Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 70 references

Nonlinear projection for ballistic correlation functions: a formula in terms of minimal connected covers

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes a general projection formula expressing leading ballistic n-point connected correlation functions of arbitrary local observables, in any spatial dimension and in or out of equilibrium, entirely in terms of…

desk verdict A genuine n-point projection formula with a rigorous combinatorial core and a clearly flagged physical bridge; the conditional status is real but the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05266 v2 pith:HWJMZJ5J submitted 2025-06-05 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MP

Benjamin Doyon This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP
keywords nonlinearprojectionEuleramplitudesballisticcorrelationfunctionslocalrelaxationoffluctuationsminimalconnectedcoversconserveddensitiescumulantexpansionTASEP
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to prove that, at large scales of space and time, every connected correlation function of arbitrary local observables is a known function of correlation functions of conserved densities alone. The function is a sum over 'minimal connected covers' of the observation points, with one factor of a conserved-density correlation for each patch and one thermodynamic derivative of the observable for each point. If true, this closes the hydrodynamic description of ballistic fluctuations: no information about the microscopic observable beyond its microcanonical equation of state is needed at leading order. The claim covers all $n$-point functions, all spatial dimensions $d \ge 1$, and both equilibrium and non-equilibrium states, away from shocks and coincident points. A sympathetic reader would care because it turns a long list of special-case results into one combinatorial theorem.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three pieces. The first is the hypothesis of local relaxation of fluctuations: a fluid-cell average of any local observable at macroscopic position becomes a fixed function of the coarse-grained conserved densities, so fluctuations of observables are tied to fluctuations of densities. The second is the ballistic large-deviation ansatz that connected correlation functions of conserved densities scale as $\ell^{(1-n)d}$ times Euler amplitudes. The third is the combinatorial engine: a partial-moment-to-cumulant expansion lemma applied to observables written as polynomials in densities. That lemma organises the leading order as a sum over minimal connected covers, a cover of $\{1,\ldots,n\}$ whose patches have at least two points and whose index $\sum_V |V|-|\Upsilon|$ takes the minimal value $n-1$, equivalently built so each new patch meets the union of the previous ones in exactly one point. The index identity $|\Upsilon|-\sum_V |V|=1-n$ ensures each term carries the same power $\ell^{(1-n)d}$.

What would settle it

Compute, by Monte Carlo simulation of the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process or by exact methods, the connected three-point density correlation at three well-separated ballistic rays with density $\rho$, and compare with Eq. (101), which predicts the amplitude $\rho(1-\rho)(1-2\rho)\,\delta(x_{12}-vt_{12})\delta(x_{13}-vt_{13}) + 2\rho^2(1-\rho)^2(t_1\partial_{x_1}\delta(x_{12}-vt_{12})\delta(x_{13}-vt_{13}) + \mathrm{cyclic})$ at leading order in $\ell$; a mismatch in prefactor or in the support of the distribution would falsify the projection formula. Equivalently, in an exactly solvable one-dimensional model with known exact hydrodynamic data, evaluate $\ell^2\langle q(\ell x_1,\ell t_1)q(\ell x_2,\ell t_2)q(\ell x_3,\ell t_3)\rangle^c$ numerically at large $\ell$ and compare with the integral expression (104).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is Eq. (68): the Euler amplitude $S_{o_1,\ldots,o_n}(z_1,\ldots,z_n)$ of $n$ local observables equals a sum over minimal connected covers $\Upsilon$ of the set of space-time points, in which each patch $V$ contributes the conserved-density Euler amplitude $S_{i_{V_{k_1}},\ldots,i_{V_{k_{|V|}}}}(z_{k_1},\ldots,z_{k_{|V|}})$ and each point $z_k$, covered $m_k$ times, contributes the $m_k$-th mixed derivative of $o_k$ with respect to the corresponding conserved densities, evaluated at the local equilibrium values $q(z_k)$. The coefficients are all unity. The formula holds as a distributional equality for leading ballistic asymptotics, $\langle o_1(\ell z_1),\ldots,o_n(\ell z_n)\rangle^c_\ell \sim \ell^{(1-n)d} S_{o_1,\ldots,o_n}(z_1,\ldots,z_n)$, in any dimension $d\ge 1$, in and out of equilibrium, provided the points are distinct and away from fluid singularities. It generalises the linear-response projection for two-point functions to all orders in the nonlinearity, with the nonlinearity encoded in higher thermodynamic derivatives and in the combinatorial structure of the cover.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on the hypothesis that, at large scales, the average of any local observable over a small fluid cell takes the value it would have in a microcanonical ensemble fixed by the local conserved densities; the paper notes this fails at shocks and when two observation points coincide, and if it fails more broadly the projection formula breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $n$ and every spatial dimension $d\ge 1$, the leading ballistic $n$-point correlations of any local observables are fully determined by conserved-density correlation functions together with microcanonical derivatives, so the same hydrodynamic data that fix two-point functions also fix all higher cumulants.
  • In stationary states the two-point amplitude is $\sum_l \int \frac{d^d p}{(2\pi)^d} \,(\exp ip\cdot(x-At))^l_i\, C_{lj}$, a formula the paper notes is new for $d>1$, and combining it with the projection gives explicit two-point correlation functions of generic observables.
  • For three-point functions the paper derives explicit formulas in terms of the flux Jacobian, susceptibility, and three-point couplings, in $d=1$ for any number of conserved quantities and in $d>1$ for a single conserved quantity; time-translation invariance of the solution relies on a new symmetry relation for the three-point coupling.
  • Concrete predictions follow for the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process, Eq. (101), and for integrable models through their exact hydrodynamic data such as dressed scattering kernels and effective velocities.
  • The minimal connected covers give a finite, graphical recipe for any $n$, so the formula can be turned into explicit expressions without solving new dynamical equations beyond the Euler equation for the background state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the formula is correct, a natural next step the paper only gestures at is to read it as a non-Gaussian Wick theorem: Euler-scale correlations are generated by an effective field theory whose interaction vertices are thermodynamic derivatives of the observables and whose two-point structures are conserved-density amplitudes; the minimal connected covers are then exactly the connected diagrams of
  • The contact-singularity failure at coincident points, which the paper exhibits explicitly for two-point functions, suggests that equal-space-time correlations carry short-time information that hydrodynamic projection cannot reproduce; extending the formula to coincident points would require keeping mesoscopic structure in the observables, an extension the paper's own distributional caveats point t
  • Because local relaxation fails precisely at shocks, the formula implies shock trajectories are loci where the universal large-scale description breaks down; this could be tested by measuring three-point correlations approaching a shock in a lattice gas and looking for corrections that grow as the shock is approached.
  • The concluding table connecting $n$-point functions to corrections of one-point functions suggests the projection formula may be the leading term of a systematic expansion in inverse powers of the scale $\ell$; a concrete test would be to extract the next-order correction to the three-point function in an integrable model and check that it matches the diffusive-scale hydrodynamic-noise results the
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a nonlinear projection formula for ballistic (Euler-scale) connected correlation functions of local observables in many-body systems. It first states a general combinatorial theorem (Theorem 2.2) about cumulants in an abstract commutative algebra, proved in Appendix B, and then applies it to hydrodynamics by identifying algebra elements with functions of coarse-grained conserved densities. The main physical result, Eq. (68), expresses n-point Euler amplitudes S_{o_1,...,o_n} in terms of conserved-density amplitudes and thermodynamic derivatives of microcanonical averages, summed over minimal connected covers. The paper reproduces known 2- and 3-point projection formulas, derives explicit two- and three-point amplitudes in stationary states, and gives a TASEP prediction (Eq. (101)). The rigorous content is the combinatorial theorem; the bridge to hydrodynamics rests on the hypotheses of local relaxation of fluctuations (Eq. (33)) and the induced-measure relations (Eqs. (57)-(58)).

Significance. If correct, Eq. (68) is a major unification: it extends linear-response projection to arbitrary n-point functions in arbitrary spatial dimension, with no fitted parameters. The combinatorial theorem is self-contained and its proof is given in Appendix B; the reduction to n=2 and n=3 matches earlier independent results, and the stationary-state three-point formulas are explicit and new. The TASEP prediction (101) is honestly flagged as conjectural. However, the physical projection step (58) is not derived from microscopic dynamics, and the formula's distributional well-definedness is left open in Remark 4.1. These are load-bearing limitations: Eq. (68) is a conditional statement unless the hypotheses are stated explicitly or proved. The paper is commendably transparent about these gaps, but the abstract's claim of a complete derivation goes beyond what is established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.5, Eqs. (57)-(58) and Remark 4.1] The central formula (68) relies on the induced-measure relation (58), which asserts that Euler amplitudes computed from cumulants of o_1(q(z_1)), ..., o_n(q(z_n)) in the induced measure equal the physical Euler amplitudes S_{o_1,...,o_n}. The derivation in Eqs. (59)-(65) uses a saddle-point argument, an exchange of functional derivatives with the macroscopic limit, and local relaxation with negligible o(ℓ) corrections. Remark 4.1 explicitly concedes that (57)-(58) are distributional while the proof assumes true asymptotic relations, and that the final ε→0 limit requires the right-hand side of (68) to be a well-defined distribution. No proof of this distributional well-definedness or of the bridge is provided, so the main claim is conditional. The manuscript should either state the precise hypotheses under which (58) holds or present Eq. (68) as a conjecture, cleanly separated from the rigorous combinatorial theorem.
  2. [§4, Eq. (68)] The right-hand side of (68) is generically a product of distributions, namely products of Euler amplitudes of conserved densities. The paper asserts that the product 'does not cause problems' because every two patches share at most one point, but this is not a proof. Remark 4.1 again acknowledges that small-ε corrections may combine with diverging terms when products of distributions are ill-defined. Without a distributional calculus or a restriction to cases where the amplitudes are regular functions, formula (68) as a distributional identity is not established. This is load-bearing because the formula's output is precisely the leading distributional behaviour of correlation functions.
  3. [§3.2, Remark 3.1 and §3.4, Eq. (47)] The domain of validity is restricted to space-time configurations away from shocks and coincident points, and these restrictions are essential for local relaxation of fluctuations (33). The paper states that these failures are measure-zero, but no argument is given that the excluded set is measure-zero for general n and general states; the possibility of extrinsic fluid singularities for n≥3 is explicitly left open in Sec. 3.4. The abstract's claim of applicability 'in every d≥1 ... both in and out of equilibrium' should be qualified by these unproved restrictions, or the restrictions should be promoted to explicit assumptions in the statement of the main result.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction and Abstract] The phrase 'complete' or 'fully determined' in the abstract and introduction should be tempered given the caveats in Remark 4.1 and Sec. 3.4; as written it overstates the status of the derivation.
  2. [Eq. (50)] The change of variables in Eq. (50) is correct, but using x as the integration variable on both sides of the equality is mildly confusing; renaming the integration variable on the right-hand side would improve clarity.
  3. [Sec. 5.4, Eq. (103)] The GHD formula (103) for A^{JK}_I uses notation T^{dr}_{IJ}, ρ_I, f_I and n_I without defining all conventions in the main text; a reader not familiar with Ref. [13] will need to consult several equations to parse the expression.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the projection formula is derived from local relaxation of fluctuations and Malyshev's cumulant expansion, with no fitted parameters and no target quantity used as an input.

full rationale

Despite the central reliance on ballistic macroscopic fluctuation theory, the paper's derivation is not circular. The Euler amplitude S_{o1...on}(z1...zn) is defined in Eq. (43) as the ℓ^{(1-n)d} limit of physical connected correlation functions, independently of the projection formula. Theorem 2.2 (Sec. 2) is a self-contained combinatorial statement: under assumption (14), Eq. (20) expresses the scaled cumulants of arbitrary algebra elements in terms of scaled cumulants of generators. Its proof (App. B) uses only Malyshev's partial-cumulant formula and index counting. No target quantity is inserted as an input and no free parameter is fitted. The physical content enters through local relaxation of fluctuations (33), taken explicitly as a hypothesis from [30,31], and through the bridge relation (58), argued in Sec. 3.5 by generating functions and a saddle-point analysis. Relation (58) is not a definition of S_o; it is an equality between two independently defined objects, the physical amplitude from (43) and the induced-measure cumulant of o(q). The final formula (68) is then the specialization of (20) to o_k(q(z_k)); it reduces for n=2 and n=3 to previously known results, which the paper uses as consistency checks rather than as premises. The caveats in Remark 4.1 — distributional relations, polynomial observables, products of distributions — and the conjectural status of the TASEP formula (101) are genuine analytical limitations but not instances of circular reasoning. The self-citations [30,31] introduce the underlying hypothesis, but the paper does not ask the reader to accept the projection formula on the authority of those citations; it derives it. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the local relaxation of fluctuations hypothesis and on the distributional well-definedness of products of Euler amplitudes; these are explicit assumptions rather than derived facts. No free parameters are fitted; all thermodynamic and Euler data are model inputs from prior literature.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math The algebra of observables is a unital, commutative, associative algebra generated by conserved density symbols, with normalized linear expectation values and cumulants defined by the moment-cumulant formula.
    This is the abstract setup needed for Theorem 2.2, imposed in Section 2.
  • domain assumption For all n, the scaled cumulants of conserved densities have finite limits: lim ℓ^(n-1) <q_a1,...,q_an>^c exists, equivalently the ballistic scaling (43)/(57).
    This is the large-deviation/ballistic scaling assumed for the physical system and is not derived from microscopic dynamics.
  • domain assumption Local relaxation of fluctuations: a fluid-cell average of any local observable tends to its microcanonical value as a function of coarse-grained conserved densities, Eq. (33).
    Core physical hypothesis of BMFT, cited from [30,31]; the paper notes it fails at shocks and at coincident points for generic observables.
  • domain assumption The induced measure on coarse-grained conserved densities reproduces the Euler amplitudes, Eqs. (57)-(58).
    Established only by saddle-point arguments in Section 3.5; this relation is needed to connect the abstract theorem to many-body correlation functions.
  • domain assumption Products of Euler amplitudes on the right-hand side of Eq. (68) make sense as distributions.
    Stated as expected but not proven in Section 4 and Remark 4.1(1); this is required for the formula to be meaningful.
  • domain assumption No fluid singularities or shocks, and differentiability of Euler solutions; for stationary three-point results, no extrinsic singularities.
    Equation (51) requires differentiability; Section 3.4 restricts to almost-everywhere configurations, and Section 5.3 labels the TASEP formula conjectural because TASEP hydrodynamics is not linearly degenerate.
  • domain assumption Observables o(q) are polynomials in the conserved densities.
    Remark 4.1(2) states this restriction is made to avoid convergence discussions, though only finitely many derivatives appear.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear projection for ballistic correlation functions: a formula in terms of minimal connected covers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HWJMZJ5J

@misc{pith2026250605266,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear projection for ballistic correlation functions: a formula in terms of minimal connected covers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HWJMZJ5J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05266}
}
abstract

In many-body systems, the dynamics is governed, at large scales of space and time, by the hydrodynamic principle of projection onto the conserved densities admitted by the model. This is formalised as local relaxation of fluctuations in the Ballistic Macroscopic Fluctuation Theory, and is a nonlinear version of the Boltzmann-Gibbs principle. We use it to derive a projection formula, expressing $n$-point connected correlation functions (cumulants) of generic observables at different space-time points, in terms of those of conserved densities. This applies in every $d\geq 1$ spatial dimensions and under the ballistic scaling of space and time, both in and out of equilibrium. It generalises the well-known linear-response principle for 2-point functions. For higher-point functions, one needs to account for nonlinear fluctuations of conserved densities and, correspondingly, higher derivatives of local averages. Using Malyshev's formula for the cumulant expansion, and keeping the leading order, the result is a nonlinear projection, expressed as a sum of products of correlation functions of conserved densities with equilibrium multivariances as coefficients. The sum is combinatorially organised via certain covers of the set of space-time points, which we call minimal connected covers. We use this in order to get general, explicit formulas for two- and three-point functions in stationary states, expressed in terms of thermodynamic and Euler-scale data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05266 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The four types of minimal connected covers for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Transport, collective motion, and brownian motion.Progress of theoretical physics, 33(3):423–455, 1965

    Hazime Mori. Transport, collective motion, and brownian motion.Progress of theoretical physics, 33(3):423–455, 1965

    1965

  2. [2]

    Statistical mechanics of irreversibility.Quantum Statistical Mechanics, page 139, 1966

    Robert W Zwanzig. Statistical mechanics of irreversibility.Quantum Statistical Mechanics, page 139, 1966

    1966

  3. [3]

    Equilibrium fluctuations of stochastic particle systems: the role of conserved quantities.The Annals of Probability, pages 742–759, 1984

    Th Brox and Hermann Rost. Equilibrium fluctuations of stochastic particle systems: the role of conserved quantities.The Annals of Probability, pages 742–759, 1984. 40

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Large scale dynamics of interacting particles

    Herbert Spohn. Large scale dynamics of interacting particles. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  5. [5]

    Springer, 2006

    Anna DeMasi and Errico Presutti.Mathematical methods for hydrodynamic limits. Springer, 2006

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Claude Kipnis and Claudio Landim.Scaling limits of interacting particle systems, volume

  7. [7]

    Correlation functions and transport coefficients in generalised hydrodynamics

    Jacopo De Nardis, Benjamin Doyon, Marko Medenjak, and Miłosz Panfil. Correlation functions and transport coefficients in generalised hydrodynamics. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2022(1):014002, 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    Hydrodynamic projections and the emergence of linearised euler equations in one-dimensional isolated systems.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 391(1):293– 356, 2022

    Benjamin Doyon. Hydrodynamic projections and the emergence of linearised euler equations in one-dimensional isolated systems.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 391(1):293– 356, 2022

    2022

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Long-time dynamics in quantum spin lat- tices: ergodicity and hydrodynamic projections at all frequencies and wavelengths

    Dimitrios Ampelogiannis and Benjamin Doyon. Long-time dynamics in quantum spin lat- tices: ergodicity and hydrodynamic projections at all frequencies and wavelengths. InAn- nales Henri Poincaré, volume 25, pages 65–123. Springer, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Canonical typi- cality

    Sheldon Goldstein, Joel L Lebowitz, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino Zanghì. Canonical typi- cality. Physical review letters, 96(5):050403, 2006

    2006

  3. [11]

    Entropy and equilibrium states in classical statistical mechanics

    Oscar E Lanford. Entropy and equilibrium states in classical statistical mechanics. In Statistical mechanics and mathematical problems, pages 1–113. Springer, 2007

    2007

  4. [12]

    Statistical mechanics and scientific explanation: Determinism, indeterminism and laws of nature

    Valia Allori. Statistical mechanics and scientific explanation: Determinism, indeterminism and laws of nature. World Scientific, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Lecture notes on generalised hydrodynamics

    Benjamin Doyon. Lecture notes on generalised hydrodynamics. SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, page 018, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Introduction to the special issue on emergent hydrodynamics in integrable many-body systems.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2022(1):014001, 2022

    Alvise Bastianello, Bruno Bertini, Benjamin Doyon, and Romain Vasseur. Introduction to the special issue on emergent hydrodynamics in integrable many-body systems.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2022(1):014001, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    A short introduction to generalized hydrodynamics.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 631:127572, 2023

    Fabian HL Essler. A short introduction to generalized hydrodynamics.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 631:127572, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Hydrodynamic Scales of Integrable Many-Body Systems

    Herbert Spohn. Hydrodynamic Scales of Integrable Many-Body Systems. World Scientific, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Diagrammatic approach to nonlinear optical response with application to weyl semimetals.Physical Review B, 99(4):045121, 2019

    Daniel E Parker, Takahiro Morimoto, Joseph Orenstein, and Joel E Moore. Diagrammatic approach to nonlinear optical response with application to weyl semimetals.Physical Review B, 99(4):045121, 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Basis-independent spectral methods for non-linear optical response in arbitrary tight-binding models.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 32(12):125901, 2019

    SM João and JM Viana Parente Lopes. Basis-independent spectral methods for non-linear optical response in arbitrary tight-binding models.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 32(12):125901, 2019. 41

    2019

  11. [19]

    Asymptotically exact theory for nonlinear spectroscopy of random quantum magnets.Physical review letters, 125(23):237601, 2020

    SA Parameswaran and Sarang Gopalakrishnan. Asymptotically exact theory for nonlinear spectroscopy of random quantum magnets.Physical review letters, 125(23):237601, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Fluctuations in ballistic transport from euler hydrody- namics

    Benjamin Doyon and Jason Myers. Fluctuations in ballistic transport from euler hydrody- namics. In Annales Henri Poincaré, volume 21, pages 255–302. Springer, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Nonlinear optical response from quantum kinetic equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.07839, 2020

    Zhi Li, Takami Tohyama, Toshiaki Iitaka, Haibin Su, and Haibo Zeng. Nonlinear optical response from quantum kinetic equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.07839, 2020

    2001 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Thermodynamic nonlinear response relation.Physical Review E, 103(3):032116, 2021

    Tristan Holsten and Matthias Krüger. Thermodynamic nonlinear response relation.Physical Review E, 103(3):032116, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Molecular insight into nonlinear transport behaviors

    Ya Gao. Molecular insight into nonlinear transport behaviors. University of California, Berkeley, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Nonlinear landauer formula: Nonlinear response theory of disordered and topological materials.Physical Review B, 106(20):205104, 2022

    Kohei Kawabata and Masahito Ueda. Nonlinear landauer formula: Nonlinear response theory of disordered and topological materials.Physical Review B, 106(20):205104, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Nonlinear spectroscopy of bound states in perturbed ising spin chains.Physical Review B, 107(10):L100404, 2023

    GiBaik Sim, Johannes Knolle, and Frank Pollmann. Nonlinear spectroscopy of bound states in perturbed ising spin chains.Physical Review B, 107(10):L100404, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Divergent nonlinear response from quasiparticle interactions.Physical review letters, 131(25):256505, 2023

    Michele Fava, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Romain Vasseur, Fabian Essler, and SA Parameswaran. Divergent nonlinear response from quasiparticle interactions.Physical review letters, 131(25):256505, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Nonlinear response in diffusive systems.SciPost Physics, 16(2):047, 2024

    Luca V Delacrétaz and Ruchira Mishra. Nonlinear response in diffusive systems.SciPost Physics, 16(2):047, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Transport fluctuations in integrable models out of equilibrium.SciPost Physics, 8(1):007, 2020

    Jason Myers, Joe Bhaseen, Rosemary J Harris, and Benjamin Doyon. Transport fluctuations in integrable models out of equilibrium.SciPost Physics, 8(1):007, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Hydrodynamic nonlinear response of interacting integrable systems

    Michele Fava, Sounak Biswas, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Romain Vasseur, and SA Parameswaran. Hydrodynamic nonlinear response of interacting integrable systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(37):e2106945118, 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    Emer- gence of hydrodynamic spatial long-range correlations in nonequilibrium many-body sys- tems

    Benjamin Doyon, Gabriele Perfetto, Tomohiro Sasamoto, and Takato Yoshimura. Emer- gence of hydrodynamic spatial long-range correlations in nonequilibrium many-body sys- tems. Physical review letters, 131(2):027101, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Ballistic macroscopic fluctuation theory.SciPost Physics, 15(4):136, 2023

    Benjamin Doyon, Gabriele Perfetto, Tomohiro Sasamoto, and Takato Yoshimura. Ballistic macroscopic fluctuation theory.SciPost Physics, 15(4):136, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Macroscopic fluctuation theory of correlations in hard rod gas

    Anupam Kundu. Macroscopic fluctuation theory of correlations in hard rod gas. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09201, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Long-time divergences in the nonlinear response of gapped one-dimensional many-particle systems

    M Fava, S Gopalakrishnan, R Vasseur, SA Parameswaran, and FHL Essler. Long-time divergences in the nonlinear response of gapped one-dimensional many-particle systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06167, 2024. 42

    2024

  26. [34]

    Exact large-scale correlations in integrable systems out of equilibrium

    Benjamin Doyon. Exact large-scale correlations in integrable systems out of equilibrium. SciPost Physics, 5(5):054, 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    Cluster expansions in lattice models of statistical physics and the quantum theory of fields.Russian Mathematical Surveys, 35(2):1, 1980

    Vadim Aleksandrovich Malyshev. Cluster expansions in lattice models of statistical physics and the quantum theory of fields.Russian Mathematical Surveys, 35(2):1, 1980

    1980

  28. [36]

    Moments, cumulants and diagram formulae for non-linear functionals of random measures.arXiv preprint arXiv:0811.1726, 2008

    Giovanni Peccati and Murad S Taqqu. Moments, cumulants and diagram formulae for non-linear functionals of random measures.arXiv preprint arXiv:0811.1726, 2008

    2008 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Can the macroscopic fluctuation theory be quantized?Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(43):433001, 2021

    Denis Bernard. Can the macroscopic fluctuation theory be quantized?Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(43):433001, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Conditional equilibrium and the equivalence of microcanonical and grandcanonical ensembles in the thermodynamic limit

    Michael Aizenman, Sheldon Goldstein, and Joel L Lebowitz. Conditional equilibrium and the equivalence of microcanonical and grandcanonical ensembles in the thermodynamic limit. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 62(3):279–302, 1978

    1978

  31. [39]

    Equivalenceofstatisticalmechanicalensembles for non-critical quantum systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03263, 2015

    FernandoGSLBrandaoandMarcusCramer. Equivalenceofstatisticalmechanicalensembles for non-critical quantum systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03263, 2015

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Equivalence and nonequivalence of ensembles: Thermodynamic, macrostate, and measure levels.Journal of Statistical Physics, 159(5):987–1016, 2015

    Hugo Touchette. Equivalence and nonequivalence of ensembles: Thermodynamic, macrostate, and measure levels.Journal of Statistical Physics, 159(5):987–1016, 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    Symmetry Groups

    Ola Bratteli and Derek William Robinson.Operator algebras and quantum statistical me- chanics I: C*-and W*-Algebras. Symmetry Groups. Decomposition of States. Springer Sci- ence & Business Media, 1987

    1987

  34. [42]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 1997

    Ola Bratteli and Derek William Robinson.Operator algebras and quantum statistical me- chanics II: Equilibrium States Models in Quantum Statistical Mechanics. Springer Science & Business Media, 1997

    1997

  35. [43]

    Diffusive hydrodynamics from long-range correlations.Phys

    Friedrich Hübner, Leonardo Biagetti, Jacopo De Nardis, and Benjamin Doyon. Diffusive hydrodynamics from long-range correlations.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134:187101, May 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws ii

    Peter D Lax. Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws ii. InSelected Papers Volume I, pages 233–262. Springer, 2005

    2005

  37. [45]

    Integration of weakly nonlinear hydrodynamic systems in riemann invariats

    EV Ferapontov. Integration of weakly nonlinear hydrodynamic systems in riemann invariats. Physics Letters A, 158(3-4):112–118, 1991

    1991

  38. [46]

    Kinetic equation for a soliton gas and its hydrodynamic reductions.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 21:151–191, 2011

    Gennady A El, Anatoliy Mikhaylovich Kamchatnov, Maxim V Pavlov, and SA Zykov. Kinetic equation for a soliton gas and its hydrodynamic reductions.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 21:151–191, 2011

    2011

  39. [47]

    Generalized hydro- dynamic reductions of the kinetic equation for a soliton gas.Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 171:675–682, 2012

    Maxim V Pavlov, Vladimir B Taranov, and Gennadii Abramovich El. Generalized hydro- dynamic reductions of the kinetic equation for a soliton gas.Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 171:675–682, 2012

    2012

  40. [48]

    Hyperbolic conservation laws: an illustrated tutorial

    Alberto Bressan. Hyperbolic conservation laws: an illustrated tutorial. Modelling and Optimisation of Flows on Networks, Lecture Notes in Mathematics: Cetraro, Italy 2009, Editors: Benedetto Piccoli, Michel Rascle, pages 157–245, 2013. 43

    2009

  41. [49]

    Non-stationary coherent quantum many- body dynamics through dissipation.Nature Communications, 10(1):1730, 2019

    Berislav Buca, Joseph Tindall, and Dieter Jaksch. Non-stationary coherent quantum many- body dynamics through dissipation.Nature Communications, 10(1):1730, 2019

    2019

  42. [50]

    Quantum many-body attractors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.11166, 2020

    Berislav Buca, Archak Purkayastha, Giacomo Guarnieri, Mark T Mitchison, Dieter Jaksch, and John Goold. Quantum many-body attractors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.11166, 2020

    2008 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Rigorous bounds on dynamical re- sponse functions and time-translation symmetry breaking.SciPost Physics, 9(1):003, 2020

    Marko Medenjak, Tomaz Prosen, and Lenart Zadnik. Rigorous bounds on dynamical re- sponse functions and time-translation symmetry breaking.SciPost Physics, 9(1):003, 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    Out-of-time-ordered crystals and fragmentation

    Berislav Buca. Out-of-time-ordered crystals and fragmentation. Physical Review Letters, 128(10):100601, 2022

    2022

  45. [53]

    Rozdestvenskii and A.D

    B.L. Rozdestvenskii and A.D. Sidorenko. On the impossibility of ‘gradient catastrophe’ for weakly nonlinear systems.Comput. Math. & Math. Phys., 77, 1967

    1967

  46. [54]

    Development of singularities in the nonlinear waves for quasi-linear hyperbolic partial differential equations.Journal of Differential Equations, 33(1):92–111, 1979

    Tai-Ping Liu. Development of singularities in the nonlinear waves for quasi-linear hyperbolic partial differential equations.Journal of Differential Equations, 33(1):92–111, 1979

    1979

  47. [55]

    Hydrodynamic noise in one dimension: projected kubo formula and its vanishing in integrable models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05279, 2025

    Benjamin Doyon. Hydrodynamic noise in one dimension: projected kubo formula and its vanishing in integrable models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05279, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Interacting particle systems, volume 2

    Thomas Milton Liggett and Thomas M Liggett. Interacting particle systems, volume 2. Springer, 1985

    1985

  49. [57]

    Large-scale de- scription of interacting one-dimensional bose gases: Generalized hydrodynamics supersedes conventional hydrodynamics.Physical review letters, 119(19):195301, 2017

    Benjamin Doyon, Jérôme Dubail, Robert Konik, and Takato Yoshimura. Large-scale de- scription of interacting one-dimensional bose gases: Generalized hydrodynamics supersedes conventional hydrodynamics.Physical review letters, 119(19):195301, 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    A new quadrature for the generalized hy- drodynamics equation and absence of shocks in the lieb-liniger model

    Friedrich Hübner and Benjamin Doyon. A new quadrature for the generalized hy- drodynamics equation and absence of shocks in the lieb-liniger model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18322, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the gen- eralized hydrodynamics equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04922, 2024

    Friedrich Hübner and Benjamin Doyon. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the gen- eralized hydrodynamics equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04922, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Two-dimensional stationary soliton gas.Physical Review Research, 7(1):013143, 2025

    Thibault Bonnemain, Gino Biondini, Benjamin Doyon, Giacomo Roberti, and Gennady A El. Two-dimensional stationary soliton gas.Physical Review Research, 7(1):013143, 2025

    2025

  53. [61]

    Quantum gen- eralized hydrodynamics

    Paola Ruggiero, Pasquale Calabrese, Benjamin Doyon, and Jérôme Dubail. Quantum gen- eralized hydrodynamics. Physical review letters, 124(14):140603, 2020

    2020

  54. [62]

    Quantum fluctuating theory for one-dimensional shock waves

    Andrew Urilyon, Stefano Scopa, Giuseppe Del Vecchio Del Vecchio, and Jacopo De Nardis. Quantum fluctuating theory for one-dimensional shock waves. Physical Review B , 111(4):045401, 2025

    2025

  55. [63]

    Onsager relations and eulerian hydrodynamic limit for systems with several conservation laws.Journal of Statistical Physics, 112:497–521, 2003

    Bálint Tóth and Benedek Valkó. Onsager relations and eulerian hydrodynamic limit for systems with several conservation laws.Journal of Statistical Physics, 112:497–521, 2003

    2003

  56. [64]

    Current symmetries for particle systems with several conservation laws.Journal of statistical physics, 145:1499–1512, 2011

    Rafael M Grisi and Gunter M Schütz. Current symmetries for particle systems with several conservation laws.Journal of statistical physics, 145:1499–1512, 2011. 44

    2011

  57. [65]

    Nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics for anharmonic chains

    Herbert Spohn. Nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics for anharmonic chains. Journal of Statistical Physics, 154:1191–1227, 2014

    2014

  58. [66]

    Emergent hydrody- namics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium.Physical Review X, 6(4):041065, 2016

    Olalla A Castro-Alvaredo, Benjamin Doyon, and Takato Yoshimura. Emergent hydrody- namics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium.Physical Review X, 6(4):041065, 2016

    2016

  59. [67]

    Diffusion in generalized hydrody- namics and quasiparticle scattering.SciPost Physics, 6(4):049, 2019

    Jacopo De Nardis, Denis Bernard, and Benjamin Doyon. Diffusion in generalized hydrody- namics and quasiparticle scattering.SciPost Physics, 6(4):049, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    Charge-current correlation equalities for quantum sys- tems far from equilibrium.SciPost Physics, 6(6):068, 2019

    Dragi Karevski and Gunter Schütz. Charge-current correlation equalities for quantum sys- tems far from equilibrium.SciPost Physics, 6(6):068, 2019

    2019

  61. [69]

    Free energy fluxes and the kubo–martin–schwinger relation

    Benjamin Doyon and Joseph Durnin. Free energy fluxes and the kubo–martin–schwinger relation. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2021(4):043206, 2021. 45

    2021

  62. [320]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.