei, Yi Ren, Jinglin Liu, Chen Zhang, and Xiang Yin. 2023. C2G2: Controllable Co-speech Gesture Generation with Latent Diffusion Model. CoRR abs/2308.15016 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Pengcheng Jiang, Cao Xiao, Adam Cross, and Jimeng Sun. [n. d.]. GraphCare: Enhancing Healthcare Predictions with Personalized Knowledge Graphs. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net

    2024

  8. [16]

    Peng Jin, Hao Li, Zesen Cheng, Kehan Li, Xiangyang Ji, Chang Liu, Li Yuan, and Jie Chen. 2023. DiffusionRet: Generative Text-Video Retrieval with Diffusion Model. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2023, Paris, France, October 1-6, 2023 . IEEE, 2470–2481

    2023

  9. [17]

    Alistair EW Johnson, Lucas Bulgarelli, Lu Shen, Alvin Gayles, Ayad Shammout, Steven Horng, Tom J Pollard, Sicheng Hao, Benjamin Moody, Brian Gow, et al

  10. [18]

    Alistair EW Johnson, Tom J Pollard, Lu Shen, Li-wei H Lehman, Mengling Feng, Mohammad Ghassemi, Benjamin Moody, Peter Szolovits, Leo Anthony Celi, and Roger G Mark. 2016. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database.Scientific data 3, 1 (2016), 1–9

    2016

  11. [19]

    Kibum Kim, Dongmin Hyun, Sukwon Yun, and Chanyoung Park. 2023. MELT: Mutual Enhancement of Long-Tailed User and Item for Sequential Recommenda- tion. In Proceedings of the 46th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval . 68–77

    2023

  12. [20]

    Taeri Kim, Jiho Heo, Hongil Kim, Kijung Shin, and Sang-Wook Kim. 2024. VITA: ’Carefully Chosen and Weighted Less’ Is Better in Medication Recommendation. In Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2024, Thirty- Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications...

    2024

  13. [21]

    Scientific data 10, 1 (2023), 1

    MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Scientific data 10, 1 (2023), 1

    2023

  14. [22]

    Doyup Lee, Chiheon Kim, Saehoon Kim, Minsu Cho, and Wook-Shin Han. 2022. Autoregressive Image Generation using Residual Quantization. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 18-24, 2022 . IEEE, 11513–11522

    2022

  15. [23]

    Shiwei Li, Huifeng Guo, Xing Tang, Ruiming Tang, Lu Hou, Ruixuan Li, and Rui Zhang. 2024. Embedding Compression in Recommender Systems: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 5 (2024), 130:1–130:21

    2024

  16. [24]

    Xiaoxi Li, Jiajie Jin, Yujia Zhou, Yuyao Zhang, Peitian Zhang, Yutao Zhu, and Zhicheng Dou. 2024. From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval. CoRR abs/2404.14851 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Tzu-Lin Kuo, Tzu-Wei Chiu, Tzung-Sheng Lin, Sheng-Yang Wu, Chao-Wei Huang, and Yun-Nung Chen. 2024. A Survey of Generative Information Retrieval. CoRR abs/2406.01197 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Yuhan Li, Zhixun Li, Peisong Wang, Jia Li, Xiangguo Sun, Hong Cheng, and Jeffrey Xu Yu. 2024. A Survey of Graph Meets Large Language Model: Progress and Future Directions. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 202...

    2024

  19. [27]

    Yongqi Li, Nan Yang, Liang Wang, Furu Wei, and Wenjie Li. 2023. Generative retrieval for conversational question answering. Information Processing & Man- agement 60, 5 (2023), 103475

    2023

  20. [28]

    Zhixun Li, Xin Sun, Yifan Luo, Yanqiao Zhu, Dingshuo Chen, Yingtao Luo, Xi- angxin Zhou, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Liang Wang, and Jeffrey Xu Yu. 2023. GSLB: The Graph Structure Learning Benchmark. InAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural ...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Xiang Li, Shunpan Liang, Yulei Hou, and Tengfei Ma. 2024. StratMed: Relevance stratification between biomedical entities for sparsity on medication recommen- dation. Knowledge-Based Systems 284 (2024), 111239

    2024

  22. [30]

    Sicen Liu, Xiaolong Wang, Jingcheng Du, Yongshuai Hou, Xianbing Zhao, Hui Xu, Hui Wang, Yang Xiang, and Buzhou Tang. 2023. SHAPE: A Sample-adaptive Hierarchical Prediction Network for Medication Recommendation. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Junyu Luo, Muchao Ye, Cao Xiao, and Fenglong Ma. 2020. Hitanet: Hierarchical time-aware attention networks for risk prediction on electronic health records. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining . 647–656

    2020

  24. [32]

    Renqian Luo, Liai Sun, Yingce Xia, Tao Qin, Sheng Zhang, Hoifung Poon, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2022. BioGPT: generative pre-trained transformer for biomedical text generation and mining. Briefings in bioinformatics 23, 6 (2022), bbac409

    2022

  25. [33]

    Fangyu Liu, Ehsan Shareghi, Zaiqiao Meng, Marco Basaldella, and Nigel Collier

  26. [34]

    Fenglong Ma, Radha Chitta, Jing Zhou, Quanzeng You, Tong Sun, and Jing Gao

  27. [35]

    Fenglong Ma, Yaqing Wang, Jing Gao, Houping Xiao, and Jing Zhou. 2020. Rare Disease Prediction by Generating Quality-Assured Electronic Health Records. In Proceedings of the 2020 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, SDM 2020, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, May 7-9, 2020 . SIA...

    2020

  28. [36]

    Phuoc Nguyen, Truyen Tran, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, and Svetha Venkatesh

  29. [37]

    Tom J Pollard, Alistair EW Johnson, Jesse D Raffa, Leo A Celi, Roger G Mark, and Omar Badawi. 2018. The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research. Scientific data 5, 1 (2018), 1–13

    2018

  30. [38]

    Hang Lv, Zehai Chen, Yacong Yang, Guofang Ma, Tan Yanchao, and Carl Yang

  31. [39]

    Ali Razavi, Aäron van den Oord, and Oriol Vinyals. 2019. Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2. InAdvances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, WWW ’25, April 28-May 02, 2025, Sydney, Au...

    2019

  32. [40]

    Wolfgang Sadee, Danxin Wang, Katherine Hartmann, and Amanda Ewart Toland

  33. [41]

    Junyuan Shang, Cao Xiao, Tengfei Ma, Hongyan Li, and Jimeng Sun. 2019. GAMENet: Graph Augmented MEmory Networks for Recommending Medication Combination. In The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artif...

    2019

  34. [42]

    Weiwei Sun, Lingyong Yan, Zheng Chen, Shuaiqiang Wang, Haichao Zhu, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Dawei Yin, Maarten de Rijke, and Zhaochun Ren. 2023. Learning to Tokenize for Generative Retrieval. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural...

    2023

  35. [43]

    Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All you Need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Con- ference on Neural Information Processing Systems ...

    2017

  36. [44]

    Ioannis S Vizirianakis. 2011. Nanomedicine and personalized medicine toward the application of pharmacotyping in clinical practice to improve drug-delivery outcomes. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine7, 1 (2011), 11–17

    2011

  37. [45]

    Guangyu Wang, Xiaohong Liu, Zhen Ying, Guoxing Yang, Zhiwei Chen, Zhiwen Liu, Min Zhang, Hongmei Yan, Yuxing Lu, Yuanxu Gao, et al. 2023. Optimized glycemic control of type 2 diabetes with reinforcement learning: a proof-of- concept trial. Nature Medicine 29, 10 (2023), 2633–2642

    2023

  38. [46]

    Tran, Jonah Samost, Maciej Kula, Ed H

    Shashank Rajput, Nikhil Mehta, Anima Singh, Raghunandan Hulikal Keshavan, Trung Vu, Lukasz Heldt, Lichan Hong, Yi Tay, Vinh Q. Tran, Jonah Samost, Maciej Kula, Ed H. Chi, and Mahesh Sathiamoorthy. 2023. Recommender Systems with Generative Retrieval. In Advances in Neural Infor...

    2023

  39. [47]

    Le Wu, Xiangnan He, Xiang Wang, Kun Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2022. A survey on accuracy-oriented neural recommendation: From collaborative filtering to information-rich recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 35, 5 (2022), 4425–4445

    2022

  40. [48]

    Likang Wu, Zhi Li, Hongke Zhao, Zhenya Huang, Yongqiang Han, Junji Jiang, and Enhong Chen. 2024. Supporting Your Idea Reasonably: A Knowledge-Aware Topic Reasoning Strategy for Citation Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Pharmacological reviews 75, 4 (2023), 789–814

    Pharmacogenomics: driving personalized medicine. Pharmacological reviews 75, 4 (2023), 789–814

    2023

  42. [50]

    Yan Xia, Hai Huang, Jieming Zhu, and Zhou Zhao. 2023. Achieving Cross Modal Generalization with Multimodal Unified Representation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orlean...

    2023

  43. [51]

    Yisheng Xiao, Lijun Wu, Junliang Guo, Juntao Li, Min Zhang, Tao Qin, and Tie- yan Liu. 2023. A survey on non-autoregressive generation for neural machine translation and beyond. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45, 10 (2023), 11407–11427

    2023

  44. [52]

    Jingjing Xu, Xu Sun, Zhiyuan Zhang, Guangxiang Zhao, and Junyang Lin. 2019. Understanding and Improving Layer Normalization. In Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14,...

    2019

  45. [53]

    Yongxin Xu, Xu Chu, Kai Yang, Zhiyuan Wang, Peinie Zou, Hongxin Ding, Junfeng Zhao, Yasha Wang, and Bing Xie. 2023. Seqcare: Sequential training with external medical knowledge graph for diagnosis prediction in healthcare data. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 . 2819–2830

    2023

  46. [54]

    Chaoqi Yang, Zhenbang Wu, Patrick Jiang, Zhen Lin, Junyi Gao, Benjamin P Danek, and Jimeng Sun. 2023. Pyhealth: A deep learning toolkit for healthcare applications. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 5788–5789

    2023

  47. [55]

    Liping Wang, Qiang Liu, Mengqi Zhang, Yaxuan Hu, Shu Wu, and Liang Wang

  48. [56]

    IEEE Trans

    Stage-Aware Hierarchical Attentive Relational Network for Diagnosis Prediction. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 36, 4 (2024), 1773–1784

    2024

  49. [57]

    Nianzu Yang, Kaipeng Zeng, Qitian Wu, and Junchi Yan. 2023. Molerec: Combina- torial drug recommendation with substructure-aware molecular representation learning. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 . 4075–4085

    2023

  50. [58]

    Xihong Yang, Cheng Tan, Yue Liu, Ke Liang, Siwei Wang, Sihang Zhou, Jun Xia, Stan Z Li, Xinwang Liu, and En Zhu. 2023. Convert: Contrastive graph clustering with reliable augmentation. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 319–327

    2023

  51. [59]

    Rui Wu, Zhaopeng Qiu, Jiacheng Jiang, Guilin Qi, and Xian Wu. 2022. Conditional generation net for medication recommendation. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. 935–945

    2022

  52. [60]

    Muhan Zhang, Shali Jiang, Zhicheng Cui, Roman Garnett, and Yixin Chen

  53. [61]

    Yifan Zhang, Bingyi Kang, Bryan Hooi, Shuicheng Yan, and Jiashi Feng. 2023. Deep long-tailed learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45, 9 (2023), 10795–10816

    2023

  54. [62]

    Chuang Zhao, Hongke Zhao, Xiaofang Zhou, and Xiaomeng Li. 2024. Enhanc- ing Precision Drug Recommendations via In-Depth Exploration of Motif Rela- tionships. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 36, 12 (2024), 8164–8178

    2024

  55. [63]

    Zihao Zhao, Yi Jing, Fuli Feng, Jiancan Wu, Chongming Gao, and Xiangnan He

  56. [64]

    Chuanxia Zheng, Tung-Long Vuong, Jianfei Cai, and Dinh Phung. 2022. Movq: Modulating quantized vectors for high-fidelity image generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 23412–23425. Unveiling Discrete Clues: Superior Healthcare Predictions for Ra...

    2022

  57. [65]

    Chaoqi Yang, Cao Xiao, Lucas Glass, and Jimeng Sun. 2021. Change Matters: Medication Change Prediction with Recurrent Residual Networks. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2021, Virtual Event / Montreal, Canada, 19-...

    2021

  58. [66]

    Chaoqi Yang, Cao Xiao, Fenglong Ma, Lucas Glass, and Jimeng Sun. 2021. Safe- Drug: Dual Molecular Graph Encoders for Recommending Effective and Safe Drug Combinations. In30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2021. International Joint Conferences...

    2021

  59. [69]

    Muchao Ye, Suhan Cui, Yaqing Wang, Junyu Luo, Cao Xiao, and Fenglong Ma

  60. [70]

    In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021

    Medpath: Augmenting health risk prediction via medical knowledge paths. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 . 1397–1409

    2021

  61. [76]

    Leave No Patient Behind: Enhancing Medication Recommendation for Rare Disease Patients. (2024)

    2024

  62. [1985]

    Circulation 71, 3 (1985), 516–522

    The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of traditional clinical evaluation of peripheral arterial disease: results from noninvasive testing in a defined population. Circulation 71, 3 (1985), 516–522

    1985

  63. [2016]

    IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 21, 1 (2016), 22–30

    Deepr: a convolutional net for medical records. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 21, 1 (2016), 22–30

    2016

  64. [2017]

    In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining

    Dipole: Diagnosis prediction in healthcare via attention-based bidirectional recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 1903–1911

    1903

  65. [2019]

    D-VAE: A Variational Autoencoder for Directed Acyclic Graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Confer- ence on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, Decem- ber 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada , Hanna M. Wallach, Hugo Laroche...

    2019

  66. [2020]

    In WWW ’20: The Web Conference 2020, Taipei, Taiwan, April 20-24, 2020

    StageNet: Stage-Aware Neural Networks for Health Risk Prediction. In WWW ’20: The Web Conference 2020, Taipei, Taiwan, April 20-24, 2020 . ACM / IW3C2, 530–540

    2020

  67. [2021]

    In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

    Self-Alignment Pretraining for Biomedical Entity Representations. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies . 4228–4238

    2021

  68. [2023]

    Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews 147 (2023), 105076

    The association between type 2 diabetes and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and population-based sibling study. Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews 147 (2023), 105076

    2023

  69. [2024]

    In Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024

    BoxCare: A Box Embedding Model for Disease Representation and Diagno- sis Prediction in Healthcare Data. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024. 1130–1133

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.